ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07807176Updated Nov 5, 2026

Neuromodulation Combined With Dual FES Cycling and Cognitive Training After Stroke

An interventional study of Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling and Cognitive Task Training in Stroke, sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 5, 2026Start date movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will evaluate the effects of functional electrical stimulation (FES) cycling, cognitive task training, and non-invasive photobiomodulation on cognitive and upper-limb motor performance in adults after stroke. The study includes three stages to identify favorable FES cycling and neuromodulation approaches and to evaluate their combined effects. Participants will complete 10 intervention sessions over 2 weeks. Cognitive and motor outcomes will be assessed before treatment, immediately after treatment, and at 3-month follow-up. Feasibility, tolerance, and adverse events will also be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

This is a three-stage, randomized, sham-controlled study in individuals after stroke. Stage 1 will compare FES cycling alone, FES cycling combined with cognitive task training, and sham FES cycling. Stage 2 will compare photobiomodulation applied to the ear, forehead, and sham stimulation. Stage 3 will evaluate the selected FES cycling and neuromodulation approaches alone and in combination. Participants will complete 10 sessions over 2 weeks. Cognitive, upper-extremity motor, functional, participation, and quality-of-life outcomes will be assessed at baseline, immediately after treatment, and at 3-month follow-up. Feasibility, adherence, tolerance, and adverse events will also be monitored.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Functional Electrical Stimulation
  • FES Cycling
  • Photobiomodulation
  • Neuromodulation
  • Cognitive Task Training
  • Dual-Task Training
  • Upper Extremity Rehabilitation
  • Cognitive-Motor Performance
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 150 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,096 studies on the registry; 239 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 20 to 80 years.
  • First-ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with unilateral impairment in hand or arm strength or motor function.
  • Medically stable and able to participate safely in the training program.
  • Able to understand the study procedures and sign the form.
  • Able to follow verbal instructions, comply with study procedures, and complete all assessments.
  • Able to maintain a seated position and participate in each training session (approximately 40-60 minutes).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stroke involving the brainstem or cerebellum.
  • History of epilepsy, photosensitive epilepsy, or a tendency to faint.
  • Presence of implanted electronic devices, such as pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), or other electronic medical implants (e.g., artificial heart, infusion pumps, cochlear implants).
  • Wounds, infections, or significant skin problems at potential stimulation sites (ear or scalp).
  • Presence of major psychiatric disorders or inability to understand or cooperate with testing.
  • Cardiovascular or vascular-related conditions, including severe heart disease, uncontrolled arrhythmia, or medical advice against exercise; use of anticoagulant medication that makes laser stimulation inappropriate.
  • Acute illness, such as fever or active infection.
  • Botulinum toxin injections or relevant surgeries within the past six months.
  • Photosensitive disorders (e.g., lupus, porphyria) or current use of photosensitizing medications.
  • Inability to safely perform cycling training (e.g., recent fractures, severe spasticity, difficulty maintaining seated posture).
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding individuals.
  • Any other condition deemed unsuitable by the study physician (e.g., severe claustrophobia).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Stage 1: FES Cycling Alone

    Participants receive FES-assisted arm cycling.

    Device: Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling

  • Experimental
    Stage 1: Dual-Task FES Cycling

    Participants receive FES-assisted arm cycling combined with cognitive task training.

    Device: Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling · Behavioral: Cognitive Task Training

  • Placebo comparator
    Stage 1: Sham FES Cycling

    Participants receive sham FES cycling.

    Device: Sham Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling

  • Experimental
    Stage 2: Auricular Photobiomodulation

    Participants receive transcutaneous auricular photobiomodulation (taPBM).

    Device: Transcutaneous Auricular Photobiomodulation

  • Experimental
    Stage 2: Forehead Photobiomodulation

    Participants receive transcutaneous forehead photobiomodulation (tfPBM).

    Device: Transcutaneous Forehead Photobiomodulation

  • Placebo comparator
    Stage 2: Sham Photobiomodulation

    Participants receive sham photobiomodulation.

    Device: Sham Photobiomodulation

  • Experimental
    Stage 3: Optimal FES Cycling + Sham Neuromodulation

    Participants receive the optimal FES cycling protocol identified in Stage 1 combined with sham neuromodulation.

    Device: Sham Photobiomodulation · Other: Optimal FES Cycling Protocol

  • Experimental
    Stage 3: Optimal Neuromodulation + Sham FES Cycling

    Participants receive the optimal neuromodulation protocol identified in Stage 2 combined with sham FES cycling.

    Device: Sham Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling · Device: Optimal Neuromodulation Protocol

  • Experimental
    Stage 3: Optimal FES Cycling + Optimal Neuromodulation

    Participants receive the optimal FES cycling protocol combined with the optimal neuromodulation protocol.

    Other: Optimal FES Cycling Protocol · Device: Optimal Neuromodulation Protocol

  • Placebo comparator
    Stage 3: Sham FES Cycling + Sham Neuromodulation

    Participants receive sham FES cycling combined with sham neuromodulation.

    Device: Sham Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling · Device: Sham Photobiomodulation

Interventions

  • DeviceFunctional Electrical Stimulation Cycling

    FES-assisted arm cycling is provided for approximately 40 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week for 2 weeks.

  • BehavioralCognitive Task Training

    Cognitive tasks are performed during FES cycling and progressively target attention, working memory, and executive control.

  • DeviceTranscutaneous Auricular Photobiomodulation

    Photobiomodulation is applied to the outer ear for approximately 20 to 30 minutes.

  • DeviceTranscutaneous Forehead Photobiomodulation

    Photobiomodulation is applied to the forehead for approximately 20 to 30 minutes.

  • DeviceSham Functional Electrical Stimulation Cycling

    Participants receive the sham FES cycling control condition.

  • DeviceSham Photobiomodulation

    Participants receive the sham photobiomodulation control condition.

  • OtherOptimal FES Cycling Protocol

    The FES cycling condition associated with the most favorable cognitive-motor performance pattern in Stage 1 will be selected for use in Stage 3. The selected protocol will consist of either FES cycling alone or FES cycling combined with cognitive task training.

  • DeviceOptimal Neuromodulation Protocol

    The photobiomodulation condition associated with the most favorable cognitive-motor performance pattern in Stage 2 will be selected for use in Stage 3. The selected protocol will consist of either transcutaneous auricular photobiomodulation (taPBM) or transcutaneous forehead photobiomodulation (tfPBM).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Trail Making Test-Part B (TMT-B)

    The TMT-B assesses executive function and cognitive flexibility. Longer completion times indicate poorer executive function and cognitive flexibility.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  2. Intra-Extra Dimensional Shift (IED)

    The IED assesses set-shifting ability and cognitive flexibility. Fewer errors indicate better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  3. Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVP)

    The RVP assesses sustained attention. Higher accuracy indicates better sustained attention.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  4. Digit Span Test

    The Digit Span Test assesses working memory and sustained attention. Higher span scores indicate stronger working memory and sustained attention.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  5. Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE)

    The FMA-UE assesses upper-extremity motor control. Scores range from 0 to 66, with higher scores indicating better motor control.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  6. Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)

    The ARAT assesses upper-limb functional performance. Scores range from 0 to 57, with higher scores indicating better upper-limb function.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    The MoCA assesses cognitive functioning across domains including attention, executive function, memory, and visuospatial skills. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  2. Trail Making Test-Part A (TMT-A)

    The TMT-A assesses processing speed and attention. Longer completion times indicate poorer processing speed and attention.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  3. Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT)

    The SDMT assesses processing speed. More correct responses indicate better processing speed.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  4. Spatial Working Memory (SWM)

    The SWM assesses working memory. Fewer errors indicate better working memory performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  5. Paired Associates Learning (PAL)

    The PAL assesses visual learning. Fewer errors indicate better visual learning performance.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  6. Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    The MAS assesses muscle spasticity. Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater spasticity.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  7. Grip and Pinch Dynamometry

    Grip and pinch dynamometry measures upper-extremity muscle strength. Higher force output indicates greater muscle strength.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  8. Box and Block Test (BBT)

    The BBT assesses gross manual dexterity. More blocks transferred indicate better gross manual dexterity.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  9. Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT)

    The 9HPT assesses fine motor coordination. Shorter completion times indicate better fine motor coordination.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  10. Motor Activity Log (MAL)

    The MAL assesses use of the affected arm in daily activities and perceived quality of movement. Scores range from 0 to 5, with higher ratings indicating greater daily arm use and better movement quality.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  11. ABILHAND Questionnaire

    The ABILHAND Questionnaire assesses perceived manual ability in daily activities. Higher logit scores indicate better perceived manual ability.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  12. Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

    The FIM assesses functional independence. Scores range from 18 to 126, with higher scores indicating greater functional independence.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  13. Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)

    The SIS assesses the impact of stroke on functional recovery. Domain scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better functional recovery.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

  14. Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL)

    The SS-QOL assesses stroke-specific health-related quality of life. Higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), immediately after the 2-week intervention (T1), and 3-month follow-up (T2).

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Oct 2028, 22 months later.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 22 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Oct 2026 → Dec 2026, on Nov 5, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 2, 2026
First posted
Sep 8, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2026was Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2028
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Oct 1, 2026→Dec 1, 2026
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Start date Oct 1, 2026→Dec 1, 2026

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07807176
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 8, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Chia-Ling Chen
Contact
clingchen@gmail.com
+883-3-3281200 ext. 8148
Chia-Ling Chen
study director · Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion