ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07891663Updated Oct 23, 2026

Comparing Lumbar Fusion With and Without Stress Endplate Augmentation in Patients With Low Bone Mass

An observational study in Degenerative Lumbar Disease, sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing · Observational

Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Degenerative lumbar disease can cause back pain, leg pain, and difficulty with daily activities. Some patients require lumbar fusion surgery. In patients with low bone mass, the bones may provide less support for the interbody cage, an implant placed between two vertebrae. The cage may sink into the surrounding bone after surgery, a complication known as cage subsidence. Stress endplate augmentation strengthens the bone near the surfaces supporting the cage, but its benefits and risks require further evaluation.

This single-center prospective observational cohort study will compare outcomes in patients undergoing oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with or without stress endplate augmentation. Consecutive eligible patients aged 50 years or older with low bone mass and degenerative lumbar disease will be enrolled before surgery and followed for 18 months afterward.

Whether stress endplate augmentation is performed will be determined by the treating surgeon and patient through routine clinical decision-making. The study will not assign treatment. Patients will be grouped according to whether they receive stress endplate augmentation.

The main outcome will be cage subsidence at 18 months after surgery. Other outcomes will include spinal fusion, changes in spinal measurements on imaging, back and leg pain, functional disability, surgical and hospitalization measures, and complications.

Clinical information, bone density measurements, imaging findings, and patient-reported outcomes will be collected before surgery and during follow-up. Comparisons will account for differences in patient characteristics and surgical factors. The study aims to clarify the benefits and risks associated with stress endplate augmentation in patients with low bone mass undergoing OLIF.

02

Conditions studied

  • Degenerative Lumbar Disease
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing is the lead sponsor of 357 studies on the registry; 226 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Consecutive eligible patients aged 50 years or older with low bone mass and symptomatic degenerative lumbar disease who are scheduled to undergo oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) at Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University. Patients will be enrolled before surgery and followed prospectively for 18 months.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 50 years or older.
  2. Degenerative lumbar disease diagnosed clinically and by imaging, including lumbar spinal stenosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, or degenerative disc disease.
  3. Persistent symptoms despite appropriate nonsurgical treatment, with a clinical indication for surgery.
  4. Scheduled to undergo oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF).
  5. Low bone mass identified by preoperative dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), defined as a T-score below -1.0 at a valid measurement site.
  6. Ability and willingness to complete the required imaging examinations, patient-reported outcome assessments, and follow-up through 18 months after surgery.
  7. Ability to understand the study and provision of written informed consent before enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous lumbar spine surgery.
  2. Nondegenerative lumbar conditions, including spinal infection, tumor, or acute trauma.
  3. Severe vertebral compression fracture.
  4. Grade II or higher lumbar spondylolisthesis, or spinal deformity requiring complex osteotomy or other major corrective surgery.
  5. Inability to complete the required imaging examinations or scheduled follow-up.
  6. Other conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, make participation unsuitable.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • OLIF With Stress Endplate Augmentation

    Patients with low bone mass and degenerative lumbar disease undergoing oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with stress endplate augmentation of the vertebral bone adjacent to the endplates supporting the interbody cage.

  • OLIF Without Stress Endplate Augmentation

    Patients with low bone mass and degenerative lumbar disease undergoing OLIF without stress endplate augmentation.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cage Subsidence at 18 Months After Surgery

    Number of participants with interbody cage subsidence, defined as a decrease of more than 2 mm in intervertebral disc height at any operated level compared with the postoperative predischarge imaging reference. A participant with subsidence at one or more operated levels is counted once. Participants undergoing revision surgery for cage subsidence before the 18-month assessment are also counted as having the outcome.

    Time frame: Postoperative predischarge imaging as the reference and 18 months after surgery; subsidence-related revision surgery assessed through 18 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Intervertebral Disc Height

    Change in intervertebral disc height, measured in millimeters, from postoperative predischarge imaging to 18 months after surgery.

    Time frame: 18 months after surgery.

  2. Change in Intervertebral Foraminal Height

    Change in intervertebral foraminal height, measured in millimeters, from postoperative predischarge imaging to 18 months after surgery.

    Time frame: 18 months after surgery.

  3. Change in Lumbar Lordosis at 18 Months

    Change in lumbar lordosis, measured in degrees, from postoperative predischarge imaging to 18 months after surgery.

    Time frame: 18 months after surgery.

  4. Number of Participants With Pseudarthrosis

    Number of participants with radiographic pseudarthrosis at one or more operated levels at 18 months after surgery. For this study, pseudarthrosis is defined as radiographic nonunion on CT, classified as Bridwell grade III (an intact graft with radiolucency at the superior or inferior graft-endplate interface) or grade IV (absent fusion with graft resorption or collapse). Each participant is counted once, regardless of the number of affected levels.

    Time frame: 18 months after surgery.

  5. Functional Improvement

    Change in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score from baseline to 18 months after surgery. The ODI measures back-related disability, with scores ranging from 0 to 100 and higher scores indicating greater disability. Change is calculated as the 18-month score minus the baseline score; negative values indicate improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and 18 months after surgery.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Dec 2029, 36 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 18, 2026
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2029
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07891663
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion