ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07764016DASBAD-NCUpdated Oct 7, 2026

DCB Outcomes After Non-Compliant Balloon Vessel Preparation With or Without Scoring in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease

An interventional study of Non-compliant Plain Balloon angioplasty (PBA) and Non-compliant Scoring Balloon Angioplasty (SB) in Femoropopliteal Disease, Drug Coated Balloon and Critical Limb-Threatening Ischaemia, sponsored by Marc Sirvent. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-07.

Sponsored by Marc Sirvent · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
142
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to determine whether vessel preparation with a non-compliant scoring balloon before drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty provides superior procedural and clinical outcomes compared with vessel preparation using a non-compliant plain balloon in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) undergoing femoropopliteal endovascular intervention.

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  • Does non-compliant scoring balloon vessel preparation reduce the need for bailout stenting during the index procedure?
  • Does it improve primary patency after DCB angioplasty?
  • Does it improve clinically relevant outcomes such as wound healing, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation, limb salvage and health-related quality of life?
  • Does it provide procedural and economic advantages compared with non-compliant plain balloon vessel preparation?

Participants will be randomly assigned to undergo vessel preparation using either a non-compliant plain balloon or the DKutting™ non-compliant scoring balloon, followed by angioplasty with the Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon. Patients will undergo clinical, duplex ultrasound and quality-of-life follow-up for 24 months.

Read the detailed description

The DASBAD-NC trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, patient-blinded, controlled clinical investigation designed to compare two vessel preparation strategies before drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for femoropopliteal arterial disease in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (Rutherford classification 4-5).

Eligible patients with significant atherosclerotic femoropopliteal disease (≥50% stenosis or chronic total occlusion) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio, after successful guidewire crossing of the target lesion and confirmation of all eligibility criteria, to one of two treatment strategies:

  • Vessel preparation using a non-compliant plain balloon (PBA arm), followed by Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon angioplasty.
  • Vessel preparation using the DKutting™ non-compliant scoring balloon (SB arm), followed by Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon angioplasty.

Vessel preparation will be performed using a 1:1 balloon-to-reference vessel diameter ratio with a minimum inflation time of 180 seconds. Predilatation with a smaller balloon will only be permitted if the allocated study balloon cannot cross the lesion. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty will subsequently be performed using the Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon according to the study protocol. Bailout stenting will only be permitted in the presence of residual stenosis ≥30% and/or flow-limiting dissection after DCB treatment.

The co-primary endpoints are bailout stenting during the index procedure and primary patency at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation, target limb major amputation, all-cause mortality, wound healing, health-related quality of life, procedural success, slow-flow phenomenon, procedural costs and other prespecified clinical and imaging outcomes.

Duplex ultrasound follow-up examinations will undergo blinded central review by an independent duplex ultrasound core laboratory. Procedural angiographic outcomes will undergo an independent blinded quality assurance review after database lock by experienced investigators according to the prespecified study methodology. Clinical events will be adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee according to prespecified endpoint definitions.

Patients will be followed for 24 months after the index procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Femoropopliteal Disease
  • Drug Coated Balloon
  • Critical Limb-Threatening Ischaemia
  • Peripheral Arterial Disease

Keywords

  • Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia (CLTI)
  • Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD)
  • Femoropopliteal Disease
  • Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB)
  • Vessel Preparation
  • Scoring Balloon
  • Non-Compliant Balloon
  • Primary Patency
  • Bailout Stenting
03

In context

Peripheral Arterial Disease

1,377 studies on the registry are indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease; 275 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 142 is above the median of 70 across 927 interventional studies indexed under Peripheral Arterial Disease.

Browse Peripheral Arterial Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Marc Sirvent is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥18 years of age.
  • Rutherford class 4-5.
  • Estimated >1 year, per investigator's judgment.
  • Significant atherosclerotic lesions (≥50% stenosis or chronic total occlusion) in the femoropopliteal segment, including in-stent restenosis.
  • Signed .
  • Willingness to comply with follow-up visits.
  • ≥1 patent infragenicular artery (\<50% stenosis) at the end of the procedure.
  • Target vessel diameter ≤8 mm.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study.
  • Participation in another drug/device trial.
  • Inability to cross the target lesion with a guidewire. Successful crossing is defined as advancement of the guidewire tip distal to the target lesion without vessel perforation or flow-limiting dissection.
  • Inadequate treatment of proximal lesion (>30% residual stenosis).
  • Severe calcification of the target vessel [group 4 of Fanelli classification17 defined as circumferential calcification (270º-360º)], evidenced before contrast injection or digital subtraction angiography.
  • Thrombus in the target vessel.
  • Anastomotic stenosis of a bypass.
  • Use of atherectomy, thrombectomy, laser, or similar devices.
  • Prior or planned above-the-ankle amputation of the target limb.
  • Coagulopathy, hypercoagulable state, bleeding diathesis, \<80 000/µL or >700 000/µL, or other blood disorder.
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding requiring transfusion within 3 months.
  • to antiplatelet/anticoagulant/thrombolytic therapy.
  • Acute coronary syndrome within 30 days.
  • Stroke or within 90 days.
  • /contraindication to nitinol.
  • Comorbidities precluding treatment or follow-up (per investigator).
  • Hypersensitivity/allergy to contrast not manageable medically.
  • Hypersensitivity/allergy to heparin, aspirin, paclitaxel, clopidogrel, or other antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents.
  • Contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
142 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Non-compliant plain balloon (PBA)

    * Vessel preparation using non-compliant plain balloon * Definitive treatment: drug-coated balloon angioplasty (Legflow XP™; Manufacturer: Cardionovum GmbH Bonn, Germany).

    Device: Non-compliant Plain Balloon angioplasty (PBA)

  • Active comparator
    Scoring balloon (SB)

    * Vessel preparation using non-compliant scoring balloon (DKutting™; Manufacturer: DK Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) * Definitive treatment: drug-coated balloon angioplasty (Legflow XP™; Manufacturer: Cardionovum GmbH Bonn, Germany) as definitve treatment.

    Device: Non-compliant Scoring Balloon Angioplasty (SB)

Interventions

  • DeviceNon-compliant Plain Balloon angioplasty (PBA)

    The intervention consists of preparing the artery with a non-compliant plain balloon before using the DCB (Legflow XP™; Manufacturer: Cardionovum GmbH Bonn, Germany).

    Also known as: Control group, Group 0

  • DeviceNon-compliant Scoring Balloon Angioplasty (SB)

    The intervention consists of preparing the artery with a non-compliant scoring balloon (DKutting™; Manufacturer: DK Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) before using the DCB (Legflow XP™; Manufacturer: Cardionovum GmbH Bonn, Germany) as definitve treatment.

    Also known as: Treatment group, Intervention group, Group 1

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Bailout stenting

    The need for bailout stenting during the index procedure, defined as stent implantation due to residual stenosis \>30% or a flow-limiting dissection (type C according to the Kobayashi classification)

    Time frame: At index procedure

  2. Primary Patency

    Primary patency at 12 months defined as absence of ≥50% restenosis (peak systolic velocity ratio\<2.5) and no clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR), as adjudicated by the duplex core laboratory and the Clinical Events Committee.

    Time frame: At 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Device success

    Device success, defined as successful delivery, inflation, and retrieval of the assigned balloon catheter, resulting in a residual stenosis \<30% without flow-limiting dissection (FLD) on final angiography.

    Time frame: During the index procedure

  2. Technical success

    Technical success, defined as successful use of a device or technique to re-establish vessel patency with a residual stenosis \<30% by visual estimation and \<50% by duplex during the index procedure.

    Time frame: During the index procedure.

  3. Procedural cost

    Procedural cost, defined as the total acquisition cost (€) of all lesion preparation balloons (including adjunctive predilatation balloons, if required) and bailout stents used during the index procedure for the target lesion.

    Time frame: During the index procedure

  4. Slow-flow phenomenon

    Slow-flow phenomenon, defined as an angiographic reduction in antegrade flow occurring after DCB inflation compared with the immediately preceding angiogram, in the absence of residual stenosis \>30%, flow-limiting dissection, or vasospasm. The presence or absence of slow-flow phenomenon will be determined by the independent blinded angiographic review.

    Time frame: During the index procedure

  5. Procedural success

    Procedural success, defined as technical success with absence of rupture, distal embolization, thrombosis, access complications, or major adverse cardiovascular events. These events should be listed as occurring \<24 hours and \<1 month of the procedure.

    Time frame: Occurring <24 hours and <1 month of the index procedure.

  6. Freedom from device and procedure-related death

    Freedom from device and procedure-related death through 30 days post-procedure.

    Time frame: Until 30 days post-procedure

  7. Freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE)

    Freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE) up to 24 months post-procedure. MAE are defined as the composite of: * Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding requiring transfusion or surgical intervention. * Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE), including above-the-ankle target limb amputation or major re-intervention involving the target lesion, defined as new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision, thrombectomy, thrombolysis or endovascular reintervention.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post-procedure

  8. Primary patency

    Primary patency at 6 and 24 months post-procedure, defined as absence of ≥50% restenosis (peak systolic velocity ratio\<2.5) and no CD-TLR, as adjudicated by the duplex core laboratory and the Clinical Events Committee (CEC).

    Time frame: At 6 and 24 months post-procedure

  9. Freedom from CD-TLR

    Freedom from CD-TLR up to 24 months post-procedure. * CD-TLR is defined as any repeat revascularisation procedure performed to maintain or restore patency within the treated segment, including 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the edges of the originally treated lesion, due to clinical deterioration. * Clinical deterioration is defined as a ≥1-category worsening in Rutherford classification, impaired wound healing, or new or recurrent ulceration or rest pain attributable to the target lesion

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post-procedure

  10. Change in Rutherford classification

    Change in Rutherford classification up to 24 months post-procedure.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post-procedure.

  11. Change in EQ-5D questionnaire

    Change in EQ-5D questionnaire from baseline up to 24 months post-procedure

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post-procedure

  12. Amputation free survival

    Amputation free survival up to 24 months post-procedure. • Amputation free survival is defined as survival without above-the-ankle amputation of the target limb.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post-procedure.

  13. Wound healing evolution

    Wound healing evolution up to 24 months post-procedure, assessed according to the following predefined ordinal classification: * Healed: Complete epithelialisation of the target wound maintained for at least 14 consecutive days. * Improved: Reduction in target wound area \>50% compared with baseline. * Unchanged: Increase or decrease in target wound area ≤50% compared with baseline. * Worsened: Increase in target wound area \>50% compared with baseline. The target wound will be defined as the largest or clinically most relevant wound identified at baseline.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months post-procedure

  14. Wound healing time

    Wound healing time is defined as the number of days from the index procedure to complete epithelialisation of the target wound, without drainage or need for dressing, as assessed by the treating physician. • Major amputation of the index limb or death prior to complete wound healing will be considered failure of the wound healing endpoint.

    Time frame: Days from the index procedure to complete epithelialisation of the target wound

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data collected within the DASBAD-NC study will be made available to researchers upon reasonable request. Access to the data is controlled to ensure the protection of participant privacy and compliance with applicable data protection laws and regulations. Data will be shared upon revision and approval based on scientific merit by the DASBAD-NC management group (which includes a qualified statistician) of a detailed proposal for their use. The data required for the approved, specified purposes and the trial protocol will be provided after the completion of a data-sharing agreement that will be set up by the principal investigator and his team. All data provided will be anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial. Estimated timeframe for response will be within 30 days. Requests for data should be addressed to the sponsor and PI (msirvent@fphag.org).

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date
1 update, last Oct 7, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 7, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07764016
Lead sponsor
Marc Sirvent
Collaborators
DK Medical Technology (Suzhou) Co., Ltd., Cardionovum GmbH
Responsible party
Marc Sirvent (PhD, MD, FEBVS, Head of the Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital General de Granollers, Hospital de Granollers) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Aug 13, 2026
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 7, 2026

Study contacts

Marc Sirvent, PhD
Contact
msirvent@fphag.org
+34938425000 ext. 2575

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion