CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07718646Updated Jul 22, 2026

Mobile Health Coping Intervention for Mothers Experiencing Food Insecurity

An interventional study of MOMent in Food Insecurity, sponsored by Oklahoma State University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-22.

Sponsored by Oklahoma State University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a pilot study testing a mobile app that is designed to help mothers experiencing food insecurity manage stress and build coping skills. Participants will use the app for 8 weeks and complete surveys about their experiences, mental health, and coping. The study will help us learn whether the app is helpful and feasible for future research.

Read the detailed description

This is a single-arm pilot study enrolling mothers experiencing food insecurity. Because this is a pilot feasibility study, no comparison group is included. Eligible participants will complete baseline assessments before beginning the intervention, including measures of food security, mental health symptoms, coping strategies, and related psychosocial factors. Participants will then complete an eight-week fully mHealth-based intervention using the Univeristy of Oklahoma Insight mHealth mobile application.

Throughout the intervention, participants will receive 3 daily messages focused on building coping skills, managing stress, and supporting mental well-being. The app includes educational modules, goal-setting activities, coping exercises, daily check-ins, and supportive messages. Participants will engage with the app at their own pace and will receive brief assessments and messages throughout the intervention period.

After completing the eight-week intervention, participants will complete post-intervention assessments to evaluate changes in mental health, coping, and intervention acceptability and feasibility. A subset of participants will also be invited to complete a follow-up interview to provide feedback on their experiences using the app, including facilitators and barriers to engagement.

This pilot study will provide preliminary information on the feasibility, acceptability, and potential efficacy of a cognitive behavioral therapy-informed mHealth intervention to support mental health among mothers experiencing food insecurity.

02

Conditions studied

  • Food Insecurity

Keywords

  • Food Insecurity
  • Mental Health
  • Mobile Applications
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
  • Stress, Psychological
  • Mothers
  • Depression
  • Anxiety
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Reside in Oklahoma
  • Identify as a woman or non-binary
  • At least 18 years old
  • Have a child under 18 years old living in your household
  • Experienced food insecurity in the past 30 days

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently undergoing mental health counseling
  • No access to a smartphone (Apple or Android)
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    mHealth app

    Mobile phone-delivered content focused on building coping skills, managing stress, and supporting mental well-being among mothers experiencing food insecurity.

    Behavioral: MOMent

Interventions

  • BehavioralMOMent

    An 8-week behavioral intervention delivered through a mobile application that combines multiple behavior change techniques, including coping education, self-monitoring, goal setting, and skill-building reflections The intervention is designed to help participants develop and practice coping strategies to manage stress and improve mental well-being.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment feasibility

    Percentage (%) of eligible individuals who enroll in the study among all individuals determined eligible through the screening survey. Higher percentages indicate greater recruitment feasibility.

    Time frame: Evaluated throughout recruitment and at completion of the recruitment period

  2. Intervention retention

    Percentage (%) of enrolled participants who complete the post-intervention assessment. Higher percentages indicate greater retention.

    Time frame: Measured from enrollment through completion of post-intervention data collection (8 weeks)

  3. App Engagement

    Intervention engagement assessed using Insight application analytics, including number of intervention messages opened, number of weekly goal-setting activities completed, and interactions with intervention content. Greater values indicate higher engagement.

    Time frame: Measured throughout the 8-week intervention period

  4. Usability

    Systems Usability Scale (SUS) total score (range 0-100). Higher scores indicate greater usability; scores \>68 indicate above-average usability.

    Time frame: Measured at post-intervention (8 weeks)

  5. Participant Acceptability

    Program satisfaction assessed using investigator-developed 5-point Likert-scale items evaluating intervention acceptability. Mean scores range from 1-5, with higher scores indicate greater acceptability.

    Time frame: Measured at post-intervention (8 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Food Security Status

    USDA 18-item Household Food Security Survey Module (HFSSM) raw score assessing household, adult, and child food security over the previous 30 days. Scores range from 0-18, with higher scores indicate greater food insecurity.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and post intervention (8 weeks)

  2. Cognitive Functioning

    Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive Function Short Form and PROMIS Cognitive Function Abilities Short Form 6a T-scores assessing perceived cognitive functioning. T scores have an average of 50, and 10 is one standard deviation. Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and post intervention (8 weeks)

  3. Anxiety Symptoms

    Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) total score (range 0-21). Higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptom severity.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and post intervention (8 weeks)

  4. Depressive Symptoms

    Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) total score (range 0-27). Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and post intervention (8 weeks)

  5. Coping Behaviors

    Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Inventory (Brief COPE) questionnaire scores assessing coping quantity and coping style. Scores are calculated according to the Brief COPE scoring protocol; higher scores indicate greater use of each coping strategy. Mean scores range from 1 to 4.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and post intervention (8 weeks)

  6. Diet Quality

    Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) score are the output from the National Cancer Institute Diet History Questionnaire III (DHQ III) survey. Higher scores indicate better overall diet quality (score range: 0-100).

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and post intervention (8 weeks)

  7. Food resource management

    A subset of problem-focused coping, food resource management, will be assessed with an adapted version of items from the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program (EFNEP) questionnaire. Scores range from Never (0) to Always (5), with higher mean scores indicating more food resource management behaviors.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks).

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Oklahoma State University
    Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, United States
    Recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07718646
Lead sponsor
Oklahoma State University
Responsible party
RachelLiebe (Assistant Professor, Oklahoma State University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 22, 2026
Start date
Jul 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 22, 2026

Study contacts

Rachel Liebe
Contact
rachel.liebe@okstate.edu
405-744-5043

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion