ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07915154Updated Nov 9, 2026

Eye Covering and White Noise During Nasogastric Tube Insertion in Preterm Infants

An interventional study of Eye Covering and White Noise in Preterm Infants, sponsored by Marmara University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 3 Days and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Marmara University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Updated Nov 9, 2026Primary outcomes revisedNewly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Days and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the effects of eye covering and white noise during nasogastric tube insertion on comfort, pain, stress, and physiological parameters in preterm infants. A total of 90 preterm infants will be randomly assigned to one of three groups: eye covering, white noise, or combined eye covering and white noise. Comfort, pain, stress, heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation will be assessed before, during, and after nasogastric tube insertion.

Read the detailed description

Preterm infants are more sensitive to invasive procedures and environmental stimuli performed in neonatal intensive care units because their physiological and neurological systems are not yet fully mature. Nasogastric tube placement is one of the procedures frequently performed on these infants and can cause pain, stress, behavioral distress, and changes in physiological parameters. Therefore, it is important to evaluate non-pharmacological developmental care interventions aimed at reducing pain and stress, increasing comfort, and supporting physiological stability during the procedure. Eye-covering is a non-pharmacological intervention designed to reduce environmental light stimuli. White noise, on the other hand, aims to support the infant's calming and reduce sensitivity to environmental sounds by providing a continuous auditory stimulus without sudden changes. However, evidence regarding the effects of applying these two interventions-separately or in combination-during nasogastric tube placement on preterm infants' comfort, pain, stress levels, and physiological parameters is limited.

This study is a single-center, three-arm, randomized controlled trial planned to be conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit of a university hospital. A total of 90 preterm infants are planned to be included in the study, and the infants will be randomly assigned to three groups in a 1:1:1 ratio. Randomization will be performed using an online randomization program.

Infants in the first group will be fitted with a phototherapy eye mask 15 minutes before nasogastric tube placement, and the eye mask will be kept in place during the procedure and for 15 minutes afterward. Infants in the second group will begin listening to white noise 15 minutes before nasogastric tube placement, and the white noise will continue during the procedure and for 15 minutes afterward. White noise will be administered at a sound level of 40-60 dB via a pre-recorded audio file, and the sound source will be positioned approximately 30-50 cm away from the infant. For infants in the third group, both the eye-covering and white noise interventions will be administered simultaneously. Both interventions will begin 15 minutes before nasogastric tube placement and will continue throughout the procedure and for 15 minutes afterward. In all groups, the infants' comfort, pain, and stress levels, as well as their physiological parameters, will be assessed at three different time points: 5 minutes before the procedure, during the procedure, and 5 minutes after the procedure. Comfort levels will be determined using the Neonatal Comfort Behavior Scale (COMFORTneo), while pain and stress levels will be assessed using the ALPS-NEO Neonatal Pain and Stress Assessment Scale. Physiological assessments will include measurements of heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation.

Nasogastric tube placement will be performed by healthcare professionals working in the neonatal intensive care unit in accordance with the infant's clinical needs. No additional invasive procedures beyond clinical care requirements will be performed on the infants as part of this study. To minimize assessment bias, comfort, pain, and stress assessments will be conducted by neonatal nurses who are not part of the research team; physiological parameters will be recorded by the researcher. The study aims to compare the effects of eye-covering and white noise-both individually and in combination-on preterm infants' comfort, pain, stress levels, and physiological responses. The findings are expected to contribute to the scientific evidence regarding non-pharmacological, developmentally-based nursing interventions that can be used during nasogastric tube placement in neonatal intensive care units.

02

Conditions studied

  • Preterm Infants

Keywords

  • Nasogastric Tube Insertion
  • Eye Covering
  • White Noise
  • Neonatal Comfort
  • Neonatal Pain
  • Neonatal Stress
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Marmara University is the lead sponsor of 599 studies on the registry; 138 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Days and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Written and verbal parental consent for participation
  • Gestational age between 32 and 36 weeks
  • Birth weight of 1500 g or greater
  • Apgar score of 6 or greater at 1 and 5 minutes
  • Postnatal age of 3 days or older
  • Hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit for more than 24 hours
  • No sedation
  • No procedures such as peripheral intravenous catheter insertion, blood sampling, or aspiration within 1 hour before enrollment
  • Clinically stable condition

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Central nervous system problems such as intracranial hemorrhage, seizures, or hypertonia
  • Congenital or genetic anomalies
  • Receiving phototherapy
  • Respiratory distress requiring oxygen support
  • Receiving mechanical ventilation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Eye Covering

    Preterm infants will receive eye covering beginning 15 minutes before nasogastric tube insertion. The eye covering will remain in place during the procedure and for 15 minutes after the procedure.

    Other: Eye Covering

  • Experimental
    White Noise

    Preterm infants will receive white noise at 45 dB beginning 15 minutes before nasogastric tube insertion. White noise will continue during the procedure and for 15 minutes after the procedure.

    Other: White Noise

  • Experimental
    Eye Covering and White Noise

    Preterm infants will receive both eye covering and white noise beginning 15 minutes before nasogastric tube insertion. Both interventions will continue during the procedure and for 15 minutes after the procedure.

    Other: Eye Covering and White Noise

Interventions

  • OtherEye Covering

    Eye covering will be applied 15 minutes before nasogastric tube insertion and will remain in place during the procedure and for 15 minutes after the procedure.

  • OtherWhite Noise

    White noise at 45 dB will be started 15 minutes before nasogastric tube insertion and will continue during the procedure and for 15 minutes after the procedure.

  • OtherEye Covering and White Noise

    Eye covering and white noise at 45 dB will be applied together beginning 15 minutes before nasogastric tube insertion. Both interventions will continue during the procedure and for 15 minutes after the procedure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neonatal Comfort Level Assessed Using the COMFORTneo Scale

    The scale was developed to measure behavior in newborns in the intensive care unit without relying on physiological parameters. COMFORTneo is a Likert-type scale consisting of six parameters: alertness, calmness/agitation, respiratory response, crying, body movements, facial tension, and muscle tone. It is stated that the lowest possible score on the Neonatal Comfort Behavior Scale is 6, and the highest is 30. High scores indicate that the infant is not comfortable and requires interventions to ensure comfort. Additionally, scores of 4-6 on the Numerical Rating Scales indicate moderate pain and distress, while scores of 7-10 indicate severe pain and distress. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the scale was conducted by Kahraman et al. in 2014. In the Turkish validity and reliability study, the Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was reported as 0.85.

    Time frame: 5 minutes before, during procedure, and 5 minutes after nasogastric tube insertion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Neonatal Pain and Stress Assessed Using the ALPS-Neo Scale

    It was developed by Lundqvist et al. to assess pain and stress in preterm and term newborns, and the scale's Cronbach's alpha coefficient was reported as 0.95 (Lundqvist et al. 2014). The Turkish validity and reliability of the scale were established by Ceylan and Bolışık (2017). The ALPS-Neo is a 3-point Likert-type scale consisting of 5 items: the newborn's facial expression, breathing pattern, limb tone, hand and foot activities, and activity level. Measurements are made through observation. As the score increases, pain and stress increase. The evaluation results indicate that a score of 0-2 indicates the presence of pain and stress; no intervention is required for pain and stress. A score of 3-5 indicates the presence of moderate pain and stress. A score of 5 or higher indicates the presence of severe pain and stress.

    Time frame: 5 minutes before, during procedure, and 5 minutes after nasogastric tube insertion

  2. Heart Rate

    Heart rate will be measured using a pulse oximeter and recorded as beats per minute.

    Time frame: 5 minutes before, during procedure, and 5 minutes after nasogastric tube insertion

  3. Respiratory Rate

    Respiratory rate will be measured and recorded as breaths per minute.

    Time frame: 5 minutes before, during procedure, and 5 minutes after nasogastric tube insertion

  4. Oxygen Saturation

    Peripheral oxygen saturation will be measured using a pulse oximeter and recorded as a percentage.

    Time frame: 5 minutes before, during procedure, and 5 minutes after nasogastric tube insertion

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Nov 2027, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 29, 2026
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Nov 1, 2027
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionNeonatal Comfort Level Assessed Using the COMFORTneo Scale: how it is measured was reworded
Nov 9, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionNeonatal Pain and Stress Assessed Using the ALPS-Neo Scale: how it is measured was reworded
Nov 9, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    Primary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionNeonatal Comfort Level Assessed Using the COMFORTneo Scale: how it is measured was reworded
    Secondary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionNeonatal Pain and Stress Assessed Using the ALPS-Neo Scale: how it is measured was reworded
    + 2 other changes: verification date and description
  2. Nov 4, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07915154
Lead sponsor
Marmara University
Responsible party
Ayşegül Şimşek (Associate Professor, Marmara University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Aysegu Simsek, PhD
Contact
asimsek@marmara.edu.tr
+905413155774
Aysegul Simsek, PhD
principal investigator · Marmara University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion