ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07422766Updated Aug 7, 2026

Comparison of Non-Invasive Mean Arterial Blood Pressure Measurements at the Arm and Ankle During Elective Cesarean Delivery.

An observational study in Pregnancy, Cesarean Delivery and Blood Pressure Measurement in Pregnancy, sponsored by St. Justine's Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.

Sponsored by St. Justine's Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
110
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This observational study aims to compare mean arterial pressure measurements obtained using an ankle blood pressure cuff with those obtained using a standard upper-arm cuff in pregnant individuals undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. The primary objective is to determine the level of agreement between the two measurement sites.The main question[s] it aims to answer [is/are]:

Demonstrate that the mean arterial pressure is similar between arm and ankle with the blood pressure cuff

Every participant will be their own control. (Measurements will be taken at both sites on every participant)

Read the detailed description

Background Spinal anesthesia during elective cesarean delivery requires close monitoring of blood pressure to prevent maternal hypotension and decreased fetal perfusion. After birth, skin-to-skin contact offers several benefits, including improved well-being for the baby and support for breastfeeding initiation. The standard non-invasive blood pressure (BP) cuff on the arm can hinder comfortable and optimal positioning of the mother-infant dyad. This study aims to determine whether blood pressure measured by a non-invasive cuff on the ankle, five minutes after birth, is comparable to the standard measurement taken on the arm.

Objectives

Primary Objective:

Demonstrate a similar MAP between arm and ankle blood pressure measurements 5 minutes after birth

Secondary Objectives:

  • Difference in MAP between arm and ankle BP before neuraxial anesthesia, in the waiting room
  • Difference in MAP between arm and ankle BP five minutes after neuraxial anesthesia
  • Assess maternal comfort and ease of skin-to-skin contact with each BP cuff. Four yes/no questions will be asked postoperatively in the recovery room.

Methods 110 term pregnant women (35 weeks and over) scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia will be recruited. Each patient will have a non-invasive BP cuff on the arm and another on the ankle. BP will be measured simultaneously at both sites before entering the operating room, five minutes after spinal anesthesia, and five minutes after birth.

Study Design Prospective, controlled, observational.

Study Population Pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section with a single fetus of 35 weeks or more of gestational age.

Exclusion: Women with preeclampsia or gestational hypertension, preterm pregnancy (\< 35 weeks), urgent cesarean, cesarean under general anesthesia.

Sample Size 110 patients.

Study Duration 12 months.

Study Center Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHUSJ), Montreal, Quebec, CANADA.

Adverse Events Side effects of standard practice.

Hypothesis (Detailed) The investigators hypothesize that the use of the ankle BP cuff is a valid method for measuring blood pressure in elective cesarean section, meaning the MAP at the ankle will be equivalent to the MAP at the arm, five minutes after birth.

Objectives (Detailed)

Primary:

Assess equivalence between MAP measured by BP cuff at the arm and at the ankle five minutes after birth during elective cesarean under neuraxial anesthesia.

Secondary:

  • Equivalence of MAP between arm and ankle BP before neuraxial anesthesia, in the waiting room
  • Equivalence of MAP between arm and ankle BP five minutes after neuraxial anesthesia
  • Assess maternal comfort and ease of skin-to-skin application with each BP cuff. Four yes/no questions will be asked postoperatively in the recovery room :

    1. Did the arm BP cuff cause you discomfort or pain?
    2. Did the ankle BP cuff cause you discomfort or pain?
    3. Did the arm BP cuff limit your ability to hold your newborn as you wished?
    4. Did the ankle BP cuff limit your ability to hold your newborn as you wished?

Methodology Population The target population will be adult pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean at CHU Sainte-Justine. Eligibility will be determined by the inclusion and exclusion criteria below.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Women scheduled for elective cesarean under neuraxial anesthesia at CHU Sainte-Justine
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I-III
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Gestation ≥ 35 weeks
  • BMI \< 40
  • Able to consent in French or English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cesarean under general anesthesia
  • Multiple pregnancy
  • Prematurity \< 35 weeks gestation
  • Major fetal abnormalities
  • Morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40)
  • Active labor
  • Emergency cesarean
  • Prisoners
  • Peripheral vascular disease requiring medication or treatment
  • Hypertensive diseases requiring medication
  • Inability to place BP cuff on ankle (amputation, dysmorphism, etc.)
  • Complications requiring significant hemodynamic support (transfusions, inotropes, multiple vasopressors, etc.)

Outcomes BP will be the only clinical outcome. It will be measured simultaneously at different times at the arm (standard care) and left ankle (research objective).

  • Pre-spinal anesthesia: Supine with wedge under right hip in the operating room waiting area. BP taken twice; the average MAP will be considered baseline.
  • 5 min post-spinal anesthesia: With 15-degree left uterine tilt.
  • 5 min after birth: Primary objective. The arm BP cuff will be placed on the arm opposite the main peripheral IV, per standard practice. The leg BP cuff will be placed on the left ankle. Cuff size will be measured per AHA guidelines.

Co-interventions Neuraxial anesthesia will be administered per CHU Sainte-Justine standard practice by the attending anesthesiologist. Hypotension prevention will also follow standard practice. After spinal anesthesia, 1 liter of lactated Ringer's as a co-load and a phenylephrine infusion will be started. Phenylephrine will be titrated to keep MAP within normal limits for the patient (+/- 20% of baseline MAP from waiting room measurements). Clinical decisions will be based only on arm BP (standard), not ankle BP (research). Uterine atony prevention will follow standard practice and at the anesthesiologist's discretion. Shivering will be treated with 30 mcg IV dexmedetomidine after birth if shivering occurs. Fetal and neonatal monitoring will follow standard practices for elective cesarean at CHU Sainte-Justine.

Data Collection

MAP data will be collected using a standardized data collection form. The following data will also be collected:

  • Demographics: age, weight, height, gestational age, gravida, para, reason for cesarean
  • Systolic, diastolic, and mean BP before neuraxial anesthesia, 5 min after neuraxial anesthesia, and 5, 10, 15, 20 min after birth
  • Incidence of shivering
  • Incidence of shivering treated with dexmedetomidine
  • Yes/no responses to the four Drake 2013 questions postoperatively
  • Newborn Apgar score
  • Newborn weight

Statistical Analysis Maternal and newborn demographic parameters (e.g., age, weight, height, BMI, gravida and parity, gestational age, fetal morphology and weight, obstetric factors), clinical parameters (e.g., shivering, BP at different times) will be summarized using descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, median, quartile, frequencies, proportions). Categorical data will be presented as counts and proportions. The main analysis will compare the difference between the two MAP measurements taken five minutes after birth. A Bland-Altman analysis will estimate the mean bias and 95% limits of agreement, with 95% confidence intervals. A Deming regression will also estimate proportional bias, with 95% confidence intervals. Secondary analyses will include similar analyses for other time points. Additionally, a multivariable mixed linear regression model will assess the association between measurement differences and time, adjusted for confounding factors measured before surgery (age, fasting hours, weight). Random intercepts and slopes will be estimated for each patient.

Data collection and Analysis All the necessary information obtained throughout this research is considered confidential information and will be obtained by the investigators and will be secured in a locked drawer file and transcribed manually into an electronic secure data set (a secure Excel sheet) for data analysis that will only be accessible by the investigators. Data will be obtained directly from the patient, from their medical files (registry of CHU Sainte-Justine, Dossier Santé Québec, and other hospital files if necessary) and from the study. Only the investigators will perform data analyses, such as Bland-Altman analyses, and interpret the results. No adverse events are expected in this study, but the investigators will nonetheless monitor for possible bruising, skin damage, nerve damage, and blood clots (theoretically possible but not clinically observed) and will alert clinical caretakers if observed.

Sample Size Calculation Based on previous observations, the distribution of arm MAP is 78.3, SD 7.1. Preliminary work in a non-obstetric population of 250 patients found arm MAP of 96.34 ± 11.71 mmHg. Based on this data, the investigators postulate a mean difference of 0 and SD of 6. To observe 95% of differences within a 15 mmHg agreement limit at alpha 0.05 and 80% power, 108 patients are needed. The investigators will recruit 110 to account for possible measurement issues.

Ethical Considerations Recruitment Patients will be approached by their obstetrician during pregnancy follow-up regarding the existence of a research project. They will be met upon arrival in the operating room waiting area. Consent will be explained and obtained before surgery. The study's implications will be explained, and questions will be answered. It will be explained that consent will not affect their care. Patients may withdraw consent at any time and will then receive standard treatment.

Risks and Benefits

Expected Benefits:

This study offers no direct benefit to participants.

Risks:

No discomfort is expected for participants, as they will be treated per standard care, and the addition of an ankle BP cuff may only cause slight discomfort at the first measurement before neuraxial anesthesia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pregnancy
  • Cesarean Delivery
  • Blood Pressure Measurement in Pregnancy
  • Skin to Skin Contact

Keywords

  • blood pressure
  • Mean arterial pressure
  • pregnancy
  • cesarean
  • skin to skin
03

In context

Lead sponsor

St. Justine's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 156 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The target population will be adult pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery at CHU Sainte-Justine.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women scheduled for elective cesarean under neuraxial anesthesia at CHU Sainte-Justine.
  • Physical Status I-III
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • Gestation ≥ 35 weeks
  • \< 40
  • Able to consent in French or English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cesarean planned under general anesthesia.
  • Multiple pregnancy
  • Prematurity \< 35 weeks gestation
  • Major fetal anomalies
  • Morbid obesity ( ≥ 40)
  • Active labor
  • Emergency cesarean
  • Prisoners
  • Peripheral vascular disease requiring medication or treatment
  • Hypertensive diseases requiring medication
  • Inability to place blood pressure cuff on ankle (amputation, dysmorphism, etc.)
  • Complications requiring significant hemodynamic support (transfusions, inotropes, multiple vasopressors, etc.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
110 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Cesarean delivery patients

    Patients will have a blood pressure cuff on the arm and the ankle.

    Device: Mean arterial pressure

Interventions

  • DeviceMean arterial pressure

    Mean arterial pressure will be taken on the arm and on the ankle from the same patient and compared.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of mean arterial pressure taken by appropriately sized blood pressure cuffs between arm and ankle taken 5 min after birth.

    Comparison of mean arterial pressure taken by appropriately sized blood pressure cuffs between arm and ankle taken 5 min after birth. This is to measure the outcome at a time point compatible with skin-to-skin for the mother-baby dyad.

    Time frame: From enrollment (in the waiting room) to end of surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison in mean, systolic, diastolic arterial pressure taken by appropriately sized pressure cuffs between arm and ankle before neuraxial anesthesia, in the holding area.

    Comparison in mean arterial pressure taken by appropriately sized pressure cuffs between arm and ankle before neuraxial anesthesia, in the holding area. This is is to compare the blood pressure before any intervention was made, and to observe it a difference already exists.

    Time frame: From the waiting room to before neuraxial anesthesia

  2. Comparison of mean, systolic, diastolic arterial pressure taken by appropriately sized blood pressure cuffs between arm and ankle taken 5 min after neuraxial anesthesia.

    Comparison of mean, systolic, diastolic arterial pressure taken by appropriately sized blood pressure cuffs between arm and ankle taken 5 min after neuraxial anesthesia. This is to evaluate if the two measurements are comparable when under neuraxial anesthesia with a vasopressor infusion.

    Time frame: 5 min after neuraxial anesthesia

  3. Comparison in mean, systolic, diastolic arterial pressure taken by appropriately sized pressure cuffs between arm and ankle 10, 15, 20 minutes after birth.

    Comparison in mean, systolic, diastolic arterial pressure taken by appropriately sized pressure cuffs between arm and ankle 10, 15, 20 minutes after birth. This is to determine if the blood pressure is comparable between arm and ankle for several time points after birth.

    Time frame: 10, 15, 20 minutes after birth

  4. Assess maternal comfort and ease of skin-to-skin application with each blood pressure cuff (on the ankle and on the arm)

    Assess maternal comfort and ease of skin-to-skin application with each blood pressure cuff (on the ankle and on the arm) with a questionnaire containing these questions : 1. Did the arm BP cuff cause you discomfort or pain? 2. Did the ankle BP cuff cause you discomfort or pain? 3. Did the arm BP cuff limit your ability to hold your newborn as you wished? 4. Did the ankle BP cuff limit your ability to hold your newborn as you wished?

    Time frame: From enrollment in the waiting room to end of surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Drake MJ, Hill JS. Observational study comparing non-invasive blood pressure measurement at the arm and ankle during caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2013 May;68(5):461-6. doi: 10.1111/anae.12194. Epub 2013 Mar 11. PubMed 23480469 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — A researcher can contact me if needed.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 9 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 13, 2026
First posted
Feb 20, 2026
StartActual
Feb 26, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Aug 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07422766
Collaborators
Université de Montréal
Responsible party
Valerie Zaphiratos (Associate Professor of Anesthesiology, St. Justine's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2026
Start date
Feb 26, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2026

Study contacts

Valerie Zaphiratos, MD, MSc, FRCPC, Anesthesiology
Contact
valerie@zaphiratos.ca
15143454931 ext. 4733
Marc Leclerc, MD
Contact
marc.leclerc.3@umontreal.ca
15143454931 ext. 4733
Valerie Zaphiratos
principal investigator · St. Justine's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion