ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07726082CHOOSE-POCUpdated Aug 18, 2026

Micro-choice-based Intervention for Multicausal Fatigue

An interventional study of Micro-choice-based intervention in Multicausal Fatigue, Fatigue and Post COVID Condition, sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland. Recruiting at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-18.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 32 studies in Fatigue with a site in Switzerland — 6 open to participants now, 8 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Fatigue · Switzerland.

Planned enrollment
14th of 18
24 · median 69
Started
2026
with 3 others
No phase
8 of 32
2 open now
Registered
30th of 32
by date
Lead sponsor
2 of 32
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Among the 32 studies in Fatigue with a site in Switzerland, this one is the 14th largest by planned enrollment of the 18 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 4 that started in 2026, is one of 8 with no phase, and was the 30th registered.

Fatigue

2,232 studies on the registry are indexed under Fatigue; 428 are open to participants now.

Browse Fatigue studies →

Open to participants now

6 of the 32 studies in Fatigue with a site in Switzerland are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 6 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Switzerland have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Switzerland →

Who these studies take

Of the 240 Fatigue studies recruiting now, 111 (46%) set no upper age limit and 99 (41%) stop at 75 or younger; 23 take children under 18; 73 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 65 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 32 studies in Fatigue with a site in Switzerland, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This proof-of-concept study aims to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and potential benefits of a novel multimodal approach: the micro-choice-based intervention.

Read the detailed description

The intervention of this study includes a preparation phase, a four-day intensive group treatment, and a follow-up phase to support the integration of new behaviors into daily life. As no comparable program currently exists in Switzerland, this project addresses a significant gap in care. If found to be feasible, the intervention has the potential to improve quality of life, support reintegration into daily and professional activities, and reduce the risk of disability and long-term work incapacity, thereby also contributing to lower healthcare costs.

03

Conditions studied

  • Multicausal Fatigue
  • Fatigue
  • Post COVID Condition
  • Long COVID Syndrome
  • Postviral Fatigue

Keywords

  • neuroplastic therapy
  • group intervention
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- Experiencing persistent fatigue with a significant impact on daily functioning (Chalder Fatigue- Scale bimodal ≥ 4)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have insufficient proficiency in German to complete study-related questionnaires
  • Lack the cognitive capacity to understand study procedures (e.g. due to dementia)
  • Present with severe medical conditions that may interfere with participation (e.g., advanced organ failure, uncontrolled inflammatory or diseases, or severe psychiatric disorders)
  • Have active cancer or are currently undergoing cancer treatment
  • Are deemed incompatible with group participation during the preparation phase, based on a team assessment. Reasons for exclusion based on group incompatibility include:

    1. Need for a level of individual therapeutic support that exceeds what can be provided in a group setting; b) Refusal to engage in group-based therapy; c) Personality traits that are considered incompatible with group dynamics; d) Failure to attend the mandatory preparatory webinar (no-show is considered a no-go); e) Other significant reasons as determined by the therapeutic team)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention Arm

    Behavioral: Micro-choice-based intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralMicro-choice-based intervention

    The intervention consists of three phases: (1) a preparation phase including a preparatory webinar about the concept of micro-choices; active decision to participate; (2) a concentrated four-day group intervention based on the micro-choice model, delivered by an interdisciplinary team (psychosomatics, internal medicine, physiotherapy, occupational therapy); and (3) a follow-up phase over three weeks, during which participants are supported in integrating behavioral changes into everyday life through digital self-monitoring and an individual follow-up consultation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Retention rate

    defined as the percentage of participants who complete all phases of the study. To assess this, the investigators will evaluate: * Dropout rates at different phases of the study: preparation, concentrated intervention and follow up * Completion rates within each phase to identify potential barriers to adherence and engagement

    Time frame: up to 6 month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be assessed using the ZUF-8 (Fragebogen zur Messung der Patientenzufriedenheit), the validated German version of the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8). Items are answered on a 4-point scale. Scores are summed across items once. Some items are reverse scored. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: up to 6 month

  2. Fatigue

    Fatigue is assessed by the 11-item Chalder Fatigue Scale (46), e.g. by asking "Do you have difficulty concentrating?". Items are answered on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 = "Better than usual" to 3 = "much worse than usual".

    Time frame: up to 6 month

  3. Somatic Symptom Severity

    The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-15; 34) assesses somatic symptom severity during the past 4 weeks. Patients are asked how impaired they felt by their symptoms, e.g. back pain. Items are answered on a 3-point scale ranging from 0 = "not bothered at all" to 2 = "bothered a lot".

    Time frame: up to 6 month

  4. Somatic Distress

    The Somatic Symptom Disorder Questionnaire (SSD-12; 35) assesses psychological features of somatic disorders, e.g. catastrophizing thoughts and health anxiety, e.g. with the statement "I think that my physical symptoms are signs of a serious illness". Items are answered on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 = "never" to 4 = "very often".

    Time frame: up to 6 month

  5. Depressive Symptoms

    The 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8; 36) assesses the severity of depressive disorders. Patients are asked if in the past weeks, they were bothered by a problem, e.g. by having little interest or pleasure in doing things. Items are answered on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 = "not at all" to 3 = "nearly every day".

    Time frame: up to 6 month

  6. Anxiety Symptoms

    Anxiety is assessed with the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire (GAD-7; 44). It assesses if the patient was bothered by complaints related to anxiety during the past 2 weeks, e.g. by asking about having trouble to relax. Items are answered on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 = "not at all" to 3 = "nearly every day".

    Time frame: up to 6 month

  7. Functional capacity

    The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) assesses and classifies disability due to health problems during the past 4 weeks. This study will utilize the 12-item version. An example item would be "In the past 4 weeks, how much difficulty did you have in walking a long distance such as a kilometer (or equivalent)?". Items are answered on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 = "none" to 4 = "extreme or cannot do".

    Time frame: up to 6 month

  8. Change in Quality of life

    As a measure of life quality, the EuroHIS Quality-of-Life-8 (QOL-8; 42) will be used. This 8-item instrument assesses quality of life and perceived health during the past 4 weeks, e.g. by asking "Do you have enough energy for everyday life?". Items are answered on a 5-point scale, with wording differing between questions (e.g., from "very dissatisfied" to "very satisfied").

    Time frame: up to 6 month

  9. Work ability

    assessed via questionnaires: at full work, at partial work, not at work.

    Time frame: up to 6 month

  10. Work and Social Adjustment

    Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS;(38) ) assesses functional impairment attributable to a health condition in key areas of daily life, including work, home management, social and private leisure activities, and close relationships. An example item is "Because of my illness, my ability to work is impaired." Items are rated on a 9-point scale ranging from 0 = "not at all impaired" to 8 = "very severely impaired". Higher total scores indicate greater functional impairment.

    Time frame: up to 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 12 months after the start.

Of 936 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Fatigue, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 27. This study's planned 12 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 989 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 27.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 21, 2026
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
StartActual
Aug 13, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2027
CompletionEst.
Aug 2027
Last update
Aug 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07726082
Collaborators
Kämpf- Bötschi Stiftung, propatient Forschungsstiftung
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 24, 2026
Start date
Aug 13, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 18, 2026

Study contacts

Katrin Bopp, Dr.
Contact
katrin.bopp@usb.ch
+41 61 265 50 05
Katrin Bopp, Dr.
principal investigator · University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion