CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07737886VR-SPINEUpdated Jul 30, 2026

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effects of Virtual Reality for Pain, Anxiety and Recovery Enhancement of Children Post-scoliosis Surgical Repair

An interventional study of Virtual Reality and Standard medical treatment in Scoliosis Patients, sponsored by St. Justine's Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-30.

Sponsored by St. Justine's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is the most common spinal deformity in adolescents and frequently requires surgical intervention when curvature becomes severe. Although surgical correction improves long-term outcomes, the immediate postoperative period is often characterized by significant pain and anxiety, particularly during early mobilization, which can delay participation in physiotherapy and recovery. Virtual reality (VR) has emerged as a promising non-pharmacological intervention for reducing pain and anxiety in pediatric medical settings through immersive distraction and guided engagement.

The VR-SPINE study is a mixed-methods pilot randomized controlled trial designed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary clinical effects of a VR-based intervention during early postoperative mobilization in adolescents undergoing scoliosis surgery. 24 participants aged 10-17 years undergoing corrective scoliosis surgery will be recruited at CHU Sainte-Justine and randomized to either VR plus standard postoperative care or standard care alone. The VR intervention consists of a collaborative therapeutic game played during the first postoperative mobilization to an armchair, designed to promote relaxation, distraction, and engagement with physiotherapy.

Primary outcomes include the feasibility of recruitment and implementation, as well as acceptability and satisfaction among participants and healthcare professionals. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain, anxiety, tolerance to mobilization, analgesic use, and adverse effects. Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants and healthcare professionals will further explore perceived barriers, facilitators, and the clinical experience of using VR during early recovery.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a three-dimensional spinal deformity of unknown cause. It is often called 'adolescent' because it is most commonly diagnosed during adolescence. However, scoliosis can be viewed as a condition that exists from birth through adulthood and can be identified at any age. Idiopathic scoliosis is the most common spinal deformity seen in adolescents over 10 years old, accounting for about 80% of cases. This deformity is characterized by a Cobb angle greater than 10 degrees when measured on an anterior-posterior radiograph. Its prevalence among patients aged 10 to 18 years ranges from 2% to 4%.

Scoliosis management entails observation for small curvature (10 - 25 degrees), bracing for moderate curvature and surgical stabilization for curvature greater than 45 degrees. Although the incidence of surgical management is small, it is associated with substantial acute postoperative pain and notable psychological distress, including anxiety and depressive symptoms, for a significant subset of patients. Prospective trajectory studies show that many adolescents report moderate to severe pain in the immediate postoperative period that gradually declines over weeks, yet a non-trivial minority experience persistent postsurgical pain and pain-related interference. Anxiety and depression are more prevalent in AIS than in the general adolescent population and are linked with longer hospital length of stay after posterior spinal fusion. Qualitative work also indicates that concerns about body image, treatment efficacy, and loss of control around the time of surgery contribute to heightened anxiety in adolescents with AIS.

Preoperative pain and anxiety are strong predictors of both acute and longer-term postoperative pain in AIS, forming a continuum from pre- to postsurgical experiences. Higher baseline pain, anxiety, and pain catastrophizing are associated with more intense early postoperative pain, greater risk of persistent postsurgical pain at 6-12 months, and poorer health-related quality of life. Sex differences appear relevant: girls constitute the majority of AIS cases and tend to exhibit higher emotional distress and more tightly interconnected anxiety-depression symptom networks than boys. After posterior spinal fusion, female adolescents report higher average pain scores in the first 48 hours and at initial physical therapy compared with males, despite similar surgical characteristics and analgesic regimens, suggesting that female patients may require more proactive perioperative pain and psychological support.

Early postoperative mobilization, embedded within multimodal "rapid recovery" pathways, plays an important role in modulating pain, anxiety, and overall recovery after AIS surgery. Protocols that promote sitting, standing, and assisted ambulation within the first 24 hours, combined with scheduled non-opioid and rescue opioid analgesia, have been associated with reduced daily pain scores, fewer opioid-related side effects, earlier functional recovery, and shorter length of stay, without worsening pain or increasing readmissions. Given that opioids are commonly associated with adverse effects such as nausea, constipation, pruritus, drowsiness, and, less frequently, respiratory depression, multimodal and opioid-sparing regimens in AIS aim to reduce both pain intensity and opioid-related morbidity to facilitate earlier mobilization and recovery. By helping adolescents safely resume movement, early mobilization can lessen fear of movement and perceived fragility and may indirectly reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms that otherwise prolong hospitalization. Clinical pathways now explicitly list early mobilization as a key objective to standardize care, minimize opioid exposure, and support both physical and psychological recovery after AIS fusion.

Considering the familiarity that adolescents have with immersive gaming, VR-based interventions may help adolescents with AIS better tolerate early postoperative mobilisation by concurrently targeting pain and anxiety. Guided-relaxation and distraction-based VR sessions have shown transient reductions in postoperative pain intensity, pain unpleasantness, and anxiety in children and adolescents, with the greatest benefit in those with higher anxiety sensitivity. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in pediatric populations indicate that VR distraction during medical procedures produces moderate-to-large reductions in pain and anxiety, supporting its use as a non-pharmacological tool alongside multimodal analgesia. Emerging perioperative trials suggest that integrating VR into early mobilization or physiotherapy can facilitate engagement, preserve or improve respiratory and functional parameters, and address fear of movement (kinesiophobia), which are all relevant to optimizing early post-fusion recovery in AIS.

Despite advances in perioperative care, adolescents undergoing spinal fusion for scoliosis continue to experience clinically significant pain and anxiety, particularly during early mobilization, which can hinder participation in physiotherapy and delay functional recovery. Immersive virtual reality has shown small-to-moderate, short-term benefits for postoperative pain and anxiety in mixed pediatric surgical populations, and emerging evidence suggests it is feasible, acceptable, and safe as an adjunct during early mobilization. However, only one published pilot study and a few ongoing or protocol-stage trials have specifically examined VR in adolescents after scoliosis fusion, with limited data focused on pain and anxiety associated with physiotherapy sessions. This major evidence gap, combined with the high symptom burden and the potential of VR to enhance engagement with early rehabilitation, justifies a pilot randomized controlled trial to assess feasibility, safety, and preliminary efficacy of VR-assisted early mobilization for postsurgical pain and anxiety management in this population.

Therefore, this pilot randomized controlled trial aims to better understand the feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction with a VR intervention in reducing pain and anxiety and improving tolerance to early post-surgical mobilization in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients.

OBJECTIVES

The main objectives are:

  1. To evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction with the VR intervention among children and healthcare professionals (HCPs) (physicians, nurses, and physical therapists).
  2. To assess the preliminary effects of the VR game on children's postoperative pain, anxiety, and tolerance to early mobilization.
  3. To examine the feasibility of the research design (procedures, recruitment, data collection, workflow integration) within the hospital context.
  4. To explore the influence of socio-demographic factors (sex, gender, socio-economic status) on feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, and early clinical responses (pain, anxiety, and mobilization tolerance).

METHODS Mixed-methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial This project is a pilot initiative because it introduces an innovative element in the treatment of postoperative pain, anxiety, and tolerance to mobilization in adolescents post-corrective scoliosis. First, to the best of our knowledge, VR games have not been used in previous studies to manage pain, anxiety, and facilitate early mobilization in such children. Second, children undergoing SS appear to have had little to no exposure to such technologies in a hospital setting, despite experiencing a very painful recovery, making this an ideal population to assess the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of this intervention. These factors provide a unique opportunity to test this novel therapy.

The quantitative component consists of a two-arm parallel-group RCT in which participants are randomized (1:1) to either a) the VR intervention plus standard care or b) standard care alone. The qualitative component uses a descriptive qualitative design to explore acceptability, satisfaction, and feasibility from both children and healthcare professionals (HCP).

The RCT is designed to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, recruitment capacity, data-collection procedures, intervention delivery, and preliminary clinical trends. Findings will inform the refinement of the intervention and determine the appropriateness and parameters (sample size, outcomes, procedures) for a fully powered RCT. Randomization will be performed using simple allocation sequences generated by a biostatistician not involved in data collection. Outcome assessors will be blinded to group allocation whenever possible.

RECRUITMENT Convenience sampling will be used to recruit participants on the surgical unit at CHU Sainte-Justine and health care professionals involved in postsurgical care (physicians, nurses, and physical therapists).

Sample size justification A total of 24 children will be recruited, which represents about 50% of the annual surgical cases at CHUSJ. This provides sufficient precision to estimate feasibility outcomes (e.g., an acceptability rate of 90% with 5% alpha). Although not powered for effectiveness, assuming a standard deviation of 2.0 points on a 0-10 Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS), this sample is expected to provide 80% power to detect a reduction in pain of 2.0 points if differences in pain score emerge.

Procedures All adolescents scheduled for scoliosis surgery will be approached during their presurgical visit and asked to participate. The presurgical visit entails a virtual reality tour of the surgical theatre and a meeting with the IPS to answer patients' questions.

Participants in both groups will receive standard postoperative care (multimodal analgesia, parental presence (if desired), routine reassurance practices). The VR group will receive standard usual care \& VR game during the first mobilization to an armchair. The control group will receive only standard care.

OUTCOME MEASURES Study feasibility will be assessed using recruitment and study logs documenting participant enrollment, retention, protocol adherence, and intervention completion. Acceptability and satisfaction will be evaluated using the Treatment Acceptability and Preference (TAP) Scale and 0-10 Verbal Numerical Rating Scales completed by children and healthcare professionals. Pain, anxiety, time spent in the armchair, analgesic administration, and side effects will be collected using standardized rating scales, study forms, and medical chart review. Semi-structured interviews will also be conducted with a subsample of participants and healthcare professionals; interview data will be analyzed using NVivo, and findings will be integrated with quantitative results through data triangulation to provide a comprehensive assessment of the intervention.

Interventions:

  • Standard Care Standard post-surgical care includes multimodal analgesia, parental presence (if desired), and routine reassurance practices.
  • Virtual reality intervention Virtual reality (VR) is defined as an artificial environment which is experienced through sensory stimuli. It is a modern tool that can immerse patients in a "game" or "world." Commonly used in the medical field to help distract patients during unpleasant procedures such as vaccination and cast removal, it has proven to be effective at decreasing anxiety and providing a more positive experience for patients. Developed by Paperplane Therapeutics, the VR game used in the VR-SPINE study is tailored for the pediatric population and has been reviewed by healthcare professionals with expertise in pediatric care. The simplified, no-failure game design allows children and adolescents to enjoy the experience regardless of their previous video game experience. The game is delivered through the Pico Neo 4 VR headset and takes place in a relaxing virtual environment designed to promote distraction, engagement, and comfort during mobilization.

Participants interact with the game by using eye-tracking technology integrated into the headset to direct laser beams toward virtual targets. This feature minimizes the need for head movements, making the intervention more comfortable for patients recovering from surgery while also helping to reduce the risk of cybersickness.

02

Conditions studied

  • Scoliosis Patients

Keywords

  • virtual reality
  • scoliosis
  • children
  • pain
  • anxiety
  • mobilization
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adolescents aged 10 to 17 years hospitalized for corrective scoliosis surgery
  • Stable medical condition
  • Able to communicate in both French and English.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented photosensitive epilepsy
  • Severe cognitive deficits, preventing assent
  • Prone to motion sickness.

The investigators will also recruit a sample of (HCP):

Inclusion:

-Closely implicated in the care of participants.

04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Virtual reality Distraction

    Use of virtual reality after first mobilisation during 15 minutes.

    Device: Virtual Reality

  • Active comparator
    Standard Treatment

    Standard care as per the unit's protocol will serve as the control after the first or the second mobilization after surgery.

    Other: Standard medical treatment

Interventions

  • DeviceVirtual Reality

    Children play using a VR headset, while a physiotherapist interacts via a connected tablet, creating a cooperative experience. The 15-30-minute session takes place in a relaxing, magical jungle environment where players explore the island together to uncover treasures, collect items, and interact with non-threatening creatures. The game emphasizes collaboration and communication to achieve shared objectives and a positive experience. The design prioritizes accessibility, relaxation, and distraction to reduce pain and anxiety during early mobilization.

  • OtherStandard medical treatment

    Standard post-surgical care includes multimodal analgesia, parental presence (if desired), and routine reassurance practices.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment Rate

    Recruitment feasibility using a participant recruitment log. All eligible children will be approached for the study. The target is that at least 50% of participants agree to participate.

    Time frame: Through study completion, around one week.

  2. Completion Rate

    Protocol feasibility assessed using case report form (CRF) documentation. The procedure will be considered feasible if 90% of participants successfully complete the study procedures and assessments.

    Time frame: Through study completion, around one week

  3. Acceptability of IVR among patients and HCP

    This will be assessed using the Treatment Acceptability \& Preference (TAP), a 5- point Likert scale (0="not at all" and 4= "very much"), by both HCP and children and through interview feedback (qualitative).

    Time frame: Post-intervention (immediately after returning to bed following mobilization)

  4. Satisfaction regarding VR intervention

    Children's and HCPs' satisfaction levels will be assessed using a 0-10 Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS), with 0 = low and 10 = high.

    Time frame: This will be measured post-intervention (immediately after returning to bed following mobilization), and 14 days post-operative.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Child Pain

    Pain measured using the 0-10 Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS), where 0="no pain" and 10="worst pain".

    Time frame: This will be assessed at baseline (T0), after mobilization, before starting VR game (T1), before repositioning to bed (T2), & post-intervention (immediately after returning to bed following mobilization, T3), on day 1.

  2. Children's anxiety

    Measured using an adapted 0-10 Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS), with 0 = low and 10 = high.

    Time frame: This will be assessed at baseline (T0), after mobilization, before starting VR game (T1), before repositioning to bed (T2), and post-intervention (immediately after returning to bed following mobilization, T3), on day 1.

  3. Time tolerated in the armchair (minutes)

    The duration of time that the child tolerates mobilization in the armchair will be measured.

    Time frame: This will be assessed before repositioning to bed (T2), on day 1.

  4. Administration of narcotic analgesics

    Administration of narcotic analgesics before and after the chair mobilizations and in the following subsequent 2 hours.

    Time frame: This will be assessed at baseline (T0), after mobilization, before starting VR game (T1), before repositioning to bed (T2), post-intervention (immediately after returning to bed following mobilization, T3) and in the subsequent 2 hours, on day 1.

  5. Side effects

    Side effects in both groups at all time points.

    Time frame: This will be assessed at baseline (T0), after mobilization, before starting VR game (T1), before repositioning to bed (T2), & post-intervention (immediately after returning to bed following mobilization, T3), on day 1.

06

Study locations

1 site
  • St. Justine's Hospital
    Montreal, Quebec H1T 3C5, Canada
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Miller MT, Stephen, Miller's Review of Orthopaedics, 8th ed: Elsevier 2019.
  • SRS. Adloescent Idiopathic Scoliosis 2022 USA: Scoliosis Research Society; [Available from: SRS.org.
  • de Seze M, Cugy E. Pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis: a review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2012 Mar;55(2):128-38. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Jan 27. English, French. PubMed 22321868 ↗
  • Kikanloo SR, Tarpada SP, Cho W. Etiology of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Literature Review. Asian Spine J. 2019 Jun;13(3):519-526. doi: 10.31616/asj.2018.0096. Epub 2019 Feb 13. PubMed 30744305 ↗
  • Konieczny MR, Senyurt H, Krauspe R. Epidemiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop. 2013 Feb;7(1):3-9. doi: 10.1007/s11832-012-0457-4. Epub 2012 Dec 11. PubMed 24432052 ↗
  • Weinstein SL. The Natural History of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2019 Jul;39(Issue 6, Supplement 1 Suppl 1):S44-S46. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001350. PubMed 31169647 ↗
  • Bao H, Shu S, Yan P, Liu S, Liu Z, Zhu Z, Qian B, Qiu Y. Fifteen Years and 2530 Patients: The Evolution of Instrumentation, Surgical Strategies, and Outcomes in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in a Single Institution. World Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;120:e24-e32. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.07.054. Epub 2018 Jul 17. PubMed 30026141 ↗
  • Horne JP, Flannery R, Usman S. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2014 Feb 1;89(3):193-8. PubMed 24506121 ↗
  • Bailey KM, Howard JJ, El-Hawary R, Chorney J. Pain Trajectories Following Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Correction: Analysis of Predictors and Functional Outcomes. JB JS Open Access. 2021 Apr 30;6(2):e20.00122. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00122. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun. PubMed 34056507 ↗
  • Chidambaran V, Ding L, Moore DL, Spruance K, Cudilo EM, Pilipenko V, Hossain M, Sturm P, Kashikar-Zuck S, Martin LJ, Sadhasivam S. Predicting the pain continuum after adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery: A prospective cohort study. Eur J Pain. 2017 Aug;21(7):1252-1265. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1025. Epub 2017 Mar 27. PubMed 28346762 ↗
  • Anastasio AT, Farley KX, Rhee JM. Depression and anxiety as emerging contributors to increased hospital length of stay after posterior spinal fusion in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. N Am Spine Soc J. 2020 Jun 14;2:100012. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2020.100012. eCollection 2020 Aug. PubMed 35141583 ↗
  • Rullander AC, Isberg S, Karling M, Jonsson H, Lindh V. Adolescents' experience with scoliosis surgery: a qualitative study. Pain Manag Nurs. 2013 Mar;14(1):50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.07.005. Epub 2010 Sep 9. PubMed 23452527 ↗
  • Dong SW, Yang L, Lin YF, Yang LW, Li D, Zhu LW, Zhang CY, Li YZ, Wang WX, Lu CY, Yan B. Sex and age differences in depression and anxiety networks among adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: A network analysis. World J Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 19;15(3):102790. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i3.102790. eCollection 2025 Mar 19. PubMed 40110004 ↗
  • Perry M, Sieberg CB, Young EE, Baumbauer K, Singh V, Wong C, Starkweather A. The Potential Role of Preoperative Pain, Catastrophizing, and Differential Gene Expression on Pain Outcomes after Pediatric Spinal Fusion. Pain Manag Nurs. 2021 Feb;22(1):44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.05.007. Epub 2020 Aug 6. PubMed 32771349 ↗
  • Collis RW, Dry T, Chan G, Lim P, Oswald T. Sex related difference in postoperative pain and opioid use following posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2024 May;12(3):711-715. doi: 10.1007/s43390-024-00826-x. Epub 2024 Feb 8. PubMed 38329603 ↗
  • Montgomery EY, Pernik MN, Singh R, Eldridge CM, Schmitt KA, Khalid S, Nunna R, Caruso J, Johnson Z, Bagley CA, Adogwa O. Sex Differences in Postoperative Complications and Functional Status After Deformity Correction Surgery: Do Men Fare Better Than Women? World Neurosurg. 2021 Apr;148:e94-e100. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.12.051. Epub 2020 Dec 17. PubMed 33340724 ↗
  • Ahdoot ES, Fan J, Aminian A. Rapid Recovery Pathway for Postoperative Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Mar 10;5(3):e20.00220. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-20-00220. PubMed 33720057 ↗
  • Muhly WT, Sankar WN, Ryan K, Norton A, Maxwell LG, DiMaggio T, Farrell S, Hughes R, Gornitzky A, Keren R, McCloskey JJ, Flynn JM. Rapid Recovery Pathway After Spinal Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis. Pediatrics. 2016 Apr;137(4):e20151568. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1568. Epub 2016 Mar 23. PubMed 27009035 ↗
  • Dinter K, Bretschneider H, Zwingenberger S, Disch A, Osmers A, Vicent O, Thielemann F, Seifert J, Bernstein P. Accelerate postoperative management after scoliosis surgery in healthy and impaired children: intravenous opioid therapy versus epidural therapy. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Jan;143(1):301-309. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03972-3. Epub 2021 Jul 24. PubMed 34302521 ↗
  • Einhorn LM, Krishnan P, Poirier C, Ingelmo P. Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Children and Adolescents: A Call for Action. J Pain Res. 2024 May 29;17:1967-1978. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S464009. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38828088 ↗
  • Gadiya AD, Koch JEJ, Patel MS, Shafafy M, Grevitt MP, Quraishi NA. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): a meta-analysis and systematic review. Spine Deform. 2021 Jul;9(4):893-904. doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00310-w. Epub 2021 Mar 16. PubMed 33725329 ↗
  • Kalsotra S, Froass D, Gupta A, Amaya S, Tobias JD, Olbrecht VA. Virtual Reality for Pediatric Postoperative Pain Management: Exploring Methods and Efficacy. J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 7;27:e68348. doi: 10.2196/68348. PubMed 40774337 ↗
  • Sanchez-Caballero E, Ortega-Donaire L, Sanz-Martos S. Immersive Virtual Reality for Pain and Anxiety Management Associated with Medical Procedures in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review. Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 13;11(8):975. doi: 10.3390/children11080975. PubMed 39201910 ↗
  • Tas FQ, van Eijk CAM, Staals LM, Legerstee JS, Dierckx B. Virtual reality in pediatrics, effects on pain and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis update. Paediatr Anaesth. 2022 Dec;32(12):1292-1304. doi: 10.1111/pan.14546. Epub 2022 Sep 1. PubMed 35993398 ↗
  • Desai B, Newcomb N, Plost B, Waldron S, Sarkar K, Haber L. Virtual reality use in pediatric patients for orthopedic clinical procedures: A randomized prospective trial of efficacy. J Child Orthop. 2024 May 26;18(4):414-420. doi: 10.1177/18632521241254707. eCollection 2024 Aug. PubMed 39100983 ↗
  • Eijlers R, Utens EMWJ, Staals LM, de Nijs PFA, Berghmans JM, Wijnen RMH, Hillegers MHJ, Dierckx B, Legerstee JS. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Virtual Reality in Pediatrics: Effects on Pain and Anxiety. Anesth Analg. 2019 Nov;129(5):1344-1353. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004165. PubMed 31136330 ↗
  • Taylan S, Kilic KM, Ozkan I. Effects of virtual reality on pain, anxiety, and delirium in pediatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Surg Int. 2025 Jun 10;41(1):163. doi: 10.1007/s00383-025-06084-w. PubMed 40493088 ↗
  • Gornitzky AL, Flynn JM, Muhly WT, Sankar WN. A Rapid Recovery Pathway for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis That Improves Pain Control and Reduces Time to Inpatient Recovery After Posterior Spinal Fusion. Spine Deform. 2016 Jul;4(4):288-295. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jun 16. PubMed 27927519 ↗
  • Mannam P, Vazquez M, Mittelman D, Knapp E, Carpenter W, Lambert W, Koenig K, Astur R, Zempsky W, Lee M, Hersh DS. Implementation of Virtual Reality for Postoperative Recovery in an Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Population: A Prospective Pilot Study. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2026;61(2):154-161. doi: 10.1159/000550834. Epub 2026 Feb 3. PubMed 41632729 ↗
  • 35. Bachatene L. La scoliose idiopathique : solutions numériques pour la détection, le diagnostic et le suivi chez l'enfant et l'adolescent. May, 2025. Available from: https://www.bibliotheque.assnat.qc.ca/DepotNumerique_v2/AffichageFichier.aspx?idf=316248.
  • Armitage P, Berry G, Matthews JNS. Statistical Methods in Medical Research: Wiley; 2008.
  • Pea R. User Centred System Design-New Perspectives on Human/Computer Interaction. J Educ Comput Res. 1987;3.
  • Caserman P, Garcia-Agundez A, Gámez Zerban A, Göbel S. Cybersickness in current-generation virtual reality head-mounted displays: systematic review and outlook. Virtual Reality. 2021;25(4):1153-70.
  • Gold JI, SooHoo M, Laikin AM, Lane AS, Klein MJ. Effect of an Immersive Virtual Reality Intervention on Pain and Anxiety Associated With Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement in the Pediatric Setting: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2122569. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22569. PubMed 34432011 ↗
  • Hoffman HG, Patterson DR, Rodriguez RA, Pena R, Beck W, Meyer WJ. Virtual Reality Analgesia for Children With Large Severe Burn Wounds During Burn Wound Debridement. Front Virtual Real. 2020 Dec;1:602299. doi: 10.3389/frvir.2020.602299. Epub 2020 Dec 10. PubMed 33585833 ↗
  • Le May S, Hupin M, Khadra C, Ballard A, Paquin D, Beaudin M, Bouchard S, Cotes-Turpin C, Noel M, Guingo E, Hoffman HG, Dery J, Hung N, Perreault I. Decreasing Pain and Fear in Medical Procedures with a Pediatric Population (DREAM): A Pilot Randomized Within-Subject Trial. Pain Manag Nurs. 2021 Apr;22(2):191-197. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2020.10.002. Epub 2021 Jan 22. PubMed 33495093 ↗
  • Garrido LE, Frias-Hiciano M, Moreno-Jimenez M, Cruz GN, Garcia-Batista ZE, Guerra-Pena K, Medrano LA. Focusing on cybersickness: pervasiveness, latent trajectories, susceptibility, and effects on the virtual reality experience. Virtual Real. 2022;26(4):1347-1371. doi: 10.1007/s10055-022-00636-4. Epub 2022 Mar 1. PubMed 35250349 ↗
  • Golding JF. Motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire revised and its relationship to other forms of sickness. Brain Res Bull. 1998 Nov 15;47(5):507-16. doi: 10.1016/s0361-9230(98)00091-4. PubMed 10052582 ↗
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77-101.
  • Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook: SAGE Publications; 2018.
  • Thurston KL, Zhang SJ, Wilbanks BA, Billings R, Aroke EN. A Systematic Review of Race, Sex, and Socioeconomic Status Differences in Postoperative Pain and Pain Management. J Perianesth Nurs. 2023 Jun;38(3):504-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Dec 1. PubMed 36464570 ↗
  • Page MG, Stinson J, Campbell F, Isaac L, Katz J. Pain-related psychological correlates of pediatric acute post-surgical pain. J Pain Res. 2012;5:547-58. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S36614. Epub 2012 Nov 12. PubMed 23204864 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07737886
Lead sponsor
St. Justine's Hospital
Responsible party
Sylvie Le May (Principal Investigator, St. Justine's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 30, 2026
Start date
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 30, 2026

Study contacts

Sylvie Le May, PhD
Contact
sylvie.lemay@umontreal.ca
514-345-4931 ext. 4938

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion