ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07898202Updated Oct 28, 2026

Comparison of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Versus Moist Wound Dressing in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Patients

An interventional study of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and Moist Wound Dressing in Diabetic Foot Ulcer, sponsored by Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 28, 2026Primary outcomes revisedStudy contact changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Diabetic foot ulcer is a common and disabling complication of diabetes mellitus. This randomized controlled trial will be conducted at Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences, Muzaffarabad to compare the efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy versus conventional moist wound dressing. A total of 60 patients aged 18-70 years with diabetic foot ulcer size greater than 3 cm will be randomly divided into two groups of 30 patients each. Group A will receive negative pressure wound therapy and Group B will receive moist wound dressing. Efficacy will be measured in terms of healing time and reduction in ulcer size after 4 weeks of treatment.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized controlled trial to be conducted in Department of General Surgery, Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences, Muzaffarabad. After approval from ethical review committee and CPSP, 60 patients presenting in outpatient Department of Surgery fulfilling inclusion criteria will be selected after informed consent. Patients will be randomized by lottery method into Group A and Group B. In Group A, negative pressure wound therapy will be applied using Vacuum Assisted Closure device at 100-125 mmHg, dressing changed every 48-72 hours, no less than two times per week. In Group B, moist wound dressing with normal saline will be applied daily. Age, gender, duration of ulcer, size of ulcer, BMI, HbA1c will be noted. Ulcer size will be measured as product of two largest perpendicular diameters in cm2 at presentation and after 4 weeks. Healing time will be measured in days from application of first dressing to appearance of granulation tissue. Efficacy is defined as healing in 4 weeks and greater than 3 cm reduction in ulcer size. Data will be analyzed in SPSS. Hypothesis is that efficacy of negative pressure wound therapy is better than moist wound dressing in diabetic foot ulcer patients

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Negative pressure wound therapy
  • Moist wound dressing
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,077 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is close to the median of 60 across 847 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-70 years, both male and female
  • Patients with diabetic foot ulcer
  • Ulcer size greater than 3 cm
  • Patients presenting in Department of General Surgery, Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences, Muzaffarabad
  • Willing to give

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with non-diabetic ulcers (venous ulcer, traumatic ulcer, malignant ulcer)
  • Patients with osteomyelitis
  • Patients with known
  • Patients on therapy or
  • Patients with severe peripheral arterial disease with absent distal pulses
  • Patients not willing to participate
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

    NPWT applied with vacuum assisted closure device, 100-125 mmHg, changed every 48-72 hours for 4 weeks

    Device: Negative Pressure Wound Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Moist Wound Dressing

    Moist wound dressing with normal saline soaked gauze, changed daily for 4 weeks

    Other: Moist Wound Dressing

Interventions

  • DeviceNegative Pressure Wound Therapy

    NPWT will be applied using Vacuum Assisted Closure device at 100-125 mmHg pressure, dressing changed every 48-72 hours for 4 weeks

  • OtherMoist Wound Dressing

    Moist wound dressing with normal saline soaked gauze, dressing changed daily for 4 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus Moist Wound Dressing

    Efficacy defined as wound healing within 4 weeks and greater than 3 cm reduction in ulcer size. Ulcer size measured as product of two largest perpendicular diameters in cm\^2 . Healing time measured in days from application of first dressing to appearance of granulation tissue.

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reduction in ulcer size

    Change in ulcer size from baseline to 4 weeks, measured in cm\^2

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences Muzaffarabad
    Muzaffarabad, Azad Kashmir 13100, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No plan to share individual participant data

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for May 2027, 6 months later.

Of 240 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Diabetic Foot, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 37. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 343 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 21, 2026
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2027
Last update
Oct 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionEfficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus Moist Wound Dressing: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 28, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionReduction in ulcer size: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 28, 2026
Contact
Study contact now listed: added k•••@gmail.com · •••2999. See the current contact
Oct 28, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    Primary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionEfficacy of Negative Pressure Wound Therapy versus Moist Wound Dressing: how it is measured was reworded
    Secondary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionReduction in ulcer size: how it is measured was reworded
    Contact Study contact now listed: added k•••@gmail.com · •••2999. See the current contact
  2. Oct 27, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07898202
Lead sponsor
Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences
Responsible party
Ahsan Ahmed (Dr Ahsan Ahmed, Post Graduate Resident, General Surgery, Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Study contacts

Ahsan Ahmed, FCPS
Contact
khawaja.ahsanahmed@gmail.com
+923000332999
Ahsan Ahmed, FCPS
principal investigator · Abbas Institute of Medical Sciences Muzaffarabad.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion