ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07781917Updated Sep 10, 2026

HPTC Versus AFSM in Diabetic Foot Ulcers

An interventional study of High Purity Type-I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute and SOC and Acellular Intact Fish Skin Matrix and SOC in Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), sponsored by Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara. Recruiting at 4 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized controlled clinical investigation in patients suffering from diabetic foot ulcers at multiple centres in India and Bangladesh. The study compares patient outcomes using standard wound care with a High Purity Type-I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute against standard wound care with an Acellular Intact Fish Skin Matrix.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of a high-purity type-I collagen-based skin substitute (HPTC) versus an acellular intact fish-skin matrix (AFSM) in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), each combined with standardized background wound care. Eligible participants with a Wagner Grade 1-2 target ulcer will be randomized 1:1, stratified by centre and baseline ulcer-size stratum, to receive HPTC or AFSM. The primary outcome is the proportion of participants achieving confirmed complete closure of the target ulcer by Week 12. Outcome assessment (digital planimetry and closure adjudication) is performed by assessors blinded to treatment allocation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer;
  • High Purity Type-I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute;
  • Acellular Intact Fish Skin Matrix;
  • Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial;
  • Multicentric Study;
  • Dermal Matrix
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,077 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 60 across 847 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects must be at least 18 years of age or older.
  • Subjects must have a diagnosis of type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus.
  • Diabetic foot ulcer located below the malleoli, Wagner Grade 1 or 2 (University of Texas Grade 1-2), without exposed bone.
  • Target ulcer present for a minimum of 4 weeks, with post-debridement area of approximately 5-20 cm².
  • Failure to achieve ≥30% ulcer-area reduction during the run-in period, or an equivalent documented waiver (Section 12.1).
  • Adequate circulation to the affected foot: ankle-brachial index (ABI) between 0.7 and 1.3 (or alternative vascular criteria per protocol).
  • (HbA1c) ≤ 12%.
  • The subject must consent to using the prescribed off-loading method for the duration of the study.
  • The subject must agree to attend the scheduled study visits required by the protocol.
  • The subject must be willing and able to participate in the process.
  • Patients must have read and signed the IEC-approved ICF before screening procedures are undertaken.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A subject known to have a of less than 6 months.
  • If the target ulcer is infected or if there is cellulitis in the surrounding skin.
  • Presence of osteomyelitis or exposed bone, probes to bone or joint capsule on investigator's exam or radiographic evidence; Wagner Grade ≥3.
  • A subject that has an infection in the target ulcer that requires systemic antibiotic therapy.
  • A subject receiving (including systemic at doses greater than 10 mg of prednisone per day or equivalent) or cytotoxic chemotherapy.
  • Topical application of steroids to the ulcer surface within one month of initial screening.
  • A subject with a previous partial amputation on the affected foot, if the resulting deformity impedes proper offloading of the target ulcer.
  • A subject with (HbA1c) greater than 12% at or within 3 months of the initial screening visit.
  • A subject with an acute Charcot foot, or an inactive Charcot foot that impedes proper offloading of the target ulcer.
  • Women who are pregnant or considering becoming pregnant within the next 6 months.
  • A subject with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis; active .
  • A subject who participated in a clinical trial involving treatment with an product within the previous 30 days.
  • A subject who, in the opinion of the investigator, has a medical or psychological condition that may interfere with study assessments.
  • A subject treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy or a cellular and/or tissue product (CTP) in the 30 days prior to the initial screening visit.
  • Known to HPTC or its components; known fish allergy/hypersensitivity for participants who would be allocated to AFSM.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    High Purity Type-I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute and SOC

    The SOC in this study is wound care covering with High Purity Type-I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute applied weekly or as needed, followed by a padded 3-layer dressing (non-adherent porous paraffin gauze; absorbent gauze pads; soft roll and compressive crepe bandage).

    Device: High Purity Type-I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute and SOC

  • Active comparator
    Acellular Intact Fish Skin Matrix and SOC

    The SOC in this study is wound care covering with Acellular Intact Fish Skin Matrix applied weekly or as needed, followed by the same padded 3-layer dressing described above.

    Device: Acellular Intact Fish Skin Matrix and SOC

Interventions

  • DeviceHigh Purity Type-I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute and SOC

    Arm A - The SOC in this study is wound care covering with High Purity Type-I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute applied weekly or as needed followed by a padded 3-layer dressing comprised of first layer - non-adherent and porous paraffin gauze, second layer - absorbent gauze pads \& third layer - soft roll and compressive wrap (crepe bandage). For participants enrolled in the optional histopathological sub-study, a 2-mm punch biopsy will be obtained from the wound edge at baseline and on Day 5 under local anesthesia. Specimens will be fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, paraffin-embedded, and sectioned at 4 μm for histological and immunohistochemical analysis.

    Also known as: HPTC

  • DeviceAcellular Intact Fish Skin Matrix and SOC

    Arm B - The SOC in this study is wound care covering with Acellular Intact Fish Skin Matrix applied weekly or as needed followed by a padded 3-layer dressing comprised of first layer - non-adherent and porous paraffin gauze, second layer - absorbent gauze pads \& third layer - soft roll and compressive wrap (crepe bandage). For participants enrolled in the optional histopathological sub-study, a 2-mm punch biopsy will be obtained from the wound edge at baseline and on Day 5 under local anesthesia. Specimens will be fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, paraffin-embedded, and sectioned at 4 μm for histological and immunohistochemical analysis.

    Also known as: AFSM, Decellularized Fish Dermal Matrix

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants Achieving Confirmed Complete Wound Closure

    Complete wound closure is defined as 100% epithelialization of the target ulcer with no drainage and no clinically evident open area requiring dressing, confirmed by a blinded central adjudicator at a follow-up visit approximately 7 days after initial clinical closure is observed.

    Time frame: Up to Week 13 (initial closure assessed through Week 12; confirmation visit approximately 7 days later)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percentage Wound Area Reduction Over Time

    Percentage reduction in wound area from baseline, measured by standardized digital photography and central digital planimetry.

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, and 12

  2. Proportion Achieving ≥50%, ≥75%, and ≥90% Wound-Area Reduction

    Proportion of participants achieving each threshold of wound-area reduction relative to baseline.

    Time frame: Week 12

  3. Time to Confirmed Complete Wound Closure

    Time from randomization to confirmed complete closure of the target ulcer, analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methods.

    Time frame: Up to Week 13

  4. Mean Number of Study-Product Applications

    Average number of applications of HPTC or AFSM required to achieve wound closure or study completion.

    Time frame: Up to Week 6

  5. Number of Participants with Adverse Events

    Number of participants experiencing adverse events related to the intervention (e.g., infection, allergic reaction, local irritation).

    Time frame: Up to Week 13

  6. Patient-Reported Quality of Life (DFS-SF)

    Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale-Short Form, four subscales (physical functioning, daily activities, emotions, social functioning), 0-100 per subscale, higher = better.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  7. Scar Quality (Vancouver Scar Scale)

    Vancouver Scar Scale assessing pigmentation, pliability, height, and vascularity; total score 0-13, lower = better.

    Time frame: Week 12 or at confirmed closure

  8. Ulcer Recurrence

    Recurrence of the index ulcer after confirmed closure, monitored through study completion.

    Time frame: Up to Week 13

Other outcomes

  1. Tissue Advanced Glycation End-Product Accumulation (CML)

    Quantification of Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine (CML), a marker of tissue advanced glycation end-product accumulation relevant to impaired diabetic wound healing, in wound-edge biopsy specimens by ELISA (preferred) or immunohistochemistry with anti-CML antibody. Analysis Population Description: Histopathological sub-study subset only (approximately 30-40 participants, balanced between arms, at selected centres) - not assessed in the full 120-participant population.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 5

  2. Quantitative Collagen Organization and Maturation

    Collagen density, fibre alignment, fibre orientation, and degree of organization in wound-edge biopsy specimens, assessed by Masson's Trichrome or Picrosirius Red staining with polarized light microscopy and quantified using digital image analysis software (ImageJ or QuPath). Analysis Population Description: Histopathological sub-study subset only.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 5

  3. Microvessel Density and Vascular Maturation

    Angiogenesis assessed by CD31 immunohistochemistry (endothelial cell count, microvessel density expressed as vessels per high-power field, and CD31-positive area percentage), and vascular maturation assessed by α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA) immunohistochemistry (mature/stabilized vessel count and activated myofibroblast density). Analysis Population Description: Histopathological sub-study subset only.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 5

  4. General Histopathological Wound Response (H&E)

    Hematoxylin and eosin-stained wound-edge biopsy specimens assessed for inflammatory cell infiltrate, necrosis, epithelial migration, granulation tissue formation, and overall tissue architecture. Analysis Population Description: Histopathological sub-study subset only.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 5

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
  • National Institute of Burn & Plastic Surgery
    Dhaka, 1000, Bangladesh
    Recruiting
    • Shawon B Rahman, MBBS, MS · Contact
  • EKAGRA Health
    Dhaka, 1209, Bangladesh
    Recruiting
    • Rashedul M Rashedul, MBBS, FACS · Contact
  • Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences
    Mandya, Karnataka 571448, India
    Recruiting
    • Naveen Narayan, MS, MCh · Contactnaveennumerouno@gmail.com · 9980023372
    • Chethan Shivannaiah, DNB · Contactdrschethan@gmail.com
    • Naveen Narayan, MS, MCh · Principal investigator
    • Chethan Shivannaiah, DNB · Sub investigator
  • Mysore Medical College and Research Institute
    Mysore, Karnataka 570001, India
    Recruiting
    • Vijay Kumar, MS, MCh · Contactnaveen_uno1@yahoo.co.in · 9141716348
    • Vijay Kumar, MS, MCh · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Narayan N, Gowda S, Shivannaiah C. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Use of High Purity Type-I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute vs. Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Cureus. 2024 Dec 5;16(12):e75182. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75182. eCollection 2024 Dec. PubMed 39649230 ↗
  • Narayan N, Shivaiah R, Kumar V, Kumar KM, Chethan S, Gowda S. Comparative Efficacy of High Purity Type I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute and Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane in Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial. Cureus. 2025 Oct 19;17(10):e94952. doi: 10.7759/cureus.94952. eCollection 2025 Oct. PubMed 41122365 ↗
  • Lullove EJ, Liden B, Winters C, McEneaney P, Raphael A, Lantis Ii JC. A Multicenter, Blinded, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effect of Omega-3-Rich Fish Skin in the Treatment of Chronic, Nonresponsive Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Wounds. 2021 Jul;33(7):169-177. doi: 10.25270/wnds/2021.169177. Epub 2021 Apr 14. PubMed 33872197 ↗
  • Lantis Ii JC, Lullove EJ, Liden B, McEneaney P, Raphael A, Klein R, Winters C, Huynh RN. Final efficacy and cost analysis of a fish skin graft vs standard of care in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial. Wounds. 2023 Apr;35(4):71-79. doi: 10.25270/wnds/22094. PubMed 37023475 ↗
  • Dardari D, Piaggesi A, Potier L, Sultan A, Diener H, Francois M, Dorweiler B, Bouillet B, M'Bemba J, Chaillous L, Clerici G, Kessler L, Wetzel-Roth W, Storck M, Davidsson OB, Baldursson B, Kjartansson H, Lantis JC, Charpentier G. Intact Fish Skin Graft to Treat Deep Diabetic Foot Ulcers. NEJM Evid. 2024 Dec;3(12):EVIDoa2400171. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2400171. Epub 2024 Oct 4. PubMed 39365895 ↗
  • Hopewell S, Chan AW, Collins GS, Hrobjartsson A, Moher D, Schulz KF, Tunn R, Aggarwal R, Berkwits M, Berlin JA, Bhandari N, Butcher NJ, Campbell MK, Chidebe RCW, Elbourne D, Farmer A, Fergusson DA, Golub RM, Goodman SN, Hoffmann TC, Ioannidis JPA, Kahan BC, Knowles RL, Lamb SE, Lewis S, Loder E, Offringa M, Ravaud P, Richards DP, Rockhold FW, Schriger DL, Siegfried NL, Staniszewska S, Taylor RS, Thabane L, Torgerson D, Vohra S, White IR, Boutron I. CONSORT 2025 statement: updated guideline for reporting randomised trials. Lancet. 2025 Apr 14:S0140-6736(25)00672-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)00672-5. Online ahead of print. PubMed 40245901 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the primary publication, together with the study protocol and statistical analysis plan, will be made available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months after publication of the primary manuscript

Access criteria: Requests should be directed to the corresponding author (Dr. Naveen Narayan, naveennumerouno@gmail.com) with a methodologically sound research proposal. Data will be provided after de-identification, subject to a signed data-access agreement, and following approval of the proposal by the trial investigator group.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 6 months after the start.

Of 240 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetic Foot, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 343 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 20, 2026
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
StartActual
Aug 28, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 2027
Last update
Sep 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07781917
Lead sponsor
Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara
Collaborators
Mysore Medical College and Research Institute, Mysurur, National Institute of Burn & Plastic Surgery, Dhaka, EKAGRA Health, Dhaka
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 24, 2026
Start date
Aug 28, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Study contacts

Naveen Narayan
Contact
naveennumerouno@gmail.com
9980023372
Chethan Shivannaiah
Contact
drrschethan@gmail.com
8277520509
Prema Dhanraj, MS, MCh
study chair · Rajarajeshwari Medical College and Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion