ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07810231Updated Sep 9, 2026

Prospective Longitudinal Cohort Study of Implant Age, Pocket Plane, Incision, Surface Texture, and Volume as Predictors of Clinically Significant Capsular Contracture

An observational study in Capsular Contracture of Breast Implant, sponsored by Research Inc. Recruiting at 1 site in Colombia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Sponsored by Research Inc · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2014; still recruiting 12 years 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3,000
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective breast implant surveillance cohort will evaluate whether implant age, pocket plane, incision route, surface texture, and volume predict clinically significant capsular contracture. Women with Baker grade I or II aesthetic implants at enrollment will undergo standardized annual assessments for up to five years. The primary outcome is time to incident Baker grade III or IV contracture. Progression, pain, imaging, treatment, and patient-reported outcomes will also be described.

Read the detailed description

Women with aesthetic breast implants and no clinically significant contracture at cohort entry will be enrolled into a dynamic surveillance cohort. Operative and device information will be verified from records. Trained assessors will apply a locked Baker grading protocol annually, supported by photographs, symptom assessment, and imaging. Suspected incident Baker III/IV contracture will undergo independent confirmation and operative verification when available. Delayed-entry survival models will estimate the independent effects of implant age, plane, incision, texture, and volume while accounting for bilateral implants and competing implant removal.

02

Conditions studied

  • Capsular Contracture of Breast Implant

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Capsular Contracture
  • Baker Grade
  • Breast Implant
  • Pocket Plane
  • Incision
  • Surface Texture
  • Implant Volume
  • Time-to-Event
03

In context

Surgical Wound

315 studies on the registry are indexed under Surgical Wound; 57 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 3,000 is above the median of 72 across 51 observational studies indexed under Surgical Wound.

Browse Surgical Wound studies →

Lead sponsor

Research Inc is the lead sponsor of 24 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult women with aesthetic breast implants and no clinically significant capsular contracture at cohort entry.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female sex and age 18 years or older.
  • Aesthetic breast augmentation with permanent silicone or saline implants under the final protocol.
  • Baker grade I or II in the analyzed breast at cohort entry, confirmed by standardized examination.
  • Known implantation date or year and known pocket plane, incision route, surface texture, and volume.
  • Ability to complete annual clinical assessment for up to five years.
  • Written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Baker grade III or IV contracture at cohort entry in the analyzed breast.
  • Reconstructive implantation after mastectomy or major trauma.
  • Tissue expander.
  • Active breast infection or open wound at enrollment.
  • Planned immediate implant exchange or explantation.
  • Missing core implant or operative data.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
10 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Breast Implant Capsule Surveillance Cohort

    Women with Baker grade I or II implants are followed prospectively. Implant and operative characteristics are modeled as exposures.

    Device: Breast Implant Exposure · Diagnostic Test: Standardized Capsular Contracture Assessment

Interventions

  • DeviceBreast Implant Exposure

    Implant-level data include age, laterality, material, surface texture, shape, volume, pocket plane, incision route, primary or revision placement, manufacturer/lot when available, and concomitant mastopexy or fat grafting. Linked arm/group(s): Breast Implant Capsule Surveillance Cohort.

  • Diagnostic testStandardized Capsular Contracture Assessment

    Two trained assessors will apply a standardized Baker grading protocol, with breast firmness, distortion, pain, and imaging recorded. Suspected grade III/IV events will undergo central review or operative confirmation when surgery occurs. Linked arm/group(s): Breast Implant Capsule Surveillance Cohort.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Incident Baker Grade III or IV Capsular Contracture

    Implant-level time from cohort entry to the first confirmed clinically significant contracture. Grade III is visible distortion/firmness and grade IV includes pain under the locked examination manual. Bilateral implants will be clustered by participant.

    Time frame: From cohort entry through years of prospective follow-up. 10 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Capsular Contracture-Free Survival by Implant Age

    Probability of remaining free of Baker grade III/IV contracture at prespecified implant ages, estimated with delayed-entry survival methods when prevalent implants are included.

    Time frame: Prospective follow-up through 10 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bachour Y, Bargon CA, de Blok CJM, Ket JCF, Ritt MJPF, Niessen FB. Risk factors for developing capsular contracture in women after breast implant surgery: A systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2018 Sep;71(9):e29-e48. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Jun 9. PubMed 29980456 ↗
  • Calobrace MB, Stevens WG, Capizzi PJ, Cohen R, Godinez T, Beckstrand M. Risk Factor Analysis for Capsular Contracture: A 10-Year Sientra Study Using Round, Smooth, and Textured Implants for Breast Augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Apr;141(4S Sientra Shaped and Round Cohesive Gel Implants):20S-28S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004351. PubMed 29595715 ↗
  • Christodoulou N, Secanho M, Kokosis G, Malgor RD, Winocour J, Yu JW, Mathes DW, Kaoutzanis C. Capsular contracture in breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2024 Nov;98:131-143. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.08.057. Epub 2024 Aug 17. PubMed 39244792 ↗
  • Stevens WG, Nahabedian MY, Calobrace MB, Harrington JL, Capizzi PJ, Cohen R, d'Incelli RC, Beckstrand M. Risk factor analysis for capsular contracture: a 5-year Sientra study analysis using round, smooth, and textured implants for breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Nov;132(5):1115-1123. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000435317.76381.68. PubMed 24056498 ↗
  • Liu X, Zhou L, Pan F, Gao Y, Yuan X, Fan D. Comparison of the postoperative incidence rate of capsular contracture among different breast implants: a cumulative meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2015 Feb 13;10(2):e0116071. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116071. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25680100 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — not contempled in the patient informed consent

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2014 to primary completion in Jan 2026, 143 months.

Of 31 observational studies under Surgical Wound, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 48. This study's 143 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 2, 2026
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
StartActual
Jan 12, 2014
Primary completionActual
Jan 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 15, 2026
Last update
Sep 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07810231
Lead sponsor
Research Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Start date
Jan 12, 2014
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2026
Completion
Dec 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Juan Velez, MD, Plastic surgeon
Contact
info@velezlara.com
+57 3054511588
juan velez, MD, plastic surgery
principal investigator

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion