ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07696468Updated Jul 15, 2026

Comparison of Two Rotational Alignment Methods for Astigmatism Correction in SMILE Surgery

An interventional study of Device-assisted cyclotorsion control during SMILE and Manual limbal marking-guided cyclotorsion adjustment during SMILE in Myopia and Refractive Ametropia, sponsored by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-15.

Sponsored by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 24 studies in Myopia by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University — 12 open to participants now, 14 under way, none of them phase 3. Myopia · Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University.

Planned enrollment
16th of 17
52 · median 194
Started
2026
with 4 others
No phase
17 of 24
8 open now
Primary completion
2027-06
later than 11 of 13 live
Registered
22nd of 24
by date

Among the 24 studies in Myopia by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, this one is the 16th largest by planned enrollment of the 17 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2026, is one of 17 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 11 of the 13 other live ones, and was the 22nd registered.

Myopia

1,160 studies on the registry are indexed under Myopia; 225 are open to participants now.

Browse Myopia studies →

Open to participants now

12 of the 24 studies in Myopia by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

6 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 12 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 122 Myopia studies recruiting now, 19 (16%) set no upper age limit and 102 (84%) stop at 75 or younger; 86 take children under 18; 53 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 40 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 24 studies in Myopia by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a commonly used corneal refractive procedure for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism. During astigmatism correction, eye rotation between the upright examination position and the supine surgical position may affect the alignment of the astigmatic treatment axis and may contribute to residual astigmatism after surgery.

Manual limbal marking is a commonly used method to guide cyclotorsion adjustment during refractive surgery. OcuLign is an assisted cyclotorsion control function of the VISUMAX 800 platform that helps identify ocular rotation and guide axis alignment during SMILE. However, direct clinical evidence comparing OcuLign-assisted cyclotorsion control with manual limbal marking during SMILE is limited.

This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized, masked, contralateral-eye non-inferiority trial. Adults aged 18 to 40 years with stable myopia and astigmatism who plan to undergo bilateral SMILE surgery will be enrolled. In each participant, one eye will receive SMILE with OcuLign-assisted cyclotorsion control, and the fellow eye will receive SMILE with manual limbal marking-guided cyclotorsion adjustment. The treatment assigned to the right eye will be determined by randomization.

The primary objective is to compare residual refractive astigmatism at 3 months after surgery between the two methods. Secondary outcomes include visual acuity, refractive predictability and stability, astigmatism vector analysis, higher-order aberrations, contrast sensitivity, patient-reported quality of vision, overall satisfaction, and safety outcomes. Participants will be followed for approximately 6 months after surgery.

Read the detailed description

Accurate alignment of the astigmatic treatment axis is an important factor in the correction of myopic astigmatism during small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Cyclotorsion may occur when a patient changes from the upright preoperative examination position to the supine surgical position, and may also be influenced by fixation, head position, and suction during surgery. Inadequate compensation for ocular rotation may reduce astigmatic correction accuracy and contribute to postoperative residual astigmatism.

Manual limbal marking is a commonly used method for cyclotorsion adjustment in corneal refractive surgery. This method is clinically feasible and widely used, but it depends on preoperative marking and intraoperative manual judgment. Marking clarity, ocular surface conditions, patient cooperation, and surgeon experience may affect the accuracy and reproducibility of the adjustment. OcuLign is an assisted cyclotorsion control function of the VISUMAX 800 platform that helps identify ocular rotation and guide axis alignment during SMILE. This study is designed to compare OcuLign-assisted cyclotorsion control with manual limbal marking-guided cyclotorsion adjustment during SMILE.

This trial uses a prospective, randomized, contralateral-eye non-inferiority design. Each participant will undergo bilateral SMILE surgery. One eye will be assigned to OcuLign-assisted cyclotorsion control, and the fellow eye will be assigned to manual limbal marking-guided cyclotorsion adjustment, according to a prespecified randomization sequence. This paired-eye design is intended to reduce inter-individual variability in refractive characteristics, healing response, and subjective visual perception. Apart from the method of cyclotorsion adjustment, surgical parameters, lenticule design, suction procedure, postoperative medication, and follow-up schedule will be kept consistent between the two eyes.

Participants and postoperative outcome assessors will be masked to the eye-level treatment assignment whenever feasible. The operating surgeon cannot be masked because the assigned cyclotorsion adjustment method must be performed during surgery. Postoperative assessments will be conducted at predefined follow-up visits through approximately 6 months after surgery.

The primary comparison will evaluate whether OcuLign-assisted cyclotorsion control is non-inferior to manual limbal marking-guided adjustment in terms of residual refractive astigmatism at 3 months after surgery. Secondary assessments will evaluate visual acuity, refractive predictability and stability, astigmatism vector parameters, higher-order aberrations, contrast sensitivity, patient-reported quality of vision, satisfaction, and safety. Safety monitoring will include loss of corrected distance visual acuity and postoperative adverse events.

03

Conditions studied

  • Myopia
  • Refractive Ametropia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • myopia
  • SMILE
  • VisuMax 800
  • Cyclotorsion
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age range: 18 - 40 years old. Patients with myopic astigmatism and stable refractive status for >= 1 year.
  2. Normal corneal morphology in both eyes, with corneal thickness and other ocular parameters meeting the requirements for SMILE surgery.
  3. Preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) >= 1.0 in both eyes.
  4. Manifest refractive cylinder >= 0.75 D in both eyes, with an interocular difference in absolute cylinder power \<= 1.00 D.
  5. Both eyes can provide reliable preoperative upright-position image information required for astigmatic axis recognition, and are judged by the investigator to meet the requirements for OcuLign cyclotorsion recognition and axis alignment on the VISUMAX 800 platform.
  6. Voluntary to undergo bilateral SMILE surgery on the VISUMAX 800 platform, understanding the random eye-assignment scheme and signing the form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of prior ocular surgery, significant ocular trauma, or presence of ocular diseases that may affect the safety of refractive surgery or the interpretation of study outcomes.
  2. Irregular astigmatism or poor repeatability of bilateral astigmatism measurements, making reliable astigmatic axis analysis impossible.
  3. Presence of strabismus, nystagmus, significant binocular vision abnormality, or any condition that may affect fixation or cooperation during examinations.
  4. Severe systemic diseases that may affect ocular healing or surgical safety.
  5. Females who are pregnant or lactating.
  6. Inability to complete the required postoperative follow-up visits or questionnaire assessments.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    OcuLign-Assisted Cyclotorsion Control

    One eye of each participant will undergo SMILE using OcuLign-assisted cyclotorsion control on the VISUMAX 800 platform. OcuLign will be used intraoperatively to assist in identifying ocular rotation and guiding astigmatic axis alignment. Apart from the cyclotorsion adjustment method, the surgical parameters, lenticule design, suction procedure, postoperative medication, and follow-up schedule will be the same as those used for the fellow eye.

    Procedure: Device-assisted cyclotorsion control during SMILE

  • Active comparator
    Manual Limbal Marking-Guided Adjustment

    The fellow eye of each participant will undergo SMILE using manual limbal marking-guided cyclotorsion adjustment. Limbal reference marks will be made in the upright preoperative position, and intraoperative axis alignment will be manually adjusted according to the marks and the surgical reference direction. Apart from the cyclotorsion adjustment method, the surgical parameters, surgical procedure, postoperative medication, and follow-up schedule will be the same as those used for the contralateral eye.

    Procedure: Manual limbal marking-guided cyclotorsion adjustment during SMILE

Interventions

  • ProcedureDevice-assisted cyclotorsion control during SMILE

    One eye of each participant will undergo SMILE using device-assisted cyclotorsion control with the OcuLign function of the VISUMAX 800 platform. During surgery, OcuLign will assist in identifying ocular rotation and guiding astigmatic axis alignment. Apart from the cyclotorsion adjustment method, the surgical parameters, lenticule design, suction procedure, postoperative medication, and follow-up schedule will be the same as those used for the fellow eye.

    Also known as: OcuLign-assisted cyclotorsion control, VISUMAX 800 OcuLign

  • ProcedureManual limbal marking-guided cyclotorsion adjustment during SMILE

    The fellow eye of each participant will undergo SMILE using manual limbal marking-guided cyclotorsion adjustment. Limbal reference marks will be made in the upright preoperative position, and intraoperative axis alignment will be manually adjusted according to the limbal marks and the surgical reference direction. Apart from the cyclotorsion adjustment method, the surgical parameters, surgical procedure, postoperative medication, and follow-up schedule will be the same as those used for the contralateral eye.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Residual refractive astigmatism

    Residual refractive astigmatism will be measured as the absolute manifest cylinder power in diopters at 3 months after SMILE. The primary analysis will compare residual refractive astigmatism between eyes treated with OcuLign-assisted cyclotorsion control and eyes treated with manual limbal marking-guided cyclotorsion adjustment to evaluate non-inferiority.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Astigmatic correction predictability

    Astigmatic correction predictability will be assessed as the proportion of eyes with postoperative residual manifest cylinder within predefined thresholds, including ≤0.25 D, ≤0.50 D, and ≤1.00 D.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

  2. Astigmatic Correction Assessed by Alpins Vector Analysis

    Postoperative astigmatic correction will be assessed using the Alpins vector analysis method based on refractive cylinder and axis data. This outcome will be used to describe the overall accuracy of astigmatism correction after surgery.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

  3. Visual acuity

    Uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity will be measured using standardized visual acuity charts and recorded as logMAR visual acuity. Visual acuity-derived performance will also be summarized using the safety index and efficacy index, calculated from the same visual acuity measurements. The safety index is defined as postoperative corrected distance visual acuity divided by preoperative corrected distance visual acuity, and the efficacy index is defined as postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity divided by preoperative corrected distance visual acuity.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

  4. Manifest refraction

    Postoperative manifest refraction will include sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent measured by standard manifest refraction.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

  5. Refractive accuracy

    Refractive accuracy will be assessed as the proportion of eyes with postoperative spherical equivalent within predefined ranges of the target refraction, including within ±0.25 D, ±0.50 D, and ±1.00 D.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

  6. Refractive stability

    Refractive stability will be assessed as the change in manifest spherical equivalent refraction between postoperative follow-up visits.

    Time frame: 1 month to 6 months after surgery

  7. Higher-Order Wavefront Aberration Assessment

    Higher-order wavefront aberrations will be measured using wavefront aberrometry under standardized conditions to assess postoperative optical quality.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

  8. Contrast sensitivity

    Contrast sensitivity will be measured under standardized conditions using the CSV-1000 contrast sensitivity testing system at multiple spatial frequencies, including 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree. The area under the log contrast sensitivity function may be calculated as a summary measure when appropriate.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

  9. Quality of Vision score

    Subjective visual symptoms will be assessed using the Quality of Vision questionnaire, which evaluates the frequency, severity, and bothersome nature of visual disturbances such as glare, halos, and double vision. Higher scores indicate worse subjective visual quality.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

  10. Overall visual satisfaction score

    Overall visual satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point Likert rating scale. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chen P, Ye Y, Yu N, Zhang X, He J, Zheng H, Wei H, Zhuang J, Yu K. Comparison of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery With and Without Cyclotorsion Error Correction for Patients With Astigmatism. Cornea. 2019 Jun;38(6):723-729. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000001937. PubMed 30950894 ↗
  • Wang B, Wang Y, Zhang J. Comparison of astigmatic correction with and without limbal marking during small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Aug 1;48(8):924-928. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000889. PubMed 35067664 ↗
  • Yang X, Liu Y, Xiao K, Song Q, Xu Y, Li J, Zhou Y. Effect of Cyclotorsion Compensation in Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Surgery for the Correction of Myopic Astigmatism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 May;13(5):1271-1288. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00921-2. Epub 2024 Mar 18. PubMed 38498276 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2026; primary completion for Jun 2027, 11 months later.

Of 200 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Myopia, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 434 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 6, 2026
First posted
Jul 10, 2026
StartEst.
Jul 13, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Jul 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07696468
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 10, 2026
Start date
Jul 13, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 15, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion