ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07512115Updated Jul 7, 2026

The Impact of 'A Miss Is as Good as a Mile': Is Compensation Necessary for Minimal Ocular Deviation in Myopic Laser Surgery?

An interventional study of Apply compensation to the Kappa angle. and Apply no compensation to the Kappa angle in Myopia and Refractive Ametropia, sponsored by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
224
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 24 studies in Myopia by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University — 12 open to participants now, 14 under way, none of them phase 3. Myopia · Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University.

Planned enrollment
8th of 17
224 · median 194
Started
2026
with 4 others
No phase
17 of 24
8 open now
Primary completion
2027-05
later than 9 of 13 live
Registered
19th of 24
by date

Among the 24 studies in Myopia by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, this one is the 8th largest by planned enrollment of the 17 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 5 that started in 2026, is one of 17 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 9 of the 13 other live ones, and was the 19th registered.

Myopia

1,160 studies on the registry are indexed under Myopia; 225 are open to participants now.

Browse Myopia studies →

Open to participants now

12 of the 24 studies in Myopia by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University are open now, in 1 country. Recruiting first, the newest first:

6 more — sign in →

By country, each count listing its studies:

All 12 open studies →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 122 Myopia studies recruiting now, 19 (16%) set no upper age limit and 102 (84%) stop at 75 or younger; 86 take children under 18; 53 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 40 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 24 studies in Myopia by Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of intraoperative kappa-angle compensation on postoperative visual quality in patients undergoing small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using the VisuMax 800 platform. The study will enroll patients with myopia and a kappa-angle offset \< 0.2 mm.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does intraoperative kappa-angle compensation reduce postoperative higher-order aberrations after SMILE? Does kappa-angle compensation improve postoperative visual quality and refractive outcomes compared with no compensation?

Researchers will compare SMILE with intraoperative kappa-angle compensation to SMILE without compensation to determine whether compensation leads to better optical quality and visual performance.

Participants will:

Undergo SMILE surgery with or without intraoperative kappa-angle compensation Complete scheduled postoperative examinations at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery Receive measurements of visual acuity, refraction, higher-order aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and safety outcomes

Read the detailed description

Angle kappa refers to the offset between the visual axis and the pupil center and may influence the centration of the treatment zone during corneal refractive surgery. Inaccurate centration can lead to decentered ablation and may affect postoperative visual quality, especially higher-order aberrations. With the development of femtosecond laser technology, more precise intraoperative alignment has become possible.

Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) is a commonly used corneal refractive procedure with good safety and predictability. The VisuMax 800 system incorporates machine vision-assisted centration guidance, which allows intraoperative adjustment of the treatment center according to the relative position of the corneal vertex and the pupil center. This provides the possibility of performing intraoperative compensation based on the kappa-angle offset.

Previous studies have mainly evaluated centration adjustment in eyes with relatively large kappa-angle offsets and suggested that compensation may improve postoperative optical quality. However, for patients with small offsets, the necessity of intraoperative compensation remains unclear, and prospective randomized clinical trials are limited.

The purpose of this study is to compare the visual outcomes and optical quality after SMILE with or without intraoperative kappa-angle compensation in patients with small kappa-angle offsets.

This study is a single-center, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial. Participants who are suitable for SMILE surgery and have a kappa-angle offset less than 0.2 mm will be enrolled and randomly assigned to receive SMILE with compensation or SMILE without compensation using the VisuMax 800 platform.

All surgeries will be performed by experienced surgeons using standard SMILE procedures. Participants will undergo routine ophthalmic examinations before surgery and will be followed after surgery at scheduled visits.

The main evaluation will assess postoperative visual quality and refractive outcomes. Additional assessments will include visual acuity, refractive accuracy, higher-order aberrations, contrast sensitivity, and safety outcomes.

03

Conditions studied

  • Myopia
  • Refractive Ametropia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • myopia
  • SMILE
  • Refractive Surgery
  • Randomized Clinical Trial
  • Angle Kappa
  • VisuMax 800
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients aged 18 to 40 years with myopia or myopic astigmatism and stable refraction for >=1 year, whose refractive errors fall within the treatable range of and meet the indications for SMILE surgery.
  2. Normal corneal morphology and corneal thickness meeting surgical requirements.
  3. Preoperative corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) >= 1.0.
  4. Preoperative synthetic Kappa angle offset measured >= 0.10 mm and \< 0.20 mm.
  5. Voluntarily agree to undergo SMILE surgery on the VISUMAX 800 platform, understand the randomization scheme, and provide signed .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of prior ocular surgery, significant ocular trauma, or presence of corneal or ocular diseases that may affect the safety of refractive surgery.
  2. Severe systemic diseases that may affect ocular healing or surgical safety.
  3. Females who are pregnant or lactating.
  4. Inability to cooperate as required to complete the procedure or follow-up visits.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
224 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Non-compensation group

    Subjects underwent SMILE surgery on the VisuMax 800 platform. Preoperative offset coordinates (x, y) were measured; however, while preserving the directional sign, no kappa-angle-based laser centration compensation was applied intraoperatively, and the treatment center was set according to the system's default centration method. Except for the difference in compensation strategy, all other surgical procedures and postoperative management were identical to those in the compensation group.

    Procedure: Apply no compensation to the Kappa angle

  • Experimental
    Compensation group

    Subjects underwent SMILE surgery on the VisuMax 800 platform. Preoperative offset coordinates (x, y) were measured, and, while preserving the directional sign, a fixed intraoperative laser centration compensation of 0.1 mm was uniformly applied to all eligible study eyes to achieve a quantitative adjustment of the treatment center toward the visual axis. Except for the difference in compensation strategy, all other surgical procedures and postoperative management were identical to those in the non-compensation group.

    Procedure: Apply compensation to the Kappa angle.

Interventions

  • ProcedureApply compensation to the Kappa angle.

    SMILE PRO is an upgraded version/procedural designation of SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction) performed on the ZEISS VisuMax 800 femtosecond laser platform and remains, in essence, an all-femtosecond corneal refractive procedure. Its basic principle is to use a femtosecond laser to create a lenticule within the corneal stroma together with a small incision, and then remove the lenticule through that incision, thereby reshaping the corneal curvature to correct myopia and astigmatism. In the compensation group, during preoperative parameter input, a fixed intraoperative laser centration compensation of 0.1 mm was uniformly applied to all study eyes meeting the inclusion criteria to achieve a quantitative adjustment of the treatment center toward the visual axis.

  • ProcedureApply no compensation to the Kappa angle

    SMILE PRO is an upgraded version/procedural designation of SMILE (Small Incision Lenticule Extraction) performed on the ZEISS VisuMax 800 femtosecond laser platform and remains, in essence, an all-femtosecond corneal refractive procedure. Its basic principle is to use a femtosecond laser to create a lenticule within the corneal stroma together with a small incision, and then remove the lenticule through that incision, thereby reshaping the corneal curvature to correct myopia and astigmatism. In the non-compensation group, no kappa-angle-based laser centration compensation was applied intraoperatively, and the treatment center was set according to the system's default centration method.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Coma aberration

    Coma aberration measured by wavefront aberrometry to evaluate the effect of intraoperative kappa-angle compensation on postoperative optical quality.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Higher-order aberrations

    Total higher-order aberrations, spherical aberration, and trefoil aberration measured using wavefront aberrometry under standardized conditions to evaluate postoperative optical quality.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

  2. Optical zone decentration

    Decentration of the optical zone measured using corneal topography by determining the displacement between the optical zone center and the corneal vertex.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

  3. Visual acuity

    Binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity and corrected distance visual acuity measured using standardized visual acuity charts to evaluate visual performance and safety.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

  4. Manifest refraction

    Postoperative sphere, cylinder, and spherical equivalent measured by manifest refraction.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

  5. Refractive accuracy

    Proportion of eyes within predefined ranges of target refraction to evaluate refractive predictability.

    Time frame: 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery

  6. Refractive stability

    Refractive stability will be assessed as the change in manifest spherical equivalent refraction between postoperative visits.

    Time frame: 1 month to 6 months after surgery

  7. Contrast sensitivity

    Contrast sensitivity will be measured using a standardized contrast sensitivity testing system (CSV-1000, VectorVision, USA) at multiple spatial frequencies.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

  8. Quality of Vision (QoV) score

    Visual symptoms will be assessed using the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire, which evaluates the frequency, severity, and bothersome nature of visual disturbances. Scores are recorded on ordinal scales, with higher scores indicating worse visual quality.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

  9. Patient satisfaction score

    Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a 5-point rating scale. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.

    Time frame: 3 months after surgery

  10. Adverse events

    Incidence of intraoperative or postoperative complications, including loss of corrected distance visual acuity and other clinically significant events.

    Time frame: Up to 6 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Doostparast A, Ghandhari M, Rastegar M, Khosronejad AH, Ghandhari M, Eslampoor A. Distribution and inter-device agreement of chord mu/alpha lengths and axes between Pentacam HR, Sirius, and IOLMaster 700. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2025 Dec;56:105275. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2025.105275. Epub 2025 Nov 6. PubMed 41205666 ↗
  • Shao T, Wang Y, Ng ALK, Chan TCY, Hao W, Zhang J, Cheng GPM, Jhanji V. The Effect of Intraoperative Angle Kappa Adjustment on Higher-Order Aberrations Before and After Small Incision Lenticule Extraction. Cornea. 2020 May;39(5):609-614. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0000000000002274. PubMed 32040010 ↗
  • Lai X, Liu X, Zeng T, Huang Y, Yang X. Comparison of visual outcomes and optical aberrations after SMILE with intraoperative Kappa angle adjustments between small and large Kappa angles. Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 24;14(1):14551. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65366-w. PubMed 38914606 ↗
  • Deng M, Zhou D, Li M, Shi Y, Sun L, Zou J, Ma X. Evaluation of corneal asymmetry and higher-order aberrations after small incision lenticule extraction for moderate and high myopia. Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 1;45(1):218. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03576-5. PubMed 40451982 ↗
  • Vingopoulos F, Zisimopoulos A, Kanellopoulos AJ. Comparison of effective corneal refractive centration to the visual axis: LASIK vs SMILE, a contralateral eye digitized comparison of the postoperative result. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2021 Dec 1;47(12):1511-1518. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000687. PubMed 34074993 ↗
  • McAlinden C, Pesudovs K, Moore JE. The development of an instrument to measure quality of vision: the Quality of Vision (QoV) questionnaire. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Nov;51(11):5537-45. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5341. Epub 2010 May 26. PubMed 20505205 ↗
  • Chang JS, Law AK, Ng JC, Chan VK. Comparison of refractive and visual outcomes with centration points 80% and 100% from pupil center toward the coaxially sighted corneal light reflex. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016 Mar;42(3):412-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2015.09.030. PubMed 27063522 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 13 months after the start.

Of 200 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Myopia, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 13 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 434 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 34.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 21, 2026
First posted
Apr 6, 2026
StartActual
Apr 8, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
May 30, 2027
Last update
Jul 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07512115
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 6, 2026
Start date
Apr 8, 2026
Primary completion
May 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion