ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07675889Updated Oct 1, 2026

Intraoperative Longitude-Latitude-Depth Localization Versus Preoperative CT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Puncture Localization for 0.8-2 cm Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules

An interventional study of Longitude-Latitude-Depth Localization and CT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Puncture Localization in Pulmonary Nodule, Solitary, Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules and Pulmonary Nodules, sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Recruiting at 4 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-01.

Sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Updated Oct 1, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
274
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 26 studies in Solitary Pulmonary Nodule with a site in China — 5 open to participants now, 7 under way, none of them phase 3. Solitary Pulmonary Nodule · China.

Planned enrollment
4th of 13
274 · median 81
Started
2026
the only one that year
No phase
12 of 26
1 open now
Registered
26th of 26
by date

Among the 26 studies in Solitary Pulmonary Nodule with a site in China, this one is the 4th largest by planned enrollment of the 13 interventional ones, is the only one that started in 2026, is one of 12 with no phase, and was the 26th registered.

By phase

26 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

Observational13 · 3 open
No phasethis study12 · 1 open
Phase 11 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 2014; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2026.

What they test

Size and results

Median enrollment 81 across the 13 interventional studies, 500 across the 13 observational. Of the 11 that completed or were terminated, 3 (27%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 26 studies in Solitary Pulmonary Nodule with a site in China, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether intraoperative longitude-latitude-depth three-dimensional localization (LLD localization) is non-inferior to preoperative CT-guided percutaneous lung puncture localization for identifying 0.8-2 cm peripheral pulmonary nodules in adults undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)-assisted sublobar resection. It will also evaluate the safety and perioperative effectiveness of the two localization methods. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Is the localization accuracy rate of LLD localization non-inferior to that of CT-guided percutaneous lung puncture localization?
  2. Does LLD localization improve perioperative outcomes, including localization time, postoperative recovery, pain, quality of life, and perioperative complication rates?

Researchers will compare LLD localization with CT-guided percutaneous lung puncture localization to determine whether LLD localization provides comparable localization accuracy while reducing procedure-related complications and improving perioperative outcomes.

Participants will:

  1. Be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the LLD localization group or the CT-guided percutaneous lung puncture localization group.
  2. Undergo pulmonary nodule localization using the assigned localization method.
  3. Receive VATS-assisted sublobar resection following localization.
  4. Be assessed for localization accuracy, perioperative complications, localization time, postoperative chest drainage tube removal time, oxygenation index, postoperative hospital stay, pain scores, and quality-of-life outcomes.
  5. Complete follow-up assessments at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery.
Read the detailed description

Peripheral pulmonary nodules, particularly small subsolid nodules, are increasingly detected due to the widespread use of low-dose computed tomography (CT) screening. Accurate intraoperative identification of these nodules remains challenging during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery because many lesions are difficult to visualize or palpate after lung collapse. Reliable localization is therefore essential to facilitate precise sublobar resection while preserving healthy lung tissue.

Preoperative CT-guided percutaneous localization techniques are widely used in clinical practice. However, these procedures require additional preoperative intervention and may be associated with complications such as pneumothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage, hemothorax, patient discomfort, and increased procedural complexity. Furthermore, successful localization depends on radiologic resources and coordination between multiple departments.

The longitude-latitude-depth (LLD) localization method is a novel intraoperative three-dimensional localization strategy developed to identify pulmonary nodules using anatomical reference lines and preoperative imaging measurements. The method utilizes the natural longitudinal and transverse landmarks of the collapsed lung together with the measured depth of the target lesion to estimate the spatial location of the nodule during surgery. Because localization is performed intraoperatively without transcutaneous puncture, the technique has the potential to reduce procedure-related trauma and simplify the clinical workflow.

Preliminary clinical experience suggests that the LLD localization method may provide accurate localization while avoiding several limitations associated with preoperative puncture-based approaches. However, high-quality prospective evidence comparing this technique with current standard localization methods remains limited.

This multicenter randomized controlled trial has been designed to provide rigorous clinical evidence regarding the performance of the LLD localization technique. The study will evaluate whether this novel approach can serve as an effective alternative to conventional CT-guided localization and support broader clinical application in the surgical management of peripheral pulmonary nodules.

03

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Nodule, Solitary
  • Peripheral Pulmonary Nodules
  • Pulmonary Nodules

Keywords

  • Peripheral Pulmonary Nodule
  • Pulmonary Nodule Localization
  • Longitude-Latitude-Depth Localization
  • CT-Guided Percutaneous Localization
  • Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
  • Sublobar Resection
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Non-Inferiority Trial
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically diagnosed pulmonary nodule by non-contrast chest CT.
  • Age 18 to 80 years.
  • Expected survival time of at least 12 months.
  • Single peripheral pulmonary nodule with a diameter between 0.8 cm and 2 cm.
  • Chest CT characteristics meeting both of the following criteria:

    1. Solid component proportion ≤50%.
    2. Located subpleurally or in the outer one-third of the lung parenchyma.
  • Willing to undergo VATS-assisted sublobar resection.
  • No to pulmonary localization procedures or surgery.
  • Able to understand the study and willing to sign written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of other localization methods or other surgical procedures.
  • Concurrent participation in another clinical study.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Unwillingness or inability to cooperate with participation in this study for any reason.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
274 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Longitude-Latitude-Depth Localization Group

    Participants assigned to this arm will undergo intraoperative longitude-latitude-depth (LLD) localization of peripheral pulmonary nodules. The localization method uses anatomical reference lines and preoperative imaging measurements to determine the three-dimensional position of the target nodule during surgery. Following localization, participants will undergo video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)-assisted sublobar resection according to standard surgical practice.

    Procedure: Longitude-Latitude-Depth Localization

  • Active comparator
    CT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Puncture Localization Group

    Participants assigned to this arm will undergo preoperative CT-guided percutaneous pulmonary nodule localization according to institutional standard practice. Following localization, participants will undergo video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)-assisted sublobar resection according to standard surgical practice.

    Procedure: CT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Puncture Localization

Interventions

  • ProcedureLongitude-Latitude-Depth Localization

    The longitude-latitude-depth (LLD) localization method is a novel intraoperative three-dimensional pulmonary nodule localization technique developed for peripheral pulmonary nodules. Based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging, the target lesion is characterized according to its longitudinal position, transverse position, and depth relative to the visceral pleural surface. During surgery, corresponding anatomical landmarks on the collapsed lung are identified, and the projected surface location and lesion depth are used to estimate the three-dimensional position of the target nodule. Localization is performed intraoperatively without preoperative transcutaneous puncture or placement of localization materials. The identified localization point is subsequently used to guide video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)-assisted sublobar resection of the target lesion.

  • ProcedureCT-Guided Percutaneous Lung Puncture Localization

    CT-guided percutaneous lung puncture localization is a preoperative localization procedure performed under computed tomography guidance. A localization device is inserted through the chest wall into the lung parenchyma to mark the location of the target pulmonary nodule before surgery. Following localization, the position of the marker relative to the nodule is confirmed by CT imaging. The localization result is subsequently used to guide video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)-assisted sublobar resection.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Localization Accuracy Rate

    Localization accuracy rate is defined as the percentage of participants with successful localization, calculated as (number of successfully localized participants / total number of participants) × 100%. Localization is deemed successful if the actual distance between the localization point and the true nodule center, or its surface projection, is 1 cm or less. A distance exceeding 1 cm is classified as localization failure. After removal of the pulmonary nodule, measure the distance from the nodule center to the marked localization point with a ruler and record the value.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively on day 0.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Perioperative Complication Rate

    The perioperative complication rate is defined as the proportion of participants experiencing one or more procedure-related or surgery-related complications during the perioperative period. Complications include, but are not limited to, pneumothorax, hemothorax, pulmonary hemorrhage, hemoptysis, prolonged air leak, and other adverse events requiring medical intervention.

    Time frame: From the initiation of the localization procedure through hospital discharge, up to 14 days post-surgery.

  2. Localization Time

    Localization time is defined as the time required to complete the pulmonary nodule localization procedure. For the LLD group, localization time is measured from initiation of intraoperative localization to successful identification of the localization point. For the CT-guided localization group, localization time is measured from initiation of the CT-guided localization procedure to completion of localization confirmation. The outcome will be reported in minutes.

    Time frame: During the localization procedure on day 0 (from the start of localization to its confirmed completion, approximately 5-20 minutes).

  3. Postoperative Chest Drainage Tube Removal Time

    Chest drainage tube removal time is defined as the interval between completion of surgery and removal of the postoperative chest drainage tube according to institutional postoperative management criteria. The outcome will be reported in days. A shorter duration indicates faster postoperative recovery.

    Time frame: From the completion of surgery to chest drainage tube removal, assessed up to 14 days post-surgery.

  4. Oxygenation Index

    The oxygenation index is calculated as the ratio of arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO₂) to the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂). Higher values indicate better pulmonary oxygenation function. The outcome will be reported as the PaO₂/FiO₂ ratio measured from arterial blood gas analysis.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 1 and day 2.

  5. Postoperative Length of Hospital Stay

    Postoperative length of hospital stay is defined as the number of days from completion of surgery until hospital discharge. The outcome will be reported in days. A shorter hospital stay indicates faster postoperative recovery and resource utilization efficiency.

    Time frame: From the completion of surgery to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days.

  6. Postoperative Pain Score (VAS)

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is used to assess postoperative pain intensity. Participants rate their pain on a scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity. The outcome will be reported as the mean VAS score at each assessment time point.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 1, day 2, day 3, and day 7.

  7. Quality of Life Score (EORTC QLQ-C30)

    The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is used to assess health-related quality of life. The questionnaire includes functional scales, symptom scales, and a global health status scale. Scores are transformed to a 0-100 scale according to the EORTC scoring manual. For functional scales and global health status, higher scores indicate better functioning and quality of life. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden and worse quality of life.

    Time frame: Postoperative month 1, month 3, and month 6.

07

Study locations

4 of 4 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhao Y, Qiu J, Bright A, Zhao R, Li R, Tang Z, Yue W, Tian H, Sun Z. Intraoperative longitude-latitude-depth three-dimensional localization of pulmonary nodules. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2025 Jan 24;14(1):260-271. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-2024-1170. Epub 2025 Jan 22. PubMed 39958213 ↗
  • Suzuki K, Nagai K, Yoshida J, Ohmatsu H, Takahashi K, Nishimura M, Nishiwaki Y. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for small indeterminate pulmonary nodules: indications for preoperative marking. Chest. 1999 Feb;115(2):563-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.2.563. PubMed 10027460 ↗
  • Zhang B, Zhang Y, Le H, Li W, Chen C, Fang R, Pan X. Intraoperative localization in minimally invasive surgery for small pulmonary nodules: a retrospective study. Transl Cancer Res. 2021 Jul;10(7):3470-3478. doi: 10.21037/tcr-21-1059. PubMed 35116651 ↗
  • Zhou C, Li X, Li W, Qian J. Clock dial integrated positioning combined with single utility port video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a new localization method for lung tumors. J Thorac Dis. 2021 Feb;13(2):1143-1150. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3312. PubMed 33717587 ↗
  • Qiu B, Ji Y, He H, Zhao J, Xue Q, Gao S. Three-dimensional reconstruction/personalized three-dimensional printed model for thoracoscopic anatomical partial-lobectomy in stage I lung cancer: a retrospective study. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(4):1235-1246. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-571. PubMed 32953501 ↗
  • Park CH, Han K, Hur J, Lee SM, Lee JW, Hwang SH, Seo JS, Lee KH, Kwon W, Kim TH, Choi BW. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Preoperative Lung Localization for Pulmonary Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Chest. 2017 Feb;151(2):316-328. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.09.017. Epub 2016 Oct 4. PubMed 27717643 ↗
  • Jonas DE, Reuland DS, Reddy SM, Nagle M, Clark SD, Weber RP, Enyioha C, Malo TL, Brenner AT, Armstrong C, Coker-Schwimmer M, Middleton JC, Voisin C, Harris RP. Screening for Lung Cancer With Low-Dose Computed Tomography: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):971-987. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0377. PubMed 33687468 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — To protect participant privacy and maintain clinical data confidentiality, individual participant data will not be made publicly available.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2028, 24 months after the start.

Of 24 interventional studies with no phase under Solitary Pulmonary Nodule, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 24 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 23, 2026
First posted
Jun 30, 2026
StartActual
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2028
Last update
Oct 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 1, 2026
Sites
4 sites changed recruiting status (4 now recruiting)
Show 4 sites
  • Xingyi People's Hospital · Xingyi, Chinano status→Recruiting
  • Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region People's Hospital · Yinchuan, Chinano status→Recruiting
  • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · Jinan, Chinano status→Recruiting
  • Linqing People's Hospital · Linqing, Chinano status→Recruiting
Oct 1, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 1, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    4 sites changed recruiting status (4 now recruiting)
    Show 4 sites
    • Xingyi People's Hospital · Xingyi, Chinano status→Recruiting
    • Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region People's Hospital · Yinchuan, Chinano status→Recruiting
    • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · Jinan, Chinano status→Recruiting
    • Linqing People's Hospital · Linqing, Chinano status→Recruiting
    + 2 other changes: verification date and date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07675889
Responsible party
Zhenguo Sun (Associate Professor, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 30, 2026
Start date
Jul 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 1, 2026

Study contacts

Zhenguo Sun, Doctor of Medicine (MD)
Contact
sunzg@sdu.edu.cn
+86-185-6008-9136

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion