ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07241091Updated Mar 30, 2026Results posted

SurgiPerito Trial: High-Purity Type-I Collagen for Peritoneal Reconstruction After Cytoreductive Surgery

An interventional study of High-Purity Type-I Collagen Scaffold and Standard Peritonectomy Closure in Peritoneal Surface Malignancy, Postoperative Adhesion and Bowel Obstruction, sponsored by Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara. Completed at 2 sites in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-30.

Sponsored by Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This dual-centre, randomized controlled trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of high-purity Type-I collagen-based biomaterial, as a peritoneal substitute following peritonectomy in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for peritoneal surface malignancy. The study tests whether Surgicoll-Mesh can reduce major postoperative intra-abdominal complications compared with standard management.

Read the detailed description

Peritonectomy during CRS often leads to adhesion formation, obstruction, and wound complications. High-purity Type-I collagen-based biomaterial, a resorbable collagen matrix, provides a temporary barrier and scaffold that promotes tissue regeneration and reduces adhesions. This trial will randomize 60 patients (30 per group) to receive standard closure or peritoneal reconstruction with high-purity Type-I collagen-based biomaterial. The primary endpoint is the incidence of major intra-abdominal complications within 2 months. Secondary endpoints include individual complication rates, bowel recovery, hospital stay, mesh-related events, and quality of life

02

Conditions studied

  • Peritoneal Surface Malignancy
  • Postoperative Adhesion
  • Bowel Obstruction
  • Wound Complications
  • Surgical Site Infection After Major Surgery
  • Ovarian Cancer (OvCa)

Keywords

  • High-Purity Type-I Collagen
  • Collagen Biomaterial
  • Peritonectomy
  • Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS)
  • Peritoneal Substitute
  • Adhesion Prevention
  • Peritoneal Reconstruction
  • Regenerative Collagen Matrix
  • HIPEC (Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy)
  • Intra-abdominal Healing
03

In context

Peritoneal Neoplasms

249 studies on the registry are indexed under Peritoneal Neoplasms; 55 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is above the median of 46 across 202 interventional studies indexed under Peritoneal Neoplasms.

Browse Peritoneal Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (100%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosed peritoneal surface (colorectal, ovarian, appendiceal, mesothelioma, pseudomyxoma)
  • Undergoing cytoreductive surgery ± HIPEC requiring peritonectomy
  • 0-2, adequate organ function,

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Collagen allergy or active infection
  • or chronic use
  • Pregnancy/lactation
  • Uncontrolled sepsis, bowel perforation, or extensive small bowel resection
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    High Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal Substitute

    Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with peritonectomy will receive intraoperative peritoneal reconstruction using High Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal Substitute, a sterile, resorbable, high-purity Type-I collagen biomaterial. The mesh is tailored to the peritonectomy defect and secured with absorbable sutures prior to abdominal closure.

    Device: High-Purity Type-I Collagen Scaffold

  • Active comparator
    Standard Peritonectomy Closure

    Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with peritonectomy will have standard closure of the peritoneal defect without the use of any biomaterial or mesh substitute. Surgical closure will follow institutional standard of care.

    Procedure: Standard Peritonectomy Closure

Interventions

  • DeviceHigh-Purity Type-I Collagen Scaffold

    Peritoneal reconstruction using High-Purity Type-I Collagen Scaffold after peritonectomy. Purpose is to act as a biologic peritoneal substitute promoting tissue regeneration and reducing postoperative adhesions and complications.

  • ProcedureStandard Peritonectomy Closure

    Conventional Closure, to serve as the comparator arm for evaluating complication rates, adhesion formation, and recovery outcomes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Major Intra-abdominal Complications

    Incidence of major intra-abdominal complications (adhesive SBO, enterocutaneous fistula, reoperation, grade ≥3 wound complication) within 2 months post-surgery

    Time frame: 2 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Individual Complication Rates

    Individual complication rates (intraperitoneal adhesions, bowel obstruction, wound infection, hernia, fistula)

    Time frame: 2 months

  2. Time to Bowel Function Recovery

    Time to bowel function recovery and diet tolerance

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. Length of Intensive Care Unit Stay

    Duration of postoperative intensive care unit stay following cytoreductive surgery.

    Time frame: During index hospitalization

  4. Length of Hospital Stay

    Total duration of hospitalization following cytoreductive surgery.

    Time frame: During index hospitalization

  5. Device-related Adverse Events

    Any adverse event deemed related to the implanted High-Purity Type-I Collagen biomaterial, including mesh reaction, infection, seroma, rejection, or need for mesh removal, assessed within the 2-month postoperative period.

    Time frame: Within 2 months after surgery

  6. MRI-Detected Intra-Abdominal Adhesions

    Number of participants with dense intra-abdominal adhesions detected by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

    Time frame: Within 2 months after surgery

  7. Change in Quality of Life Domains (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    Change from baseline in quality of life assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. For global health and functional scales, higher scores indicate better outcomes and higher change values represent improvement. For pain (symptom scales), higher scores indicate worse symptoms; therefore, reductions from baseline represent improvement

    Time frame: Baseline to 2 months after surgery

07

Results

Posted Mar 30, 2026
Limitations and caveats
First, although randomized and multicenter, the sample size was modest and powered primarily for short-term postoperative outcomes. Second, the open-label design may introduce performance bias; however, objective endpoints and blinded outcome assessment were employed to mitigate this risk. Third, while MRI provided valuable radiologic insight into adhesion formation, laparoscopy remains the gold standard for adhesion assessment and was not ethically justifiable in this context.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneHigh Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy Closure
Started3030
Completed3030
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryIncidence of Major Intra-abdominal Complications

Incidence of major intra-abdominal complications (adhesive SBO, enterocutaneous fistula, reoperation, grade ≥3 wound complication) within 2 months post-surgery

Time frame:
2 months post-surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Incidence of Major Intra-abdominal Complications
ParticipantsHigh Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy Closure
Incidence of Major Intra-abdominal Complications411
SecondaryIndividual Complication Rates

Individual complication rates (intraperitoneal adhesions, bowel obstruction, wound infection, hernia, fistula)

Time frame:
2 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Individual Complication Rates
ParticipantsHigh Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy Closure
Adhesive small bowel obstruction18
Enterocutaneous fistula03
Surgical site infection13
Incisional hernia (early)02
MRI-detected dense adhesions312
SecondaryTime to Bowel Function Recovery

Time to bowel function recovery and diet tolerance

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Median · days
Time to Bowel Function Recovery
daysHigh Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy Closure
Time to Bowel Function Recovery4.2 ± 1.76.1 ± 2.4
SecondaryLength of Intensive Care Unit Stay

Duration of postoperative intensive care unit stay following cytoreductive surgery.

Time frame:
During index hospitalization
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Intensive Care Unit Stay
daysHigh Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy Closure
Length of Intensive Care Unit Stay1.9 ± 1.13.1 ± 1.4
SecondaryLength of Hospital Stay

Total duration of hospitalization following cytoreductive surgery.

Time frame:
During index hospitalization
Reported as:
Mean · days
Length of Hospital Stay
daysHigh Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy Closure
Length of Hospital Stay9.8 ± 2.613.4 ± 3.1
SecondaryDevice-related Adverse Events

Any adverse event deemed related to the implanted High-Purity Type-I Collagen biomaterial, including mesh reaction, infection, seroma, rejection, or need for mesh removal, assessed within the 2-month postoperative period.

Time frame:
Within 2 months after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Device-related Adverse Events
ParticipantsHigh Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy Closure
Device-related Adverse Events00
SecondaryMRI-Detected Intra-Abdominal Adhesions

Number of participants with dense intra-abdominal adhesions detected by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

Time frame:
Within 2 months after surgery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
MRI-Detected Intra-Abdominal Adhesions
ParticipantsHigh Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy Closure
MRI-Detected Intra-Abdominal Adhesions312
SecondaryChange in Quality of Life Domains (EORTC QLQ-C30)

Change from baseline in quality of life assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale. For global health and functional scales, higher scores indicate better outcomes and higher change values represent improvement. For pain (symptom scales), higher scores indicate worse symptoms; therefore, reductions from baseline represent improvement

Time frame:
Baseline to 2 months after surgery
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change in Quality of Life Domains (EORTC QLQ-C30)
score on a scaleHigh Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy Closure
Global health status18.6 ± 7.49.2 ± 6.8
Physical functioning15.1 ± 6.98.3 ± 7.1
Pain (symptom scale)21.4 ± 8.111.7 ± 7.9

Adverse events

Collected over From surgery to 2 months postoperative follow-up. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
High Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal Substitute0/30 (0%)0/30 (0%)2/30 (6.7%)
Standard Peritonectomy Closure0/30 (0%)6/30 (20%)16/30 (53.3%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventHigh Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy Closure
Reoperation for intra-abdominal complicationSurgical and medical procedures0/306/30
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventHigh Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy Closure
Adhesive small bowel obstructionGastrointestinal disorders1/308/30
Enterocutaneous fistulaGastrointestinal disorders0/303/30
Surgical site infectionSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders1/303/30
Early incisional herniaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/302/30

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)High Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy ClosureTotal
Mean54.6 ± 9.856.1 ± 10.255.4 ± 10.0
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)High Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy ClosureTotal
Female131427
Male171633
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)High Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy ClosureTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)High Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy ClosureTotal
India303060
ECOG Performance Status 0-1
ECOG Performance Status 0-1(Participants)High Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy ClosureTotal
Count of participants262551
Primary Malignancy Type
Primary Malignancy Type(Participants)High Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy ClosureTotal
Colorectal cancer121123
Ovarian cancer91019
Other peritoneal surface malignancies9918
Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI)
Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI)(score on a scale)High Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy ClosureTotal
Mean17.8 ± 4.918.3 ± 5.218.1 ± 5.0
HIPEC Performed
HIPEC Performed(Participants)High Purity Type-I Collagen-based Peritoneal SubstituteStandard Peritonectomy ClosureTotal
Count of participants212243

1 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences
    Mandya, Karnataka 571448, India
  • JSS Medical College Hospital
    Mysore, Karnataka 570004, India
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Naveen Narayan, KN rajeSh, ChethaN ShivaNNaiah, SuhaS N Gowda. Collagen-based Mesh in the Treatment of Posthernioplasty Mesh Infection in Ventral Hernias: A Case Series. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. 2024 Sep, Vol-18(9): PR01-PR03
  • Narayan N, Gowda S, Shivannaiah C. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing the Use of High Purity Type-I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute vs. Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers. Cureus. 2024 Dec 5;16(12):e75182. doi: 10.7759/cureus.75182. eCollection 2024 Dec. PubMed 39649230 ↗
  • Narayan N, Shivannaiah C, Gowda S. Evaluating the Efficacy of High-Purity Type I Collagen-Based Skin Substitute Versus Dehydrated Human Amnion/Chorion Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Cureus. 2025 Jul 30;17(7):e89031. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89031. eCollection 2025 Jul. PubMed 40747200 ↗
  • Narayan N, Ramegowda YH, Raghupathi DS, Chethan S, Gowda S. Biological Skin Substitutes in Pressure Ulcers: High-Purity Type I Collagen-Based Versus Amnion/Chorion Membrane. Cureus. 2025 Aug 25;17(8):e90956. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90956. eCollection 2025 Aug. PubMed 40862036 ↗
  • Dhanraj P, Naveen N, Babu KR, Mahesh M, Hanumanthaiah KS: Healicoll - an alternate to flap cover for bare bones and tendons. Acta Medica International. 2016, 3:146-50.
  • Naveen N, Dharini K, Yashas HR: Multifaceted role of the acellular dermal matrix in novel wound healing: a case series. J Clin Diag Res. 2025, 19:01-05. 10.7860/JCDR/2025/79891.21070
  • Subramanian A, Liang MK. A 60-year literature review of stump appendicitis: the need for a critical view. Am J Surg. 2012 Apr;203(4):503-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.04.009. Epub 2011 Dec 6. PubMed 22153086 ↗
  • Tzivanakis A, Dayal SP, Arnold SJ, Mohamed F, Cecil TD, Venkatasubramaniam AK, Moran BJ. Biological mesh is a safe and effective method of abdominal wall reconstruction in cytoreductive surgery for peritoneal malignancy. BJS Open. 2018 Aug 2;2(6):464-469. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.93. eCollection 2018 Dec. PubMed 30511047 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified data and statistical code will be available upon reasonable request after publication of results.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: 6 months post-publication

Access criteria: De-identified individual participant data will be made available to investigators upon reasonable request beginning 6 months after publication. Access will be granted to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and agree to use the data only for research purposes. Researchers must sign a data access agreement. The Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) will also be shared 6 months post-publication.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2025 to primary completion in Feb 2026, 3 months.

Results were first posted in Mar 2026, 1 month after primary completion.

Of 34 interventional studies with no phase under Peritoneal Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 80. This study's 3 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 17, 2025
First posted
Nov 21, 2025
StartActual
Oct 20, 2025
Primary completionActual
Feb 13, 2026
CompletionActual
Feb 21, 2026
Results first posted
Mar 30, 2026
Last update
Mar 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07241091
Lead sponsor
Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara
Collaborators
JSS Medical College Hospital
Responsible party
Dr Naveen Narayan MS, MCh (Plastic Surgery) (Professor & HoD, Department of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery, Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences, B G Nagara) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 21, 2025
Start date
Oct 20, 2025
Primary completion
Feb 13, 2026
Completion
Feb 21, 2026
Results posted
Mar 30, 2026
Last update
Mar 30, 2026

Study contacts

NAVEEN NARAYAN, MS, MCh
study chair · Adichunchanagiri Institute of Medical Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion