CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07779486MAGHEADUpdated Aug 21, 2026

High- vs Standard-Dose Intravenous Magnesium for Acute Headache

An interventional study of Magnesium Sulfate 2 grams and Magnesium Sulfate 4 G in Acute Headache, Migraine and Tension-type Headache, sponsored by University of Monastir. Recruiting at 1 site in Tunisia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-21.

Sponsored by University of Monastir · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Headache is one of the most common reasons for consultation in emergency departments and represents a significant cause of disability, particularly in patients with migraine and other primary headache disorders. Despite the availability of several analgesic treatments, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol, pain relief is often incomplete, and a proportion of patients require additional rescue therapy.

Magnesium sulfate has emerged as a potential therapeutic option in acute headache due to its role in modulating neuronal excitability, vascular tone, and pain-related neurotransmitter release. However, its efficacy as a standalone treatment, the optimal intravenous dose, and its comparative effectiveness versus standard therapy remain unclear.

This randomized, double-blind, controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute non-traumatic headache in the emergency department. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either low-dose magnesium sulfate (2 g IV), high-dose magnesium sulfate (4 g IV), or intravenous paracetamol (1 g IV) as an active comparator.

The primary outcome is the change in pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 60 minutes after treatment administration, as well as the proportion of patients achieving at least 50% pain reduction. Secondary outcomes include time course of pain relief, need for rescue medication, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and length of stay in the emergency department.

In addition, the study will assess baseline ionized magnesium levels to explore their relationship with treatment response and evaluate whether magnesium levels may predict clinical efficacy.

The results of this study may help clarify the role of intravenous magnesium sulfate in the management of acute headache and potentially improve treatment strategies in emergency settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Headache
  • Migraine
  • Tension-type Headache
  • Cluster Headache

Keywords

  • Acute headache
  • Migraine
  • Emergency department
  • Intravenous magnesium Magnesium sulfate
  • Paracetamol
  • Acute pain
  • Analgesia
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Presentation to the emergency department with acute non-traumatic headache of less than 72 hours duration
  • Diagnosis consistent with a primary headache disorder, including:

    • Migraine
    • Tension-type headache
    • Cluster headache (according to ICHD-3 criteria)
  • Moderate to severe pain intensity (VAS ≥5/10)
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected or confirmed secondary headache (e.g., intracranial hemorrhage, infection, mass lesion)
  • Recent head trauma
  • Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to magnesium sulfate or paracetamol
  • Use of analgesic medication within the previous 6 hours
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Severe renal insufficiency or conditions contraindicating magnesium administration
  • Hemodynamic instability or clinically significant cardiac conduction disorders Prior participation in this study
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Magnesium Sulfate 2 g IV

    Intravenous magnesium sulfate administered as a single dose of 2 g diluted in 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride over 10-15 minutes.

    Drug: Magnesium Sulfate 2 grams

  • Active comparator
    Magnesium Sulfate 4 g IV

    Intravenous magnesium sulfate administered as a single dose of 4 g diluted in 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride over 10-15 minutes.

    Drug: Magnesium Sulfate 4 G

  • Active comparator
    Paracetamol 1 g IV

    Intravenous paracetamol 1 g diluted in 100 mL, administered over 10-15 minutes.

    Drug: Paracetamol 1 g

Interventions

  • DrugMagnesium Sulfate 2 grams

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive intravenous magnesium sulfate 2 g diluted in 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride administered over 10-15 minutes, along with a matching placebo for paracetamol. Infusions will be prepared in identical formats to maintain blinding. Continuous monitoring of vital signs will be performed during and after administration. Rescue medication may be administered from 30 minutes if predefined criteria are met.

  • DrugMagnesium Sulfate 4 G

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive intravenous magnesium sulfate 4 g diluted in 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride administered over 10-15 minutes, along with a matching placebo for paracetamol.. Infusions will be prepared in identical formats to maintain blinding. Continuous monitoring of vital signs will be performed during and after administration. Rescue medication may be administered from 30 minutes if predefined criteria are met.

  • DrugParacetamol 1 g

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive intravenous paracetamol 1 g administered over 10-15 minutes, along with a matching placebo for magnesium (100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride). Infusions will be prepared in identical formats to maintain blinding. Continuous monitoring of vital signs will be performed during and after administration. Rescue medication may be administered from 30 minutes if predefined criteria are met.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Intensity at 60 Minutes

    Change in pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10) from baseline to 60 minutes after treatment administration

    Time frame: 60 minutes

  2. Proportion of Responders at 60 Minutes

    Proportion of participants achieving a ≥50% reduction in VAS pain score from baseline at 60 minutes.

    Time frame: 60 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity Over Time

    Area under the curve (AUC) of VAS pain scores measured from baseline to 120 minutes.

    Time frame: 0 to 120 minutes

  2. Time to Clinically Meaningful Pain Relief

    Time from treatment administration to achievement of clinically meaningful pain relief, defined as VAS ≤3 or ≥50% reduction from baseline.

    Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

  3. Use of Rescue Medication

    Proportion of participants requiring rescue analgesia after 30 minutes due to insufficient pain relief.

    Time frame: 30 to 120 minutes

  4. Adverse Events

    Incidence and type of treatment-emergent adverse events during the observation period.

    Time frame: 0 to 120 minutes

Other outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient-reported satisfaction with treatment using a standardized scale.

    Time frame: 120 minutes

  2. Association Between Ionized Magnesium and Treatment Response

    Relationship between baseline ionized magnesium levels and analgesic response at 60 minutes.

    Time frame: Baseline to 60 minutes

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University Hospital Fattouma Bourguiba Monastir
    Monastir, 5000, Tunisia
    Recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07779486
Lead sponsor
University of Monastir
Responsible party
Pr. Semir Nouira (Professor, University of Monastir) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2026

Study contacts

Semir Nouira, Professor
Contact
semir.nouira@rns.tn
73106046 ext. 00216

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion