ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07130760Updated Nov 3, 2026

Intraligamentary vs Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

An interventional study of Intraligamentary Injection and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (SIP), Dental Pain and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Failure, sponsored by Aula Dental Avanzada. Recruiting at 2 sites in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Aula Dental Avanzada · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This multicenter randomized trial compares the clinical effectiveness of intraligamentary injection versus inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars. The goal is to determine which technique provides better pain control during endodontic treatment.

Read the detailed description

Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars presents a clinical challenge due to the difficulty in achieving profound anesthesia. This prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluates two anesthetic techniques-intraligamentary injection (ILA) versus inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB)-to compare their efficacy in eliminating pain during endodontic access. Patients will be enrolled from multiple dental centers following standardized inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pain will be assessed using validated scales. Statistical analysis will be conducted to determine significant differences in anesthetic success between groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (SIP)
  • Dental Pain
  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Failure
  • Local Anesthesia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Inferior alveolar nerve block
  • Pulpitis Mandibular molars
  • Emergency dental treatment
  • Symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
  • Randomized clinical trial
  • Endodontics
  • Dental pain
  • Local anesthesia
  • Intraligamentary anesthesia
03

In context

Toothache

142 studies on the registry are indexed under Toothache; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 52 is below the median of 84 across 123 interventional studies indexed under Toothache.

Browse Toothache studies →

Lead sponsor

Aula Dental Avanzada is the lead sponsor of 14 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Presenting with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in a mandibular molar
  • Vital response to cold testing
  • Ability to understand and provide
  • Available for follow-up and data collection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to lidocaine or epinephrine
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Use of analgesics or anti-inflammatory drugs in the previous 6 hours
  • Non-vital or previously treated teeth
  • Significant systemic disease ( or above)
  • History of psychiatric or neurological disorders affecting pain perception
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
52 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intraligamentary Injection Group

    Patients in this arm will receive intraligamentary anesthesia prior to endodontic access.

    Procedure: Intraligamentary Injection

  • Active comparator
    Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Group

    Patients in this arm will receive standard inferior alveolar nerve block prior to endodontic access.

    Procedure: Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

Interventions

  • ProcedureIntraligamentary Injection

    Intraligamentary local anesthesia will be administered using a standard dental syringe with 2% lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine.

    Also known as: Intraligamental anesthesia (ILA), Periodontal ligament injection (PDL injection), Intraligamentary anesthetic technique

  • ProcedureInferior Alveolar Nerve Block

    Inferior alveolar nerve block will be performed with 2% lidocaine and 1:100,000 epinephrine using the conventional technique.

    Also known as: Inferior alveolar nerve anesthesia, Inferior dental block

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain during endodontic access

    Pain intensity experienced by the patient during endodontic access after the assigned anesthetic technique.

    Time frame: Immediately after access cavity preparation (within 30 minutes of anesthesia)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Need for supplementary anesthesia

    Whether the initial anesthesia technique was sufficient or required additional anesthetic injection to complete the procedure pain-free.

    Time frame: During access or initial root canal instrumentation (within first 45 minutes)

  2. Patient satisfaction immediately after treatment

    Patient-reported satisfaction immediately after treatment will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale. The scale ranges from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). Higher scores indicate better satisfaction.

    Time frame: End of visit (within 1 hour)

  3. Postoperative pain at 7 days

    Pain intensity reported by the patient at day 7 after treatment will be assessed using a 4-point ordinal scale: 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe). Higher scores indicate worse pain.

    Time frame: Day 7 post-treatment

  4. Patient satisfaction at 7 days

    Patient-reported satisfaction one week after treatment will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale. The scale ranges from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 5 (very satisfied). Higher scores indicate better satisfaction.

    Time frame: Day 7 post-treatment

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Clínica Dental 4
    Ferrol, A coruña 15402, Spain
    Recruiting
  • Clínica Dental Esteve
    Alicante, Alicante 03001, Spain
    Recruiting
    • Guillem Esteve-Pardo, PhD · Contactguillem@clinicaesteve.com · 34965215755
    • Guillem Esteve-Pardo, PhD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This study will not share individual participant data (IPD).

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 44 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Toothache, half reached primary completion within 5 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's planned 24 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 45 studies reached it within 5 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 12.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 5, 2025
First posted
Aug 19, 2025
StartActual
Jun 20, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 2027
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date
1 update, last Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07130760
Lead sponsor
Aula Dental Avanzada
Responsible party
Guillem Esteve-Pardo (Principal Investigator - DDS, PhD (Bioengineering), Aula Dental Avanzada) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 19, 2025
Start date
Jun 20, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Guillem Esteve-Pardo, PhD
Contact
guillem@clinicaesteve.com
34965215755

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion