ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07875751Updated Oct 15, 2026

Effectiveness of Sensorimotor Proprioceptive Stimulation Combined With Conventional Physical Therapy on Symptoms, Sensory Function, Proprioception, and Hand Function in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

An interventional study of sensorimotor proprioceptive stimulation and conventional physical therapy in Carpel Tunnel Syndrome, sponsored by Delta University for Science and Technology. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-15.

Sponsored by Delta University for Science and Technology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 15, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial will evaluate whether adding sensorimotor proprioceptive stimulation to conventional physiotherapy improves symptoms and hand function in patients with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome. The primary outcome is change in the Boston Symptom Severity Scale, while secondary outcomes include functional status, pain, paresthesia, nerve conduction, median-nerve morphology, proprioception, and hand strength.

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled trial will investigate whether adding sensorimotor proprioceptive stimulation to conventional physical therapy improves symptoms, sensory function, proprioception, and hand function in adults with mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving sensorimotor proprioceptive stimulation plus conventional physical therapy or a control group receiving conventional physical therapy alone. The intervention will target sensory awareness, wrist and hand joint-position control, median-nerve function, coordination, and functional hand use.

Experimental Intervention

The experimental group will receive a structured program involving:

Wrist and hand joint-position-reproduction exercises.

Visual and nonvisual proprioceptive training.

Controlled wrist, thumb, and finger movements.

Tendon-gliding and median-nerve-gliding exercises.

Graded tactile and sensory stimulation.

Grip, pinch, and fine-motor coordination activities.

Progressive closed-chain or weight-bearing exercises, when tolerated.

Home exercises performed according to a standardized program.

Exercises will progress from simple, visually guided movements to more challenging tasks performed with reduced visual feedback and increased functional demand. The therapist will monitor symptom aggravation, numbness, pain, fatigue, and movement accuracy throughout treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Carpel Tunnel Syndrome

Keywords

  • proprioception
  • sensorimotor
  • conventional
  • CTS
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Delta University for Science and Technology is the lead sponsor of 85 studies on the registry; 17 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Are adults aged 30-50 years.
  • Have clinically diagnosed mild-to-moderate carpal tunnel syndrome.
  • Report pain, numbness, tingling, or nocturnal symptoms in the median-nerve distribution.
  • Have symptoms lasting at least 4 weeks.
  • Have electrodiagnostic findings consistent with mild-to-moderate median-nerve compression at the wrist.
  • Can understand and follow study instructions.
  • Can attend treatment and assessment sessions.
  • Provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe carpal tunnel syndrome requiring immediate surgery.
  • Previous carpal tunnel release or wrist surgery.

Cervical radiculopathy, brachial plexopathy, or another peripheral neuropathy.

  • Diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, thyroid disease, or other systemic conditions affecting nerve function, unless medically stable and permitted by the protocol.
  • Wrist fracture, arthritis, tendon injury, or other upper-limb musculoskeletal disorders.
  • Pregnancy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    study group

    Other: sensorimotor proprioceptive stimulation

  • Active comparator
    control group

    Other: conventional physical therapy

Interventions

  • Othersensorimotor proprioceptive stimulation

    Participants will receive sensorimotor proprioceptive stimulation combined with conventional physical therapy. The program will include joint-position training, tactile sensory stimulation, wrist and hand coordination exercises, tendon and median-nerve gliding, grip and pinch activities, and progressive functional hand exercises.

  • Otherconventional physical therapy

    Participants will receive conventional physical therapy alone, including education, ergonomic advice, wrist and hand range-of-motion exercises, tendon-gliding exercises, strengthening exercises, and a standardized home-exercise program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale

    The Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire Symptom Severity Scale consists of 11 items assessing pain, numbness, tingling, weakness, nocturnal symptoms, and difficulty grasping objects. Each item is scored from 1 to 5. The total score will be calculated as the mean of the 11 item scores: Mean SSS score = sum of the 11 item scores ÷ 11 The final score ranges from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity.

    Time frame: baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity will be assessed using a visual analogue scale. Participants will mark their pain intensity on a continuous 10-cm line, where 0 cm represents no pain and 10 cm represents the worst possible pain. The distance from 0 cm to the participant's mark will be recorded.Unit of Measure: Centimeters (cm)

    Time frame: baseline

  2. Median sensory nerve-conduction velocity (m/s)

    Median sensory nerve-conduction velocity will be measured using standard nerve-conduction studies by stimulating the median nerve at a predefined site and recording the sensory nerve action potential from the selected digit. Conduction velocity will be calculated as the distance between the stimulation and recording sites divided by the relevant conduction time. Unit of Measure: Meters per second (m/s)

    Time frame: baseline

  3. Unit of Measure Degrees (°)

    Unit of Measure Degrees (°)will be assessed using a joint-position-reproduction test. Participants will reproduce a predefined target wrist position without visual feedback. The absolute angular error will be calculated as the absolute difference between the target angle and the reproduced angle. Errors from the predefined trials will be averaged to obtain one participant-level outcome value. A smaller error indicates better proprioceptive accuracy. Unit of Measure Degrees (°)

    Time frame: baseline

  4. Median-Nerve cross sectional area (mm²)

    The median nerve will be examined using diagnostic ultrasound. The primary measurement will be the cross-sectional area of the median nerve at the carpal tunnel, usually measured at the tunnel inlet unit of measure Square millimeters (mm²)

    Time frame: baseline

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — confidentiality

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Jan 2027, 3 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 3, 2026
First posted
Oct 15, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 5, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jan 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 1, 2027
Last update
Oct 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 15, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 15, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07875751
Lead sponsor
Delta University for Science and Technology
Responsible party
Ibrahim Ahmed Ibrahim Abu Ella (lecturer, Delta University for Science and Technology) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 15, 2026
Start date
Oct 5, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 15, 2026

Study contacts

Ibrahim Abu Ella, PhD
Contact
ibrahimneuron@gmail.com
020108442281

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion