ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07882784CR-4-HealthUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Outcome Prediction and Recovery After Spontaneous Intracerebral Haemorrhage

An observational study in Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Hemorrhagic Stroke, sponsored by University Medical Centre Maribor. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-20.

Sponsored by University Medical Centre Maribor · Observational

Updated Oct 20, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is a severe form of stroke with high mortality and frequent long-term disability. Current tools to predict how an individual patient will recover are limited.

CrossReg-4-Health is a prospective, multicentre observational cohort study that will enrol 300 consecutive adults with acute spontaneous ICH at three hospitals in Slovenia and Austria. During hospitalisation, the study will collect clinical data, standardised neurological and pain assessments, routine laboratory results, CT, CT angiography and MRI findings, and two research blood samples for biomarkers of brain injury, inflammation, coagulation and pain. Participants will be followed up at 6 and 12 months for survival, functional outcome, neurological status, pain, health-related quality of life, rehabilitation use and readmissions.

The main aim is to develop a multimodal prognostic model for functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale) 12 months after ICH.

Read the detailed description

Background: Outcome prediction after spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) relies mainly on clinical severity and neuroimaging markers and only partially captures multidimensional recovery. Blood-based biomarkers, pain burden, rehabilitation exposure, care trajectories and patient-reported outcomes are rarely integrated in prospective real-world cohorts.

Design: Prospective, multicentre, longitudinal observational cohort study conducted within the Interreg Slovenia-Austria project CrossReg-4-Health (grant SIAT00307). Approximately 100 consecutive patients will be enrolled at each of three centres (University Medical Centre Maribor; LKH-Universitätsklinikum Graz; Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee). Treatment follows routine clinical practice and is not influenced by study participation.

Assessments:

  • Admission: demographics, vascular risk factors, comorbidities, medication (including antithrombotic treatment), premorbid mRS, NIHSS, GCS, baseline non-contrast CT (NCCT), routine laboratory tests, first research blood sample.
  • Approximately 24-48 hours: repeat NCCT for haematoma expansion, repeat NIHSS, second research blood sample where feasible.
  • During hospitalisation: hierarchical pain assessment (NRS 0-10 in communicative patients; Behavioural Pain Scale in ventilated or non-communicative patients; revised Nociception Coma Scale in disorders of consciousness; PAIC15 or Doloplus-2 in aphasia or cognitive impairment), MRI when clinically stable (T2, FLAIR, SWI), care-trajectory data.
  • Discharge: NIHSS, mRS, length of stay, discharge destination, rehabilitation plan.
  • 6 and 12 months: survival, NIHSS, mRS, pain (NRS), PROMIS-29, EQ-5D VAS, rehabilitation use, readmissions, living status.

Biomarkers: S100B, GFAP, NfL, CRP, IL-6, TNF-alpha, IL-10, D-dimer and exploratory substance P, analysed centrally in batches. Remaining aliquots are stored in the institutional biobank only with separate optional consent.

Neuroimaging: haematoma volume and location, intraventricular haemorrhage, haematoma expansion, perihaematomal oedema, CTA spot sign, CT and MRI markers of cerebral small vessel disease (white matter hyperintensities, cerebral microbleeds, cortical superficial siderosis, lacunes, enlarged perivascular spaces) and MRI-based aetiology. CT-based radiomics and premorbid frailty indicators are exploratory.

Statistical analysis: The primary model is multivariable logistic regression for unfavourable outcome (mRS 4-6 vs 0-3) at 12 months with approximately 15 prespecified candidate predictor parameters (sample size checked using the Riley framework: outcome proportion 0.55, anticipated Cox-Snell R2 0.25, target shrinkage 0.90). Penalised regression may be used. Performance will be assessed by discrimination, calibration and overall performance, with internal validation by bootstrapping or cross-validation. The full ordinal mRS will be analysed with proportional odds regression as a secondary analysis. Mortality will be analysed with Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression. Missing data will be handled by multiple imputation, with complete-case sensitivity analysis.

Embedded substudy: A subset of up to 100 participants with upper-limb motor impairment will take part in an exploratory rehabilitation substudy of haptic-assisted virtual reality training, registered separately on ClinicalTrials.gov.

02

Conditions studied

  • Intracerebral Hemorrhage
  • Hemorrhagic Stroke

Keywords

  • intracerebral haemorrhage
  • prognostic model
  • biomarkers
  • GFAP
  • neurofilament light chain
  • cerebral small vessel disease
  • post-stroke pain
  • PROMIS-29
  • quality of life
  • care trajectories
03

In context

Cerebral Hemorrhage

476 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Hemorrhage; 178 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is close to the median of 287 across 181 observational studies indexed under Cerebral Hemorrhage.

Browse Cerebral Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

University Medical Centre Maribor is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Consecutive adults with acute spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage admitted to stroke units, neurology wards, neurosurgical units or intensive care units of three hospital centres in Slovenia and Austria.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older
  • Acute spontaneous (non-traumatic) intracerebral haemorrhage confirmed by non-contrast CT or MRI
  • Admission during the acute phase of haemorrhage to one of the participating centres
  • Written informed consent from the patient or, if the patient lacks capacity, consent from a legally authorised representative

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Intracerebral haemorrhage secondary to head trauma
  • Haemorrhage due to an intracranial neoplasm
  • Isolated subarachnoid haemorrhage or another primary type of intracranial haemorrhage
  • Expected survival of less than 24 hours due to non-neurological comorbidity
  • End-of-life care decision already made at presentation
  • Withdrawal of consent or major protocol violation
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Spontaneous ICH cohort

    Consecutive adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage admitted to one of three participating centres, managed according to routine clinical practice.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Unfavourable functional outcome at 12 months (modified Rankin Scale 4-6)

    Proportion of participants with mRS 4-6 (unfavourable) versus 0-3. The mRS ranges from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death); higher scores indicate worse outcome. Used as the outcome of the multivariable prognostic model.

    Time frame: 12 months after ICH onset

Secondary outcomes

  1. Functional outcome on the full ordinal modified Rankin Scale at 12 months

    Distribution of mRS scores (0 = no symptoms to 6 = death; higher scores indicate worse outcome), analysed with proportional odds regression.

    Time frame: 12 months after ICH onset

  2. Functional outcome at 6 months (modified Rankin Scale)

    mRS score (0 = no symptoms to 6 = death; higher scores indicate worse outcome).

    Time frame: 6 months after ICH onset

  3. All-cause mortality

    Proportion of participants who died from any cause.

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and 12 months after ICH onset

  4. Change in neurological deficit (NIHSS) during hospitalisation

    National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (0-42; higher scores indicate more severe deficit).

    Time frame: Admission, approximately 48 hours, and hospital discharge (up to approximately 4 weeks)

  5. Neurological deficit at follow-up (NIHSS)

    National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (0-42; higher scores indicate more severe deficit).

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months after ICH onset

  6. Pain burden during hospitalisation

    Pain assessed hierarchically according to communication ability: Numeric Rating Scale 0-10 (higher = more pain) in communicative patients; Behavioural Pain Scale, revised Nociception Coma Scale, PAIC15 or Doloplus-2 in non-communicative patients.

    Time frame: From admission to hospital discharge (up to approximately 4 weeks)

  7. Pain intensity at follow-up (Numeric Rating Scale)

    Numeric Rating Scale 0-10 (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months after ICH onset

  8. Health-related quality of life (PROMIS-29)

    PROMIS-29 domain T-scores (physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles, pain interference) and pain intensity item. Higher scores indicate more of the domain measured.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months after ICH onset

  9. Self-rated health (EQ-5D VAS)

    EuroQol visual analogue scale, 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months after ICH onset

  10. Intensive care unit length of stay

    Days in the intensive care unit.

    Time frame: From admission to hospital discharge (up to approximately 4 weeks)

  11. ICU-to-ward transition time

    Time from admission to transfer from the intensive care unit to a ward, in days.

    Time frame: From admission to hospital discharge (up to approximately 4 weeks)

  12. Total hospital length of stay

    Days from admission to discharge.

    Time frame: From admission to hospital discharge (up to approximately 4 weeks)

  13. Discharge destination

    Categories such as home, inpatient rehabilitation, long-term care facility, other hospital, or death.

    Time frame: At hospital discharge (up to approximately 4 weeks)

  14. Rehabilitation exposure

    Type, setting and amount of rehabilitation received.

    Time frame: From admission to 12 months after ICH onset

  15. Hospital readmissions

    Number of participants readmitted and number of readmissions.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after ICH onset

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • LKH-Universitätsklinikum Graz, Medical University of Graz
    Graz, 8036, Austria
  • Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee
    Klagenfurt, 9020, Austria
  • University Medical Centre Maribor, Department of Neurology
    Maribor, 2000, Slovenia
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No, due to legal restrictions.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Oct 2028, 23 months later.

Of 83 non-industry observational studies under Cerebral Hemorrhage, half reached primary completion within 62 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 27 and three quarters within 127. This study's planned 23 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 85 studies reached it within 62 months; a quarter within 27 and three quarters within 127.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 12, 2026
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Oct 31, 2028
Last update
Oct 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 20, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 20, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07882784
Lead sponsor
University Medical Centre Maribor
Collaborators
Medical University of Graz, Kärntner Landeskrankenanstalten-Betriebsgesellschaft (KABEG)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 20, 2026

Study contacts

Martin Rakuša, MD, PhD
Contact
martin.rakusa@ukc-mb.si
+386 2 321 16 56
Martin Rakuša, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University Medical Centre Maribor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion