ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07713329Updated Jul 20, 2026

Chemical vs Mechanical Pleural Adhesiolysis for Liberation of Captive Pleura in Stacked Effusion

A Phase 2 interventional study of Intrapleural Hydrogen Peroxide (H_2O_2) and Intrapleural Corticosteroids in Pleural Infection, Pleural Adhesions and Pleural Effusion, sponsored by Delta University for Science and Technology. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 62 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-20.

Sponsored by Delta University for Science and Technology · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2026, registered Jun 2026).
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 62 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiological efficacy of chemical pleural adhesiolysis (using either intrapleural 3% hydrogen peroxide or intrapleural corticosteroids) versus mechanical pleural adhesiolysis (via medical thoracoscopy) in patients with non-malignant, complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE).

Complicated pleural effusions often lead to the formation of fibrinous septa and adhesions, which impair drainage and prevent lung re-expansion. Standard interventions like tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and DNase can be costly and limited in resource-constrained settings, while thoracoscopic mechanical pleurolysis requires specialized expertise and equipment.

The investigators aim to evaluate whether chemical adhesiolysis using accessible, cost-effective agents (hydrogen peroxide or steroids) can offer a comparable and reliable alternative to thoracoscopic mechanical disruption of septa. Efficacy will be assessed using a novel composite clinical and radiological efficiency score evaluated seven days post-procedure.

Read the detailed description

This is a parallel-group, open-label, single-blinded (radiological and ultrasonographic assessors), pilot randomized controlled clinical trial conducted at the Chest Medicine Department, Mansoura University Hospital.

A total of 36 eligible adult patients (aged 18-62 years) presenting with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion requiring pleurolytic intervention will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into one of three treatment arms (12 patients per arm):

  • Group A (Hydrogen Peroxide-Mediated Pleurolysis): Patients will receive intrapleural instillation of 250-300 mL of 3% hydrogen peroxide (diluted with sterile saline) via an existing intercostal drain after the initial drainage phase. The tube will be clamped for 4-6 hours while the patient alternates positions (supine and lateral decubitus) to optimize distribution. This protocol will be repeated 24 hours later for a total of two sessions.
  • Group B (Steroid-Mediated Pleurolysis): Patients will receive intrapleural instillation of either Dexamethasone 8 mg or Triamcinolone acetonide 0.3-0.6 mg/kg (approximately 80 mg), diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 250-300 mL via the intercostal drain.

Clamping, positional rotation, and dosing intervals (two sessions 24 hours apart) will be identical to Group A.

● Group C (Thoracoscopic Mechanical Pleurolysis): Patients will undergo medical thoracoscopy under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. This involves direct visual exploration of the pleural cavity, mechanical disruption of fibrinous septa/adhesions, evacuation of loculated fluid, and subsequent placement of an intercostal drain.

Assessments will be conducted at baseline (pre-intervention) and at 7 days post-procedure to evaluate treatment response:

  1. CT Volumetry (128-slice multidetector CT) will quantify affected lung volume and percentage of improvement.
  2. Chest Ultrasonography (B-mode and M-mode) will measure fractional pleural thickness reduction and diaphragmatic excursion.

The primary outcome will be evaluated using a 0-6 point composite clinical/radiological efficiency score at day 7, combining lung volumetric improvement, diaphragmatic excursion, pleural thickness reduction, drained fluid volume, and resolution of effusion complexity. Patients who fail chemical pleurolysis (Group A or B) will be offered crossover to mechanical pleurolysis as a rescue intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pleural Infection
  • Pleural Adhesions
  • Pleural Effusion
  • Pleural Empyema

Keywords

  • Medical Thoracoscopy
  • Pleural Effusion
  • Empyema
  • Adhesiolysis
  • Pleural Decortication
  • Pleurolysis
  • Pleural Adhesions
03

In context

Pleural Effusion

241 studies on the registry are indexed under Pleural Effusion; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 80 across 142 interventional studies indexed under Pleural Effusion.

Browse Pleural Effusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Delta University for Science and Technology is the lead sponsor of 86 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 62 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

-

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient age between 18 and 62 years inclusive.
  2. Presence of a unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion (CPPE) requiring pleurolytic intervention.
  3. Imaging-confirmed pleural loculation on chest ultrasonography or computed tomography (CT).
  4. Pleural fluid biochemical or microbiological indicators of complicated effusion, defined by at least one of the following: pleural fluid pH \< 7.2, glucose \< 60 mg/dL, and/or a positive Gram stain or culture.
  5. Absolute histopathological or cytological exclusion of malignant and tuberculous pleural disease prior to enrollment (verified via closed pleural and/or image-guided pleural biopsy based on clinical presentation).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Confirmed malignant pleural effusion or features highly suggestive of (e.g., pleural nodularity, circumferential pleural thickening > 10 mm, mediastinal pleural involvement, or associated pulmonary masses) not yet fully evaluated.
  2. Tuberculous pleural effusion.
  3. Transudative pleural effusion.
  4. Frozen chest syndrome or chronic trapped lung.
  5. Pregnancy.
  6. Known bleeding diathesis or uncorrected coagulopathy.
  7. Patient refusal or inability to provide written .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: Hydrogen Peroxide-Mediated Pleurolysis

    Participants with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion randomized to receive intrapleural 3% hydrogen peroxide instilled via an existing intercostal drain.

    Drug: Intrapleural Hydrogen Peroxide (H_2O_2)

  • Experimental
    Group B: Steroid-Mediated Pleurolysis

    Participants with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion randomized to receive intrapleural corticosteroids (dexamethasone or triamcinolone acetonide) instilled via an existing intercostal drain.

    Drug: Intrapleural Corticosteroids

  • Experimental
    Group C: Thoracoscopic Mechanical Pleurolysis

    Participants with unilateral complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion randomized to undergo medical thoracoscopy for direct vision-guided mechanical disruption of fibrinous septa and adhesions.

    Procedure: Thoracoscopic Mechanical Pleurolysis

Interventions

  • DrugIntrapleural Hydrogen Peroxide (H_2O_2)

    Diluted pharmaceutical-grade 3% hydrogen peroxide solution. A total volume of 250-300 mL is instilled via an intercostal chest tube (accounting for tube dead space to deliver approximately 250 mL directly into the pleural cavity). Administered in 2 sessions, spaced 24 hours apart, with a 4-6 hour chest tube clamping window per session.

  • DrugIntrapleural Corticosteroids

    Administered via an existing intercostal drain. Corticosteroid agent used is either Dexamethasone 8 mg or Triamcinolone acetonide 0.3-0.6 mg/kg (approximately 80 mg), diluted in normal saline to a total volume of 250-300 mL. Administered in 2 sessions, spaced 24 hours apart, with a 4-6 hour chest tube clamping window per session.

  • ProcedureThoracoscopic Mechanical Pleurolysis

    Performed under local anesthesia and conscious sedation. Involves medical thoracoscopy for direct vision-guided mechanical disruption of fibrinous septa and adhesions, evacuation of loculations, and placement of an intercostal drain.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Composite Radiological Efficiency Score

    Treatment efficiency is evaluated using a study-defined composite clinical/radiological score ranging from 0 to 6. The score integrates 5 domains: (1) Lung volumetric improvement, (2) Diaphragmatic excursion improvement, (3) Pleural thickness reduction, and (4) Drained pleural fluid volume. For these first four domains, a percentage change/improvement from baseline equals or more than 30% is assigned 1 point, while a change \< 30% is assigned 0 points. The 5th domain is Effusion complexity, scored sonographically as: septated = 0, complex = 1, and simple = 2. Higher total scores indicate a greater pleurolytic response, with treatment success classified as a total score equals or more than 5.

    Time frame: 7 days post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Delta university for science and technology
    Gamasa, 1234, Egypt
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in the final published manuscript (including text, tables, and figures) will be made available to qualified medical researchers to facilitate secondary academic reviews or meta-analyses.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Data will become available beginning 6 months after publication of the main trial results and will remain accessible for up to 36 months.

Access criteria: IPD will be shared upon reasonable formal request directed to the principal investigator. Requests must include a methodologically sound research proposal and a signed data access agreement to ensure ethical compliance.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2026 to primary completion in Jun 2026, 3 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 28, 2026
First posted
Jul 20, 2026
StartActual
Mar 26, 2026
Primary completionActual
Jun 27, 2026
CompletionActual
Jun 27, 2026
Last update
Jul 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07713329
Lead sponsor
Delta University for Science and Technology
Responsible party
Amir Soliman (Associate professor, Delta University for Science and Technology) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 20, 2026
Start date
Mar 26, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 27, 2026
Completion
Jun 27, 2026
Last update
Jul 20, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion