ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07805915Updated Oct 7, 2026

Prospective One-Year Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of an Investigator-Developed Rectus Abdominis Plication Technique in Abdominoplasty

An interventional study of Investigator-Developed Rectus Abdominis Plication and Standardized Abdominal Wall Ultrasound in Diastasis Recti Abdominis and Abdominal Wall Laxity, sponsored by Research Inc. Recruiting at 1 site in Colombia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-07.

Primary conditionnone(registry's first term: Recurrence)No conditionIs this wrong?Recurrence describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about. The study names no condition we can place it under, so it is not compared with other studies by condition.

Sponsored by Research Inc · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2024, registered Sep 2026).
  • Started Jan 2024; still recruiting 2 years 9 months later.
Updated Oct 7, 2026Interventions changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective single-group study will evaluate an investigator-developed rectus abdominis plication performed during abdominoplasty. Standardized ultrasound will measure inter-rectus distance before surgery and at 3 and 12 months. The primary outcome is change in mean inter-rectus distance at one year. Recurrence, abdominal wall function, BODY-Q satisfaction, surgical complications, and reoperation will also be assessed.

Read the detailed description

Adults undergoing primary abdominoplasty with rectus diastasis will receive a standardized plication described in a locked operative manual. Baseline and postoperative ultrasound will measure the inter-rectus distance at three fixed abdominal levels. Operative variables and protocol adherence will be recorded. Follow-up visits through month 12 will assess anatomical durability, recurrence, abdominal wall function, patient-reported satisfaction, and complications. The study is designed to generate reproducible one-year safety and effectiveness estimates and to identify factors associated with recurrence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diastasis Recti Abdominis
  • Abdominal Wall Laxity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Abdominoplasty
  • Rectus Abdominis Plication
  • Diastasis Recti
  • Ultrasound
  • Abdominal Wall Function
  • Recurrence
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Research Inc is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 65 years.
  • Scheduled for primary abdominoplasty with rectus plication.
  • Rectus diastasis documented clinically or by baseline ultrasound.
  • Stable body weight for at least 3 months before surgery.
  • Ability to complete ultrasound and clinical follow-up through 12 months.
  • Written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior major abdominal wall reconstruction or mesh repair that prevents standardized plication assessment.
  • Ventral or incisional hernia requiring a separate reconstructive procedure.
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding, or planned pregnancy during the 12-month follow-up.
  • Uncontrolled systemic disease or to elective abdominoplasty.
  • greater than 35 kg/m2 unless the final operative protocol intentionally includes this population.
  • Inability to obtain technically adequate baseline ultrasound measurements.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Investigator-Developed Rectus Plication

    Participants undergo abdominoplasty with the standardized investigator-developed plication and complete one-year anatomical, functional, and safety follow-up.

    Procedure: Investigator-Developed Rectus Abdominis Plication · Diagnostic Test: Standardized Abdominal Wall Ultrasound

  • Active comparator
    abdominoplasty with linear rectus plication

    Participants undergo abdominoplasty with linear rectus plication the standardized control; investigator-perform plication and complete one-year anatomical, functional, and safety follow-up.

    Diagnostic Test: Standardized Abdominal Wall Ultrasound

Interventions

  • ProcedureInvestigator-Developed Rectus Abdominis Plication

    A standardized plication is performed during abdominoplasty. The locked operative appendix will specify patient position, exposure, cranial and caudal limits, suture material, number of layers, stitch configuration, target tension, intraoperative measurements, and management of associated hernia if permitted. Linked arm/group(s): Investigator-Developed Rectus Plication.

  • Diagnostic testStandardized Abdominal Wall Ultrasound

    Inter-rectus distance will be measured at fixed levels during a standardized respiratory phase and abdominal muscle state. Three measurements per level will be averaged by a trained assessor. Linked arm/group(s): Investigator-Developed Rectus Plication.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Mean waist perimeter

    waist perimeter in cm will be measured by a meter at fixed supraumbilical levels. Change is 12-month minus baseline distance; a more negative value indicates greater narrowing.

    Time frame: Baseline and postoperative month 12. 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Plication-Related Major Complications

    Proportion of participants with abdominal compartment symptoms requiring intervention, plication disruption, symptomatic recurrence, reoperation, thromboembolic event, respiratory compromise attributed to increased abdominal pressure, or other serious event adjudicated as related to plication.

    Time frame: From surgery through postoperative month 12.

  2. Change in Abdominal Wall Physical Function

    Change in the selected validated abdominal/core function instrument or BODY-Q Physical Function score. The final instrument and scoring rules will be locked before enrollment.

    Time frame: Baseline, postoperative month 3, and postoperative month 12.

  3. Change in BODY-Q Abdomen Satisfaction Score

    Rasch-transformed 0-to-100 BODY-Q Abdomen score; higher values indicate greater satisfaction with abdominal appearance. Use requires the appropriate license and authorized translation.

    Time frame: Baseline, postoperative month 6, and postoperative month 12.

  4. Incidence of Standard Abdominoplasty Complications

    Proportion with seroma requiring aspiration, hematoma, surgical-site infection, wound dehiscence, skin necrosis, venous thromboembolism, or unplanned reoperation.

    Time frame: From surgery through postoperative day 30. 30 days

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Amro C, Ryan IA, Jog A, Broach RB, Fischer JP, Altieri MS, Azoury SC. Outcomes of Abdominal Contouring in Patients with and without Weight Loss Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Comparison Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2026 Mar 1;157(3):464-473. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000012384. Epub 2025 Aug 13. PubMed 40801412 ↗
  • Swanson E. Abdominal Fascial Plication and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Abdominoplasty Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2025 Mar 1;94(3):378-383. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000004149. Epub 2024 Nov 6. PubMed 39774064 ↗
  • Restifo RJ. An In-Depth Analysis of 1370 Consecutive Abdominoplasties: Fascial Plication Increases Risk of Venous Thromboembolism, and Scoring for Plication Improves the Caprini Risk Assessment Model. Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Nov 15;44(12):NP870-NP882. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae139. PubMed 38967610 ↗
  • Marchica P, Costa AL, Brambullo T, Marini M, Masciopinto G, Gardener C, Grigatti M, Bassetto F, Vindigni V. Retrospective Analysis of Predictive Factors for Complications in Abdominoplasty in Massive Weight Loss Patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Aug;47(4):1447-1458. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03235-5. Epub 2023 Jan 6. PubMed 36609741 ↗
  • Staalesen T, Olsen MF, Elander A. The Effect of Abdominoplasty and Outcome of Rectus Fascia Plication on Health-Related Quality of Life in Post-Bariatric Surgery Patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Dec;136(6):750e-761e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001772. PubMed 26595030 ↗
  • Wilting R, Lier B, de Vries CE, Dalaei F, Poulsen L, Luketina R, Repo JP, Paul M, Hoogbergen M; BODY-Q Network. Health-Related Quality-of-Life Effects of Rectus Repair during Body Contouring Surgery in Postbariatric Patients: A Prospective Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Oct 1;154(4):735-745. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000011168. Epub 2023 Oct 30. PubMed 37903329 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — no contemplated in the patient informed consent

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Interventions
Arm changed abdominoplasty without plication→abdominoplasty with linear rectus plication
Oct 7, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 7, 2026
    Interventions Arm changed abdominoplasty without plication→abdominoplasty with linear rectus plication
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07805915
Lead sponsor
Research Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 8, 2026
Start date
Jan 12, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 7, 2026

Study contacts

jose D Salazar, MD, Plastic surgeon
Contact
heimdal007@gmail.com
+57 311 6058486
jose D Salazar
principal investigator

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion