ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07688655Updated Jul 7, 2026

Effects of Three Orthodontic Archwire Protocols on Root and Bone Changes

An interventional study of Square-shaped cross-sectional archwire and Rectangular-shaped cross-sectional archwire in Malocclusion of Anterior Teeth and Malocclusion; Displaced Teeth, sponsored by Damascus University. Completed at 1 site in Syria. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 25 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-07.

Sponsored by Damascus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2024, registered Jun 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
53
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 25 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial compares the effects of three orthodontic archwire protocols used during the alignment phase on anterior tooth roots and the supporting alveolar bone. Participants were randomly allocated to one of three parallel groups according to the experimental archwire used. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained before treatment initiation and after completion of the follow-up period. The primary outcome is volumetric root resorption, while secondary outcomes include changes in Buccal alveolar bone height and thickness. Recruitment and follow-up have been completed, and the study is currently in the data verification and statistical analysis phase. The findings are expected to help clinicians choose archwire protocols that reduce undesirable biological side effects during orthodontic treatment.

Read the detailed description

Orthodontic tooth movement may result in undesirable biological side effects, including external root resorption and remodeling of the alveolar bone surrounding the moved teeth. These effects are clinically important because they may influence long-term tooth support and treatment safety. During the alignment phase of orthodontic treatment, different archwire designs may produce different biomechanical effects; however, evidence comparing their influence on root structure and alveolar bone remains limited.

This study is a randomized controlled clinical trial designed to compare three orthodontic archwire protocols during the alignment phase in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. The primary objective is to assess volumetric root resorption in the anterior teeth using three-dimensional CBCT-based measurements. Secondary objectives include assessment of alveolar bone height change, and alveolar bone thickness change at standardized cervical, middle, and apical levels.

Participants were enrolled from the Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University. Eligible patients were randomly allocated to one of three parallel groups. All groups received the same initial alignment sequence using 0.014-inch nickel-titanium and 0.016-inch nickel-titanium archwires. The groups differed in the experimental archwire used thereafter. The square group received a 0.016 × 0.016-inch nickel-titanium archwire, the rectangular group received a 0.016 × 0.022-inch nickel-titanium archwire, and the control group continued with a 0.016-inch round nickel-titanium archwire. Archwire changes were performed at standardized 35-day intervals according to the study protocol.

CBCT records were obtained at baseline before treatment initiation and again at the end of the observation period. Root volume measurements were used to calculate volumetric root resorption in cubic millimeters and as a percentage of the baseline root volume. Buccal alveolar bone height and thickness were measured on standardized CBCT sections using predefined reference planes and anatomical landmarks.

Participant recruitment started on 01 October 2023, and follow-up of the last participant was completed on 25 June 2025. The study is currently in the data verification and statistical analysis phase.

02

Conditions studied

  • Malocclusion of Anterior Teeth
  • Malocclusion; Displaced Teeth

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Archwire sequence protocol
  • Volumetric external root resorption
  • Alveolar bone changes
  • Buccal alveolar bone height
  • Buccal alveolar bone thickness
  • Cone-beam computed tomography
03

In context

Malocclusion

323 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 53 is above the median of 37 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion.

Browse Malocclusion studies →

Lead sponsor

Damascus University is the lead sponsor of 212 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 25 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged between 16 and 25 years
  • Presence of a complete permanent dentition
  • Moderate crowding ranging from 4 to 6 mm, according to Little's Irregularity Index (Little, 1975)
  • Indication for non-extraction orthodontic treatment
  • Normal or slightly retroclined incisors, as evaluated radiographically and on study models
  • Good oral health status
  • Periodontally healthy supporting tissues

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe skeletal discrepancies
  • Patients with craniofacial anomalies
  • Presence of impacted or supernumerary teeth
  • History of previous orthodontic treatment
  • Presence of systemic conditions or use of medications known to influence tooth movement
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients for whom the follow-up (T1) records were not obtained within the permitted 35-day window
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
53 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Square-shaped cross-sectional archwire group

    Participants in this group received fixed orthodontic treatment with an alignment sequence ending with a 0.016 × 0.016-inch nickel-titanium archwire as the experimental archwire

    Procedure: Square-shaped cross-sectional archwire

  • Experimental
    Rectangular-shaped cross-sectional archwire group

    Participants in this group received fixed orthodontic treatment with an alignment sequence ending with a 0.016 × 0.022-inch nickel-titanium archwire as the experimental archwire

    Procedure: Rectangular-shaped cross-sectional archwire

  • Active comparator
    Control group

    Participants in this group received fixed orthodontic treatment with an alignment sequence ending with a 0.016-inch round nickel-titanium archwire, which served as the control wire.

    Procedure: Traditional sequence of archwires

Interventions

  • ProcedureSquare-shaped cross-sectional archwire

    Fixed orthodontic treatment using the following archwire sequence: 0.014-inch NiTi, followed by 0.016-inch NiTi, followed by 0.016 × 0.016-inch NiTi as the experimental archwire. Archwire change will be done at 35-day intervals.

  • ProcedureRectangular-shaped cross-sectional archwire

    Fixed orthodontic treatment using the following archwire sequence: 0.014-inch NiTi, followed by 0.016-inch NiTi, followed by 0.016 × 0.022-inch NiTi as the experimental archwire. Archwire change will be done at 35-day intervals.

  • ProcedureTraditional sequence of archwires

    Fixed orthodontic treatment using the following archwire sequence: 0.014-inch NiTi, followed by 0.016-inch NiTi, followed by 0.016-inch round NiTi, which served as the control archwire. Archwire change will be done at 35-day intervals.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Volumetric External Root Resorption (VERR)

    Volumetric root resorption was assessed in the anterior teeth using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and three-dimensional volumetric analysis. Root volume was measured at baseline and follow-up, and the difference between the two measurements was recorded as volumetric root resorption. The unit of measurement was cubic millimeters (mm³).

    Time frame: Measured on CBCT images obtained at baseline (before treatment initiation) and at the end of the 6-month follow-up period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Buccal Alveolar Bone Height Change (DBH)

    Buccal alveolar bone height was measured as the vertical distance from a standardized horizontal reference plane to the most coronal point of the Buccal alveolar crest on CBCT images. The change between baseline and follow-up was recorded in millimeters (mm).

    Time frame: Measured on CBCT images obtained at baseline before treatment initiation and at the end of six-month follow-up period.

  2. Buccal Alveolar Bone Thickness Change at the Cervical Level (DBT-CT)

    Buccal alveolar bone thickness at the cervical level was measured on CBCT images using a standardized geometric protocol. The change between baseline and follow-up was recorded in millimeters (mm).

    Time frame: Measured on CBCT images obtained at baseline (before treatment initiation) and at the end of the 6-month follow-up period.

  3. Buccal Alveolar Bone Thickness Change at the Middle Level (DBT-MT)

    Buccal alveolar bone thickness at the middle root level was measured on CBCT images using a standardized geometric protocol. The change between baseline and follow-up was recorded in millimeters (mm).

    Time frame: Measured on CBCT images obtained at baseline (before treatment initiation) and at the end of the 6-month follow-up period.

  4. Buccal Alveolar Bone Thickness Change at the Apical Level (DBT-AT)

    Buccal alveolar bone thickness at the apical level was measured on CBCT images using a standardized geometric protocol. The change between baseline and follow-up was recorded in millimeters (mm).

    Time frame: Measured on CBCT images obtained at baseline (before treatment initiation) and at the end of the 6-month follow-up period.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus
    Damascus, Rif-dimashq Governorate DM20AM19, Syria
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Smale I, Artun J, Behbehani F, Doppel D, van't Hof M, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Apical root resorption 6 months after initiation of fixed orthodontic appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Jul;128(1):57-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.12.030. PubMed 16027626 ↗
  • Papageorgiou SN, Sifakakis I, Doulis I, Eliades T, Bourauel C. Torque efficiency of square and rectangular archwires into 0.018 and 0.022 in. conventional brackets. Prog Orthod. 2016;17:5. doi: 10.1186/s40510-016-0118-0. Epub 2016 Jan 15. PubMed 26780465 ↗
  • Montasser MA, Keilig L, Bourauel C. Archwire diameter effect on tooth alignment with different bracket-archwire combinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Jan;149(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.06.026. PubMed 26718381 ↗
  • Liu C, Wei Z, Jian F, McIntyre G, Millett DT, Lai W, Wang Y. Initial arch wires used in orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 6;2(2):CD007859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007859.pub5. PubMed 38319008 ↗
  • Gravina MA, Brunharo IH, Fraga MR, Artese F, Campos MJ, Vitral RW, Quintao CC. Clinical evaluation of dental alignment and leveling with three different types of orthodontic wires. Dental Press J Orthod. 2013 Nov-Dec;18(6):31-7. doi: 10.1590/s2176-94512013000600006. PubMed 24351147 ↗
  • Ajmera S, Shivanand Venkatesh, Ganeshkar SV. Volumetric evaluation of root resorption during orthodontic treatment. J Clin Orthod. 2014 Feb;48(2):113-9. No abstract available. PubMed 24763679 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07688655
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 7, 2026
Start date
Mar 3, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 16, 2025
Completion
Dec 25, 2025
Last update
Jul 7, 2026

Study contacts

Waseem M Allouch, DDS, MSc
principal investigator · Faculty of Dentistry, University of Damascus.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion