ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06691269Updated Aug 12, 2026

Photobiomodulation and Tooth Analgesia

An interventional study of Photobiomodulation and Topical Benzocaine in Dental Anaesthesia, Dental Pain and Dental Analgesia, sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-12.

Sponsored by University of Maryland, Baltimore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to test photobiomodulation (PBM) with a non-invasive light device for reducing discomfort during dental treatments in children. We plan to conduct a series of three clinical studies in 200 school-aged children requiring routine dental treatment. The first study aims to test if PBM works for tooth and soft tissue by assessing response to cold testing and probing of gums. The second study aims to test if use of PBM on soft tissues before injection reduces discomfort. The third study aims to test if PBM can be used to do simple dental fillings in baby teeth without numbing injection.

Read the detailed description

Dental anxiety and fear of pain during procedures are major barriers to oral health care, especially among children. Traditional local anesthesia injections can be distressing for pediatric patients. The fear of needle and dental pain are perhaps among the top reasons for avoidance of dental care. Photomodulation (PBM) is a promising non-tissue penetrating (i.e. minimally invasive) approach for achieving tooth and soft tissue anesthesia/analgesia in dental patients.Investigators plan to use an intra-oral PBM device with a tip comprising of a series of photonic emitters with specific wavelengths that can go through the tooth structure and bone, blocking the nerve conduction like local anesthetics. Research has shown that one burst of light application (for about 20 second) can provide up to 15-20 minutes of pain relief. This could significantly reduce dental anxiety and facilitate access to care and the implications of such an alternative to needles will be a gamechanger especially in pediatric dentistry. The proposed randomzied clinical trials will evaluate if photobiomodulation (PBM) with the near-infrared device produces dental analgesia comparable to local anesthetic injection in pediatric patients. This will be a series of three prospective, clinical studies in 200 school-aged children aged 6-12 years requiring routine dental procedures. The first trial will test the effectiveness of PBM in tooth and soft tissue analgesia by assessing response to diagnostic approaches such as cold pulp testing and gingival probing. The second trial will assess the pre-emptive analgesic effect of PBM on soft tissues at the site of injection prior to local anesthesia infiltration to reduce the discomfort of injection, and the third trial will assess effectiveness of PBM in providing tooth analgesia (compared to routinely used topical anesthesia/local infiltration) for simple restorative procedures in primary teeth.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Anaesthesia
  • Dental Pain
  • Dental Analgesia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • photobiomodulation
  • dental analgesia
  • dental anesthesia
03

In context

Toothache

142 studies on the registry are indexed under Toothache; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 84 across 123 interventional studies indexed under Toothache.

Browse Toothache studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Maryland, Baltimore is the lead sponsor of 700 studies on the registry; 132 are open to participants now.

Of its 92 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 66 (72%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy children, aged 6-12 years, requiring routine dental treatment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with uncooperative behavior or signficant medical history
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PBM- Study 1

    In PBM group, the selected tooth will receive one burst of light application (20 seconds) before being subjected to sensibility testing and gingival probing.

    Device: Photobiomodulation

  • No intervention
    no PBM - Study 1

    In the control (no PBM) group, the selected tooth will be subjected to sensibility testing and gingival probing without PBM.

  • Experimental
    PBM- Study 2

    PBM (one burst/ 20 seconds application) at injection site (prior to local anesthesia infiltration)

    Device: Photobiomodulation

  • Active comparator
    no PBM- Study 2

    Topical benzocaine at injection site (prior to local anesthesia infiltration)

    Drug: Topical Benzocaine

  • Experimental
    PBM- Study 3

    PBM (one burst/ 20 seconds application) followed by traditional tooth preparation with burs/handpiece and placement of restoration. Additional bursts may be provided every 20 minutes depending on the length of the procedure and patient-reported discomfort.

    Device: Photobiomodulation

  • Active comparator
    no PBM- Study 3

    Topical benzocaine/Local infiltration followed by traditional tooth preparation with burs/handpiece and placement of restoration.

    Drug: Topical Benzocaine · Drug: Local Anesthesia

Interventions

  • DevicePhotobiomodulation

    Photomodulation (PBM) is a promising non-tissue penetrating (i.e. minimally invasive) approach for achieving tooth and soft tissue anesthesia/analgesia in dental patients. A patent pending near-infrared laser technology that aims to provide dental analgesia will be used for PBM. This intra-oral PBM device comes with a tip comprising of a series of photonic emitters with specific wavelengths that can go through the tooth structure and bone, blocking the nerve conduction like local anesthetics. Research has shown that one burst of light application (for about 20 second) can provide up to 15-20 minutes of pain relief. Based on existing research PBM does not present a serious risk to health, safety, or welfare of a subject.

    Also known as: Low-level light therapy, near-infrared light

  • Topical Benzocaine at injection site to reduce discomfort of local infiltration

  • DrugLocal Anesthesia

    Local infiltration using local anesthetics with epinephrine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Study 1- Response to Cold Pulp (Pulp sensibility) testing

    Name of measurement: Response to cold pulp testing. Measurement tool: Child's acknowledgement of cold sensation. A small amount of cold spray (Endo Ice/Ethyl Chloride) will be sprayed onto a cotton pellet, and gently place the cotton pellet on the middle third of the buccal surface of the tooth for a few seconds or until the child indicates a sensation. Child will be asked to raise their hand when they feel a cold sensation. Unit of measurement: Response will be noted (Yes/No), if the cold sensation is felt by the child on application of cold stimulus. Difference in cold pulp testing between PBM and no PBM group.

    Time frame: during the intervention (application of cold stimuli)

  2. Study 1- Anxiety related to routine gingival probing

    Name of the measurement: Assessment of anxiety Measurement tool: Visual analogue scale (VAS)- a 100-mm horizontal line with two extremes "not anxious" (left) to "very anxious" (right). Measurement unit: rating scale

    Time frame: pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after the procedure

  3. Study 1- Pain (physician documented) related to routine gingival probing

    Name of the measurement: Heart rate Measurement tool: Pulse oximetry. Unit of measurement: Heart rate per minute

    Time frame: pre-procedure (baseline), during procedure, and immediately after procedure

  4. Study 1- Self-reported Pain related to routine gingival probing

    Name of the measurement: Pain/discomfort Measurement tool: Self-reported Wong Baker faces Scale (six-point scale from score 0 (no hurt) to score 10 (hurts worst). Unit of measurement: Rating Scale

    Time frame: pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after procedure

  5. Study 2- Anxiety related to local anesthesia injection (local infiltration)

    Name of the measurement: Assessment of procedural anxiety Measurement tool: Visual analogue scale (VAS)- a 100-mm horizontal line with two extremes "not anxious" (left) to "very anxious" (right). Measurement unit: rating scale

    Time frame: pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after the procedure

  6. Study 2- Pain (physician documented) related to local anesthesia injection (local infiltration)

    Name of the measurement: Heart rate Measurement tool: Pulse oximetry. Unit of measurement: Heart rate per minute

    Time frame: pre-procedure (baseline), during procedure, and immediately after procedure

  7. Study 2- Self-reported Pain related to local anesthesia injection (local infiltration)

    Name of the measurement: Pain/discomfort Measurement tool: Self-reported Wong Baker faces Scale (six-point scale from score 0 (no hurt) to score 10 (hurts worst). Unit of measurement: Rating Scale

    Time frame: pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after procedure

  8. Study 2- Cooperative behavior related to local anesthesia injection (local infiltration)

    Name of the measurement: Cooperative behavior Measurement tool: Frankel's Behavior rating scale (definitely negative, negative, positive, definitely positive) Unit of measurement: Rating Scale

    Time frame: pre-procedure (baseline), during, and immediately after procedure

  9. Study 3- Anxiety during restorative procedure

    Name of the measurement: Assessment of procedural anxiety Measurement tool: Visual analogue scale (VAS)- a 100-mm horizontal line with two extremes "not anxious" (left) to "very anxious" (right). Measurement unit: rating scale

    Time frame: pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after the procedure

  10. Study 3- Pain (physician documented) during restorative procedure

    Name of the measurement: Heart rate Measurement tool: Pulse oximetry. Unit of measurement: Heart rate per minute

    Time frame: pre-procedure (baseline), during procedure, and immediately after procedure

  11. Study 3- Self-reported Pain during restorative procedure

    Name of the measurement: Pain/discomfort Measurement tool: Self-reported Wong Baker faces Scale (six-point scale from score 0 (no hurt) to score 10 (hurts worst). Unit of measurement: Rating Scale

    Time frame: pre-procedure (baseline) and immediately after procedure

  12. Study 3- Cooperative behavior during restorative procedure

    Name of the measurement: Cooperative behavior Measurement tool: Frankel's Behavior rating scale (definitely negative, negative, positive, definitely positive) Unit of measurement: Rating Scale

    Time frame: pre-procedure (baseline), during, and immediately after procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Study 1- Duration of tooth analgesia in PBM group

    Name of measurement: Duration or time taken for response to cold pulp testing. Measurement tool: Child's acknowledgement of cold sensation. A small amount of cold spray (Endo Ice/Ethyl Chloride) will be sprayed onto a cotton pellet, and gently place the cotton pellet on the middle third of the buccal surface of the tooth for a few seconds or until the child indicates a sensation. Child will be asked to raise their hand when they feel a cold sensation. Unit of measurement: Time (measured in seconds) taken for response in PBM group and no PBM groups.

    Time frame: baseline and immediately after response is felt

  2. Study 1- Duration of soft tissue analgesia

    Name of measurement: Duration of analgesia or time taken for patient to respond to gingival probing Measurement tool: Yes/No to discomfort experienced during gingival probing Unit of measurement: Time in seconds

    Time frame: baseline, immediately after response is felt

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • University of Maryland School of Dentistry, Pediatric Clinics
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shrutha SP, Havale R, Aishwarya BG, Raj S, Quazi N, Prasad V, Guttiganur N, Kandalam R. Use of Three Pre-Injection Procedures to Reduce Pain Perception of Intraoral Injections in Eight- to 12-Year-Old Children: Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatr Dent. 2024 Sep 15;46(5):306-311. PubMed 39420491 ↗
  • Shekarchi F, Nokhbatolfoghahaei H, Chiniforush N, Mohaghegh S, Haeri Boroojeni HS, Amini S, Biria M. Evaluating the Preemptive Analgesic Effect of Photo-biomodulation Therapy on Pain Perception During Local Anesthesia Injection in Children: A Split-mouth Triple-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Photochem Photobiol. 2022 Sep;98(5):1195-1200. doi: 10.1111/php.13605. Epub 2022 Feb 17. PubMed 35122442 ↗
  • Kulkarni S, George R, Love R, Ranjitkar S. Effectiveness of photobiomodulation in reducing pain and producing dental analgesia: a systematic review. Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Sep;37(7):3011-3019. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03590-4. Epub 2022 Jun 14. PubMed 35699807 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06691269
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 15, 2024
Start date
Jul 7, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 12, 2026

Study contacts

Vineet Dhar, BDS, MDS, PhD
Contact
vdhar@umaryland.edu
410-706-7970
Kue-Ling Hsu, DDS, MS
Contact
khsu@umaryland.edu
410-706-7970

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion