ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07779486MAGHEADUpdated Aug 21, 2026

High- vs Standard-Dose Intravenous Magnesium for Acute Headache

An interventional study of Magnesium Sulfate 2 grams and Magnesium Sulfate 4 G in Acute Headache, Migraine and Tension-type Headache, sponsored by University of Monastir. Recruiting at 1 site in Tunisia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-21.

Sponsored by University of Monastir · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Headache is one of the most common reasons for consultation in emergency departments and represents a significant cause of disability, particularly in patients with migraine and other primary headache disorders. Despite the availability of several analgesic treatments, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and paracetamol, pain relief is often incomplete, and a proportion of patients require additional rescue therapy.

Magnesium sulfate has emerged as a potential therapeutic option in acute headache due to its role in modulating neuronal excitability, vascular tone, and pain-related neurotransmitter release. However, its efficacy as a standalone treatment, the optimal intravenous dose, and its comparative effectiveness versus standard therapy remain unclear.

This randomized, double-blind, controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous magnesium sulfate in the treatment of acute non-traumatic headache in the emergency department. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either low-dose magnesium sulfate (2 g IV), high-dose magnesium sulfate (4 g IV), or intravenous paracetamol (1 g IV) as an active comparator.

The primary outcome is the change in pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 60 minutes after treatment administration, as well as the proportion of patients achieving at least 50% pain reduction. Secondary outcomes include time course of pain relief, need for rescue medication, adverse events, patient satisfaction, and length of stay in the emergency department.

In addition, the study will assess baseline ionized magnesium levels to explore their relationship with treatment response and evaluate whether magnesium levels may predict clinical efficacy.

The results of this study may help clarify the role of intravenous magnesium sulfate in the management of acute headache and potentially improve treatment strategies in emergency settings.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Headache
  • Migraine
  • Tension-type Headache
  • Cluster Headache

Keywords

  • Acute headache
  • Migraine
  • Emergency department
  • Intravenous magnesium Magnesium sulfate
  • Paracetamol
  • Acute pain
  • Analgesia
03

In context

Migraine Disorders

1,657 studies on the registry are indexed under Migraine Disorders; 339 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 80 across 1,269 interventional studies indexed under Migraine Disorders.

Browse Migraine Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Monastir is the lead sponsor of 114 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Presentation to the emergency department with acute non-traumatic headache of less than 72 hours duration
  • Diagnosis consistent with a primary headache disorder, including:

    • Migraine
    • Tension-type headache
    • Cluster headache (according to ICHD-3 criteria)
  • Moderate to severe pain intensity (VAS ≥5/10)
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected or confirmed secondary headache (e.g., intracranial hemorrhage, infection, mass lesion)
  • Recent head trauma
  • Known or to magnesium sulfate or paracetamol
  • Use of analgesic medication within the previous 6 hours
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Severe renal insufficiency or conditions contraindicating magnesium administration
  • Hemodynamic instability or cardiac conduction disorders Prior participation in this study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Magnesium Sulfate 2 g IV

    Intravenous magnesium sulfate administered as a single dose of 2 g diluted in 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride over 10-15 minutes.

    Drug: Magnesium Sulfate 2 grams

  • Active comparator
    Magnesium Sulfate 4 g IV

    Intravenous magnesium sulfate administered as a single dose of 4 g diluted in 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride over 10-15 minutes.

    Drug: Magnesium Sulfate 4 G

  • Active comparator
    Paracetamol 1 g IV

    Intravenous paracetamol 1 g diluted in 100 mL, administered over 10-15 minutes.

    Drug: Paracetamol 1 g

Interventions

  • DrugMagnesium Sulfate 2 grams

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive intravenous magnesium sulfate 2 g diluted in 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride administered over 10-15 minutes, along with a matching placebo for paracetamol. Infusions will be prepared in identical formats to maintain blinding. Continuous monitoring of vital signs will be performed during and after administration. Rescue medication may be administered from 30 minutes if predefined criteria are met.

  • Participants assigned to this arm will receive intravenous magnesium sulfate 4 g diluted in 100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride administered over 10-15 minutes, along with a matching placebo for paracetamol.. Infusions will be prepared in identical formats to maintain blinding. Continuous monitoring of vital signs will be performed during and after administration. Rescue medication may be administered from 30 minutes if predefined criteria are met.

  • Participants assigned to this arm will receive intravenous paracetamol 1 g administered over 10-15 minutes, along with a matching placebo for magnesium (100 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride). Infusions will be prepared in identical formats to maintain blinding. Continuous monitoring of vital signs will be performed during and after administration. Rescue medication may be administered from 30 minutes if predefined criteria are met.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain Intensity at 60 Minutes

    Change in pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-10) from baseline to 60 minutes after treatment administration

    Time frame: 60 minutes

  2. Proportion of Responders at 60 Minutes

    Proportion of participants achieving a ≥50% reduction in VAS pain score from baseline at 60 minutes.

    Time frame: 60 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity Over Time

    Area under the curve (AUC) of VAS pain scores measured from baseline to 120 minutes.

    Time frame: 0 to 120 minutes

  2. Time to Clinically Meaningful Pain Relief

    Time from treatment administration to achievement of clinically meaningful pain relief, defined as VAS ≤3 or ≥50% reduction from baseline.

    Time frame: Up to 120 minutes

  3. Use of Rescue Medication

    Proportion of participants requiring rescue analgesia after 30 minutes due to insufficient pain relief.

    Time frame: 30 to 120 minutes

  4. Adverse Events

    Incidence and type of treatment-emergent adverse events during the observation period.

    Time frame: 0 to 120 minutes

Other outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient-reported satisfaction with treatment using a standardized scale.

    Time frame: 120 minutes

  2. Association Between Ionized Magnesium and Treatment Response

    Relationship between baseline ionized magnesium levels and analgesic response at 60 minutes.

    Time frame: Baseline to 60 minutes

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2029, 42 months after the start.

Of 309 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Migraine Disorders, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 42 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 358 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 19, 2026
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
StartActual
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2030
Last update
Aug 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07779486
Responsible party
Pr. Semir Nouira (Professor, University of Monastir) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 21, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 21, 2026

Study contacts

Semir Nouira, Professor
Contact
semir.nouira@rns.tn
73106046 ext. 00216

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Magnesium Sulfate · Acetaminophen

Start the discussion