ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07832162VAC-WOUNDUpdated Sep 21, 2026

Comparison of Wound Healing Duration Between Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) and Conventional Dressings

An interventional study of Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Therapy Description: and Conventional Wound Dressing in Wound Healing, sponsored by Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial will compare vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy with conventional wound dressings for the treatment of open contaminated and dirty wounds. The study will be conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC), Karachi. Eligible patients aged 15 to 60 years with open contaminated or dirty wounds measuring 5-10 cm and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade I or II will be randomly allocated to either VAC therapy or conventional dressings. The primary outcome will be mean duration of wound healing, measured in days from initiation of the assigned treatment until complete wound healing according to predefined clinical criteria. The study will compare the duration of wound healing between the two treatment groups.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial is designed to compare the mean duration of wound healing between vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy and conventional wound dressings in patients with open contaminated or dirty wounds.

The study will be conducted in the Department of General Surgery, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC), Karachi. Patients aged 15-60 years of either sex with open contaminated or dirty wounds measuring 5-10 cm and classified as ASA grade I or II will be considered for inclusion. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants before enrollment.

A total of 60 participants will be enrolled and randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to two parallel treatment groups. Group A will receive VAC therapy, while Group B will receive conventional wound dressings.

All wounds will be thoroughly irrigated with normal saline, and surgical debridement will be performed when clinically indicated. In Group A, the wound will be covered with polyurethane foam, followed by application of an airtight dressing connected to a negative-pressure system. Intermittent negative pressure of 125 mmHg will be applied using cycles of 45 minutes ON and 15 minutes OFF. VAC dressings will be changed every 48-72 hours.

In Group B, saline-soaked conventional dressings will be applied and changed every 24 hours. Participants in both groups will be assessed for wound healing and wound-related complications during the treatment period.

The primary outcome will be mean duration of wound healing, measured in days from initiation of the assigned treatment until complete wound healing according to predefined clinical criteria. Wound surface area may also be assessed as a separate secondary outcome if it is prespecified in the study protocol.

Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 23. Quantitative variables will be assessed for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally distributed continuous variables will be summarized using mean and standard deviation, while non-normally distributed variables will be summarized using median and interquartile range. Categorical variables will be presented as frequencies and percentages. The duration of wound healing will be compared between groups using an independent-samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test, as appropriate. A p-value of \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Wound Healing

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • VAC THERAPY
  • NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY
  • CONVENTIONAL WOUND DRESSING
  • WOUND HEALING
  • SURGICAL WOUNDS
  • WOUND CARE
  • Vacuum-Assisted Closure
03

In context

Surgical Wound

315 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 66 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Surgical Wound.

Browse Surgical Wound studies →

Lead sponsor

Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre is the lead sponsor of 38 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients having open contaminated and dirty wounds of size 5 - 10cm as per operational definition.

    • Patients between ages 15 to 60 years.
    • Both gender
    • I \& II
    • Willing to provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with wounds having dry eschar, in wound, untreated osteomyelitis, exposed blood vessels and organs, long term anticoagulant therapy, bleeding disorders and fistula to organ / body cavities. Dermatological disorders like acute dermatitis, fungal infections of perianal region.
  • All the patients presented with exposed bone, tendons or nerve will be excluded from study
  • Pregnant women.
  • Patients on medications, such as , agents or chemotherapy. All above will be assessed on history and documented medical history.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    VAC Therapy

    Participants will receive vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) therapy for wound management.

    Device: Vacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Therapy Description:

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Dressing

    Participants will receive conventional saline-soaked wound dressings.

    Other: Conventional Wound Dressing

Interventions

  • DeviceVacuum-Assisted Closure (VAC) Therapy Description:

    The wound will be covered with polyurethane foam and a multi-hole drain will be placed over it. The dressing will be sealed with an airtight dressing and connected to a negative-pressure system providing intermittent negative pressure of 125 mmHg, with 45 minutes ON and 15 minutes OFF cycles. VAC dressing changes will be performed every 48-72 hours.

  • OtherConventional Wound Dressing

    Saline-soaked dressing will be placed over the wound and bandage applied, with dressing changes every 24 hours

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Duration of Wound Healing

    Duration of wound healing, measured in days from initiation of the assigned treatment until complete wound healing according to the predefined clinical criteria. The mean duration in days will be compared between the VAC therapy and conventional dressing groups.

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment until complete wound healing, up to 2 weeks.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Wound Infection

    Frequency of wound infection during the treatment period, based on predefined clinical criteria.

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment until completion of the 2-week follow-up period.

  2. Length of Hospital Stay

    Number of days from hospital admission until discharge.

    Time frame: During the index hospital admission.

  3. Need for Additional Surgical Intervention

    Proportion of participants requiring additional surgical intervention for wound management during the study period.

    Time frame: From initiation of treatment until completion of the 2-week follow-up period.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jamali MA, Memon SA, Sameena N, Tahmida A. Vacuum assisted closure versus conventional dressings in treatment of open untidy wounds. Esculapio. 2016;12(3):139-144.
  • Cheema SA, Hafsa N, Shumaila RD, Urwa TA. Comparison of vacuum assisted closure technique versus conventional dressing for management of wounds in term of duration of wound healing. Ann Pak Med Coll. 2020;14(1):1-4.

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers. The data will be collected and used solely for the purposes of this study and will be maintained confidentially in accordance with institutional and ethical requirements.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Dec 2026, 2 months later.

Of 99 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Surgical Wound, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 53. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 126 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 11, 2026
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 20, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 9, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 9, 2026
Last update
Sep 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07832162
Lead sponsor
Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre
Responsible party
Syeda Zareen Raza (Asisstant professor, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 21, 2026
Start date
Sep 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 9, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 9, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Dr Aourangzaib Dr Aourangzaib, MBBS, FCPS
Contact
zaibb9032@gmail.com
03347476661
Dr Irfan Dr Irfan, mbbs
Contact
irfankhoso103@gmail.com
03042635107

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion