ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07897435RandomizedUpdated Oct 27, 2026

Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Analgesic Strategies for Pain Control After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC)

An interventional study of Low pneumoperitoneum and Local anaesthetic instillation to gallbladder bed in Gallstones and Pain, sponsored by Assiut University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Assiut University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Updated Oct 27, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators collected 200 patients underwent safe uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy, then different strategies of pain control are used.

Read the detailed description

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold-standard treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

However, postoperative pain-either incisional, visceral, or referred to the back/shoulder tip-remains a major concern regarding morbidity and the duration hospital stay.

There are two independent strategies prescribed to overcome post LC pain, the 1st one is to reduce the pressure of pneumoperitoneum from the conventional 11 - 14 mmHg to 8 - 10 mmHg and the 2nd strategy is the instillation of a local anaesthetic agent (i.e, bupivicaine).

The low pneumoperitoneum proved to lessen the peritoneal stretch and diaphragmatic irritation, while the local anaesthetic targets nociception at its source.

The evidence of both interventions are studied separately. Hence, in our study we aim in our RCT to study the each single strategy separately and the combined effect of both of them.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gallstones
  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • Analgesia
03

In context

Gallstones

199 studies on the registry are indexed under Gallstones; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 98 across 121 interventional studies indexed under Gallstones.

Browse Gallstones studies →

Lead sponsor

Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged between 18 years and 75 years.
  • Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
  • class I or II. . Patients willing and able to provide and cooperate with postoperative pain assessment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Emergency or acute presentation of LC as (gallbladder empyema, ganrenous GB, perforation, gallstone pancreatitis)
  • patients with known or suspected gallbladder carcinoma.
  • Patients undergoing cholecystectomy as part of another major abdominal procedure.
  • - patients allergic to local anaesthetics.
  • Addict patients to opioids / psychic patients or patients with any disease affecting pain reporting.
  • The cases of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy conversion to Open Cholecystectomy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Control (standard pressure + saline)

    Neither local anaesthetic nor low pressure pneumoperitoneum is used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure.

    Procedure: Normal Saline (Placebo)

  • Active comparator
    GB-bed LA

    Instillation of local anaesthetic (bupivicaine) to the gallbladder bed in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

    Procedure: Local anaesthetic instillation to gallbladder bed

  • Experimental
    low pressure pneumoperitoneum

    Low pressure pneumoperitoneum is used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure (8 : 10mmHg).

    Procedure: Low pneumoperitoneum

  • Experimental
    Group with combined strategies

    Both local anaesthetic instillation and r low pressure pneumoperitoneum is used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure

    Procedure: Low pneumoperitoneum · Procedure: Local anaesthetic instillation to gallbladder bed

Interventions

  • ProcedureLow pneumoperitoneum

    Low pressure pneumoperitoneum is done at 8 : 10 mmHg.

  • ProcedureLocal anaesthetic instillation to gallbladder bed

    Instillation of local anaesthetic at gallbladder bed

    Also known as: Bupivicaine

  • ProcedureNormal Saline (Placebo)

    Normal saline injection at the gallbladder bed as placebo.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative abdominal pain intensity by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) (VAS) at 6 hours after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Pain intensity on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), 0 to 10 cm. 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain. Higher score = worse outcome. Compared across the 4 groups (standard pressure + saline, standard pressure + GB-bed bupivacaine, low pressure + saline, low pressure + bupivacaine) by factorial analysis: pressure effect, instillation effect, and pressure × instillation interaction.

    Time frame: 6 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Abdominal pain VAS at 2, 12 and 24 hours after LC

    VAS 0 to 10 cm, at rest and with movement/coughing. 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain. Higher = worse.

    Time frame: 2, 12 and 24 hours after surgery

  2. Shoulder-tip pain VAS after LC

    VAS 0 to 10 cm. 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain. Higher = worse.

    Time frame: 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours after surgery

  3. Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control at discharge

    Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain control measured by a 5-point Likert scale. Minimum 1 (very dissatisfied), maximum 5 (very satisfied). Higher score = better outcome.

    Time frame: At discharge (up to 48 hours postoperatively)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — It's still undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07897435
Lead sponsor
Assiut University
Responsible party
Ahmed Hassan Mohammed Ali (Director of the research, Assiut University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion