CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07365670COMPAXE-HNFUpdated Sep 21, 2026

Comparison of the Best Method for Measuring Anti-Xa Activity in Children Receiving Unfractionated Heparin in Cardiac Intensive Care (COMPAXE-HNF)

An interventional study of blood sampling for measuring anti-Xa activity and measurement of anti-XA activity in Congenital Heart Disease, Unfractionated Heparin and Anti Xa Activity, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
22
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
1 Day to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to compare the accuracy of two different blood sampling methods from a central venous catheter (CVC) for measuring anti-Xa activity in children receiving unfractionated heparin (UFH) from this CVC. The results will be compared to a "gold standard" sample taken from an arterial catheter (KTA) whithout UFH. The objective is to identify a more reliable method for monitoring UFH, thereby reducing the risk of bleeding or thrombosis in these patients.

Read the detailed description
  • Scientific Justification: UFH is widely used in pediatric cardiac intensive care for its short half-life and availability of an antidote. However, monitoring its effect via anti-Xa activity is challenging. The standard method of sampling from a CVC is known to be prone to heparin contamination, leading to inaccurate results (over- or under-anticoagulation). This lack of precision can lead to dangerous complications like major bleeding or thrombotic events. As studies by Palermo et al. (1980) and Bauman et al. (2012) have shown, the unreliability of CVC samples justifies the search for a safer alternative. The arterial catheter (KTA) provides a contamination-free "gold standard," making it the ideal comparison for evaluating the more reliable sampling method.
  • Procedure: The study will compare two CVC sampling methods (a standard flush protocol and a new experimental method) against the gold standard (KTA sampling without UFH)
  • Follow-up: The study will be conducted over three consecutive days. Each day, three sets of blood samples will be collected every 6 hours per patient (KTA, standard CVC, and experimental CVC).
02

Conditions studied

  • Congenital Heart Disease
  • Unfractionated Heparin
  • Anti Xa Activity

Keywords

  • Unfractionated Heparin
  • Anti-Xa activity
  • Pediatric Intensive Care
  • Congenital Heart Disease
  • Blood Sampling
  • Central Venous Catheter
  • Arterial Catheter
  • Thrombosis
  • Hemostasis.
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Minors aged 0 to 17 inclusive
  • Weight greater than or equal to 3.5 kg
  • Admitted to resuscitation or congenital cardiac intensive care
  • Requiring treatment with unfractionated heparin at curative doses administered via central venous access
  • Equipped with a central arterial and venous catheter
  • Affiliated with or beneficiary of a social security scheme
  • Free, informed, and written consent signed by one of the two representatives of parental authority and the investigator (no later than the day of inclusion and before any examination required by the research).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Newborns \< 37 weeks gestation
  • Patients treated by a humanitarian organization
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
22 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    anti-Xa activity monitoring

    All patients included in the study

    Procedure: blood sampling for measuring anti-Xa activity · Procedure: measurement of anti-XA activity

Interventions

  • Procedureblood sampling for measuring anti-Xa activity

    Each patient included in the study will have a series of three samples taken every 4 hours for 3 days: * Sample taken from a non-heparinized arterial catheter (Gold Standard), performed as part of routine care: Method ① * Sample taken from a central venous catheter without stopping the HNF: Method ② * Sampling from a central venous catheter with an HNF pause: Method ③ At each anti-Xa activity check in the included patients, the nurse will take the 3 blood samples. The order in which samples ② and ③ are taken will be determined by randomization.

  • Proceduremeasurement of anti-XA activity

    Each patient will have, each time that anti-Xa activity needs to be measured, three successive samples taken: * Sample taken from a non-heparinized arterial catheter (gold standard), performed as part of routine care: Method ① * Sample taken from a central venous catheter without stopping the HNF: Method ② * Sample from central venous catheter with HNF pause: Method ③

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Measurement of anti-Xa activity (in IU/mL) from two samples (with and without HNF pause) taken from the central venous line where HNF is administered, compared to a sample taken from a non-heparinized arterial catheter (i.e., gold standard).

    Anti-Xa activity and APTT measurements will be performed at the university hospital's central laboratory, which guarantees the consistency of the reagents, automated systems, and techniques used. The recommended therapeutic target is between 0.3 and 0.6 IU/mL.

    Time frame: "From enrollment to the end of study at 72hours"

Secondary outcomes

  1. Measurement of APTT from two samples (with and without HNF pause) taken from the central venous line where HNF is administered, compared to a sample taken from a non-heparinized arterial catheter (i.e., gold standard).

    Activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT): Mainly used in the United States and in some French intensive care units, the APTT provides an overall assessment of the activity of several coagulation factors: factor I (or fibrinogen), factor II (or prothrombin), factor V, factor VIII, factor IX, factor X, factor XI, and factor XII. (Figure 1) The APTT is a measure of blood clotting time. It is expressed as a ratio between the patient's APTT and a "control" APTT, which is that of the laboratory. It is expressed in seconds. Normal values for the patient APTT/control APTT ratio are between 0.80 s and 1.20 s. * Above this range: the risk of bleeding increases. * Below this range: treatment is ineffective, with a risk of clot formation.

    Time frame: "From enrollment to the end of study at 72 hours"

  2. Measurement of APTT and anti-Xa activity (in IU/mL) from a sample taken from a non-heparinized arterial catheter (i.e., gold standard)

    The TCA measurement is performed in the same way.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of study at 72 hours

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07365670
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 26, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Marie CONEAU
Contact
marieconeau@gmail.com
+262693829524

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion