An interventional study of Telephone education session and Online educational materials in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC), Family History of Pancreas Cancer and Genetic Testing, sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.
Sponsored by Brigham and Women's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Among 1,852 studies in Pancreatic Neoplasms with a site in United States — 305 open to participants now, 477 under way, 25 of them phase 3. Pancreatic Neoplasms · United States.
Among the 1,852 studies in Pancreatic Neoplasms with a site in United States, this one is the 408th largest by planned enrollment of the 1,575 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 84 that started in 2026, is one of 246 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 355 of the 474 other live ones, and was the 1,835th registered.
3,896 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 1,007 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 80 is above the median of 47 across 2,932 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.
Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →305 of the 1,852 studies in Pancreatic Neoplasms with a site in United States are open now, in 12 countries. Each count lists the studies.
Of the 746 Pancreatic Neoplasms studies recruiting now, 479 (64%) set no upper age limit and 151 (20%) stop at 75 or younger; 40 take children under 18; 59 take healthy volunteers.
This study: 18 Years and older · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.
The full table on the hub →1,852 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.
First in 1991; this study’s year is marked. 84 started in 2026.
Median enrollment 37 across the 1,575 interventional studies, 137 across the 230 observational. Of the 1,219 that completed or were terminated, 478 (39%) have results posted.
578 of 1,852 have an industry lead sponsor. The 10 most frequent:
Brigham and Women's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,267 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.
Of its 116 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 65 (56%) have results posted.
Brigham and Women's Hospital has 1 study filed under Pancreatic Neoplasms — fewer than ten, so there is no comparison to draw.
165 of the studies in Pancreatic Neoplasms with a site in United States that are under way reach primary completion within a year, 3 of them phase 3. Phase 3 first, then by date:
| Study | Primary completion |
|---|---|
| NCT05720338Phase 3Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterIs Intraperitoneal Drainage Necessary Following Distal Pancreatectomy? | 2026-12-31 |
| NCT03257033Phase 3RenovoRxIntra-arterial Gemcitabine vs. IV Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel Following Radiotherapy for LAPC | 2027-06 |
| NCT06861088Phase 3Quercis Pharma AGThe Effect of Kinisoquin™ on Thromboembolic Events in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer | 2027-10-31 |
| NCT04275557H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteUsing Radiogenomics to Predict Malignant Potential of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms of the Pancreas | 2026-11 |
| NCT07814872Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)A Preregistered Multi-Cohort Evaluation of the FATHOM AI System for Molecular Testing Prioritization to Support Clinical Trial Enrollment | 2026-11 |
Among the 1,852 studies in Pancreatic Neoplasms with a site in United States, from their registry updates:
This study will test a remote approach to help people who may be at higher risk for pancreatic cancer learn about and decide whether to get genetic testing and a blood test that looks for signs of several cancers (MCED testing). The study is focused on Black, Latino/a, and Medicaid-enrolled individuals who may have had less access to cancer genetics and early detection services. About 80 participants, who reside in Massachusetts, will be assigned by chance to receive either online education alone or online education plus a phone call with a trained educator from the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN). After the education, participants can choose whether or not to have genetic testing and/or MCED testing. The main goal is to learn whether this approach is practical to carry out, acceptable to participants, and delivered as planned. Participants will complete 3 surveys during study participation.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is frequently diagnosed at advanced stages and has poor survival. Approximately 10% of patients with PDAC have a pathogenic germline variant in a cancer gene, and national guidelines recommend genetic testing in patients with PDAC and their at-risk relatives. Surveillance in individuals at risk for PDAC has been associated with earlier-stage detection and improved survival. However, uptake of genetic testing among individuals at risk for hereditary cancer syndromes is often low, and this gap is especially pronounced in Black, Latino/a, and Medicaid-enrolled populations. This study is designed to address this gap by evaluating a lower-cost, patient-driven remote model for PDAC genetic education/testing and multi-cancer early detection (MCED) education/testing.
The REGENERATE Feasibility Trial is a randomized feasibility study evaluating a novel intervention consisting of phone-based navigation delivered through a trusted national pancreatic cancer organization, PanCAN, compared with routine online educational materials alone. The study will assess whether this approach can improve uptake of germline genetic testing and MCED testing among individuals at risk for PDAC who have obstacles to healthcare access. The trial specifically focuses on Black, Latino/a, and Medicaid-enrolled individuals at risk for PDAC who reside in Massachusetts, reflecting the study goal of improving access to cancer genetics and early detection services.
The study plans to randomize 80 individuals at risk for PDAC, approximately 40 per arm, and will enroll until 80 participants have been randomized. This is a single-site HCC study with collaborating partners assisting with study outreach. Participants must live in Massachusetts, speak English, have internet access, and be willing to travel to Dana-Farber Cancer Institute in Boston for diagnostic testing if an MCED result indicates possible malignancy. Eligible participants must be aged 50 years or older or within 10 years of the earliest PDAC diagnosis in the family, and must be currently enrolled in Medicaid and/or identify as Black and/or Latino/a, with no prior PDAC-related genetic testing.
After consent and completion of the baseline survey, participants will be randomized through REDCap to 1 of 2 study arms. In the online education arm, participants will receive links to the testing company's educational websites and review materials at their own pace. In the PanCAN telephone education arm, a trained PanCAN educator will conduct a scheduled telephone session. The telephone session includes approximately 10 minutes of education about pancreatic cancer, genetic risk, and genetic testing, followed during the same call by approximately 10 minutes of education about the risks, benefits, and limitations of MCED testing. After either the phone session or online review, participants complete a post-education survey assessing satisfaction, knowledge, and preparation for decision-making. Receipt of genetic testing and/or MCED testing is optional, and participants may take up to 3 months to opt in to testing if accrual remains open.
For participants who choose genetic testing, the study team will facilitate ordering through the testing company, which will mail a saliva kit to the participant's home. For participants who choose MCED testing, the testing company will arrange either home phlebotomy or blood collection at a local facility based on participant preference. Genetic and MCED results are returned directly to the study team. Negative results are generally communicated by email and mail. Positive genetic results trigger telephone follow-up from a Dana-Farber clinical genetic counselor for clinical navigation. Participants with a positive MCED result will be contacted for phone, virtual, or in-person follow-up with a Dana-Farber provider familiar with MCED testing and invited to Dana-Farber for diagnostic workup until resolution. Recommended workup may include contrast-enhanced CT imaging and, if needed, PET-CT or other targeted follow-up procedures or labs based on clinical context.
The primary objectives for both the genetic education and MCED education components are feasibility, acceptability, and fidelity. Feasibility outcomes include completion of germline genetic testing, completion of MCED testing, provision of a testing decision, study enrollment, and retention. Acceptability will be measured with the 3-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-3). Fidelity will be assessed only in the telephone education arm using session checklists evaluating adherence to planned content and duration; selected sessions will be audio-recorded to validate checklist completion and monitor adherence. Exploratory aims will summarize patient-reported outcomes related to genetic risk, genetic testing, and MCED testing, with no formal hypothesis testing planned for these exploratory analyses.
The study defines the intervention as feasible if at least 30% of enrolled participants complete germline genetic testing and at least 30% complete MCED testing. Enrollment feasibility will be considered promising if at least 60% of eligible participants enroll, and decision-making feasibility if at least 60% of enrolled participants provide a testing decision. Retention will be considered promising if at least 60% of enrolled participants complete follow-up. Acceptability will be considered adequate if the mean CSQ-3 score is at least 3, and fidelity will be considered adequate if at least 90% of participants in the telephone arm complete a session in which at least 90% of required educational content is reviewed.
Study activities are conducted primarily remotely. Recruitment will use social media advertisements and outreach through PanCAN, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston-area community health clinics, and community organizations serving target populations. Participant-related data, including screening information, surveys, and test results, will be stored in a secure password-protected REDCap database with access restricted to study personnel. Participants will be assigned unique study IDs, and no data or specimens will be banked as part of this study. The protocol anticipates no greater than minimal risk, although risks include distress related to genetic findings, blood draw-related discomfort, questionnaire-related emotional distress, false-positive MCED results, and risks related to follow-up procedures and labs after a positive MCED result.
The expected duration of participation is approximately 6 to 9 months and includes consent, baseline assessment, education, specimen return and testing, result disclosure, and follow-up. All participants, including those who decline testing, will be asked to complete a follow-up survey 3 to 4 months after their last study step. Enrollment is expected to take about 18 months.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Cancer (malignancy)
Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.
Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Participants will receive information about genetic testing and MCED testing through a telephone education session, in addition to receiving emailed links to online educational materials from the testing company.
Behavioral: Telephone education session · Behavioral: Online educational materials
Participants will be emailed links to online educational materials from the testing company
Behavioral: Online educational materials
Participants will receive a telephone call from a trained navigator at PanCAN to provide \~20mins of information about genetic testing and MCED testing.
Participants will receive links to test information provided by the testing company.
Feasibility of completion of genetic testing and MCED testing
The intervention will be feasible if at least 30% of enrolled participants complete germline genetic testing and at least 30% complete MCED testing.
Time frame: Within 6 months of randomization
Acceptability of the education delivery
Acceptability will be assessed using the 3-item Client Satisfaction Questionnaire-3 (CSQ-3), with a mean score of at least 3 indicating acceptable intervention acceptability.
Time frame: Within 6 months of the educational information
Fidelity of the intervention
Fidelity will be considered adequate if at least 90% of participants in the telephone arm complete a session in which at least 90% of the required educational contents is reviewed
Time frame: Assessed within 6 months of the education session
Started Oct 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2028, 23 months after the start.
Of 403 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pancreatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 45 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 75. This study's planned 23 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 430 studies reached it within 44 months; a quarter within 26 and three quarters within 75.
Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Sep 2026 → Oct 2026, on Oct 22, 2026.
Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Brigham and Women's Hospital →