ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07896603Updated Oct 27, 2026

Physical Activity Interventions for Sleep Improvement and Sedative-Hypnotic Reduction in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Investigating the Role of Sarcopenia

An interventional study of resistance training and Relaxation training in Insomnia Chronic, Hypnotics and Sedatives and Physical Activities, sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 27, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

The prevalence of sedative-hypnotic use among middle-aged and older adults in Taiwan has continued to rise, highlighting the need to better understand the underlying factors contributing to sleep disturbances and medication dependence. Emerging evidence suggests that, beyond psychological and behavioral contributors, age-related physiological decline may play an important role. Sarcopenia, characterized by progressive loss of muscle mass and strength, is common in aging populations and has been linked to poor sleep quality, daytime fatigue, increased fall risk, and higher medication use. Regular physical activity not only improves symptoms of sarcopenia but has also been shown to enhance subjective sleep quality and modify objective sleep architecture, including increases in N3 slow-wave sleep. Despite these benefits, no study to date has directly examined whether physical activity can facilitate sedative-hypnotic dose reduction among chronic users.

Purpose:

The aim of this study is to investigate the associations among sarcopenia, sleep disturbances, and sedative-hypnotic use, and to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured physical activity intervention in improving subjective and objective sleep outcomes and promoting dose reduction in chronic hypnotic users.

Methods:

This three-year study will recruit 180 adults aged 50 years and older who have long-term sedative-hypnotic use. Participants will be randomly assigned to either an individualized 12-week physical activity program or a relaxation training control condition. Baseline and post-intervention assessments will include subjective sleep questionnaires, polysomnography, muscle strength and mass measurements, and standardized hypnotic dose quantification.

Expected Results:

Investigators anticipate that physical activity targeting muscle health will significantly improve sleep quality and contribute to meaningful reductions in sedative-hypnotic medication use among chronic users.

02

Conditions studied

  • Insomnia Chronic
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives
  • Physical Activities

Keywords

  • Physical activity
  • Exercise
  • Sarcopenia
  • Insomnia
  • Sedative-hypnotic
  • Middle age
  • Elders
03

In context

Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders

1,933 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; 616 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 72 across 1,694 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders.

Browse Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,094 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 50 years old
  2. Sedative-hypnotic use for more than 6 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to perform informed consent.
  2. Unstable or severe medical conditions that may interfere with participation, such as uncontrolled cardiovascular disease, advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, recent stroke (\<6 months), or severe renal/hepatic failure.
  3. Neuromuscular or orthopedic disorders that limit safe participation in resistance training (e.g., severe arthritis, recent fractures, progressive neuromuscular diseases).
  4. Current diagnosis of major psychiatric disorders (e.g., uncontrolled major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, psychosis) that may impair adherence.
  5. Current participation in a structured exercise program ≥2 days/week in the last 3 months, which may confound intervention effects.
  6. Currently under psychotherapy or ever received non-pharmacological treatment for insomnia
  7. Any condition judged by the investigator to pose a safety risk or interfere with study participation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    resistance training for 12 weeks

    Behavioral: resistance training

  • Active comparator
    relaxation training for 12 weeks

    Behavioral: Relaxation training

Interventions

  • Behavioralresistance training

    The program will rely mainly on body weight movements supplemented with elastic resistance bands and will be performed at an intensity corresponding to eight to twelve repetition maximum.

  • BehavioralRelaxation training

    This training will include instruction in abdominal breathing and progressive muscle relaxation. An audio recording of the relaxation script will be provided, and participants will be asked to practice at home one to two times each week for a total duration of three months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Daily Dose equivalent for statistical purpose (S-DDD)

    Sedative-hypnotic medications constitute a heterogeneous group that includes benzodiazepines, non-benzodiazepine Z-drugs, and other agents with sleep-promoting properties. Because these medications vary substantially in potency, half-life, receptor specificity, and clinically prescribed daily doses, direct comparison of milligram quantities is not meaningful. To permit standardized analysis, the prescribed dose of each hypnotic medication will be converted into its corresponding WHO Defined Daily Dose equivalent for statistical purpose (S-DDD). The dosage of sedative-hypnotic medications was standardized by dividing each participant's prescribed dose by the World Health Organization assigned Defined Daily Dose (DDD) for the corresponding medication (WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, 2024), expressed in DDDs. Changes in medication use from baseline to the three-month post-intervention assessment were compared both within and between the two groups.

    Time frame: baseline and three-month post-intervention assessment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)

    Physical activity levels were assessed using the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) following WHO scoring guidelines (Keating et al., 2019). Weekly minutes of vigorous, moderate, and transport-related activity were multiplied by assigned MET values (8.0 for vigorous, 4.0 for moderate and transport) to calculate MET-minutes per week. Total physical activity was obtained by summing MET-minutes across all domains. Higher MET values indicate higher levels of physical activity among participants. Differences in MET values at baseline and after the 3-month intervention were compared both within participants and between the two groups.

    Time frame: baseline and three months after the end of interventions

  2. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) is a predominant, self-reported measurement tool for evaluating subjective sleep quality. This instrument is structured around nineteen individual items which are aggregated into seven distinct component scores. These components comprehensively cover key dimensions of sleep, specifically: sleep duration, sleep latency, habitual sleep efficiency, frequency of sleep disturbances, reliance on sleep medication, presence of daytime dysfunction, and the individual's global perception of their sleep quality. Each of the seven components is rated on a 0 to 3 scale, which generates a final Global PSQI Score ranging from 0 to 21 with higher values indicating poorer sleep quality. A global score greater than five is commonly used as the clinical cutoff for identifying individuals with meaningful sleep disturbance. The PSQI has demonstrated strong reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change across a wide range of populations (Buysse et al., 1989)

    Time frame: baseline and three months after the end of interventions

  3. Polysomnography (PSG)

    Polysomnography (PSG) records multiple physiological signals simultaneously during an overnight sleep study, including electroencephalography (EEG), electrooculography (EOG), and electromyography (EMG), to evaluate brain activity, eye movements, and muscle tone. These measurements enable accurate identification of sleep stages, including non-rapid eye movement (NREM) stages N1, N2, and N3, as well as rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, allowing detailed assessment of sleep architecture. It also incorporates additional monitoring, such as airflow and oxygen saturation, to detect sleep-related breathing disorders and other physiological abnormalities. Furthermore, it provides quantitative measures of sleep continuity, including total sleep time, sleep efficiency, and sleep onset latency, together with physiological events such as arousals and respiratory events. PSG allow researchers to comprehensively evaluate participants' sleep characteristics.

    Time frame: baseline and three months after the end of interventions

  4. Sarcopenia evaluation

    According to the latest 2025 guidelines released by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS), the assessment of sarcopenia includes handgrip strength (kg), calf circumference (cm), gait speed (m/s), five-times chair stand test (s), and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). DXA was used to assess skeletal muscle mass. The skeletal muscle mass was adjusted by dividing the muscle mass value by the participant's BMI to enable comparisons among participants, with the unit expressed as kg/m². In this study, changes in sarcopenia-related parameters, including handgrip strength, calf circumference, gait speed, five-times chair stand time, and muscle mass adjusted for BMI, were compared within participants between baseline and after the 3-month intervention. Differences in these parameters were also examined between groups.

    Time frame: baseline and three months after the end of interventions

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
    Keelung, 204004, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07896603
Collaborators
National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion