ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07915726Updated Nov 4, 2026

Endoscopic Papillectomy Versus Surgery for Ampullary Tumors: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

An observational study in Ampullary Neoplasm and Ampullary Adenoma, sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University · Observational

Updated Nov 4, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
306
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatment (endoscopic papillectomy [EP] with or without intraductal radiofrequency ablation [RFA]) and surgical treatment (transduodenal ampullectomy [TSA] and pancreatoduodenectomy [PD]) in patients with ampullary tumors (ampullary adenoma and early ampullary carcinoma), focusing on residual disease, recurrence, postoperative complications, and overall costs.

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, two-arm, prospective cohort study. The diagnosis of ampullary adenoma must be confirmed by biopsy.

The endoscopic treatment group receives EP; patients without intraductal extension receive EP alone, while patients with intraductal extension receive additional RFA in the same or a subsequent session. The surgical treatment group receives TSA or PD. Patients are followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial treatment, then annually for at least 5 years, with side-viewing duodenoscopy, targeted biopsy, and CT assessment. To control confounding between the two groups, propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting will be applied.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ampullary Neoplasm
  • Ampullary Adenoma

Keywords

  • endoscopic papillectomy
  • ampullary adenoma
  • intraductal radiofrequency ablation
  • transduodenal ampullectomy
  • pancreaticoduodenectomy
  • ampullary carcinoma
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University is the lead sponsor of 310 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with histologically confirmed ampullary adenoma or early ampullary carcinoma (Tis/T1) without invasion into the duodenal muscularis propria, staged M0/N0 by EUS , MRCP and CT , with intraductal tumor extension ≤ 20 mm on EUS, MRCP, or IDUS, undergoing endoscopic papillectomy or surgery.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients aged ≥18 years
  2. Patients with confirmed ampullary adenoma or early ampullary carcinoma (Tis/T1) based on endoscopic (i.e., without tumor invasion into the duodenal muscularis propria).
  3. Preoperative staging by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) , magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or computed tomography (CT) showing no distant (M0) and no lymph node metastasis (N0).
  4. Intraductal tumor extension (ITE) ≤ 20 mm assessed by EUS, MRCP or Intraductal ultrasound (IDUS ).
  5. Planned to undergo EP, with or without intraductal RFA, or surgical treatment (TSA or PD).
  6. Patients who provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients unable to tolerate general anesthesia or surgery.
  2. Ectopic duodenal papilla.
  3. to endoscopic procedures (e.g., severe esophageal stenosis, gastric outlet obstruction, or other conditions precluding endoscopic access to the papilla).
  4. Major upper abdominal surgery or previous biliary surgery history.
  5. Uncorrectable coagulopathy ( > 1.5) or thrombocytopenia ( count \< 50,000/μL), or inability to withhold antithrombotic (anticoagulant or antiplatelet) therapy for the planned endoscopic or surgical procedure..
  6. Pregnant or lactating women.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
306 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Endoscopic treatment group

    Patients undergoing EP with or without RFA.

    Procedure: Endoscopic treatment group

  • Surgical treatment group

    Patients undergoing surgical treatment.

    Procedure: Surgical treatment group

Interventions

  • ProcedureEndoscopic treatment group

    Endoscopic papillectomy (EP); EP combined with intraductal RFA for lesions with intraductal tumor extension.

  • ProcedureSurgical treatment group

    TSA or PD

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence rate at 12 months

    Recurrence confirmed by endoscopic biopsy after an interval ≥ 3 months from the end of treatment, assessed at the 12-month follow-up.

    Time frame: At 12 months after the initial treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. R0 resection rate

    Proportion of patients with complete resection achieved at the first endoscopic or surgical intervention and confirmed by histology (negative margins).

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  2. Procedure-related adverse event rate

    Proportion of patients who experienced at least one adverse event attributable to the initial endoscopic or surgical procedure within 30 days after the procedure, irrespective of severity.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days after the initial treatment

  3. Recurrence rate at 6 months

    Recurrence confirmed by endoscopic biopsy after an interval ≥ 3 months from the end of treatment, assessed at the 6-month follow-up.

    Time frame: At 6 months after the initial treatment

  4. Residual lesion rate

    Presence of residual adenoma tissue at the next endoscopy after treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 3 months after the initial treatment

  5. Clinical success rate

    Proportion of patients who achieved complete excision of the lesion (regardless of the number of procedures) with no histologically confirmed adenoma regrowth, no evidence of invasive cancer, and without the need for surgical resection, during follow-up up to 5 years after the initial treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 5 years after the initial treatment

  6. Endoscopic treatment failure rate

    Inability to completely resect the lesion endoscopically (regardless of the number of procedures), histopathologically invasive malignancy, or recurrence no longer amenable to endoscopic treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after the initial treatment

  7. Total number of readmissions within 12 months

    All readmissions due to disease-related symptoms (e.g., cholangitis, pancreatitis, obstructive jaundice) or treatment-related events (e.g., bleeding, perforation, anastomotic problems).

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after the initial treatment

  8. Technical success rate

    Proportion of patients in whom the planned procedure was completed as intended.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  9. Total treatment cost

    All direct medical costs from admission to 12 months after the initial treatment (including procedure, anesthesia, hospitalization, medication, examinations, and readmission costs).

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after the initial treatment

  10. Index hospitalization length of stay

    Number of calendar days from the date of admission for the initial treatment to the date of discharge for the initial treatment,including the day of admission

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  11. Total length of stay within 12 months

    Total number of calendar days spent in hospital within 12 months after the initial treatment, including the index hospitalization and all readmissions due to disease-related symptoms or treatment-related events.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after the initial treatment

  12. Postprocedural pancreatitis rate

    Defined by two of three criteria: characteristic abdominal pain; amylase or lipase \> 3× upper limit of normal; imaging features of pancreatitis; severity graded mild / moderate / severe per protocol.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days after the initial treatment

  13. Postprocedural bleeding rate

    Proportion of patients with clinically significant post-procedural bleeding within 30 days after the procedure, defined as any of the following after achieving primary haemostasis: overt bleeding symptoms (hematemesis, melena, hematochezia, or blood aspirated via nasogastric tube); haemodynamic instability attributable to bleeding; a decrease in haemoglobin greater than 2 g/dL; or direct endoscopic evidence of bleeding from the papillectomy site.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days after the initial treatment

  14. Postprocedural perforation rate

    Direct visualization of a transmural defect during endoscopy, or radiographic evidence of extraluminal free air on abdominal CT or plain radiograph.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days after the initial treatment

  15. Postprocedural cholangitis rate

    New onset temperature \>38 °C for more than 24 hours combined with cholestasis. Severity will be graded separately according to the TG18 severity classification (Grade I / II / III) and reported descriptively.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days after the initial treatment

  16. Cumulative recurrence rate

    Cumulative recurrence during annual follow-up up to 5 years

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, Baron TH, Hutter MM, Jacobson BC, Mergener K, Nemcek A Jr, Petersen BT, Petrini JL, Pike IM, Rabeneck L, Romagnuolo J, Vargo JJ. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):446-54. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027. No abstract available. PubMed 20189503 ↗
  • Kiriyama S, Kozaka K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA, Gabata T, Hata J, Liau KH, Miura F, Horiguchi A, Liu KH, Su CH, Wada K, Jagannath P, Itoi T, Gouma DJ, Mori Y, Mukai S, Gimenez ME, Huang WS, Kim MH, Okamoto K, Belli G, Dervenis C, Chan ACW, Lau WY, Endo I, Gomi H, Yoshida M, Mayumi T, Baron TH, de Santibanes E, Teoh AYB, Hwang TL, Ker CG, Chen MF, Han HS, Yoon YS, Choi IS, Yoon DS, Higuchi R, Kitano S, Inomata M, Deziel DJ, Jonas E, Hirata K, Sumiyama Y, Inui K, Yamamoto M. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):17-30. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.512. Epub 2018 Jan 5. PubMed 29032610 ↗
  • Abraham NS, Barkun AN, Sauer BG, Douketis J, Laine L, Noseworthy PA, Telford JJ, Leontiadis GI. American College of Gastroenterology-Canadian Association of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Management of Anticoagulants and Antiplatelets During Acute Gastrointestinal Bleeding and the Periendoscopic Period. Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Apr 1;117(4):542-558. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001627. PubMed 35297395 ↗
  • Karam E, Hollenbach M, Ali EA, Auriemma F, Gulla A, Heise C, Regner S, Gaujoux S; on the Pancreas 2000 Research Group; Regimbeau JM, Kahler G, Seyfried S, Vaillant JC, De Ponthaud C, Sauvanet A, Birnbaum D, Regenet N, Truant S, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Bruzzi M, Lupinacci RM, Brunel M, Belfiori G, Barbier L, Salame E, Souche FR, Schwarz L, Maggino L, Salvia R, Gagniere J, Del Chiaro M, Leung G, Hackert T, Kleemann T, Paik WH, Caca K, Dugic A, Muehldorfer S, Schumacher B, Albers D. Outcomes of rescue procedures in the management of locally recurrent ampullary tumors: A Pancreas 2000/EPC study. Surgery. 2023 May;173(5):1254-1262. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.12.011. Epub 2023 Jan 13. PubMed 36642655 ↗
  • Fritzsche JA, Fockens P, Barthet M, Bruno MJ, Carr-Locke DL, Costamagna G, Cote GA, Deprez PH, Giovannini M, Haber GB, Hawes RH, Hyun JJ, Itoi T, Iwasaki E, Kylanpaa L, Neuhaus H, Park JY, Reddy DN, Sakai A, Bourke MJ, Voermans RP. Expert consensus on endoscopic papillectomy using a Delphi process. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Oct;94(4):760-773.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 19. PubMed 33887269 ↗
  • Vanbiervliet G, Strijker M, Arvanitakis M, Aelvoet A, Arnelo U, Beyna T, Busch O, Deprez PH, Kunovsky L, Larghi A, Manes G, Moss A, Napoleon B, Nayar M, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Seewald S, Barthet M, van Hooft JE. Endoscopic management of ampullary tumors: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2021 Apr;53(4):429-448. doi: 10.1055/a-1397-3198. Epub 2021 Mar 16. PubMed 33728632 ↗
  • Abe S, Sakai A, Masuda A, Miki M, Harada Y, Nagao K, Inomata N, Kohashi S, Uemura H, Masuda S, Ashina S, Gonda M, Yamakawa K, Tsujimae M, Yamada Y, Tanaka T, Kobayashi T, Nakano R, Shiomi H, Tsugawa D, Yanagimoto H, Ajiki T, Kanzawa M, Fukumoto T, Itoh T, Kodama Y. Advantage of endoscopic papillectomy for ampullary tumors as an alternative treatment for pancreatoduodenectomy. Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 7;12(1):15134. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19439-3. PubMed 36071180 ↗
  • Hollenbach M, Heise C, Abou-Ali E, Gulla A, Auriemma F, Soares K, Leung G, Schattner MA, Jarnagin WR, Wang T, Caillol F, Giovannini M, Dahel Y, Hackert T, Paik WH, Zerbi A, Nappo G, Napoleon B, Arnelo U, Haraldsson E, Halimi A, Waldthaler A, Will U, Saadeh R, Masaryk V, van der Wiel SE, Bruno MJ, Perez-Cuadrado-Robles E, Deprez P, Sauvanet A, Bolm L, Keck T, Souche R, Fabre JM, Musquer N, Kahler G, Seyfried S, Petrone MC, Mariani A, Zaccari P, Belfiori G, Crippa S, Falconi M, Partelli S, Yilmaz B, Demir IE, Ceyhan GO, Satoi S, Regimbeau JM, Gagniere J, Repici A, Anderloni A, Vollmer C, Casciani F, Del Chiaro M, Oba A, Schulick RD, Berger A, Maggino L, Salvia R, Schemmer P, Wichmann D, Inoue Y, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Laranjo A, Libanio D, Kleemann T, Sandru V, Ilie M, Ahola R, Laukkarinen J, Schumacher B, Albers D, Curdia Goncalves T, Barbier L, Salame E, Weismuller TJ, Heling D, Alves A, Karam E, Regenet N, Dugic A, Muehldorfer S, Truant S, Caca K, Meier B, Miutescu BP, Tantau M, Birnbaum D, Miksch RC, Wedi E, Salzmann K, Bruzzi M, Lupinacci RM, David P, De Ponthaud C, Schmidt A, Regner S, Gaujoux S; ESAP study group. Endoscopic papillectomy versus surgical ampullectomy for adenomas and early cancers of the papilla: a retrospective Pancreas2000/European Pancreatic Club analysis. Gut. 2025 Feb 6;74(3):397-409. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-327996. PubMed 39642968 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07915726
Collaborators
Beijing Friendship Hospital, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shandong First Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Shandong Provincial Hospital, LanZhou University, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
Start date
Oct 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 20, 2032 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 20, 2036 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

Zhen Li, MD
Contact
qilulizhen@sdu.edu.cn
18560086106
Ning Zhong, MD
Contact
zhongning@email.sdu.edu.cn
18560086096
Zhen Li, MD
principal investigator · Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion