ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07705906ZEPUAI3RCTUpdated Sep 11, 2026

ZEPU-AI3 Lower Limb Feedback Robot Training Study

An interventional study of ZEPU-AI3 Lower Limb Feedback Training and Evaluation Robot and Conventional Rehabilitation in Stroke, Spinal Cord Injuries and Gait Disorders, sponsored by Bangladesh Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in Bangladesh. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Bangladesh Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Lower limb motor dysfunction resulting from stroke, spinal cord injury, or other neurological disorders substantially limits mobility, independence, and quality of life. Robotic rehabilitation has emerged as a promising approach to provide intensive, repetitive, task-oriented training. The ZEPU-AI3 Lower Limb Feedback Training and Evaluation Robot is designed to deliver interactive lower limb training while providing real-time performance feedback. This pilot randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of ZEPU-AI3-assisted rehabilitation combined with conventional rehabilitation compared with conventional rehabilitation alone in patients with lower limb motor dysfunction. The primary outcomes include safety, feasibility, and changes in lower limb motor function, gait performance, and functional mobility. The findings will provide preliminary evidence to support future large-scale clinical trials and the implementation of robotic rehabilitation in clinical practice.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Lower limb motor dysfunction is a major cause of disability following neurological and musculoskeletal disorders. Conventional rehabilitation improves function but is often limited by therapist workload and the difficulty of delivering high-intensity, repetitive, task-specific training. Robotic rehabilitation systems have the potential to overcome these limitations by providing standardized, intensive, and feedback-guided exercise.

Objective:

To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of the ZEPU-AI3 Lower Limb Feedback Training and Evaluation Robot in patients with lower limb motor dysfunction.

Study Design:

This is a prospective, single-center, pilot randomized controlled trial conducted at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bangladesh Medical University. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ZEPU-AI3-assisted rehabilitation plus conventional rehabilitation or conventional rehabilitation alone.

Intervention:

Participants in the intervention group will receive robot-assisted lower limb feedback training using the ZEPU-AI3 device in addition to conventional rehabilitation. The control group will receive conventional rehabilitation according to institutional standards. The intervention duration, frequency, and intensity will follow the approved study protocol.

Outcome Measures:

Primary and secondary outcomes include safety, feasibility, lower limb motor recovery, gait performance, balance, functional mobility, and adverse events. Participants will be assessed at baseline and after completion of the intervention.

Significance:

This pilot study will generate preliminary evidence regarding the clinical utility, safety, and feasibility of the ZEPU-AI3 robotic rehabilitation system and will inform the design of future multicenter randomized controlled trials.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Spinal Cord Injuries
  • Gait Disorders

Keywords

  • Robotic Rehabilitation
  • Neurorehabilitation
  • Feedback Training
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 32 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Bangladesh Medical University is the lead sponsor of 43 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Lower-limb motor dysfunction from one of the following: (a) stroke (onset 2-24 months), (b) incomplete spinal-cord injury (neurological level T12 and below, ASIA C or D), (c) orthopedic surgery (e.g., knee/hip replacement) with persistent gait impairment > 3month post-surgery. Stroke onset between 2-24 months ensures inclusion of individuals in the subacute to chronic phase, where gait recovery is still achievable and measurable. Incomplete SCI targets individuals with partial motor preservation, who are capable of engaging in active gait training with robotic assistance.

      • Age >18 and ≤ 60 years. This age limit is chosen because individuals with this age range generally have better cardiopulmonary reserve and musculoskeletal tolerance, allowing safer participation in intensive robotic-assisted training with reduced risk of adverse events. Excluding younger patients minimizes heterogeneity related to growth, neurodevelopmental factors and congenital disorders, which may influence gait mechanics and response to robotic therapy. Excluding older adults (>60 years) helps reduce confounding from age-related degenerative changes that may affect gait outcomes and safety.
      • Able to provide and understand instructions which ensures participants can actively engage in therapy, follow safety instructions and report adverse events.
      • Weight ≤ 100 kg (as per device spec) and height within device adjustable range (manufacturer spec). Exceeding weight or height limits may compromise mechanical support, safety, and accurate gait training.
      • Medically stable and cleared by physician for exoskeleton use (no active infection, uncontrolled cardiac/respiratory disease, severe osteoporosis, uncontrolled epilepsy, untreated DVT) through pre-screening with necessary investigations.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Complete spinal cord injury with inability to bear any weight as it requires the patient to actively support some body weight or participate in stepping movements.

      • Severe cognitive impairment (e.g., \< 24) preventing safe participation.
      • Severe spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale > 3) in lower limbs. High muscle tone or rigidity increases risk of joint strain, skin injury and falls during robotic-assisted training.
      • Unstable fractures, severe hip/knee contractures (> 30° fixed flexion), severe osteoarthritis requiring imminent surgery. They can pose high risk for injury during weight-bearing or gait cycles.
      • Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia, pacemaker incompatibility or implanted electronic device incompatible with robot sensors. Individuals with these conditions may face elevated risk of adverse cardiac events or device malfunction.
      • Pregnancy as safety data for robotic exoskeleton use in pregnant individuals are lacking.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
32 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ZEPU-AI3 + Conventional Rehabilitation

    Participants will receive ZEPU-AI3 Lower Limb Feedback Training and Evaluation Robot-assisted rehabilitation in addition to conventional rehabilitation according to the study protocol.

    Device: ZEPU-AI3 Lower Limb Feedback Training and Evaluation Robot · Other: Conventional Rehabilitation

  • Active comparator
    Conventional Rehabilitation

    Participants will receive conventional rehabilitation according to institutional standard care without ZEPU-AI3 robotic training.

    Other: Conventional Rehabilitation

Interventions

  • DeviceZEPU-AI3 Lower Limb Feedback Training and Evaluation Robot

    Participants assigned to the experimental arm will receive rehabilitation using the ZEPU-AI3 Lower Limb Feedback Training and Evaluation Robot in addition to conventional rehabilitation. Robot-assisted training will be delivered according to the approved study protocol, including supervised lower-limb feedback training sessions combined with standard rehabilitation care.

  • OtherConventional Rehabilitation

    Participants assigned to the control arm will receive conventional rehabilitation according to the standard clinical practice of the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Bangladesh Medical University. Conventional rehabilitation may include therapeutic exercises, gait training, balance training, strengthening exercises, and other standard rehabilitation interventions as indicated.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Device-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    Incidence of device-related adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring during the 12-week intervention, including falls, skin breakdown or pressure sores, joint pain or injury, cardiovascular events, fractures, and device malfunction.

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 12

  2. Device Tolerability

    Device tolerability assessed by the proportion of planned treatment sessions completed, participant adherence, study withdrawals, and reasons for withdrawal during the 12-week intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline through Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in 6-Minute Walk Test Distance

    Change in walking endurance assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  2. Change in Lower-Limb Muscle Strength on the Medical Research Council (MRC) Muscle Strength Scale

    Lower-limb muscle strength graded using the Medical Research Council (MRC) Muscle Strength Scale, ranging from 0 (no visible muscle contraction) to 5 (normal power against full resistance). A higher score indicates better outcome (greater muscle strength).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  3. Change in Ambulatory Function on the Functional Ambulation Category (FAC)

    Level of walking independence graded on the Functional Ambulation Category, ranging from 0 (non-functional ambulation, unable to walk) to 5 (independent ambulation on any surface). A higher score indicates better outcome (greater independence in walking).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  4. Change in Balance on the Berg Balance Scale-Short Form (BBS-SF)

    Balance and postural control assessed using the Berg Balance Scale-Short Form, a 7-item version of the original Berg Balance Scale, each item scored 0 to 4, for a total range of 0 (severely impaired balance) to 28 (excellent balance). A higher score indicates better outcome (better balance).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  5. Change in Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test

    Change in functional mobility assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  6. Change in Lower-Limb Spasticity on the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    Muscle tone and spasticity of the lower limbs graded on the Modified Ashworth Scale, ranging from 0 (no increase in muscle tone) to 4 (limb rigid in flexion or extension), with an intermediate grade of 1+. A lower score indicates better outcome (less spasticity).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

  7. Change in Health-Related Quality of Life on the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) Questionnaire, Validated Bengali Version

    Health-related quality of life assessed using the EuroQol 5-Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire (validated Bengali version), comprising a descriptive index score and a visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). A higher score indicates better outcome (better quality of life).

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 2 months after the start.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 10, 2026
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 15, 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 15, 2026
Last update
Sep 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07705906
Lead sponsor
Bangladesh Medical University
Responsible party
Md. Abdus Shakoor, Ph.D. (Chairman & Professor, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Bangladesh Medical University, Bangladesh Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 15, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Md. Abdus Shakoor, Ph.D.
Contact
shakoorma@bmu.ac.bd
+8801819410080
Md. Abdus Shakoor, Ph.D.
principal investigator · Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Bangladesh Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion