ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07442669Updated Aug 19, 2026

Utilization of Lung Ultrasound Score in Decision for Minimally Invasive Surfactant Administration

An interventional study of Lung ultrasound in Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn and Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant, sponsored by Hackensack Meridian Health. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 27 Weeks to 34 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by Hackensack Meridian Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
27 Weeks to 34 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective randomized controlled study aims to determine if using a lung ultrasound score can lead to a faster diagnosis of severe respiratory distress syndrome and quicker administration of surfactant in moderately and late-preterm infants. The research will involve 100 infants, with 67 in the prospective group and 33 serving as controls.

The primary goal is to shorten the time to treatment for these vulnerable newborns. The study will also assess whether this ultrasound-guided approach improves short-term respiratory outcomes. These secondary objectives include measuring any decrease in the need for and duration of mechanical ventilation, the length of non-invasive respiratory support, and the overall need for oxygen.

The study population includes infants born between 27 and 34 6/7 weeks of gestation who are admitted to the NICU. Each participant will be monitored from birth until they are discharged or transferred. This research aligns with a growing body of evidence suggesting that lung ultrasound can be a valuable tool in neonatal care, potentially leading to earlier and more precise treatment for respiratory distress syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is a frequently diagnosed disorder in premature infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). It is caused by pulmonary immaturity and surfactant deficiency that result in increased alveolar collapse, mismatched ventilation-perfusion and ultimately hypoxia in neonates. Historically, early administration of exogenous surfactant via endotracheal tube has become the mainstay treatment and management of RDS. However, studies have shown neonates receiving invasive mechanical ventilation have higher incidence of developing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), causing a recent shift to increased use of non-invasive respiratory support for management of RDS. The use of early nasal ventilation and increasing mean airway pressure to improve alveolar stability and functional residual capacity (FRC) helps to improve fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) requirements even in the surfactant-deficient infant. This creates a dilemma for neonatologists. It is challenging to determine the severity of RDS in the first hours of life. Current standard is to use a combination of supplemental FiO2 requirement, work of breathing and chest x-ray to assess the need for surfactant replacement therapy (SRT) because there is a subset of infants who will fail non-invasive support and require intubation. Even with improvement in non-invasive RDS management, predicting surfactant deficiency before the deterioration of neonate would allow for earlier SRT and likely improve respiratory outcomes.

Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a common modality used in emergency medicine and is a rapidly emerging area of clinical research in neonatal medicine. Lung ultrasound has been shown to provide quick, reliable information via a noninvasive bedside technique in dynamically changing lungs. POCUS in neonatology has been shown to diagnose RDS earlier than waiting for chest x-ray and clinical changes. Studies have shown ultrasound can identify surfactant deficiency before clinical deterioration and decrease need for mechanical ventilation.

With this study, it is proposed to use lung ultrasound with a calculated lung ultrasound score (LUS) to assess severity of RDS and identify surfactant deficiency earlier than current practice of using supplemental FiO2 requirement and clinical status. This will allow earlier SRT, potentially improving short term respiratory outcomes and possibly longer term such as BPD. Similarly, it is proposed to investigate the potential synergy of early SRT using lung ultrasound and non-invasive administration of surfactant in positively impacting respiratory outcomes in moderately preterm and late preterm infants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Premature Infant

Keywords

  • Respiratory Distress
  • Lung ultrasound
  • Surfactant Administration
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn

123 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 90 across 93 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn studies →

Lead sponsor

Hackensack Meridian Health is the lead sponsor of 113 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 17 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 12 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
27 Weeks to 34 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Inborn at 27 0/7 to 34 6/7 weeks of gestational age
  • Spontaneously breathing at birth but requiring non-invasive respiratory support
  • RDS diagnosed on chest x-ray (diffuse, bilateral, fine granular opacities in lungs, air bronchograms) or were at risk of developing RDS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Outborn
  • Endotracheal intubation in the delivery room or within 2 hours of life
  • Surfactant in the delivery room as part of advanced resuscitation
  • Presence of major congenital malformations or chromosomal anomalies
  • Hydrops fetalis
  • Inherited disorders of metabolism
  • Air leak syndrome (pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum) prior to surfactant administration, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, congenital pneumonia, meconium aspiration syndrome
  • Infants in extremis not expected to survive
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Lung Ultrasound (LUS)

    The lung ultrasound will be performed within 2 hours of life scanning 6 anatomic lung zones. The lung ultrasound (LUS) score will be calculated in a longitudinal and transverse scan by dividing each lung into 3 different areas: upper-anterior, lower-anterior, and lateral. Every lung section will be scored 0-3 points. The total LUS score will range from 0 to 18 points according to the severity of the lung pattern. Examinations will be performed in the supine position. Lung ultrasound scores will be performed by neonatologist-researchers. A LUS score of 6 in \< 28 week gestation and 8 in \> 28 week gestation is the cut-off for initiating surfactant treatment. If the LUS score is \> 6 in neonates \< 28 weeks gestation, or \> 8 in those \> 28 weeks gestation, surfactant treatment will be administered. If a neonate in the LUS group does not meet criteria for SRT based on the lung ultrasound score, SRT may be administered per the clinician's discretion at any time.

    Diagnostic Test: Lung ultrasound

  • No intervention
    Standard of care (SOC)

    The standard of care group may have surfactant administered per clinician discretion. Standard diagnostic testing including CXR and blood gas will be performed per SOC. Current accepted practice in the NICU is to utilize a composite of chest x-ray interpretation, assessment of work of breathing, degree of respiratory support and FiO2 requirement (typically Fi02 35%) to guide SRT.

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testLung ultrasound

    Lung ultrasounds informing the decision-making on the Surfactant Administration

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Lung Ultrasound

    To assess the feasibility of the lung ultrasound, this metric measures the elapsed time from birth to the administration of the lung ultrasound.

    Time frame: From date of birth to until the date/time of the lung ultrasound or date of death from any cause, assessed up to 1 week of life

  2. Time to surfactant administration via LISA method

    Neonates who underwent evaluation with lung ultrasound and received a LUS of 6 or greater in \< 28 week gestation and total LUS of 8 or greater in \> 28 week gestation will receive exogenous surfactant via the LISA method. The time to surfactant administration will be calculated from time of birth to time receiving therapy in hours.

    Time frame: From date of birth to until the date/time of first documented progression (surfactant administration) or date of death from any cause, assessed up to 1 week of life

Secondary outcomes

  1. Need for mechanical ventilation during first 5 days

    Neonates will be followed during NICU stay and evaluate if neonates require intubation for mechanical ventilation during the first 5 days of life. This metric will be a binary outcome with "Yes" for neonates that required mechanical ventilation during the first 5 days of life and "No" for neonates that did not require mechanical ventilation or received mechanical ventilation after the 5 day period. The first 5 days of life will be defined as ≤ 120 hours.

    Time frame: First 5 days of life

  2. Duration of respiratory support during NICU hospitalization

    Neonates will be followed during NICU stay and duration of respiratory support (invasive and non-invasive defined as greater than 1L flow) will be calculated by the start of respiratory support until discontinuation of all respiratory support for a 24-hour period.

    Time frame: Duration of respiratory support during NICU stay, up to 100 days

  3. Duration of supplemental oxygen administration

    The preterm neonates admitted to NICU with confirmed diagnosis of RDS and received surfactant administration will be followed during the remainder of NICU stay. The duration of supplemental oxygen administration will be calculated from the start of receiving supplemental oxygen to until discontinuation supplemental oxygen administration for a 24-hour period.

    Time frame: Duration of receiving supplemental oxygen during NICU stay, up to 100 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2028, 23 months after the start.

Of 35 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 23 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 35 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 40.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 11, 2026
First posted
Mar 2, 2026
StartActual
Aug 18, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 17, 2028
CompletionEst.
Aug 17, 2028
Last update
Aug 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07442669
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 2, 2026
Start date
Aug 18, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 17, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 17, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Study contacts

Jeanette Buljevich Haugh
Contact
jeanette.haugh@hmhn.org
5519963457
Sandy Cheung, DO
principal investigator · Hackensack Meridian Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion