ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07827521Updated Sep 18, 2026

Seltoplasmid Plus Revascularization for Diabetic Infrapopliteal Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

A Phase 4 interventional study of Lower-Extremity Revascularization and Donaperminogene Seltoplasmid in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Infrapopliteal Arterial Occlusive Disease, sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Not yet recruiting at 6 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether Seltoplasmid Injection can improve outcomes after lower-extremity revascularization. Revascularization is a procedure used to restore blood flow to the leg. The study will include adults with type 2 diabetes, a foot ulcer caused by poor blood flow, and disease mainly affecting the arteries below the knee.

The main questions are:

  • Does adding Seltoplasmid lower the risk of major amputation, another procedure to restore blood flow, or death?
  • What medical problems occur after treatment with Seltoplasmid? About 180 participants will undergo standard lower-extremity revascularization. After the procedure, eligible participants will be assigned by chance to one of two groups. One group will receive Seltoplasmid plus standard care. The other group will receive standard care alone.

Participants in the Seltoplasmid group will receive injections into the muscles of the affected lower leg. The injections will be given on Day 0, Day 14, and Day 28.

Participants will be followed for 12 months. Researchers will also assess wound healing, survival without amputation, heart and blood vessel problems, pain, and blood flow in the affected leg.

Read the detailed description

Chronic limb-threatening ischemia in patients with diabetes is commonly associated with diffuse, calcified, and multilevel infrapopliteal arterial disease. In patients with ischemic diabetic foot ulcers, revascularization is recommended to restore blood flow, support wound healing, and reduce the risk of limb loss. However, restoration of patency in the main arteries does not always result in adequate perfusion of the distal tissue. Persistent microvascular dysfunction, impaired collateral formation, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, infection, neuropathy, and abnormal wound-repair responses may continue after technically successful revascularization. Restenosis, repeat revascularization, delayed wound healing, major amputation, cardiovascular events, and death therefore remain important residual risks.

Seltoplasmid Injection is a plasmid-based gene therapy designed to produce local expression of two human hepatocyte growth factor isoforms. Hepatocyte growth factor activates c-Met-dependent signaling pathways involved in endothelial-cell survival, migration, angiogenesis, collateral-vessel development, microvascular repair, and tissue regeneration. Previous clinical studies in patients with severe lower-extremity ischemia have shown a potential benefit for ischemic ulcer healing. However, those studies primarily involved patients who were unsuitable for revascularization or in whom revascularization had produced an inadequate result.

Revascularization and Seltoplasmid Injection may have complementary biological effects. Revascularization restores blood flow and perfusion pressure through the main arterial pathway, whereas locally expressed hepatocyte growth factor may support distal collateral formation, microvascular perfusion, endothelial repair, and wound healing. This combined strategy is intended to address both macroscopic arterial obstruction and persistent impairment of distal tissue perfusion. Nevertheless, the clinical benefit and safety of administering Seltoplasmid Injection after revascularization have not been established in an adequately controlled randomized study.

This investigator-initiated trial is designed to evaluate the benefit-risk profile of this combined strategy in a high-risk population with diabetes, Rutherford category 5 chronic limb-threatening ischemia, ischemic foot ulceration, and predominantly infrapopliteal arterial disease. Randomization will occur only after completion of the index revascularization procedure and postoperative confirmation of eligibility and safety. This design ensures that treatment assignment cannot influence the revascularization procedure and excludes participants who cannot complete the procedure or do not meet the prespecified postoperative safety conditions.

The trial is open-label because the experimental group receives multiple intramuscular injections and the control group does not receive placebo injections. To reduce potential assessment bias, suspected primary endpoint events will be adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee whose members are blinded to treatment assignment. Standardized definitions will be used for major amputation, clinically driven target-limb revascularization, ulcer healing, cardiovascular events, and other clinical outcomes. Wound assessments and photographs, vascular examinations, and tissue-perfusion measurements will be performed using prespecified procedures whenever possible.

Seltoplasmid use after completed revascularization is outside its currently approved indication in China. Participants will be specifically informed of this off-label use, the uncertainty regarding additional benefit, the possibility of unknown risks, and the potential for increased injection-site bleeding or hematoma during antiplatelet or other antithrombotic treatment. Safety will be monitored throughout the study. An independent Data Monitoring Committee will periodically review accumulating safety information and may recommend continuation, modification, temporary suspension, or termination of the study in accordance with its charter.

The study is intended to determine whether adding Seltoplasmid Injection to contemporary revascularization and standardized background care can improve clinically meaningful limb and survival outcomes, wound healing, pain, and distal tissue perfusion without introducing unacceptable safety risks. The findings may provide evidence regarding a combined treatment strategy that targets both large-vessel blood flow and persistent microvascular impairment after infrapopliteal revascularization.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer
  • Infrapopliteal Arterial Occlusive Disease

Keywords

  • Seltoplasmid
  • Revascularization
  • Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer
  • infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease
03

In context

Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

356 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia; 71 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 40 across 239 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

Browse Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia studies →

Lead sponsor

First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University is the lead sponsor of 83 studies on the registry; 57 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, aged 18 years or older at the time of signing
  • Clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with a diabetic foot ulcer and chronic limb-threatening ischemia classified as Rutherford category 5. The target limb must have an ischemic foot ulcer corresponding to WIfI wound grade 1 or 2. After at least 2 weeks of optimal standard wound care, including debridement, offloading, and infection control as clinically indicated, the ulcer must show no clear healing tendency, defined as a reduction in area of less than 30%, and infrapopliteal revascularization must be considered necessary to improve perfusion and promote wound healing.
  • Color duplex ultrasonography, computed tomography angiography (CTA), or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) demonstrates at least 70% stenosis or occlusion in one or more infrapopliteal arteries, the anterior tibial, posterior tibial, or peroneal artery, and the investigator considers this disease to be the principal cause of ischemia in the target limb.
  • No severe stenosis in the supra-popliteal inflow arteries, including the iliac, femoral, and popliteal arteries, defined as less than 70% stenosis; alternatively, any severe inflow stenosis can be treated during the index procedure. The infrapopliteal lesion or lesions must remain the principal revascularization target.
  • Objective evidence of severe limb ischemia meeting at least one of the following criteria: ankle-brachial index (ABI) ≤0.50; ankle systolic pressure measured at the dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial artery ≤70 mmHg; or transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO₂) \<30 mmHg. If ABI is >1.30 or otherwise considered unreliable because of arterial incompressibility, eligibility will be determined using toe-brachial index (TBI), toe pressure where available, and/or TcPO₂.
  • Willing and able to comply with study procedures and complete all scheduled follow-up assessments.
  • Provides written informed consent voluntarily before any study-specific procedure.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to undergo lower-extremity arterial revascularization.
  • WIfI foot-infection grade 3, including systemic infection or severe local infection requiring urgent surgical debridement. A potential participant may be reassessed after adequate antimicrobial and surgical management if the infection has improved to WIfI infection grade 1 or 2, systemic infection has resolved, and relevant infection indicators have returned to an acceptable range.
  • Gangrene or tissue destruction of the target limb for which above-ankle major amputation is considered immediately necessary or unavoidable.
  • Any to seltoplasmid injection according to the current prescribing information.
  • Acute myocardial infarction, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, or unstable angina within 3 months before randomization.
  • Acute limb ischemia or acute exacerbation of chronic limb ischemia within 3 months before randomization.
  • class IV heart failure.
  • Severe hepatic impairment, including decompensated cirrhosis, jaundice, ascites, or variceal bleeding.
  • Severe renal impairment, defined as serum creatinine >2.5 times the or estimated \<30 mL/min/1.73 m², or current dialysis.
  • Coagulation disorder, defined as count \<75 × 10⁹/L or >1.5 that cannot be corrected.
  • \<80 g/L or white blood cell count \<3.0 × 10⁹/L.
  • or aspartate aminotransferase >3 times the upper limit of normal.
  • Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, defined as >10%.
  • Active malignant tumor or a history of malignant tumor within 5 years before enrollment. Any broader -related contraindication in the current seltoplasmid prescribing information will take precedence.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman, or woman of unwilling to use effective during the protocol-defined period. Pregnancy testing and contraceptive requirements will follow the protocol and current prescribing information.
  • \<12 months or, in the investigator's judgment, inability to complete follow-up.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical study within 30 days before enrollment.
  • Positive antibody; positive virus antibody; or positive surface antigen together with detectable peripheral-blood hepatitis B virus DNA when, in the investigator's judgment, active chronic hepatitis B may increase participant risk.
  • Current treatment with therapy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy.
  • Any serious comorbidity that may interfere with assessment of study outcomes, or any psychological or social circumstance that may materially prevent optimal participation in the study, in the investigator's judgment.
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment and with the reason documented, makes participation inappropriate or exposes the participant to unacceptable risk.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(18)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Seltoplasmid Plus Revascularization

    Following completion of the index lower-extremity revascularization procedure, participants will receive Seltoplasmid Injection in addition to protocol-defined standard care. Seltoplasmid will be administered at a total dose of 8 mg by intramuscular injection at 32 sites in the affected lower leg on Day 0, Day 14 (±3 days), and Day 28 (±3 days), provided that the prespecified safety conditions are met. Standard care includes wound care, offloading, glycemic control, treatment of infection, antiplatelet therapy, lipid-lowering therapy, and other clinically indicated treatment.

    Procedure: Lower-Extremity Revascularization · Genetic: Donaperminogene Seltoplasmid

  • Active comparator
    Revascularization

    Following completion of the index lower-extremity revascularization procedure, participants will receive protocol-defined standard care without Seltoplasmid Injection or placebo injections. Standard care includes wound care, offloading, glycemic control, treatment of infection, antiplatelet therapy, lipid-lowering therapy, and other clinically indicated treatment. Participants will be followed according to the same visit schedule and outcome-assessment procedures as those in the experimental group.

    Procedure: Lower-Extremity Revascularization

Interventions

  • ProcedureLower-Extremity Revascularization

    All participants will undergo index lower-extremity revascularization before randomization, with infrapopliteal arterial disease as the principal treatment target. The revascularization strategy and technique will be selected by the treating vascular specialist according to the participant's vascular anatomy, clinical condition, and protocol-defined procedural standards. After completion of the procedure and confirmation of postoperative eligibility and safety, participants will be randomized to one of the two study arms.

  • GeneticDonaperminogene Seltoplasmid

    Seltoplasmid will be administered at a total dose of 8 mg per treatment session by intramuscular injection at 32 prespecified sites in the affected lower leg. Treatment will be administered on Day 0 after revascularization, Day 14 (±3 days), and Day 28 (±3 days), provided that the prespecified dosing and safety conditions are met.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to First Clinically Driven MALE or All-Cause Death

    Time from randomization to the first occurrence of a clinically driven major adverse limb event (MALE) or all-cause death, whichever occurs first. MALE is defined as target-limb major amputation (amputation at or above the ankle) or clinically driven target-limb revascularization. Participants without an event will be censored at the date of their last available assessment. All suspected endpoint events will be adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee blinded to treatment assignment.

    Time frame: From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

    Number and percentage of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, adverse reactions, adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, and deaths. Events will be coded using MedDRA and graded according to the protocol-specified version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.

    Time frame: From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)

  2. Incidence of Clinically Driven Target-Lesion Revascularization

    Cumulative incidence of clinically driven target-lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) in the target limb. CD-TLR is defined as repeat endovascular or surgical treatment of the index target lesion prompted by recurrent or worsening clinical symptoms, wound deterioration, or objective evidence of impaired perfusion. Death and target-limb major amputation will be treated as competing events.

    Time frame: From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)

  3. Amputation-Free Survival

    Time from randomization to the first occurrence of target-limb major amputation or all-cause death, whichever occurs first. Major amputation is defined as amputation at or above the ankle. Participants without an event will be censored at the date of their last available assessment.

    Time frame: From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)

  4. Proportion of Participants With Confirmed Complete Ulcer Healing

    Proportion of participants with complete healing of the target ulcer, defined as complete epithelialization without drainage or the need for a dressing, confirmed at two consecutive scheduled assessments. Healing assessments will be supported by standardized wound measurement and photography.

    Time frame: From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)

  5. Time to Confirmed Complete Ulcer Healing

    Change from baseline in target-limb rest pain measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. A decrease from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and scheduled assessments through Day 360 (±14 days)

  6. Change From Baseline in Target-Limb Rest Pain Score

    Change from baseline in target-limb rest pain measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. A decrease from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and scheduled assessments through Day 360 (±14 days)

  7. Change From Baseline in Target-Limb Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure

    Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO₂) will be measured in mmHg under standardized conditions at a prespecified, reproducible site near the target wound. The same device, probe location, participant position, and measurement conditions should be used whenever possible. An increase from baseline indicates improved tissue oxygenation and microcirculatory perfusion.

    Time frame: Baseline and scheduled assessments through Day 360 (±14 days)

  8. Change From Baseline in Target-Limb Ankle-Brachial Index

    Change from baseline in the ankle-brachial index (ABI) of the target limb at each scheduled assessment. ABI will be calculated as the higher target-ankle systolic pressure divided by the higher brachial systolic pressure, using a standardized measurement procedure. An increase from baseline generally indicates improved limb perfusion. ABI will be interpreted cautiously in participants with noncompressible arteries.

    Time frame: Baseline and scheduled assessments through Day 360 (±14 days)

  9. Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

    Cumulative incidence of the first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Only the first qualifying event will be counted in the time-to-first-event analysis.

    Time frame: From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)

07

Study locations

6 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Weissler EH, Wang Y, Gales JM, Feldman DN, Arya S, Secemsky EA, Aronow HD, Hawkins BM, Gutierrez JA, Patel MR, Curtis JP, Jones WS, Swaminathan RV. Cardiovascular and Limb Events Following Endovascular Revascularization Among Patients >/=65 Years Old: An American College of Cardiology PVI Registry Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 21;11(12):e024279. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024279. Epub 2022 Jun 20. PubMed 35723018 ↗
  • Conte MS, Azene E, Doros G, Gasper WJ, Hamza T, Kashyap VS, Guzman R, Mena-Hurtado C, Menard MT, Rosenfield K, Rowe VL, Strong M, Farber A. Secondary interventions following open vs endovascular revascularization for chronic limb threatening ischemia in the BEST-CLI trial. J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;79(6):1428-1437.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 17. PubMed 38368997 ↗
  • Gu Y, Cui S, Yu T, Liao L, Guo J. Nine-year follow-up of patients receiving recombinant human hepatocyte growth factor nude plasmid DNA for critical limb ischemia: updated safety and efficacy results. 2024.
  • Di X, Liu C, Ni L, Ye W, Rong Z, Zhang R, Niu S, Li F, Zheng Y, Han C, Liu Y. Rationale and design for the study of recombinant human hepatocyte growth factor plasmid in the treatment of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (HOPE CLTI): Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III clinical trials. Am Heart J. 2022 Dec;254:88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Aug 21. PubMed 36002048 ↗
  • Di X, Wang P, Li F, Han W, Ni L, Liu CW. Recombinant Human Hepatocyte Growth Factor Plasmids for Treating Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Nov;68(5):619-628. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.07.016. Epub 2024 Jul 15. PubMed 39019317 ↗
  • Powell RJ, Goodney P, Mendelsohn FO, Moen EK, Annex BH; HGF-0205 Trial Investigators. Safety and efficacy of patient specific intramuscular injection of HGF plasmid gene therapy on limb perfusion and wound healing in patients with ischemic lower extremity ulceration: results of the HGF-0205 trial. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Dec;52(6):1525-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.044. PubMed 21146749 ↗
  • Shigematsu H, Yasuda K, Iwai T, Sasajima T, Ishimaru S, Ohashi Y, Yamaguchi T, Ogihara T, Morishita R. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of hepatocyte growth factor plasmid for critical limb ischemia. Gene Ther. 2010 Sep;17(9):1152-61. doi: 10.1038/gt.2010.51. Epub 2010 Apr 15. PubMed 20393508 ↗
  • Di X, Liu C, Sun S, Qin J, Guo X, Chen Y, Li X, Zhang H, Liu M, Yang L, Zhao H, Lu S, Huang J, Zhang Y, Li J, Lin X, Yao K, Tang J, Wang J, Gao Z, Wang J, Huang X, Xu S, Liu Y, Han W, Ni L, Ye W, Zheng Y, Chen Y, Liu B. Seltoplasmid promotes ulcer healing versus placebo for treating patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia: HOPE CLTI-2 trial. Mol Ther. 2025 Jul 2;33(7):3423-3433. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.04.009. Epub 2025 Apr 11. PubMed 40221835 ↗
  • Gu Y, Cui S, Wang Q, Liu C, Jin B, Guo W, Liu C, Chu T, Shu C, Zhang F, Han C, Liu Y. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Hepatocyte Growth Factor in the Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia. Mol Ther. 2019 Dec 4;27(12):2158-2165. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.10.017. Epub 2019 Oct 31. PubMed 31805256 ↗
  • Hahn W, Pyun WB, Kim DS, Yoo WS, Lee SD, Won JH, Shin GJ, Kim JM, Kim S. Enhanced cardioprotective effects by coexpression of two isoforms of hepatocyte growth factor from naked plasmid DNA in a rat ischemic heart disease model. J Gene Med. 2011 Oct;13(10):549-55. doi: 10.1002/jgm.1603. PubMed 21898720 ↗
  • Pyun WB, Hahn W, Kim DS, Yoo WS, Lee SD, Won JH, Rho BS, Park ZY, Kim JM, Kim S. Naked DNA expressing two isoforms of hepatocyte growth factor induces collateral artery augmentation in a rabbit model of limb ischemia. Gene Ther. 2010 Dec;17(12):1442-52. doi: 10.1038/gt.2010.101. Epub 2010 Jul 29. PubMed 20668482 ↗
  • Zhao J, Wang W, Ha CH, Kim JY, Wong C, Redmond EM, Hamik A, Jain MK, Feng GS, Jin ZG. Endothelial Grb2-associated binder 1 is crucial for postnatal angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011 May;31(5):1016-23. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.224493. Epub 2011 Mar 3. PubMed 21372298 ↗
  • Jin ZG, Ueba H, Tanimoto T, Lungu AO, Frame MD, Berk BC. Ligand-independent activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 by fluid shear stress regulates activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circ Res. 2003 Aug 22;93(4):354-63. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000089257.94002.96. Epub 2003 Jul 31. PubMed 12893742 ↗
  • Tzima E, Irani-Tehrani M, Kiosses WB, Dejana E, Schultz DA, Engelhardt B, Cao G, DeLisser H, Schwartz MA. A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature. 2005 Sep 15;437(7057):426-31. doi: 10.1038/nature03952. PubMed 16163360 ↗
  • Hammad TA, Rundback J, Bunte M, Miller L, Patel PD, Sadanandan S, Fitzgerald M, Pastore J, Kashyap V, Henry TD, Shishehbor MH. Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 Plasmid Treatment for Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (STOP-PAD) Trial: Six-Month Results. J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Aug;27(4):669-675. doi: 10.1177/1526602820919951. Epub 2020 May 18. PubMed 32419594 ↗
  • Shishehbor MH, Rundback J, Bunte M, Hammad TA, Miller L, Patel PD, Sadanandan S, Fitzgerald M, Pastore J, Kashyap V, Henry TD. SDF-1 plasmid treatment for patients with peripheral artery disease (STOP-PAD): Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Vasc Med. 2019 Jun;24(3):200-207. doi: 10.1177/1358863X18817610. Epub 2019 Feb 21. PubMed 30786835 ↗
  • Miyake K, Kikuchi S, Uchida D, Doita T, Miyagawa S, Azuma N. The impact of angiographic pedal circulation status on wound healing in chronic limb-threatening ischemia after bypass surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1836-1846. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.023. Epub 2024 Aug 22. PubMed 39179004 ↗
  • Antonopoulos CN, Lazaris A, Venermo M, Geroulakos G. Predictors of Wound Healing Following Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2019 Nov;53(8):649-657. doi: 10.1177/1538574419868863. Epub 2019 Aug 12. PubMed 31405350 ↗
  • Lehtola T, Nummenmaa E, Tuure L, Hamalainen M, Nieminen RM, Moilanen T, Pemmari A, Moilanen E. Dexamethasone Attenuates the Expression of MMP-13 in Chondrocytes through MKP-1. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 31;23(7):3880. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073880. PubMed 35409238 ↗
  • Yin H, Arpino JM, Lee JJ, Pickering JG. Regenerated Microvascular Networks in Ischemic Skeletal Muscle. Front Physiol. 2021 Jun 11;12:662073. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.662073. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34177614 ↗
  • Arpino JM, Nong Z, Li F, Yin H, Ghonaim N, Milkovich S, Balint B, O'Neil C, Fraser GM, Goldman D, Ellis CG, Pickering JG. Four-Dimensional Microvascular Analysis Reveals That Regenerative Angiogenesis in Ischemic Muscle Produces a Flawed Microcirculation. Circ Res. 2017 Apr 28;120(9):1453-1465. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.310535. Epub 2017 Feb 7. PubMed 28174322 ↗
  • Liu Z, Dumville JC, Hinchliffe RJ, Cullum N, Game F, Stubbs N, Sweeting M, Peinemann F. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 17;10(10):CD010318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010318.pub3. PubMed 30328611 ↗
  • Game F, Jeffcoate W, Tarnow L, Jacobsen JL, Whitham DJ, Harrison EF, Ellender SJ, Fitzsimmons D, Londahl M; LeucoPatch II trial team. LeucoPatch system for the management of hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers in the UK, Denmark, and Sweden: an observer-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Nov;6(11):870-878. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30240-7. Epub 2018 Sep 19. PubMed 30243803 ↗
  • Serena TE, Bullock NM, Cole W, Lantis J, Li L, Moore S, Patel K, Sabo M, Wahab N, Price P. Topical oxygen therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicentre, open, randomised controlled clinical trial. J Wound Care. 2021 May 1;30(Sup5):S7-S14. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup5.S7. PubMed 33979229 ↗
  • Edmonds M, Lazaro-Martinez JL, Alfayate-Garcia JM, Martini J, Petit JM, Rayman G, Lobmann R, Uccioli L, Sauvadet A, Bohbot S, Kerihuel JC, Piaggesi A. Sucrose octasulfate dressing versus control dressing in patients with neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (Explorer): an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Mar;6(3):186-196. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30438-2. Epub 2017 Dec 20. PubMed 29275068 ↗
  • Bus SA, Armstrong DG, Crews RT, Gooday C, Jarl G, Kirketerp-Moller K, Viswanathan V, Lazzarini PA. Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3647. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3647. Epub 2023 May 25. PubMed 37226568 ↗
  • Chen P, Vilorio NC, Dhatariya K, Jeffcoate W, Lobmann R, McIntosh C, Piaggesi A, Steinberg J, Vas P, Viswanathan V, Wu S, Game F. Guidelines on interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers in people with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3644. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3644. Epub 2023 May 25. PubMed 37232034 ↗
  • Shishehbor MH, Powell RJ, Montero-Baker MF, Dua A, Martinez-Trabal JL, Bunte MC, Lee AC, Mugglin AS, Mills JL, Farber A, Clair DG; PROMISE II Investigators. Transcatheter Arterialization of Deep Veins in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 30;388(13):1171-1180. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212754. PubMed 36988592 ↗
  • Fitridge R, Chuter V, Mills J, Hinchliffe R, Azuma N, Behrendt CA, Boyko EJ, Conte MS, Humphries M, Kirksey L, McGinigle KC, Nikol S, Nordanstig J, Rowe V, Russell D, van den Berg JC, Venermo M, Schaper N. The intersocietal IWGDF, ESVS, SVS guidelines on peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes and a foot ulcer. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3686. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3686. Epub 2023 Sep 19. PubMed 37726988 ↗
  • Parikh SA, DeRubertis BG, Bonaca MP, Krishnan P, Pin RH, Lee JK, Metzger DC, Kolluri R, Shishehbor MH, Holden AH, Iida O, Armstrong E, Kum SWC, O'Connor DJ, Bajakian DR, Garcia LA, Ying SW, Wang J, Ruster K, Martinsen BJ, Igyarto Z, Varcoe RL. Long-Term Outcomes of a Drug-Eluting Resorbable Scaffold vs Angioplasty in Infrapopliteal Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: 3-Year Results From the LIFE-BTK Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026 Jul 7;88(1):95-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.04.008. Epub 2026 May 13. PubMed 42126372 ↗
  • DeRubertis BG, Varcoe RL, Krishnan P, Bonaca MP, O'Connor DJ, Pin R, Metzger DC, Holden A, Lee JK, Iida O, Armstrong EJ, Kum SWC, Kolluri R, Bajakian DR, Garcia LA, Shishehbor MH, Yu S, Ruster K, Martinsen BJ, Igyarto Z, Parikh SA. Drug-Eluting Resorbable Scaffold Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Below-the-Knee Peripheral Artery Disease: 2-Year Results From the LIFE-BTK Trial. Circulation. 2025 Oct 14;152(15):1076-1086. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.075080. Epub 2025 Sep 10. PubMed 40927852 ↗
  • Varcoe RL, DeRubertis BG, Kolluri R, Krishnan P, Metzger DC, Bonaca MP, Shishehbor MH, Holden AH, Bajakian DR, Garcia LA, Kum SWC, Rundback J, Armstrong E, Lee JK, Khatib Y, Weinberg I, Garcia-Garcia HM, Ruster K, Teraphongphom NT, Zheng Y, Wang J, Jones-McMeans JM, Parikh SA; LIFE-BTK Investigators. Drug-Eluting Resorbable Scaffold versus Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 4;390(1):9-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305637. Epub 2023 Oct 25. PubMed 37888915 ↗
  • van Overhagen H, Nakamura M, Geraghty PJ, Rao S, Arroyo M, Soga Y, Iida O, Armstrong E, Nakama T, Fujihara M, Ansari MM, Mathews SJ, Goueffic Y, Jaff MR, Weinberg I, Pinto DS, Ohura N, Couch K, Mustapha JA. Primary results of the SAVAL randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries. Vasc Med. 2023 Dec;28(6):571-580. doi: 10.1177/1358863X231199489. Epub 2023 Oct 16. PubMed 37844137 ↗
  • Spreen MI, Martens JM, Knippenberg B, van Dijk LC, de Vries JPM, Vos JA, de Borst GJ, Vonken EPA, Bijlstra OD, Wever JJ, Statius van Eps RG, Mali WPTM, van Overhagen H. Long-Term Follow-up of the PADI Trial: Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Apr 14;6(4):e004877. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004877. PubMed 28411244 ↗
  • Spreen MI, Martens JM, Hansen BE, Knippenberg B, Verhey E, van Dijk LC, de Vries JP, Vos JA, de Borst GJ, Vonken EJ, Wever JJ, Statius van Eps RG, Mali WP, van Overhagen H. Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Drug-Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia (PADI) Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb;9(2):e002376. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002376. PubMed 26861113 ↗
  • Rastan A, Brechtel K, Krankenberg H, Zahorsky R, Tepe G, Noory E, Schwarzwalder U, Macharzina R, Schwarz T, Burgelin K, Sixt S, Tubler T, Neumann FJ, Zeller T. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of infrapopliteal arteries reduce clinical event rate compared to bare-metal stents: long-term results from a randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 14;60(7):587-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.035. PubMed 22878166 ↗
  • Rastan A, Tepe G, Krankenberg H, Zahorsky R, Beschorner U, Noory E, Sixt S, Schwarz T, Brechtel K, Bohme C, Neumann FJ, Zeller T. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents for treatment of focal lesions in infrapopliteal arteries: a double-blind, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial. Eur Heart J. 2011 Sep;32(18):2274-81. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr144. Epub 2011 May 26. PubMed 21622669 ↗
  • Bosiers M, Scheinert D, Peeters P, Torsello G, Zeller T, Deloose K, Schmidt A, Tessarek J, Vinck E, Schwartz LB. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in patients with critical limb ischemia and infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;55(2):390-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.099. Epub 2011 Dec 14. PubMed 22169682 ↗
  • Er F, Dahlem KM, Nia AM, Erdmann E, Waltenberger J, Hellmich M, Kuhr K, Le MT, Herrfurth T, Taghiyev Z, Biesenbach E, Yuksel D, Eran-Ergoknil A, Vanezi M, Caglayan E, Gassanov N. Randomized Control of Sympathetic Drive With Continuous Intravenous Esmolol in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The BEtA-Blocker Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (BEAT-AMI) Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 8;9(3):231-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.035. PubMed 26847114 ↗
  • Scheinert D, Katsanos K, Zeller T, Koppensteiner R, Commeau P, Bosiers M, Krankenberg H, Baumgartner I, Siablis D, Lammer J, Van Ransbeeck M, Qureshi AC, Stoll HP; ACHILLES Investigators. A prospective randomized multicenter comparison of balloon angioplasty and infrapopliteal stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ischemic peripheral arterial disease: 1-year results from the ACHILLES trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 4;60(22):2290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.989. PubMed 23194941 ↗
  • Hsu CC, Kwan GN, Singh D, Rophael JA, Anthony C, van Driel ML. Angioplasty versus stenting for infrapopliteal arterial lesions in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 8;12(12):CD009195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009195.pub2. PubMed 30536919 ↗
  • Zeller T, Baumgartner I, Scheinert D, Brodmann M, Bosiers M, Micari A, Peeters P, Vermassen F, Landini M, Snead DB, Kent KC, Rocha-Singh KJ; IN.PACT DEEP Trial Investigators. Drug-eluting balloon versus standard balloon angioplasty for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in critical limb ischemia: 12-month results from the IN.PACT DEEP randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 14;64(15):1568-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1198. PubMed 25301459 ↗
  • Snyder DJ, Zilinyi RS, Pruthi S, George S, Tirziu D, Lansky A, Mintz AJ, Sethi SS, Parikh SA. Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Primary Patency and Binary Restenosis Rates. J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Oct;32(5):1547-1561. doi: 10.1177/15266028231212133. Epub 2023 Nov 26. PubMed 38008929 ↗
  • Mustapha JA, Finton SM, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, Saab FA, Miller LE. Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in Patients With Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May;9(5):e003468. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003468. PubMed 27162214 ↗
  • Simons JP, Schanzer A, Flahive JM, Osborne NH, Mills JL Sr, Bradbury AW, Conte MS. Survival prediction in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who undergo infrainguinal revascularization. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S120-S134.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 28. PubMed 31151867 ↗
  • Neupane S, Edla S, Maidona E, Sweet MC, Szpunar S, Davis T, LaLonde TA, Mehta RH, Rosman HS, Yamasaki H. Long-term outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous intervention for popliteal and infrapopliteal peripheral arterial disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul;92(1):117-123. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27571. Epub 2018 Mar 14. PubMed 29536612 ↗
  • Farber A. Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):171-180. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1709326. No abstract available. PubMed 29996085 ↗
  • Dua A, Powell RJ, Lee AC, Bernardo N, Mills JL, Cardona LF, Bunte MC, Martinez-Trabal JL, Ghandour S, Gandhi SS, N'Dandu Z, Schneider PA, Clair D, Shishehbor MH. Contemporary outcomes in no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09784-4. PubMed 40628923 ↗
  • Bradbury AW, Moakes CA, Popplewell M, Meecham L, Bate GR, Kelly L, Chetter I, Diamantopoulos A, Ganeshan A, Hall J, Hobbs S, Houlind K, Jarrett H, Lockyer S, Malmstedt J, Patel JV, Patel S, Rashid ST, Saratzis A, Slinn G, Scott DJA, Zayed H, Deeks JJ; BASIL-2 Investigators. A vein bypass first versus a best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy for patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia who required an infra-popliteal, with or without an additional more proximal infra-inguinal revascularisation procedure to restore limb perfusion (BASIL-2): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 May 27;401(10390):1798-1809. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00462-2. Epub 2023 Apr 25. PubMed 37116524 ↗
  • Farber A, Menard MT, Conte MS, Kaufman JA, Powell RJ, Choudhry NK, Hamza TH, Assmann SF, Creager MA, Cziraky MJ, Dake MD, Jaff MR, Reid D, Siami FS, Sopko G, White CJ, van Over M, Strong MB, Villarreal MF, McKean M, Azene E, Azarbal A, Barleben A, Chew DK, Clavijo LC, Douville Y, Findeiss L, Garg N, Gasper W, Giles KA, Goodney PP, Hawkins BM, Herman CR, Kalish JA, Koopmann MC, Laskowski IA, Mena-Hurtado C, Motaganahalli R, Rowe VL, Schanzer A, Schneider PA, Siracuse JJ, Venermo M, Rosenfield K; BEST-CLI Investigators. Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 22;387(25):2305-2316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207899. Epub 2022 Nov 7. PubMed 36342173 ↗
  • Song P, Rudan D, Zhu Y, Fowkes FJI, Rahimi K, Fowkes FGR, Rudan I. Global, regional, and national prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2015: an updated systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1020-e1030. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30255-4. PubMed 31303293 ↗
  • Conte MS, Bradbury AW, Kolh P, White JV, Dick F, Fitridge R, Mills JL, Ricco JB, Suresh KR, Murad MH; GVG Writing Group. Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6S):3S-125S.e40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 May 28. PubMed 31159978 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be made publicly available because the informed consent does not authorize unrestricted secondary use or public sharing of participant-level data. The dataset may contain sensitive clinical information, vascular imaging, wound photographs, and gene-therapy safety data. Aggregate and de-identified study results will be reported through trial registration, scientific publications, and other applicable regulatory channels.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Oct 2028, 23 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 11, 2026
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 20, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
Last update
Sep 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07827521
Lead sponsor
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Collaborators
Beijing Northland Biotech. Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
jingyong huang (Director, Department of Vascular Surgery; Principal Investigator, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
Start date
Oct 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

Jingyong Huang
Contact
43737136@qq.com
+8613600672565
Xiang Su
Contact
suxiang0815@163.com
+8613616631391

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion