ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07173231VR-HYSTEROUpdated Sep 21, 2026

Use of VR for Diagnostic Hysteroscopy

An interventional study of Immersive Virtual Reality Distraction (IVR) and Hypno-Virtual Reality Distraction (HVR) in Hysteroscopy, Anxiety and Pain, sponsored by St. Justine's Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.

Primary conditionPain, ProceduralRegistry: Anxiety DisordersReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Anxiety Disorders — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Pain, Procedural
Why
  1. The registry often attaches Anxiety Disorders to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it.
  2. The study's title name Pain, Procedural.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own title. Of 46 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 72% were exactly right and 89% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 4% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by St. Justine's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Background: Hysteroscopy (HSC) is a minimally invasive gynecological procedure that is considered to be the gold standard for diagnosing and treating intrauterine pathologies. In recent years, its use in outpatient settings for diagnosis has grown significantly due to its efficiency, low complication rate, and good patient acceptability. However, many patients still report significant pain and anxiety during the procedure. Despite advances in instrumentation and technique, pain remains a key reason for procedural failure, often worsened by preprocedural anxiety. While pharmacological strategies can be used to address this issue, they are not always suitable due to lack of effectiveness or feasibility. As a result, non-pharmacological approaches such as virtual reality (VR) and hypnosis are being increasingly explored.

Objective: This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary effects of immersive virtual reality (IVR) and Hypno-VR (HVR) in managing pain and anxiety during diagnostic HSC.

Methods: This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) will follow a three-arm parallel design to compare: 1- standard care, 2- IVR + standard care, and 3- HVR + standard care, during diagnostic HSC. A total of 45 participants (15/arm) will be recruited from the CHU Sainte-Justine's gynecology clinic and randomly assigned to one of the three groups. Primary outcomes will concern feasibility and acceptability including satisfaction of both patients and healthcare professionals. Secondary outcomes will assess self-reported pain and anxiety, physiological responses, procedure duration, procedure failure, and conversion rate from the "no-touch" vaginoscopy technique to traditional tools like the speculum and tenaculum. Demographic characteristics will also be explored as potential moderators of intervention effectiveness.

Results/Conclusion: This pilot study will provide preliminary data on the effects of IVR and HVR on procedural pain and anxiety during diagnostic HSC. It will also assess the feasibility and the acceptability of integrating these interventions into an outpatient setting. The findings will provide essential data in preparation for a larger clinical trial

02

Conditions studied

  • Hysteroscopy
  • Anxiety
  • Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • women's health
  • hysteroscopy
  • anxiety
  • procedural pain
03

In context

Pain, Procedural Reclassified

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Procedural; 64 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is below the median of 90 across 227 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Procedural.

Browse Pain, Procedural studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Justine's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 156 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Compared within Pain, Procedural, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Anxiety Disorders. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Minimum 18 years old
  • Speak and read French or English
  • Scheduled to undergo a diagnostic hysteroscopy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a diagnosis of epilepsy
  • Recent ophthalmologic surgery (\< 1month) or any ophtalmologic problems that could interfere with the patient's ability to use the VR technology
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Immersive Virtual Reality Distraction (IVR)

    Use of IVR during diagnostic hysteroscopy

    Device: Immersive Virtual Reality Distraction (IVR)

  • Experimental
    Hypno-Virtual Reality distraction (HVR)

    Use of HVR during diagnostic hysteroscopy

    Device: Hypno-Virtual Reality Distraction (HVR)

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care Treatment

    Standard protocol offered at CHU Ste-Justine's Hospital before a diagnostic hysteroscopy procedure

    Other: Usual Care Group

Interventions

  • DeviceImmersive Virtual Reality Distraction (IVR)

    The first experimental group will receive the INSPIRE® IVR intervention in addition to usual care. This intervention integrates immersive virtual environments with sensor-guided deep breathing techniques to engage the parasympathetic nervous system and promote relaxation. Within a calming forest environment, participants are guided to synchronize their breathing with the movement of a feather, encouraging breath control and relaxation.

  • DeviceHypno-Virtual Reality Distraction (HVR)

    The second experimental group will receive the HVR intervention in addition to usual care. This intervention, developed by HypnoVR, consists of a VR visual scenario combined with hypnotic verbal guidance specifically designed to reduce pain and anxiety during medical procedures.

  • OtherUsual Care Group

    The usual care group will only receive the standard preparation, which includes pre-treatment with Tylenol (1000mg) , Naproxen (500mg) and Ativan (1 mg) administered one hour prior to the procedure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Completion rate of the planned intervention

    Completion rate of the planned intervention will be assessed as the proportion of participants who complete their allocated intervention out of the total number of participants randomized.

    Time frame: To be reported at the end of the intervention, about 2 minutes after the end of the hysteroscopy procedure (T2)

  2. Recruitment rate

    Recruitment rate will be assessed as the proportion of patients who consent to participate out of the total number of HSC procedures performed.

    Time frame: To be reported right before the procedure, at baseline (T0)

  3. The healthcare professionals' satisfaction level

    The healthcare professionals' satisfaction level will be assessed using a customized questionnaire comprising 7-10 items, depending on the intervention used. Each item will be rated on a four-point Likert scale, ranging from "Strongly agree" to "Strongly disagree," evaluating their satisfaction with the intervention and its perceived impact on the procedure (T2).

    Time frame: To be reported at the end of the intervention, about 2 minutes after the end of the hysteroscopy procedure (T2)

  4. The patient's satisfaction level

    The patient's satisfaction level towards the intervention will be assessed using a Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "very dissatisfied" and 10 indicates "very satisfied." Patients will be asked the following question: "Considering anxiety relief, pain relief, side effects, and emotional recovery, how satisfied were you with the treatments you received during the procedure?" (T2).

    Time frame: To be reported at the end of the intervention, about 2 minutes after the end of the hysteroscopy procedure (T2)

  5. Patient's acceptability towards the intervention

    The patient's acceptability towards the intervention will be assessed using the Treatment Acceptability \& Preference (TAP) questionnaire: 10 questions (6 Likert-scale items from 0 to 4 and 4 open-ended questions). These questions focus on acceptability, satisfaction, ease of use, perceptions, and suggestions for improvement (T2).

    Time frame: To be reported at the end of the intervention, about 2 minutes after the end of the hysteroscopy procedure (T2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain intensity

    Pain intensity will be measured using the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS), a self-report scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 corresponds to the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Assessments will be conducted at baseline (T0), 2 minutes after the intervention (T2), and one week post-intervention (T3). The T3 assessment will be performed by a research assistant.

  2. Anxiety intensity

    Anxiety intensity will be assessed using a validated self-report scale (VNRS) ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 signifies no anxiety and 10 indicates the highest possible level of anxiety.

    Time frame: Measurements will be taken at baseline (T0), 2 minutes after the intervention (T2), and one week later (T3). The T3 evaluation will be conducted by a research assistant through the participant's preferred mode of communication.

  3. Change in heart rate

    Change in heart rate (beats per minute) will be measured by using COVIDIEN Nellcor pulse oxygen saturation meter, an approved and validated device (T0, T2).

    Time frame: Heart rate (beats per minute) will be measured right before the procedure, at baseline (T0) and about 2 minutes after the end of the hysteroscopy procedure (T2).

  4. Failure of hysteroscopy

    Failure of hysteroscopy will be assessed by recording the number of procedures that are not completed as intended or that require rescheduling.

    Time frame: To be reported during the procedure (T1)

  5. Required time for the procedure

    Required time for the procedure will be measured in minutes, starting from the insertion of the hysteroscope intravaginally to its removal, and will be recorded by the research nurse.

    Time frame: To be reported during the procedure (T1)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rousseaux F, Bicego A, Ledoux D, Massion P, Nyssen AS, Faymonville ME, Laureys S, Vanhaudenhuyse A. Hypnosis Associated with 3D Immersive Virtual Reality Technology in the Management of Pain: A Review of the Literature. J Pain Res. 2020 May 21;13:1129-1138. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S231737. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32547176 ↗
  • Lang EV, Benotsch EG, Fick LJ, Lutgendorf S, Berbaum ML, Berbaum KS, Logan H, Spiegel D. Adjunctive non-pharmacological analgesia for invasive medical procedures: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000 Apr 29;355(9214):1486-90. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02162-0. PubMed 10801169 ↗
  • Babbar S, Oyarzabal AJ. The Application of Hypnosis in Obstetrics. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Sep 1;64(3):635-647. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000635. PubMed 34323237 ↗
  • Cohen N, Nasra LA, Paz M, Kaufman Y, Lavie O, Zilberlicht A. Pain and anxiety management with virtual reality for office hysteroscopy: systemic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1127-1134. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07261-9. Epub 2023 Nov 2. PubMed 37917158 ↗
  • Sewell T, Fung Y, Al-Kufaishi A, Clifford K, Quinn S. Does virtual reality technology reduce pain and anxiety during outpatient hysteroscopy? A randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2023 Nov;130(12):1466-1472. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17550. Epub 2023 May 23. PubMed 37218438 ↗
  • Baradwan S, Alshahrani MS, AlSghan R, Alyafi M, Elsayed RE, Abdel-Hakam FA, Moustafa AA, Hussien AE, Yahia OS, Shama AA, Magdy AA, Abdelhakim AM, Badran H. The effect of virtual reality on pain and anxiety management during outpatient hysteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Apr;309(4):1267-1280. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07319-8. Epub 2024 Jan 2. PubMed 38165441 ↗
  • Deo N, Khan KS, Mak J, Allotey J, Gonzalez Carreras FJ, Fusari G, Benn J. Virtual reality for acute pain in outpatient hysteroscopy: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(1):87-95. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16377. Epub 2020 Jul 22. PubMed 32575151 ↗
  • Eijlers R, Utens EMWJ, Staals LM, de Nijs PFA, Berghmans JM, Wijnen RMH, Hillegers MHJ, Dierckx B, Legerstee JS. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Virtual Reality in Pediatrics: Effects on Pain and Anxiety. Anesth Analg. 2019 Nov;129(5):1344-1353. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004165. PubMed 31136330 ↗
  • Tas FQ, van Eijk CAM, Staals LM, Legerstee JS, Dierckx B. Virtual reality in pediatrics, effects on pain and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis update. Paediatr Anaesth. 2022 Dec;32(12):1292-1304. doi: 10.1111/pan.14546. Epub 2022 Sep 1. PubMed 35993398 ↗
  • Paulo AAS, Solheiro MHR, Paulo COS, Afreixo VMA. What proportion of women refers moderate to severe pain during office hysteroscopy with a mini-hysteroscope? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jan;293(1):37-46. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3836-5. Epub 2015 Aug 8. PubMed 26253336 ↗
  • Samy A, Nabil H, Abdelhakim AM, Mahy ME, Abdel-Latif AA, Metwally AA. Pain management during diagnostic office hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women: a randomized study. Climacteric. 2020 Aug;23(4):397-403. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1742685. Epub 2020 Apr 17. PubMed 32299254 ↗
  • Riemma G, Schiattarella A, Colacurci N, Vitale SG, Cianci S, Cianci A, De Franciscis P. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological pain relief for office hysteroscopy: an up-to-date review. Climacteric. 2020 Aug;23(4):376-383. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2020.1754388. Epub 2020 May 12. PubMed 32396751 ↗
  • Ghamry NK, Samy A, Abdelhakim AM, Elgebaly A, Ibrahim S, Ahmed AA, Abdelbaky WH, Abdallah KM, Badawy MA, Mohammed AH, Hamza M. Evaluation and ranking of different interventions for pain relief during outpatient hysteroscopy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2020 Jun;46(6):807-827. doi: 10.1111/jog.14221. Epub 2020 Feb 23. PubMed 32088931 ↗
  • Bracken O, Woodsmith A, Newell M. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for pain control in outpatient hysteroscopy: A systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Mar;306:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.004. Epub 2025 Jan 5. PubMed 39787964 ↗
  • Carta G, Palermo P, Marinangeli F, Piroli A, Necozione S, De Lellis V, Patacchiola F. Waiting time and pain during office hysteroscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 May-Jun;19(3):360-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.01.017. Epub 2012 Mar 3. PubMed 22387163 ↗
  • Law, J.Y.P. (2023). Pain relief in hysteroscopy. Hong Kong Journal of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Midwifery, 23(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjgom.23.1.08
  • Vitale SG, Alonso Pacheco L, Haimovich S, Riemma G, De Angelis MC, Carugno J, Lasmar RB, Di Spiezio Sardo A. Pain management for in-office hysteroscopy. A practical decalogue for the operator. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 Jan;50(1):101976. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101976. Epub 2020 Nov 6. PubMed 33166706 ↗
  • Vitale SG, Caruso S, Ciebiera M, Torok P, Tesarik J, Vilos GA, Cholkeri-Singh A, Gulino FA, Kamath MS, Cianci A. Management of anxiety and pain perception in women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Apr;301(4):885-894. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05460-2. Epub 2020 Mar 5. PubMed 32140807 ↗
  • de Campos BF, Benetti-Pinto CL, Yela DA. Nurse support for pain and anxiety control in women undergoing diagnostic hysteroscopy: a randomized clinical trial. Menopause. 2023 Sep 1;30(9):927-932. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002226. Epub 2023 Jul 25. PubMed 37490654 ↗
  • Estadella Tarriel J, Perello Capo J, Simo Gonzalez M, Bailon Queiruga M, Real Gatius J, Gomis-Pastor M, Marre D, Llurba Olive E. Effectiveness of Virtual Reality in Reducing Pain and Stress During Office Hysteroscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jan 12;13(2):131. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13020131. PubMed 39857158 ↗
  • Cicinelli E. Hysteroscopy without anesthesia: review of recent literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):703-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.07.003. PubMed 20955981 ↗
  • Coimbra AC, Falcao V, Pinto P, Cavaco-Gomes J, Fernandes AS, Martinho M. Predictive Factors of Tolerance in Office Hysteroscopy - a 3-Year Analysis from a Tertiary Center. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2023 Jan;45(1):38-42. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1764361. Epub 2023 Mar 6. PubMed 36878251 ↗
  • Amer-Cuenca JJ, Marin-Buck A, Vitale SG, La Rosa VL, Caruso S, Cianci A, Lison JF. Non-pharmacological pain control in outpatient hysteroscopies. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2020 Feb;29(1):10-19. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2019.1576054. Epub 2019 Feb 22. PubMed 30794005 ↗
  • Ignaszak-Kaus, N., Chmaj-Wierzchowska, K., Nowak, A., Wszolek, K., and Wilczak, M. (2022). An Overview of Outpatient Hysteroscopy. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology, 49(8), 181. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog4908181.
  • Guraslan H, Senturk MB, Dogan K, Yuksel B, Kaya C, Karacan T, Karabay Akgul O, Ceylan Y. Diagnostic office hysteroscopy; why is it still painful procedure despite the surgical experience and mini-hysteroscope? J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022 Jun;48(6):1418-1425. doi: 10.1111/jog.15219. Epub 2022 Mar 10. PubMed 35274418 ↗
  • Buzzaccarini G, Alonso Pacheco L, Vitagliano A, Haimovich S, Chiantera V, Torok P, Vitale SG, Lagana AS, Carugno J. Pain Management during Office Hysteroscopy: An Evidence-Based Approach. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 20;58(8):1132. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081132. PubMed 36013599 ↗
  • Bakour SH, Jones SE, O'Donovan P. Ambulatory hysteroscopy: evidence-based guide to diagnosis and therapy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006 Dec;20(6):953-75. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.06.004. Epub 2006 Nov 20. PubMed 17116420 ↗
  • Orlando MS, Bradley LD. Implementation of Office Hysteroscopy for the Evaluation and Treatment of Intrauterine Pathology. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep 1;140(3):499-513. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004898. Epub 2022 Aug 3. PubMed 35926213 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — According to our REB we are not allowed to share participants' data unless there is a clear Data Sharing Agreement between parties.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 10 months after the start.

Of 141 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Procedural, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 10 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 141 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 27, 2025
First posted
Sep 15, 2025
StartActual
Jul 8, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 2027
Last update
Sep 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 21, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07173231
Responsible party
Sylvie Le May (Principal investigator, St. Justine's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 15, 2025
Start date
Jul 8, 2026
Primary completion
May 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 21, 2026

Study contacts

Sylvie Le May PhD
Contact
sylvie.lemay@umontreal.ca
5143454931 ext. 4938
Sylvie Le May PhD
principal investigator · St. Justine's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion