ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07826377Updated Sep 17, 2026

Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Sticky Bone and Chitosan

An interventional study of Sticky Bone (PRF Combined with Bone Graft) and Chitosan Combined with Bone Graft in Alveolar Ridge Preservation, sponsored by Damascus University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by Damascus University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) is commonly performed following tooth extraction to minimize post-extraction dimensional changes and maintain the alveolar ridge for subsequent implant placement. This study aims to clinically compare two grafting approaches for alveolar ridge preservation: a sticky bone consisting of bone graft mixed with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), and bone graft combined with chitosan. The study will evaluate the effectiveness of these two approaches in preserving the dimensions and quality of the alveolar ridge following tooth extraction.

Read the detailed description

The present study is designed to clinically compare two approaches for alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction: a particulate bone graft combined with autologous advanced platelet-rich fibrin, forming a sticky bone graft, and the same particulate bone graft combined with chitosan. The study will use a split-mouth design, in which eligible patients requiring extraction of comparable teeth on both sides of the oral cavity will receive the two different interventions, with each side serving as a treatment site.

Following atraumatic tooth extraction and standardized socket debridement, the extraction sockets will undergo alveolar ridge preservation using one of the two assigned grafting approaches. In the PRF site, autologous PRF will be prepared from venous blood and combined with the particulate bone graft. In the chitosan site, the same type of particulate bone graft will be combined with chitosan to obtain a homogeneous grafting mixture. The graft materials will then be placed within the extraction sockets according to the standardized surgical protocol, followed by wound closure and routine postoperative care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alveolar Ridge Preservation

Keywords

  • Alveolar Ridge Preservation
  • Tooth Extraction
  • Sticky Bone
  • Chitosan
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Damascus University is the lead sponsor of 212 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults aged 18 to 65 years.
  2. Systemically healthy or with mild systemic disease classified as I-II.
  3. Clinical indication for extraction of two contralateral, symmetrical single-rooted teeth in the maxilla or mandible, with extraction not indicated because of periodontal disease.
  4. Intact alveolar socket walls following extraction, including the buccal, lingual/palatal, mesial, and distal walls, confirmed clinically after extraction and supported by preoperative CBCT assessment.
  5. A minimum width of 2 mm of keratinized tissue at each planned extraction site.
  6. Good oral hygiene, defined as an O'Leary Plaque Control Record of less than 25%.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Uncontrolled systemic diseases or conditions that may adversely affect bone metabolism or healing, including uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, hyperparathyroidism, or treatment with bisphosphonates, particularly intravenous administration.
  2. Previous radiotherapy to the head and neck region.
  3. , including active chemotherapy or long-term treatment with high-dose systemic .
  4. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  5. Multirooted teeth, including molars or teeth with root furcation involvement.
  6. Known allergy or to bovine collagen, if a bovine-derived bone graft is used, or to chitosan or shellfish products such as shrimp.
  7. Acute infection or a purulent abscess at the extraction site, or a large periapical lesion.
  8. Presence of buccal bone dehiscence or fenestration at the planned extraction site.
  9. Current smoking.
  10. Untreated or inadequately controlled periodontal disease.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Sticky Bone (PRF Combined with Bone Graft)

    This arm will receive a particulate bone graft combined with autologous advanced platelet-rich fibrin, forming a cohesive sticky bone graft, for alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction. This intervention will be applied to one eligible extraction site in each participant.

    Procedure: Sticky Bone (PRF Combined with Bone Graft)

  • Experimental
    Chitosan Combined with Bone Graft

    This arm will receive the same particulate bone graft combined with chitosan for alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction. This intervention will be applied to the contralateral eligible extraction site in each participant

    Procedure: Chitosan Combined with Bone Graft

Interventions

  • ProcedureSticky Bone (PRF Combined with Bone Graft)

    Following atraumatic tooth extraction and standard socket preparation, autologous PRF will be prepared from the participant's venous blood and combined with the particulate bone graft to produce a cohesive sticky bone graft. The prepared graft mixture will then be placed into the designated extraction socket to provide alveolar ridge preservation during the healing period. Wound closure and postoperative management will be performed according to the standardized study protocol.

  • ProcedureChitosan Combined with Bone Graft

    Following atraumatic tooth extraction and standard socket preparation, chitosan will be combined with the particulate bone graft to produce a homogeneous grafting material. The prepared mixture will then be placed into the designated extraction socket for alveolar ridge preservation during the healing period. Wound closure and postoperative management will be performed according to the standardized study protocol

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Alveolar Ridge Width

    The change in alveolar ridge width will be assessed by comparing cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements obtained immediately after the surgical procedure (T1) with those obtained at 4 months postoperatively (T2). The corresponding CBCT images from T1 and T2 will be spatially matched using the OnDemand 3D imaging software to ensure standardized identification and measurement of the same anatomical levels at both time points. Alveolar ridge width will be measured at three standardized levels located 3 mm, 7 mm, and 10 mm apical to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) of the tooth indicated for extraction. For each level, the change in ridge width will be calculated as the difference between the measurement at T1 and the corresponding measurement at T2. Alveolar ridge width and its change will be recorded in millimeters (mm).

    Time frame: Immediately after the surgical procedure (T1) and at 4 months postoperatively (T2)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Alveolar Ridge Height

    The change in alveolar ridge height will be assessed using CBCT images obtained at T1 and T2. The corresponding images will be spatially matched using OnDemand 3D imaging software. Ridge height will be measured in millimeters (mm) at standardized reference locations, including the buccal plate and the midpoint of the extraction socket. The change in ridge height will be calculated as the difference between the T1 and T2 measurements.

    Time frame: Immediately after the alveolar ridge preservation procedure (T1) and 4 months postoperatively (T2)

  2. Change in Bone Graft Volume

    The volume of the grafted material within the extraction socket will be assessed using CBCT images acquired at T1 and T2. Three-dimensional volumetric measurements will be performed using OnDemand 3D imaging software by delineating the grafted area within the extraction socket. The change in graft volume will be calculated from the difference between the T1 and T2 measurements. Volume will be expressed in cubic millimeters (mm³).

    Time frame: Immediately after graft placement (T1) and 4 months postoperatively (T2)

  3. Change in Bone Density at the Grafted Site

    Bone density within the grafted extraction socket will be evaluated using CBCT images. A standardized region of interest within the grafted site will be assessed at both time points using OnDemand 3D imaging software. Bone density will be recorded in Hounsfield units (HU), and the change in bone density will be calculated as the difference between the T1 and T2 measurements.

    Time frame: Immediately after graft placement (T1) and 4 months postoperatively (T2).

  4. Early Wound Healing

    Early soft-tissue wound healing will be assessed clinically using the Landry Wound Healing Index. The index will be determined by clinical examination and standardized clinical photographs. The Landry index evaluates wound healing according to predefined clinical characteristics, with higher scores indicating better healing.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 7,14,21,30 days

  5. Postoperative Complications

    Postoperative complications will be assessed clinically during scheduled follow-up visits. The presence or absence of the following complications will be recorded for each treatment site: infection, graft exposure, flap necrosis, wound dehiscence, and severe edema. Each complication will be recorded as a binary outcome (Yes/No) based on clinical examination. The occurrence of any complication will also be documented in the study record.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 3, 7, and 14

  6. Postoperative Pain

    Postoperative pain will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants will record their pain level during the first postoperative week using a 100-mm VAS, where 0 = no pain and 100 = worst imaginable pain. Pain scores will be recorded for each treatment site according to the study assessment schedule.

    Time frame: During the first 7 postoperative days

  7. Postoperative Analgesic Consumption

    Analgesic consumption will be assessed by recording the number of analgesic tablets taken by each participant during the first postoperative week. Participants will record analgesic use in a postoperative diary, and the total number of tablets consumed during the 7-day period will be recorded as a count (number of tablets).

    Time frame: During the first 7 postoperative days

  8. Postoperative Bleeding

    Postoperative bleeding will be assessed based on participant-reported bleeding during the first postoperative week and documented in the postoperative follow-up record. Bleeding will be recorded as present or absent (Yes/No) for each treatment site. Any clinically significant bleeding episode requiring additional intervention will also be documented.

    Time frame: During the first 7 postoperative days

  9. Postoperative Edema

    Postoperative facial edema will be assessed clinically during follow-up visits. The presence and severity of edema will be recorded using a standardized clinical assessment. Edema will be categorized as absent, mild, moderate, or severe based on clinical examination and comparison with the preoperative condition.

    Time frame: Postoperative days 3, 5, and 7

  10. Duration of Impairment of Daily Activities

    The duration for which postoperative symptoms affect the participant's normal daily activities will be assessed using a postoperative patient diary. Participants will record the number of days during which their daily activities were partially or completely impaired because of the surgical procedure. The outcome will be expressed as the number of affected days

    Time frame: During the first 14 postoperative days

  11. Patient Satisfaction with Treatment at Each Extraction Site

    Patient satisfaction with the treatment received at each extraction site will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 4 months after the procedure. Participants will rate their satisfaction on a 100-ةm VAS ranging from 0 = completely dissatisfied to 100 = completely satisfied. Satisfaction will be recorded separately for each treatment site.

    Time frame: 4 months postoperatively

  12. Change in Oral Health-Related Quality of Life

    Oral health-related quality of life will be assessed using the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire. The OHIP-14 consists of 14 items evaluating the impact of oral conditions on daily life. Each item is scored on a five-point response scale from 0 = never to 4 = very often, with total scores ranging from 0 to 56. A lower total score indicates better oral health-related quality of life. The change in OHIP-14 score from baseline to 4 months will be assessed.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 months postoperatively

  13. Feasibility of Dental Implant Placement

    The feasibility of dental implant placement at each preserved extraction site will be assessed clinically and radiographically at the 4-month follow-up. The site will be considered suitable for implant placement when the available ridge width is sufficient to accommodate a dental implant with a diameter of at least 3.5 mm, according to the predefined surgical criteria. The outcome will be recorded as feasible or not feasible (Yes/No).

    Time frame: 4 months postoperatively

  14. Need for Additional Bone Augmentation Before Implant Placement

    The need for additional bone augmentation before dental implant placement will be assessed clinically and radiographically at the 4-month follow-up. Each treatment site will be classified according to whether additional augmentation is required to achieve adequate hard-tissue dimensions for implant placement. The outcome will be recorded as Yes/No, indicating whether additional bone augmentation is required.

    Time frame: 4 months postoperatively, before implant placement

  15. Width of Keratinized Tissue

    The width of keratinized tissue at each treated extraction site will be measured clinically using a periodontal probe. The measurement will be taken from the gingival margin to the mucogingival junction at the designated treatment site. The width of keratinized tissue will be recorded in millimeters (mm).

    Time frame: 4 months postoperatively

  16. Willingness to Undergo a Second Surgical Procedure

    The participant's willingness to undergo a second surgical procedure at each treatment site will be assessed by direct questioning during the follow-up visit before the planned implant-related procedure. The response will be recorded separately for each treatment site as Yes or No

    Time frame: 4 months postoperatively

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Siawasch SAM, Yu J, Castro AB, Dhondt R, Teughels W, Temmerman A, Quirynen M. Autologous platelet concentrates in alveolar ridge preservation: A systematic review with meta-analyses. Periodontol 2000. 2025 Feb;97(1):104-130. doi: 10.1111/prd.12609. Epub 2024 Sep 30. PubMed 39345008 ↗
  • Aldommari EA, Omair A, Qasem T. Titanium-prepared platelet-rich fibrin enhances alveolar ridge preservation: a randomized controlled clinical and radiographic study. Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 5;15(1):24065. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09528-4. PubMed 40617944 ↗
  • Al-Madhagy G, Darwich K, Alghoraibi I, Al-Moraissi EA. Radiographic evaluation of alveolar ridge preservation using a chitosan/polyvinyl alcohol nanofibrous matrix: A randomized clinical study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2023 Dec;51(12):772-779. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2023.09.020. Epub 2023 Oct 12. PubMed 37863731 ↗
  • Avila-Ortiz G, Chambrone L, Vignoletti F. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation interventions following tooth extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jun;46 Suppl 21:195-223. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13057. PubMed 30623987 ↗
  • Pan J, Xu Q, Hou J, Wu Y, Liu Y, Li R, Pan Y, Zhang D. Effect of platelet-rich fibrin on alveolar ridge preservation: A systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc. 2019 Sep;150(9):766-778. doi: 10.1016/j.adaj.2019.04.025. PubMed 31439204 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for May 2027, 6 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 13, 2026
First posted
Sep 17, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 4, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 2, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 4, 2027
Last update
Sep 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07826377
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 17, 2026
Start date
Oct 4, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 4, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Wafeek Mansour, DDS, MSc student
Contact
wafeekmansour89@gmail.com
+963 932 968 704
Mohammed Monzer Alsabbagh, DDS, MSc, PhD
Contact
momonzeralsabbagh@gmail.com
+963 945 626 810

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion