ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07739264Updated Sep 11, 2026

ZEPU-SGI1PLUS Hand Training Study (ZEPUSGI1RCT)

An interventional study of ZEPU-SG1PLUS Hand Functional Comprehensive Training System and Standard-of-Care Rehabilitation in Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction, Stroke and Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury, sponsored by Bangladesh Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in Bangladesh. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Bangladesh Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-14

Among 14 studies in Stroke with a site in Bangladesh — 8 open to participants now, 9 under way, none of them phase 3. Stroke · Bangladesh.

Planned enrollment
8th of 14
36 · median 44
Started
2026
with 7 others
No phase
12 of 14
8 open now
Registered
11th of 14
by date
Lead sponsor
7 of 14
Bangladesh Medical University

Among the 14 studies in Stroke with a site in Bangladesh, this one is the 8th largest by planned enrollment, is one of 8 that started in 2026, is one of 12 with no phase, and was the 11th registered.

Stroke

8,268 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,062 are open to participants now.

Browse Stroke studies →

Open to participants now

8 of the 14 studies in Stroke with a site in Bangladesh are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

2 more — sign in →

All 8 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Bangladesh have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Bangladesh →

Who these studies take

Of the 1,418 Stroke studies recruiting now, 696 (49%) set no upper age limit and 282 (20%) stop at 75 or younger; 77 take children under 18; 196 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 60 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 14 studies in Stroke with a site in Bangladesh, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this pilot randomized controlled trial is to learn whether the ZEPU-SG1PLUS Hand Functional Comprehensive Training System - a robotic device used alongside standard rehabilitation - is safe, feasible, and helpful for people with upper limb (arm/hand) motor problems caused by stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, or orthopedic conditions.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Is robotic-assisted hand training well tolerated by patients, and can it be safely added to standard rehabilitation, with acceptable rates of device-related side effects? Does adding robotic hand training to standard rehabilitation improve arm and hand strength, range of motion, and functional ability compared with standard rehabilitation alone? Is it practical to fit this type of robotic training into everyday rehabilitation services at Bangladesh Medical University?

Researchers will compare a robotic-augmented rehabilitation group to a standard-care (control) group to see whether adding robotic hand training works better than usual rehabilitation alone.

Participants will:

Be randomly assigned to one of two groups: one receiving standard rehabilitation plus robotic hand training with the ZEPU-SG1PLUS device, and one receiving standard rehabilitation alone If assigned to the robotic training group, attend three training sessions per week for 12 weeks, each lasting about 30-45 minutes, at the Robotic Rehabilitation Centre, BMU Undergo assessments at the start of the study and at two-week intervals during the 12-week program and follow-up period, including tests of muscle strength, joint movement, hand function, and daily activity ability Be monitored throughout for any side effects or safety concerns related to the training

Read the detailed description

Upper limb motor dysfunction following stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, and orthopedic conditions is a major contributor to long-term disability. Conventional rehabilitation, while foundational, is often limited in the intensity, repetition, and task specificity needed to optimally drive neuroplasticity-dependent motor recovery. Electromechanical and robotic rehabilitation systems have emerged as adjuncts capable of delivering standardized, repetitive, programmable movement training with real-time feedback and objective performance monitoring, and evidence from high-income settings suggests such systems can improve motor function and functional outcomes when combined with conventional therapy. However, data on the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of these technologies in low- and middle-income country (LMIC) settings, including Bangladesh, remain limited.

Bangladesh Medical University (BMU) has recently introduced the ZEPU-SG1PLUS Hand Functional Comprehensive Training System at its Robotic Rehabilitation Centre. Before this technology is integrated more broadly into clinical practice, this pilot study will generate foundational local evidence on its feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy, and will inform the design and sample-size estimation of a future adequately powered randomized controlled trial.

Device: The ZEPU-SG1PLUS is a non-powered, mechanically assisted training system built around a stable steel-frame table integrated with twelve dedicated training modules targeting distinct hand and upper-limb movement patterns, including thumb-to-palm motion, wrist flexion-extension, forearm rotation, finger flexion/extension, pinching, side pinching, spherical grip rotation, ulnar/radial deviation, horizontal stretching, and hand lifting. Resistance is provided by an adjustable counterweight system (four independent columns, 250 g increments, 500 g-3000 g range), allowing progressive, individualized resistance training. A tablet-based interactive software interface supports user identification, session setup, timing control, and recording of training activity, with session duration configurable from 1-99 minutes.

Design: This is a pilot randomized controlled trial conducted at the Robotic Rehabilitation Centre, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, BMU. Eligible participants (adults with upper-limb motor dysfunction due to stroke, incomplete spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, or orthopaedic/post-surgical conditions) will be randomly allocated 1:1 to an Intervention Arm (standard-of-care rehabilitation plus ZEPU-SG1PLUS training) or a Control Arm (standard-of-care rehabilitation alone). Robotic sessions will be delivered 3 times weekly for 12 weeks (30-45 minutes per session), under supervision of physiatrists and physiotherapists, with training parameters progressively adjusted based on individual performance and tolerance. Assessments occur at baseline and at two-week intervals through the intervention and follow-up periods.

Assessment methods: Muscle strength is assessed by Manual Muscle Testing, grip strength by dynamometer, spasticity by the Modified Ashworth Scale, and general health status by the EQ-VAS. Device-recorded training parameters (e.g., repetitions, resistance level, session duration) are captured as objective indicators of rehabilitation progress. Feasibility and usability are evaluated through screening/enrollment flow, session adherence and dropout tracking, therapist training and device set-up time, level of assistance required for donning/doffing, and a Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire administered at study completion.

Safety monitoring: Pre-session screening of vital signs and skin integrity, use of a safety harness/tracking system during initial sessions, continuous therapist supervision, post-session skin and fatigue checks, and an emergency-stop mechanism on the device are built into the protocol. All adverse events and serious adverse events are recorded and reported to the safety monitor and the BMU Institutional Review Board.

Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics will summarize safety outcomes (AEs/SAEs, adherence, dropouts). Continuous efficacy variables will be summarized as mean ± SD (or median/IQR for non-normal data) at each time point, with paired/unpaired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests used to compare baseline versus follow-up findings as appropriate. The primary analysis will follow an intention-to-treat approach including all randomized participants, with a secondary per-protocol analysis restricted to those completing the intervention per protocol; missing follow-up data will be handled using group-wise mean substitution. A two-tailed p-value \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Analyses will be performed using SPSS.

03

Conditions studied

  • Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction
  • Stroke
  • Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury
  • Traumatic Brain Injury
  • Upper Limb Orthopedic Trauma

Keywords

  • Robotic Rehabilitation
  • ZEPU-SG1PLUS
  • Hand Function Training
  • Neurorehabilitation
  • Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Presence of upper-limb motor dysfunction, with or without concurrent lower-limb impairment, due to one of the following conditions: (a) stroke, with onset between 2 and 24 months prior to enrollment; (b) incomplete spinal cord injury (neurological level C5 and below), classified as ASIA Impairment Scale C or D; (c) traumatic brain injury with persistent upper-limb functional limitation; or (d) orthopedic or post-surgical conditions involving the shoulder, elbow, wrist, or hand with persistent functional impairment for > 3 months
  • Age between 18 and 60 years, inclusive
  • Ability to understand study procedures and follow instructions, and to provide written (or assent with guardian consent where applicable)
  • Body weight and limb anthropometry compatible with the ZEPU-SG1PLUS Hand Functional Comprehensive Training System per manufacturer specifications
  • Medically stable and cleared by a physician for robotic rehabilitation, with no active infection, uncontrolled cardiac or respiratory disease, severe osteoporosis, uncontrolled epilepsy, or untreated deep vein thrombosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complete spinal cord injury or profound motor paralysis preventing safe interaction with robotic devices
  • Severe cognitive impairment, defined as a (MMSE) score \< 24, that would compromise safe participation
  • Severe spasticity of the upper limb, defined as a Modified Ashworth Scale score > 3
  • Unstable fractures, severe fixed joint contractures of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, or hand (e.g., > 30°), or severe pain limiting safe robotic training
  • Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, presence of a pacemaker, or other implanted electronic medical device incompatible with robotic sensors
  • Pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Robotic-Augmented Rehabilitation Group

    Participants receive standard-of-care rehabilitation combined with robotic-assisted hand training using the ZEPU-SG1PLUS Hand Functional Comprehensive Training System, 3 sessions per week for 12 weeks (approximately 30-45 minutes per session).

    Device: ZEPU-SG1PLUS Hand Functional Comprehensive Training System · Other: Standard-of-Care Rehabilitation

  • Active comparator
    Standard Care (Control) Group

    Participants receive standard-of-care rehabilitation alone, including conventional exercise and wax bath therapy, without the addition of robotic-assisted hand training.

    Other: Standard-of-Care Rehabilitation

Interventions

  • DeviceZEPU-SG1PLUS Hand Functional Comprehensive Training System

    A non-powered, mechanically assisted robotic training device for the hand and upper limb, incorporating twelve dedicated training modules (e.g., thumb-to-palm motion, wrist flexion-extension, forearm rotation, finger flexion/extension, pinching, grip rotation) with an adjustable counterweight resistance system (500g-3000g). Administered 3 sessions/week for 12 weeks (30-45 minutes/session) in addition to standard-of-care rehabilitation.

  • OtherStandard-of-Care Rehabilitation

    Standard rehabilitation program including conventional therapeutic exercise and wax bath therapy, delivered per institutional protocol at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, BMU, without the addition of robotic-assisted training.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Device-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Number and proportion of participants experiencing device-related AEs or SAEs, including falls, skin breakdown/pressure sores, joint pain or injury, cardiovascular events, fracture, or device malfunction.

    Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) through end of 12-week intervention and follow-up

  2. Device Tolerability (Session Completion Rate)

    Number of robotic training sessions completed relative to sessions planned; number of participant drop-outs and reasons for drop-out.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Muscle Strength

    Assessed using Manual Muscle Testing (MMT).

    Time frame: Baseline and every 2 weeks through 12 weeks

  2. Grip Strength

    Assessed using a hand-held dynamometer.

    Time frame: Baseline and every 2 weeks through 12 weeks

  3. Upper-Limb Spasticity

    Assessed using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), a clinician-rated measure of resistance to passive muscle stretch, scored from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (limb rigid in flexion or extension), with higher scores indicating greater spasticity (worse outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline and every 2 weeks through 12 weeks

  4. Health-Related Quality of Life

    Health-related quality of life assessed using the EQ Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS), a self-rated measure of current health status on a vertical scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline and every 2 weeks up to 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 2 months after the start.

Of 3,117 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,261 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 27, 2026
First posted
Jul 31, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 2026
Last update
Sep 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07739264
Lead sponsor
Bangladesh Medical University
Responsible party
Md. Abdus Shakoor, Ph.D. (Chairman & Professor, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Focal Person, Robotic Rehabilitation Centre, Bangladesh Medical University, Bangladesh Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 31, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Md. Abdus Shakoor, Ph.D.
Contact
shakoorma@bmu.ac.bd
+8801819410080
Md. Abdus Shakoor, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Bangladesh Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion