ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07891650Updated Oct 23, 2026

Personalized Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation for Cognitive Impairment Related to Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

An interventional study of Active Personalized Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation and Sham Personalized Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Vascular Cognitive Impairment, sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in China. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate whether personalized intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a form of noninvasive transcranial magnetic stimulation, can safely improve cognitive function in people with cognitive impairment related to cerebral small vessel disease.

The study will enroll 160 adults aged 45-85 years with mild cognitive impairment or mild vascular dementia related to cerebral small vessel disease. Participants will be randomly assigned in equal numbers to receive active iTBS or sham stimulation. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be used to identify an individualized stimulation target in the left prefrontal cortex. Sham stimulation will mimic the treatment experience without delivering effective magnetic stimulation. Participants and outcome assessors will not know which treatment participants receive.

Treatment will last 24 weeks. Participants will receive four stimulation sessions per day for five consecutive days during the first week, followed by four sessions on one day each week during weeks 2-24. Cognitive assessments will be performed before treatment, during treatment, at the end of treatment, and three months after treatment ends. The main outcome is the change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score from baseline to week 24. Brain MRI, electroencephalography (EEG), and adverse event monitoring will be used to examine changes in brain function and treatment safety.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Small Vessel Disease
  • Vascular Cognitive Impairment

Keywords

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
  • Neuronavigation
  • Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex
  • Resting-State Functional MRI
03

In context

Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases

126 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases; 69 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 88 across 73 interventional studies indexed under Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases.

Browse Cerebral Small Vessel Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing is the lead sponsor of 357 studies on the registry; 226 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged 45-85 years, of either sex.
  2. Cognitive decline in memory or another cognitive domain, reported by the participant or an informant, lasting at least three months; brain MRI evidence of cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD); and a diagnosis of CSVD-related vascular cognitive impairment.
  3. Vascular mild cognitive impairment or mild vascular dementia. Vascular mild cognitive impairment is defined as impairment in one or more cognitive domains with largely preserved independence in daily activities. Mild vascular dementia is defined as cognitive impairment that mildly affects instrumental activities of daily living or activities of daily living, while the participant remains able to complete study assessments and treatment.
  4. Neuropsychological evidence of cognitive impairment: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥18 and \<28, with a lower threshold of ≥16 for participants with primary school education; Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) score of 0.5 or 1; or cognitive impairment determined after adjustment for educational attainment.
  5. Relatively stable overall functional status, with a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤2.
  6. Brain MRI findings consistent with CSVD, meeting at least one of the following:
  7. Multiple supratentorial small subcortical infarcts, with or without white matter lesions.
  8. Moderate-to-severe white matter hyperintensities, with a Fazekas score ≥2, with or without lacunar infarcts.
  9. Other CSVD-related imaging findings, such as cerebral microbleeds or enlarged perivascular spaces.
  10. No acute cerebrovascular event, including acute cerebral infarction, intracerebral hemorrhage, or transient ischemic attack, within the preceding three months.
  11. No or only mild hippocampal/medial temporal lobe atrophy, with a medial temporal atrophy (MTA) score of 0-1.
  12. Written informed consent voluntarily provided by the participant or their legally authorized representative.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cognitive impairment primarily explained by another disease, including Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, frontotemporal dementia, Parkinson's disease-related cognitive impairment, normal pressure hydrocephalus, brain tumor, demyelinating disease, encephalitis, epilepsy, or severe traumatic brain injury.
  2. Large cortical infarction, watershed infarction, strategic infarction, intracerebral hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, or another brain lesion sufficient to explain the cognitive impairment.
  3. Impaired consciousness from any cause.
  4. Severe depression, a psychotic disorder, or another severe psychiatric disorder.
  5. Severe systemic disease or a metabolic abnormality that may cause cognitive impairment, such as severe hepatic or renal dysfunction, thyroid dysfunction, vitamin B12 or folate deficiency, severe anemia, or active infection.
  6. A history of alcohol or drug abuse or dependence.
  7. A contraindication to intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), including a history of seizures, a first-degree relative with epilepsy, intracranial metal implants, a cardiac pacemaker, a cochlear implant, a deep brain stimulator, a vagus nerve stimulator, or another implanted electronic or metallic medical device.
  8. A contraindication to MRI or inability to complete MRI examinations, such as metal implants or claustrophobia.
  9. Transcranial magnetic stimulation or another neuromodulation treatment within the preceding three months.
  10. Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or plans to become pregnant during the study.
  11. Current participation in another interventional clinical study.
  12. Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the individual unsuitable for participation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Personalized Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

    Participants will receive active personalized intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, with the target individualized using resting-state functional MRI and neuronavigation. Treatment will last 24 weeks: four sessions per day for five consecutive days in week 1, followed by four sessions on one treatment day each week during weeks 2-24. Each session will deliver 1,800 pulses at 80-100% of the resting motor threshold, adjusted according to tolerability, with 50-60 minutes between sessions.

    Device: Active Personalized Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Personalized Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

    Participants will receive sham stimulation at the individualized left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex target using a dedicated sham coil or sham mode. Sham stimulation will mimic the sounds, vibration, and procedures of active treatment without delivering effective magnetic stimulation. The schedule will match the active group: four sessions per day for five consecutive days in week 1, followed by four sessions on one treatment day each week during weeks 2-24, with 50-60 minutes between sessions.

    Device: Sham Personalized Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceActive Personalized Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

    Active intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) will target the individualized left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex site selected using resting-state functional MRI connectivity with the frontoparietal network and neuronavigation. Intensity will be 80-100% of the resting motor threshold, adjusted for tolerability. Each session will deliver 1,800 pulses using three-pulse bursts at 50 Hz, repeated at 5 Hz, with 2-second stimulation trains and 8-second intervals. Four sessions will be administered per treatment day, with 50-60 minutes between sessions. Treatment will occur on five consecutive days in week 1 and on one day per week during weeks 2-24, totaling 112 sessions.

  • DeviceSham Personalized Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation

    Sham stimulation will target the same individualized left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex site using a dedicated sham coil or sham mode. It will mimic the sounds, vibration, and procedures of active treatment without delivering effective magnetic stimulation. The treatment schedule will match the active intervention: four sessions per treatment day, with 50-60 minutes between sessions, on five consecutive days in week 1 and on one day per week during weeks 2-24, totaling 112 sessions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Total Score at Week 24

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) assesses global cognitive function. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. Change will be calculated as the week 24 total score minus the baseline total score. A positive change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and week 24 (end of treatment)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Total Score at Three Months After Treatment

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) assesses global cognitive function. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. Change will be calculated as the three-month post-treatment follow-up total score minus the baseline total score. A positive change indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and three months after completion of the 24-week treatment period

  2. Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score

    The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) assesses global cognitive function. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function. Changes will be calculated separately as the total score at each post-baseline assessment minus the baseline total score. Positive changes indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24 (end of treatment), and three months after completion of treatment

  3. Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) Global Score

    The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) global score assesses the severity of cognitive and functional impairment. Possible scores are 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Changes will be calculated separately as the global score at each post-baseline assessment minus the baseline global score. Negative changes indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24 (end of treatment), and three months after completion of treatment

  4. Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) Score

    The Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) is calculated by summing ratings across six cognitive and functional domains. Scores range from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater impairment. Changes will be calculated separately as the score at each post-baseline assessment minus the baseline score. Negative changes indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24 (end of treatment), and three months after completion of treatment

  5. Change From Baseline in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Score

    Activities of daily living will be assessed using the ADL scale. Changes will be calculated separately as the score at each post-baseline assessment minus the baseline score.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24 (end of treatment), and three months after completion of treatment

  6. Change From Baseline in Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) Scores

    Verbal learning and memory will be assessed using the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT). Changes will be calculated separately as each prespecified AVLT score at each post-baseline assessment minus its corresponding baseline score.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24 (end of treatment), and three months after completion of treatment

  7. Change From Baseline in Trail Making Test (TMT) Performance

    Performance on the Trail Making Test (TMT) will be assessed. Changes will be calculated separately as the prespecified performance measure at each post-baseline assessment minus its corresponding baseline measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24 (end of treatment), and three months after completion of treatment

  8. Change From Baseline in Digit Span Test (DST) Scores

    Attention and working memory will be assessed using the Digit Span Test (DST). Changes will be calculated separately as each prespecified score at each post-baseline assessment minus its corresponding baseline score.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24 (end of treatment), and three months after completion of treatment

  9. Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score

    Neuropsychiatric symptoms will be assessed using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Changes will be calculated separately as the total score at each post-baseline assessment minus the baseline total score. Higher scores indicate more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms; negative changes indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24 (end of treatment), and three months after completion of treatment

Other outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Resting-State and Task-Related Electroencephalographic Measures

    Changes in resting-state and task-related electroencephalographic measures will be assessed, including spectral power, functional connectivity, and cognitive event-related potentials. Each prespecified measure will be compared with its corresponding baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 1 (end of induction), week 24 (end of treatment), and three months after completion of treatment

  2. Change From Baseline in Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measures

    Changes in multimodal magnetic resonance imaging measures will be assessed to characterize brain network function and white matter microstructure. Each prespecified measure will be compared with its corresponding baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline, week 24 (end of treatment), and three months after completion of treatment

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100050+, China
  • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100053, China
    • Aonan Li, MD · Contact · liaonan8696@126.com · +86 13661339557
    • Yi Tang, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
  • Beijing Geriatric Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing Municipality 100095, China
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — There is currently no plan to share individual participant data with other researchers.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Sep 2027, 11 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 18, 2026
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07891650
Collaborators
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People´s Republic of China, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Aonan Li
Contact
liaonan8696@126.com
+86 13661339557
Yi Tang, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion