ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07810205Updated Sep 9, 2026

Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study of Implant Age, Pocket Plane, Incision, Surface Texture, and Volume as Predictors of Breast Implant Rupture

An observational study in Breast Implant Rupture, sponsored by Research Inc. Recruiting at 1 site in Colombia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Research Inc · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2014; still recruiting 12 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective dynamic cohort will follow women with intact aesthetic silicone breast implants to evaluate predictors of rupture. Implant age, pocket plane, incision route, surface texture, and volume will be recorded, and participants will undergo annual clinical and imaging surveillance for up to five years. Confirmed rupture will require MRI or operative evidence. Delayed-entry survival models will estimate the independent association of implant and surgical characteristics with rupture risk.

Read the detailed description

Women with new or existing aesthetic silicone breast implants will enter the cohort only after baseline assessment confirms that the analyzed implant is intact. Implant and operative characteristics will be verified from device cards and operative records whenever possible. Annual high-resolution ultrasound will screen for integrity loss, with MRI or surgery used for confirmation under a standardized algorithm. Implant age will serve as the survival time scale, and prevalent implants will enter at their age on enrollment. The study will estimate rupture-free survival, symptomatic and silent rupture rates, adjusted predictor effects, and management after detection.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Implant Rupture

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Breast Implants
  • Implant Rupture
  • Silicone
  • Implant Age
  • Pocket Plane
  • Incision
  • Surface Texture
  • Implant Volume
  • Survival Analysis
03

In context

Surgical Wound

315 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 3,000 is above the median of 72 across 51 observational studies indexed under Surgical Wound.

Browse Surgical Wound studies →

Lead sponsor

Research Inc is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult women with aesthetic silicone breast implants documented as intact at cohort entry, including new implant recipients and prevalent implant carriers.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female sex and age 18 years or older.
  • Aesthetic breast augmentation with permanent silicone implants.
  • Known implantation date or sufficiently precise implantation year, pocket plane, incision route, surface texture, and implant volume.
  • Both implants or the analyzed implant documented as intact at baseline by the study imaging algorithm.
  • Ability to complete annual surveillance for up to five years.
  • Written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Reconstructive implantation after mastectomy, congenital deformity, or major trauma.
  • Tissue expander or nonpermanent device.
  • Confirmed rupture at cohort entry for the implant under analysis.
  • PIP implant or another recalled device if the final protocol elects to exclude it from etiologic modeling.
  • Missing core implant characteristics or implantation date.
  • Planned immediate explantation or exchange at enrollment for a reason unrelated to surveillance.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
10 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Aesthetic Breast Implant Surveillance Cohort

    Women with intact silicone implants at enrollment are followed prospectively. Pocket plane, incision, texture, volume, and implant age are modeled as exposures rather than recruitment groups.

    Device: Silicone Breast Implant Exposure · Diagnostic Test: Prospective Breast Implant Surveillance Imaging

Interventions

  • DeviceSilicone Breast Implant Exposure

    Implant-level exposure data include implantation date, laterality, pocket plane, incision route, surface texture, shape, volume, manufacturer/lot when available, primary versus revision placement, and concomitant mastopexy or fat grafting. Linked arm/group(s): Intact Aesthetic Breast Implant Surveillance Cohort.

  • Diagnostic testProspective Breast Implant Surveillance Imaging

    Baseline and annual high-resolution ultrasound will assess implant integrity. Suspicious or indeterminate findings will undergo MRI according to the locked diagnostic algorithm. Rupture is confirmed by MRI, operative inspection, or both. Linked arm/group(s): Intact Aesthetic Breast Implant Surveillance Cohort.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to First Confirmed Breast Implant Rupture

    Implant-level time from cohort entry to the first MRI- or surgically confirmed full-thickness implant shell rupture. Implant age is used as the survival time scale with delayed entry at age on enrollment. Contralateral implants are accounted for by patient-level clustering.

    Time frame: From cohort entry through years of prospective follow-up. 10 TO 12 YEARS

Secondary outcomes

  1. Rupture-Free Survival by Implant Age

    Kaplan-Meier or model-based probability of remaining free of confirmed rupture at prespecified implant ages, using delayed-entry methods.

    Time frame: 12 YEARS

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hadad E, Sualhi I, Legarda C, Seligman Y, Sorkin A, Dor O, Menashe S, Heller L, Wiser I. Silicone breast implant rupture is more prevalent in the dominant limb side: A retrospective cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 May;80:126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.02.016. Epub 2023 Feb 20. PubMed 37011442 ↗
  • Paolini G, Firmani G, Briganti F, Macino M, Nigrelli S, Sorotos M, Santanelli di Pompeo F. Assessment of Risk Factors for Rupture in Breast Reconstruction Patients with Macrotextured Breast Implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Apr;47(2):517-530. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03118-9. Epub 2022 Oct 13. PubMed 36229658 ↗
  • Hadad E, Klein D, Seligman Y, Wiser I, Heller L. Sub-muscular plane for augmentation mammoplasty patients increases silicone gel implant rupture rate. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2019 Mar;72(3):419-423. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 22. PubMed 30616906 ↗
  • Glener AD, Sergesketter AR, Adams WP Jr. Outcomes of In-Office, High Resolution Ultrasound Silicone Breast Implant Surveillance by Plastic Surgeons. Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Dec 12;45(1):48-55. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae165. PubMed 39054844 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — not contempled in the patient informed concent

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2014 to primary completion in Jan 2026, 143 months.

Of 31 observational studies under Surgical Wound, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 48. This study's 143 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 2, 2026
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
StartActual
Jan 12, 2014
Primary completionActual
Jan 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 15, 2026
Last update
Sep 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07810205
Lead sponsor
Research Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Start date
Jan 12, 2014
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2026
Completion
Dec 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Juan Velez, MD, Plastic surgeon
Contact
info@velezlara.com
+57 3054511588
juan velez, MD, plastic surgery
principal investigator

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion