ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07822412Updated Sep 21, 2026

PRIME Sepsis Trial: Early Sepsis Detection in the Emergency Department Using Presepsin and Immature Granulocytes

An observational study in Sepsis and Septic Shock, sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Primary conditionShock, SepticRegistry: SepsisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Sepsis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Shock, Septic
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Shock, Septic, a narrower term within Sepsis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
699
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Early identification and timely intervention for sepsis in the emergency department (ED) are critical for improving patient outcomes. However, clinical diagnosis remains challenging due to the non-specific nature of early systemic symptoms. This study protocol aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of a combined approach using Immature Granulocytes (IG) and Presepsin (sCD14-ST) for the early detection of sepsis in undifferentiated ED patients.

Read the detailed description

Sepsis is characterized by a dysregulated host inflammatory response to infection, potentially leading to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and death. Globally, the estimated annual incidence of sepsis ranges from 18 to 31.5 million cases, with mortality rates as high as 30%. Approximately 70% of sepsis patients are initially managed in the emergency department (ED). Although delayed recognition and treatment are associated with poorer outcomes, and early evidence-based intervention significantly improves survival , early identification of sepsis in the ED remains a formidable clinical challenge . Despite the critical need for prompt intervention, research indicates that the detection of infection is often delayed by more than 4 hours after hospital admission and by over 8 hours in approximately 30% of ED cases.

Diverse biomarkers have been proposed to facilitate timely diagnosis, risk stratification, and the initiation of appropriate treatment. Complete blood count (CBC) parameters are particularly advantageous in the ED due to their rapid turnaround time, low cost, and repeatability. Traditionally, white blood cell (WBC) count and immature granulocyte (IG) count have served as first-line indicators. Advanced hematology technologies now provide detailed morphologic data (e.g., cell volume and structural changes), potentially enhancing the diagnostic value of these parameters. While IG has been recognized as a marker of systemic inflammation and sepsis, its clinical utility remains a subject of ongoing debate. Specifically, some studies suggest limited predictive value for long-term outcomes such as 28-day mortality, leading to inconsistent conclusions regarding its diagnostic reliability when used in isolation for the detection of sepsis.

Recent investigations into IG for ED sepsis diagnosis have reported areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) ranging from 0.52 to 0.93. This pronounced variability is likely attributable to differences in study methodologies and patient populations. Concurrently, Presepsin (soluble CD14 subtype, sCD14-ST) has emerged as a promising alternative biomarker. Presepsin is generated via monocyte activation and pathogen phagocytosis, resulting in a rapid surge in circulating levels during the incipient immune response. Evidence suggests that Presepsin rises earlier than conventional biomarkers and correlates strongly with sepsis severity and clinical outcomes. Specifically, Presepsin has demonstrated superior or comparable diagnostic performance to C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) in emergency settings.

Previous investigations have consistently demonstrated the superior diagnostic performance of Presepsin, with reported Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) values often exceeding 0.90 in both emergency sepsis presentations and complex postoperative infectious settings, supporting its role as a benchmark biomarker for early infection detection.

In the PRIME-Sepsis Trial (Presepsin and Immature Granulocytes for Multicenter Early Sepsis Detection), we aim to evaluate the synergistic diagnostic accuracy of integrating IG and Presepsin for identifying sepsis in adult patients with a high clinical suspicion of infection in the ED. While Presepsin offers superior diagnostic potential in the hyper-acute phase, IG provides a readily available, cost-effective reflection of the systemic hematopoietic response. By synergizing these complementary biomarkers, our primary objective is to assess the incremental diagnostic yield of a combined molecular-cellular model against multiple reference standards (Sepsis-2, Sepsis-3, and qSOFA). This approach will enable us to derive and evaluate a novel dual-parameter diagnostic algorithm, ultimately facilitating earlier clinical decision-making and improving prognostic accuracy in diverse emergency care settings. This prospective, multicenter design minimizes the biases inherent in previous retrospective analyses, providing a more robust foundation for clinical implementation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis
  • Septic Shock

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sepsis
  • Emergency Department
  • Presepsin
  • Immature Granulocytes
  • Diagnostic Accuracy
  • Clinical Protocol
03

In context

Shock, Septic Reclassified

1,078 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock, Septic; 232 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 699 is above the median of 108 across 406 observational studies indexed under Shock, Septic.

Browse Shock, Septic studies →

Lead sponsor

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,096 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Compared within Shock, Septic, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Sepsis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population consists of adult patients (aged 18 years and older) who present to the emergency department of participating multi-center medical institutions with a suspected or confirmed infection and exhibit clinical signs suggestive of early sepsis.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age: Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) presenting to the EDs of the participating sites.
  2. Clinical Suspicion of Infection: A high clinical suspicion of infection as determined by the attending emergency physician, accompanied by either a Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) score ≥ 2 or a Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score ≥ 2.

    Rationale: This dual-criteria strategy (SIRS or qSOFA) reflects a pragmatic, high-sensitivity approach designed to capture the full spectrum of sepsis in the emergency setting, overcoming the sensitivity limitations of using a single scoring system.

  3. Feasibility of Biomarker Collection: Ability to obtain blood samples for IG and Presepsin measurement within 2 hours of ED arrival.
  4. : Provision of written informed consent obtained from the patient or their legally authorized representative (LAR).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Severe : Active chemotherapy, history of organ transplantation, or long-term high-dose therapy that may confound leukocyte kinetics or suppress systemic inflammatory responses.
  2. Hematological Conditions: Documented hematological or myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) capable of altering baseline IG profiles.
  3. Pregnancy or lactation, due to the potential for pregnancy-induced physiological and immunological variability.
  4. Prolonged Prior Hospitalization: Patients transferred from another facility after an admission of >24 hours, as extensive prior intervention may obscure the hyper-acute biomarker kinetics critical for early diagnosis.
  5. Consent Issues: Refusal to provide by the patient or their LAR.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
699 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
30 Days
Patient registry
Yes
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Suspected Sepsis Cohort

    This is a purely observational study. Peripheral blood samples are collected at enrollment (T0) solely for the laboratory measurement of Presepsin and immature granulocytes (IG). This process does not alter, delay, or interfere with standard clinical diagnosis, management, or treatment decisions in the emergency department.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Presepsin for Early Sepsis Screening

    The diagnostic performance of Presepsin (measured in pg/mL) will be evaluated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC). The AUROC will be analyzed to evaluate the ability of Presepsin to differentiate patients with sepsis from those with non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).

    Time frame: At enrollment (Time 0 / Emergency Department presentation)

  2. Diagnostic Accuracy of Immature Granulocytes for Early Sepsis Screening

    The diagnostic performance of immature granulocytes (IG, measured in percentage) will be evaluated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC). The AUROC will be analyzed to evaluate the ability of IG to differentiate patients with sepsis from those with non-infectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).

    Time frame: At enrollment (Time 0 / Emergency Department presentation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Prognostic Value of Presepsin for Predicting Septic Shock Development

    Evaluation of the capability of Presepsin (measured in pg/mL) to predict progression from early sepsis to septic shock. The prognostic performance will be analyzed by calculating the AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

    Time frame: Through 30 days after enrollment

  2. Prognostic Value of Immature Granulocytes for Predicting Septic Shock Development

    Evaluation of the capability of immature granulocytes (IG, measured in percentage) to predict progression from early sepsis to septic shock. The prognostic performance will be analyzed by calculating the AUROC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

    Time frame: Through 30 days after enrollment

  3. Concentration of Presepsin for Predicting 30-Day All-Cause Mortality

    Concentration of Presepsin (measured in pg/mL) used to assess the 30-day all-cause mortality rate post-enrollment. The prognostic performance will be evaluated by calculating the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) and the Odds Ratio (OR) derived from multiple logistic regression analysis to determine the predictive capability of Presepsin for 30-day mortality.

    Time frame: 30 days post-enrollment

  4. Percentage of Immature Granulocytes for Predicting 30-Day All-Cause Mortality

    Percentage of immature granulocytes (measured in percentage, %) used to assess the 30-day all-cause mortality rate post-enrollment. The prognostic performance will be evaluated by calculating the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUROC) and the Odds Ratio (OR) derived from multiple logistic regression analysis to determine the predictive capability of immature granulocytes for 30-day mortality.

    Time frame: 30 days post-enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Emergency Medicine, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital
    New Taipei City, 23652, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99. doi: 10.1002/sim.4067. Epub 2010 Nov 30. PubMed 21225900 ↗
  • Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Schorr C, Simpson S, Wiersinga WJ, Alshamsi F, Angus DC, Arabi Y, Azevedo L, Beale R, Beilman G, Belley-Cote E, Burry L, Cecconi M, Centofanti J, Coz Yataco A, De Waele J, Dellinger RP, Doi K, Du B, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Gomersall C, Hodgson C, Moller MH, Iwashyna T, Jacob S, Kleinpell R, Klompas M, Koh Y, Kumar A, Kwizera A, Lobo S, Masur H, McGloughlin S, Mehta S, Mehta Y, Mer M, Nunnally M, Oczkowski S, Osborn T, Papathanassoglou E, Perner A, Puskarich M, Roberts J, Schweickert W, Seckel M, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Welte T, Zimmerman J, Levy M. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2. No abstract available. PubMed 34599691 ↗
  • Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006 Nov-Dec;26(6):565-74. doi: 10.1177/0272989X06295361. PubMed 17099194 ↗
  • Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983 Sep;148(3):839-43. doi: 10.1148/radiology.148.3.6878708. PubMed 6878708 ↗
  • Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36. doi: 10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747. PubMed 7063747 ↗
  • Yao S, Kaido T, Uozumi R, Hirata M, Iwamura S, Miyachi Y, Macshut M, Sharshar M, Yagi S, Uemoto S. Diagnostic potential of presepsin in bacterial infection following hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery: A prospective observational study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020 Oct;27(10):756-766. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.802. Epub 2020 Aug 21. PubMed 32654388 ↗
  • Ruan L, Chen GY, Liu Z, Zhao Y, Xu GY, Li SF, Li CN, Chen LS, Tao Z. The combination of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein or presepsin alone improves the accuracy of diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Crit Care. 2018 Nov 21;22(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2236-1. PubMed 30463590 ↗
  • Piccioni A, Baroni S, Rozzi G, Belvederi F, Leggeri S, Spagnuolo F, Novelli M, Pignataro G, Candelli M, Covino M, Gasbarrini A, Franceschi F. Evaluation of Presepsin for Early Diagnosis of Sepsis in the Emergency Department. J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 4;14(7):2480. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072480. PubMed 40217929 ↗
  • Yaegashi Y, Shirakawa K, Sato N, Suzuki Y, Kojika M, Imai S, Takahashi G, Miyata M, Furusako S, Endo S. Evaluation of a newly identified soluble CD14 subtype as a marker for sepsis. J Infect Chemother. 2005 Oct;11(5):234-8. doi: 10.1007/s10156-005-0400-4. PubMed 16258819 ↗
  • Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Borderie D, Weiss N, Mallet-Coste T, Claessens YE. Presepsin (sCD14-ST), an innate immune response marker in sepsis. Clin Chim Acta. 2015 Oct 23;450:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.06.026. Epub 2015 Jul 9. PubMed 26164388 ↗
  • Paraskevas T, Chourpiliadi C, Demiri S, Micahilides C, Karanikolas E, Lagadinou M, Velissaris D. Presepsin in the diagnosis of sepsis. Clin Chim Acta. 2023 Oct 1;550:117588. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2023.117588. Epub 2023 Oct 7. PubMed 37813329 ↗
  • Jeon K, Lee N, Jeong S, Park MJ, Song W. Immature granulocyte percentage for prediction of sepsis in severe burn patients: a machine leaning-based approach. BMC Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 16;21(1):1258. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06971-2. PubMed 34915849 ↗
  • Ha SO, Park SH, Park SH, Park JS, Huh JW, Lim CM, Koh Y, Hong SB, Jang S. Fraction of immature granulocytes reflects severity but not mortality in sepsis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2015 Jan;75(1):36-43. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2014.965736. Epub 2014 Oct 24. PubMed 25342241 ↗
  • Karon BS, Tolan NV, Wockenfus AM, Block DR, Baumann NA, Bryant SC, Clements CM. Evaluation of lactate, white blood cell count, neutrophil count, procalcitonin and immature granulocyte count as biomarkers for sepsis in emergency department patients. Clin Biochem. 2017 Nov;50(16-17):956-958. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 May 25. PubMed 28552399 ↗
  • Hwang YJ, Chung SP, Park YS, Chung HS, Lee HS, Park JW, Lee JW, Hong JH, You JS, Park I. Newly designed delta neutrophil index-to-serum albumin ratio prognosis of early mortality in severe sepsis. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;33(11):1577-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.06.012. Epub 2015 Jun 14. PubMed 26238097 ↗
  • Kim H, Kong T, Chung SP, Hong JH, Lee JW, Joo Y, Ko DR, You JS, Park I. Usefulness of the Delta Neutrophil Index as a Promising Prognostic Marker of Acute Cholangitis in Emergency Departments. Shock. 2017 Mar;47(3):303-312. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000722. PubMed 27559701 ↗
  • Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb S, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30. PubMed 23361625 ↗
  • Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Schein RM, Sibbald WJ. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 1992 Jun;101(6):1644-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644. PubMed 1303622 ↗
  • Farkas JD. The complete blood count to diagnose septic shock. J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(Suppl 1):S16-S21. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.12.63. PubMed 32148922 ↗
  • Filbin MR, Arias SA, Camargo CA Jr, Barche A, Pallin DJ. Sepsis visits and antibiotic utilization in U.S. emergency departments*. Crit Care Med. 2014 Mar;42(3):528-35. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000037. PubMed 24201179 ↗
  • Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, Brunkhorst FM, Rea TD, Scherag A, Rubenfeld G, Kahn JM, Shankar-Hari M, Singer M, Deutschman CS, Escobar GJ, Angus DC. Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288. PubMed 26903335 ↗
  • Levy MM, Rhodes A, Phillips GS, Townsend SR, Schorr CA, Beale R, Osborn T, Lemeshow S, Chiche JD, Artigas A, Dellinger RP. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study. Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):3-12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000723. PubMed 25275252 ↗
  • Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, Friedrich ME, Iwashyna TJ, Phillips GS, Lemeshow S, Osborn T, Terry KM, Levy MM. Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-2244. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1703058. Epub 2017 May 21. PubMed 28528569 ↗
  • Wang HE, Shapiro NI, Angus DC, Yealy DM. National estimates of severe sepsis in United States emergency departments. Crit Care Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1928-36. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000277043.85378.C1. PubMed 17581480 ↗
  • Uffen JW, Oosterheert JJ, Schweitzer VA, Thursky K, Kaasjager HAH, Ekkelenkamp MB. Interventions for rapid recognition and treatment of sepsis in the emergency department: a narrative review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb;27(2):192-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.022. Epub 2020 Feb 29. PubMed 32120030 ↗
  • Fleischmann C, Scherag A, Adhikari NK, Hartog CS, Tsaganos T, Schlattmann P, Angus DC, Reinhart K; International Forum of Acute Care Trialists. Assessment of Global Incidence and Mortality of Hospital-treated Sepsis. Current Estimates and Limitations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Feb 1;193(3):259-72. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201504-0781OC. PubMed 26414292 ↗
  • Vincent JL, Jones G, David S, Olariu E, Cadwell KK. Frequency and mortality of septic shock in Europe and North America: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2019 May 31;23(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2478-6. PubMed 31151462 ↗
  • Barichello T, Generoso JS, Singer M, Dal-Pizzol F. Biomarkers for sepsis: more than just fever and leukocytosis-a narrative review. Crit Care. 2022 Jan 6;26(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03862-5. PubMed 34991675 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Oct 2028, 24 months later.

Of 189 non-industry observational studies under Shock, Septic, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 47. This study's planned 24 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 202 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 31, 2026
First posted
Sep 16, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 2029
Last update
Sep 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07822412
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 16, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Chen June Seak, M.D
Contact
julianseak@hotmail.com
+886-975-365-802
Chi Jui Lin
study chair · Department of Medical Laboratory, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion