ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07828899Updated Sep 18, 2026

Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of Single-Port Versus Multi-Port Robotic-Assisted Radical Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

An interventional study of Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Distal Gastrectomy and Multi-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Distal Gastrectomy in STOMACH NEOPLASM and Robotic Surgical Procedures, sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Not yet recruiting at 5 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Sponsored by First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
212
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This multicenter randomized non-inferiority trial evaluates single-port versus multi-port robotic-assisted radical distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. A prespecified prospective substudy will assess early postoperative pain, abdominal wall trauma, and early recovery between the two surgical approaches.

02

Conditions studied

  • STOMACH NEOPLASM
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures

Browse trials for

03

In context

Stomach Neoplasms

3,399 studies on the registry are indexed under Stomach Neoplasms; 992 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 212 is above the median of 66 across 2,499 interventional studies indexed under Stomach Neoplasms.

Browse Stomach Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University is the lead sponsor of 83 studies on the registry; 57 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-85 years, irrespective of sex.
  • confirmed primary gastric adenocarcinoma based on endoscopic .
  • The primary tumor is located in the middle or distal third of the stomach, or at another site considered amenable to radical distal gastrectomy. Preoperative evaluation indicates that robot-assisted radical distal gastrectomy is technically feasible and that an R0 resection is anticipated. Patients who have received standard therapy may also be eligible if reassessment confirms fulfillment of the above surgical criteria.
  • Clinical stage cT1-3N0-1M0 according to the 8th edition of the AJCC TNM staging system for gastric cancer, as assessed by gastroscopy and contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, with endoscopic ultrasonography, abdominal magnetic resonance imaging, or diagnostic laparoscopy performed when clinically indicated. Preoperative assessment should indicate that R0 resection can be achieved by distal gastrectomy, with no evidence of adjacent organ invasion or distant .
  • No history of other within the preceding 5 years, except for adequately treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, cervical carcinoma in situ, or other malignancies with a similarly negligible risk of recurrence.
  • (ASA) physical status class I-III.
  • performance status (ECOG PS) of 0-1.
  • Adequate major organ function, with preoperative assessment confirming fitness for general anesthesia and robot-assisted radical distal gastrectomy.
  • Subjects voluntarily participate in the study, fully understand the trial protocol and provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (BMI) >35 kg/m².
  • Previous gastrectomy, or a history of major upper abdominal surgery considered likely to substantially compromise the feasibility or safety of robot-assisted distal gastrectomy, such as complex hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery or surgery involving the esophagogastric junction. Previous uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, or similar procedures are not, in principle, considered exclusionary.
  • Tumor-related acute obstruction, active major hemorrhage, or perforation requiring emergency surgery.
  • Preoperative confirmation of synchronous multiple gastric cancers or remnant gastric cancer, or the presence or history within the preceding 5 years of another active that may interfere with study treatment or assessment of study endpoints.
  • Preoperative assessment indicating that radical distal gastrectomy is oncologically or technically inappropriate, including anticipated requirement for total gastrectomy, proximal gastrectomy, combined esophagectomy, or any other procedure other than distal gastrectomy.
  • Preoperative evaluation or diagnostic laparoscopy demonstrating definite invasion of adjacent organs requiring en bloc multivisceral resection; distant , including peritoneal, hepatic, pulmonary, osseous, or distant lymph-node metastasis; or positive peritoneal lavage cytology.
  • Standard preoperative evaluation indicating that the patient is not currently an appropriate candidate for upfront radical distal gastrectomy and requires initiation or continuation of therapy or other antineoplastic treatment.
  • Concomitant disease requiring an additional surgical procedure at the time of radical gastrectomy that may substantially affect operative duration, perioperative safety, postoperative recovery, or assessment of the primary endpoint.
  • Pregnancy or lactation, or planned pregnancy during the study period.
  • Severe cardiac, pulmonary, hepatic, or renal dysfunction; severe coagulation abnormalities; uncontrolled infection; or any other medical condition considered to preclude safe administration of general anesthesia or surgical treatment.
  • Inability to provide valid because of cognitive impairment, psychiatric or mental status abnormalities, or other reasons, or inability to comply with protocol-specified treatment and follow-up procedures.
  • Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, renders the patient unsuitable for participation in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(9)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
212 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single-Port Robotic Gastrectomy Group

    Participants randomized to this group will undergo single-port robot-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer according to the predefined study protocol

    Procedure: Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Distal Gastrectomy

  • Active comparator
    Multi-Port Robotic Gastrectomy Group

    Participants randomized to this group will undergo conventional multi-port robot-assisted radical distal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer according to the predefined study protocol

    Procedure: Multi-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Distal Gastrectomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureSingle-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Distal Gastrectomy

    Participants assigned to this intervention will undergo robot-assisted radical distal gastrectomy using a single-port surgical approach. The surgical procedure will be performed according to the predefined study protocol.

  • ProcedureMulti-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Distal Gastrectomy

    Participants assigned to this intervention will undergo robot-assisted radical distal gastrectomy using a multi-port surgical approach. The surgical procedure will be performed according to the predefined study protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Participants With Technical Success of the Randomly Assigned Robotic Surgical Approach

    Technical success is defined as completion of the protocol-specified gastrectomy, lymph node dissection, and gastrointestinal reconstruction using the robotic surgical approach assigned at randomization. In the single-port group, technical success requires completion using the single-port robotic system without conversion to multi-port robotic surgery, conventional laparoscopic surgery, or open surgery, and without any unplanned additional port beyond those permitted by the protocol. In the multi-port group, technical success requires completion using the multi-port robotic system without conversion to conventional laparoscopic surgery or open surgery. Failure to complete the assigned robotic procedure because of participant-related, operative, or device-related reasons will be classified as technical failure. The prespecified noninferiority margin is -10 percentage points.

    Time frame: At the end of surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total Operative Time

    Total duration of the surgical procedure, recorded in minutes according to the protocol-defined timing criteria.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  2. Robotic Docking Time

    Duration required for robotic docking, recorded in minutes according to the protocol-defined timing criteria.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  3. Robotic Console Time

    Duration of robotic console operation, recorded in minutes according to the protocol-defined timing criteria.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  4. Intraoperative Blood Loss

    Estimated volume of blood loss during surgery, recorded in milliliters.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  5. Percentage of Participants With Intraoperative Complications

    Intraoperative complications will be recorded and graded according to the Satava classification system.

    Time frame: Intraoperative

  6. Percentage of Participants With R0 Resection

    R0 resection is defined as complete tumor resection with no microscopic residual tumor at the resection margins, as determined by postoperative pathological examination.

    Time frame: At completion of postoperative pathological assessment, within 30 days after surgery

  7. Number of Lymph Nodes Retrieved

    Total number of lymph nodes retrieved and identified during postoperative pathological examination.

    Time frame: At completion of postoperative pathological assessment, within 30 days after surgery

  8. Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes

    Total number of pathologically confirmed metastatic lymph nodes identified during postoperative pathological examination.

    Time frame: At completion of postoperative pathological assessment, within 30 days after surgery

  9. Overall postoperative complications

    Any postoperative complication occurring from the end of surgery through postoperative Day 30 will be recorded according to the predefined study protocol and graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery through 30 days after surgery

  10. Percentage of Participants With Clavien-Dindo Grade III or Higher Postoperative Complications

    Severe postoperative complications are defined as postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade III or higher.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery through 30 days after surgery

  11. Specific surgery-related complications

    Prespecified surgery-related complications include anastomotic leakage, anastomotic bleeding or stenosis, duodenal stump leakage, pancreatic fistula or postoperative pancreatitis, intra-abdominal bleeding, intra-abdominal infection or abscess, bile leakage, chylous or lymphatic leakage, delayed gastric emptying, postoperative ileus or bowel obstruction, internal hernia, bowel perforation or ischemic necrosis, and wound complications requiring clinical intervention.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery through 30 days after surgery

  12. Percentage of Participants With Unplanned Reoperation Within 30 Days After Surgery

    Percentage of participants requiring an unplanned surgical reoperation for any postoperative reason within 30 days after the index surgery.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after surgery

  13. Percentage of Participants With Unplanned Readmission Within 30 Days After Surgery

    Percentage of participants requiring an unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days after the index surgery.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after surgery

  14. Percentage of Participants Who Die Within 30 Days After Surgery

    All-cause mortality occurring within 30 days after the index surgery.

    Time frame: Within 30 days after surgery

  15. Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Estimated Marginal Mean Resting VAS Pain Score Across Postoperative Days 1-3

    This is the prespecified primary outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy, which is planned to include 140 participants from the parent randomized trial. Resting postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on postoperative Days 1, 2, and 3 according to a standardized assessment procedure. For the primary analysis, a linear mixed-effects model for repeated measures will be applied, adjusting for pre-specified confounding factors including study site. It will estimate the overall mean resting VAS score across postoperative Days 1-3 for each group, together with the between-group difference and its 95% confidence interval. Higher VAS scores indicate greater pain intensity. The prespecified superiority hypothesis evaluates whether the overall resting VAS pain level across postoperative Days 1-3 is lower in the single-port group than in the multi-port group.

    Time frame: Postoperative Days 1 through 3

  16. Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Resting VAS Pain Score at 6 Hours After Surgery

    This is a prespecified supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy. Resting postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 6 hours after surgery according to the standardized assessment procedure. Higher VAS scores indicate greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: 6 hours after surgery

  17. Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Resting VAS Pain Score on Postoperative Day 1

    This is a prespecified time-point-specific supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy. Resting postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on postoperative Day 1 according to the standardized assessment procedure. VAS scores on postoperative Day 1 will be analyzed separately to compare pain intensity between the single-port and multi-port groups. Where appropriate, estimated marginal means and the between-group difference at postoperative Day 1 will be derived from the prespecified linear mixed-effects model. Multiplicity adjustment will be applied according to the prespecified statistical analysis plan. Higher VAS scores indicate greater pain intensity. This analysis is supportive of the primary longitudinal analysis and does not constitute a separate confirmatory superiority hypothesis.

    Time frame: Postoperative Day 1

  18. Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Resting VAS Pain Score on Postoperative Day 2

    This is a prespecified time-point-specific supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy. Resting postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on postoperative Day 2 according to the standardized assessment procedure. VAS scores on postoperative Day 2 will be analyzed separately to compare pain intensity between the single-port and multi-port groups. Where appropriate, estimated marginal means and the between-group difference at postoperative Day 2 will be derived from the prespecified linear mixed-effects model. Multiplicity adjustment will be applied according to the prespecified statistical analysis plan. Higher VAS scores indicate greater pain intensity. This analysis is supportive of the primary longitudinal analysis and does not constitute a separate confirmatory superiority hypothesis.

    Time frame: Postoperative Day 2

  19. Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Resting VAS Pain Score on Postoperative Day 3

    This is a prespecified time-point-specific supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy. Resting postoperative pain will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on postoperative Day 3 according to the standardized assessment procedure. VAS scores on postoperative Day 3 will be analyzed separately to compare pain intensity between the single-port and multi-port groups. Where appropriate, estimated marginal means and the between-group difference at postoperative Day 3 will be derived from the prespecified linear mixed-effects model. Multiplicity adjustment will be applied according to the prespecified statistical analysis plan. Higher VAS scores indicate greater pain intensity. This analysis is supportive of the primary longitudinal analysis and does not constitute a separate confirmatory superiority hypothesis.

    Time frame: Postoperative Day 3

  20. Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Percentage of Participants Requiring Rescue Analgesia

    This is a prespecified secondary or supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy. Rescue analgesia is defined as additional analgesic treatment administered because of inadequate pain control beyond the protocol-specified routine postoperative analgesic regimen. The proportion of participants requiring at least one rescue analgesic intervention during the prespecified postoperative observation period will be recorded and compared between the single-port and multi-port groups. This outcome does not have a separate confirmatory superiority hypothesis.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery through postoperative Day 3

  21. Pain and Early Recovery Substudy: Cumulative Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Morphine Milligram Equivalents

    This is a prespecified secondary or supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy. All postoperative opioid analgesics administered during the prespecified observation period will be recorded. Individual opioid doses will be converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME) using a prespecified standardized conversion method, and cumulative MME will be calculated for each participant to allow quantitative comparison of postoperative opioid requirements between the single-port and multi-port groups. This outcome does not have a separate confirmatory superiority hypothesis.

    Time frame: From the end of surgery through postoperative Day 3

  22. Total Abdominal Wall Incision Length

    Total abdominal wall incision length will be calculated as the sum of the lengths of all abdominal surgical incisions and recorded in centimeters according to the standardized study assessment procedure. This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare abdominal wall trauma between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups. It is also included as a prespecified supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy.

    Time frame: At the end of surgery

  23. Maximum Length of a Single Abdominal Wall Incision

    The length of the longest individual abdominal wall surgical incision will be measured in centimeters according to the standardized study assessment procedure. This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare the extent of abdominal wall trauma between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups. It is also included as a prespecified supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy.

    Time frame: At the end of surgery

  24. Time to First Postoperative Flatus

    Time to first postoperative flatus is defined as the time from the end of surgery to the first passage of flatus and will be recorded in hours. This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare early postoperative gastrointestinal recovery between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery

  25. Time to First Postoperative Defecation

    Time to first postoperative defecation is defined as the time from the end of surgery to the first postoperative bowel movement and will be recorded in hours. This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare early postoperative gastrointestinal recovery between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery

  26. Time to First Postoperative Ambulation

    Time to first postoperative walking lasting more than 5 minutes is defined as the time from the end of surgery to the first postoperative walking episode lasting more than 5 minutes and will be recorded in hours. Brief standing or walking episodes lasting 5 minutes or less will not be considered as meeting this outcome. This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare early postoperative functional recovery between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups. It is also included as a prespecified supportive outcome of the embedded postoperative pain and early recovery substudy.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery

  27. Time to First Postoperative Oral Intake

    Time to first postoperative oral intake is defined as the time from the end of surgery to the first postoperative oral intake of liquid, soft food, or regular food and will be recorded in days. This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare early postoperative recovery between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery

  28. Time to Meeting Discharge Criteria

    Time to meeting discharge criteria is defined as the time from the end of surgery until the participant meets all prespecified discharge criteria. These criteria include stable vital signs without fever; recovery of gastrointestinal function with adequate oral intake and no requirement for intravenous nutritional support; ability to ambulate independently without significant discomfort; and satisfactory wound and drainage status with laboratory findings considered clinically acceptable according to the study protocol. This outcome will be assessed in randomized participants to compare early postoperative recovery between the single-port and multi-port robotic surgical groups.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery

07

Study locations

5 sites
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07828899
Lead sponsor
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

Xian Shen, PhD
Contact
shenxian1120@126.com
+86 139 6888 8872
Qiantong Dong, PhD
Contact
dongqt2021@wmu.edu.cn
+86 13676449760

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion