ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07672873SIPDEXUpdated Jun 29, 2026

Local Dexamethasone Administration in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

An interventional study of Saline (0.9%, sterile, for infusion) and Dexamethasone in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (SIP) and Dental Pain, sponsored by Marmara University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-29.

Sponsored by Marmara University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis is associated with a high incidence of inadequate pulpal anesthesia during endodontic treatment, particularly in mandibular molar teeth. Failure to achieve profound anesthesia may result in increased intraoperative pain and patient discomfort. Corticosteroids have been suggested as adjunctive agents to improve pain control and reduce inflammatory responses; however, the influence of different local administration techniques on anesthetic success and postoperative pain remains unclear.

The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial is to compare the effects of submucosal and intraligamentary dexamethasone administration on anesthetic success and pain control in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. A total of 84 participants requiring root canal treatment of mandibular first or second molars diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis will be randomly allocated to one of three groups: (1) inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) followed by submucosal saline injection (control group), (2) IANB followed by submucosal dexamethasone injection, and (3) IANB followed by intraligamentary dexamethasone injection.

All participants will receive standardized endodontic treatment under local anesthesia. The primary outcome measure is anesthetic success during access cavity preparation and pulp extirpation. Secondary outcome measures include postoperative pain intensity at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours, and postoperative analgesic consumption. The results of this study may provide evidence regarding the effectiveness of different local dexamethasone administration techniques and contribute to improved pain management strategies in endodontic practice.

Read the detailed description

Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis is associated with a high incidence of failure of inferior alveolar nerve block anesthesia, particularly in mandibular molars, resulting in pain during endodontic treatment and the frequent need for supplemental anesthesia. Corticosteroids have been investigated as adjunctive agents because of their anti-inflammatory properties and their potential to improve anesthetic success and reduce postoperative pain. However, limited evidence is available regarding the influence of different local administration techniques on these outcomes.

This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial aims to compare the effects of submucosal and intraligamentary administration of dexamethasone on anesthetic success and postoperative pain following inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of mandibular first or second molars.

Eighty-four participants will be randomly allocated into three parallel groups (28 participants per group):

Group 1 (Control): Inferior alveolar nerve block followed by submucosal injection of normal saline (placebo).

Group 2: Inferior alveolar nerve block followed by submucosal injection of dexamethasone.

Group 3: Inferior alveolar nerve block followed by intraligamentary injection of dexamethasone.

The primary outcome is anesthetic success, assessed using the Heft-Parker Visual Analog Scale (HP-VAS) during access cavity preparation and pulp extirpation. Secondary outcomes include postoperative pain intensity assessed using the HP-VAS at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after treatment, as well as the need for postoperative analgesic medication. The findings of this study may help identify the most effective local administration technique for dexamethasone to improve anesthetic success and postoperative pain management in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (SIP)
  • Dental Pain

Keywords

  • Inferior alveolar nerve block
  • Dexamethasone
  • Submucosal injection
  • Intraligamentary injection
  • Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
  • Endodontic treatment
  • Postoperative pain
  • Heft-Parker Visual Analog Scale
  • HP-VAS
03

In context

Toothache

142 studies on the registry are indexed under Toothache; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 84 is close to the median of 84 across 123 interventional studies indexed under Toothache.

Browse Toothache studies →

Lead sponsor

Marmara University is the lead sponsor of 599 studies on the registry; 138 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 to 65 years.
  • or ASA II systemic health status.
  • Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in a mandibular molar tooth.
  • Positive response to pulp sensibility tests.
  • Preoperative pain score greater than 54 mm on the Heft-Parker Visual Analog Scale (HP-VAS).
  • Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Allergy or to articaine, dexamethasone, or study-related medications.
  • Use of analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs, or antibiotics within the previous 12 hours.
  • Presence of periapical radiolucency or diagnosis of pulpal necrosis.
  • Significant systemic disease ( or higher).
  • Inability to complete pain assessment forms or follow study procedures.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Control Group

    Participants receive an inferior alveolar nerve block followed by a submucosal saline injection prior to endodontic treatment.

    Drug: Saline (0.9%, sterile, for infusion)

  • Experimental
    Submucosal Dexamethasone

    Participants receive an inferior alveolar nerve block followed by submucosal dexamethasone administration prior to endodontic treatment.

    Drug: Dexamethasone

  • Experimental
    Intraligamentary Dexamethasone

    Participants receive an inferior alveolar nerve block followed by intraligamentary dexamethasone administration prior to endodontic treatment.

    Drug: Dexamethasone

Interventions

  • DrugSaline (0.9%, sterile, for infusion)

    Normal saline is administered submucosally following inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis undergoing root canal treatment.

  • Dexamethasone (8 mg/2 mL) is administered submucosally following inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis undergoing root canal treatment.

  • Dexamethasone (8 mg/2 mL) is administered intraligamentarily following inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis undergoing root canal treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Anesthesia

    Anesthetic success will be assessed using the Heft-Parker Visual Analog Scale (HP-VAS) during access cavity preparation and pulp extirpation. Successful anesthesia is defined as no pain or mild pain (HP-VAS \<54 mm) without the need for supplemental anesthesia. Moderate or severe pain (HP-VAS ≥54 mm) or the need for supplemental anesthesia will be considered anesthetic failure.

    Time frame: Periprocedural (during access cavity preparation and pulp extirpation)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity

    Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed using the Heft-Parker Visual Analog Scale (HP-VAS) at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after treatment.

    Time frame: 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after treatment

  2. Need for Postoperative Analgesic Medication

    The need for postoperative analgesic medication will be assessed by recording whether participants require rescue analgesic medication during the 72-hour follow-up period after treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 72 hours after treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because there is no current data-sharing plan, and the study protocol and ethics approval do not include provisions for public sharing of individual participant-level data.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 6 months after the start.

Of 44 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Toothache, half reached primary completion within 5 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 6 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 45 studies reached it within 5 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 12.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 17, 2026
First posted
Jun 29, 2026
StartActual
Jun 15, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 15, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 18, 2026
Last update
Jun 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 29, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07672873
Lead sponsor
Marmara University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 29, 2026
Start date
Jun 15, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 18, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 29, 2026

Study contacts

Elif İrem Altıntaş, Research Assistant
Contact
eialtintas@icloud.com
+905425491411
Ayşe Karadayı, Assistant Professor
Contact
ayse.karadayi@marmara.edu.tr
+905330527343

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Dexamethasone

Start the discussion