ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07628647LWBCUpdated Nov 3, 2026

Living Well With Brain Cancer: A Group-Based Intervention to Promote Whole-Person Well-Being

An interventional study of Group Self-Management Sessions and Educational Materials Only in Brain Cancer, sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver. Recruiting at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Denver · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Updated Nov 3, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
64
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the newly designed group self-management program is feasible to conduct and improves mental and behavioral health outcomes compared to a control group in people diagnosed with brain cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is it feasible to conduct this program?
  • Does the new group self-management program improve behavioral health outcomes more than in the control group that will not be in a group setting?
02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Cancer

Keywords

  • Brain cancer
  • Glioblastoma
  • Astrocytoma
  • Ependymoma
  • Oligodendroglioma
  • Brain tumor
  • Mental health
  • Glioma
  • Quality of life
03

In context

Brain Neoplasms

2,440 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Neoplasms; 540 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 64 is above the median of 40 across 1,831 interventional studies indexed under Brain Neoplasms.

Browse Brain Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Denver is the lead sponsor of 1,543 studies on the registry; 317 are open to participants now.

Of its 147 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 92 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Currently living in the United States
  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Confirmed diagnosis of a malignant brain tumor including diffuse gliomas, World Health Organization (WHO) grades II, III, and IV (either by directly sharing their pathology report or confirmation from their prescribing treating provider)
  • Treating prescribing provider who follows regularly with participant

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<1 month since initial diagnosis and/or \<1 month since surgical resection
  • Enrollment in hospice
  • Significant physical or cognitive disabilities that prohibit involvement using our clinician's judgement as a self-management expert, with consultation with personal clinician if needed
  • Currently receiving psychiatric treatment for a serious mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia)
  • Not able to communicate in English at a conversational level
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
64 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group Self-Management Arm

    Participants in the intervention arm will attend eight 90-minute virtual group sessions with nurse and peer educators that will navigate them through the different self-management content.

    Behavioral: Group Self-Management Sessions

  • Active comparator
    Education Only Arm

    Participants in this arm will be invited to use an online learning management system to access the educational materials. There are no group sessions, and there are no nurse or peer educators that will lead the participants through the materials.

    Other: Educational Materials Only

Interventions

  • BehavioralGroup Self-Management Sessions

    Our targeted self-management intervention will be delivered virtually through eight 90-minute sessions over a 3-4-month period using materials adapted from previous focus groups of people with brain cancer and an expert design panel. A nurse educator and peer educator will facilitate the virtual sessions. The content covers topics focused on how to improve the quality of life in people diagnosed with brain cancer.

    Also known as: Self-management intervention

  • OtherEducational Materials Only

    Self-management content specifically designed for people with brain cancer will be uploaded into a learning management system. The content will be broken up into modules that will be unlocked at the same frequency as the self-management group sessions arm. There are no group sessions involved, and there are no nurse or peer educators to lead the participants through this content.

    Also known as: Content only

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline of Overall Score from the RAND 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36)

    Evaluated by the change overall score of the RAND 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument (SF-36) at baseline, immediate after intervention, and 3 months post-intervention

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention, and 3 months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Score of NIH Toolbox Item Bank v3.0 - Perceived Stress

    Change from Baseline to immediately after intervention in score of NIH Toolbox Item Bank v3.0 - Percevied Stress (Ages 18+) - Fixed Form

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

  2. Change from Baseline in Score of Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Positive Affect and Well-Being

    Change from baseline to immediately post-intervention in score of Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Positive Affect and Well-Being

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

  3. Change from Baseline of score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Depression

    Change from baseline to immediately post-intervention of score from the Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Depression survey

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

  4. Change from Baseline in Score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Fatigue - Short Form

    Change from baseline to immediately post-intervention in score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 Fatigue - Short Form survey

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

  5. Overall Score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Upper Extremity Function and Lower Extremity Function

    Score evaluated at baseline from the Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Upper Extremity Function and Lower Extremity Function surveys

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Overall score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Cognitive Function - Short Form and Emotional and Behavioral Dyscontrol - Short Form

    Baseline overall score from the Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Cognitive Function - Short Form and Emotional and Behavioral Dyscontrol - Short Form surveys

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. Change from Baseline in Score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.1 - Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities - Short Form

    Change in score from baseline to immediately post-intervention of the Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.1 - Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activites - Short Form survey

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

  8. Change from Baseline in Score from Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance - Short Form

    Change in score from baseline to immediately post-intervention from the Neuro-QOL Item Bank v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance - Short Form survey

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

  9. Change from Baseline of Score from PROMIS Item Bank v1.0 - Self Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions - Managing Symptoms - Short Form 8a

    Change in score from baseline to immediately post-intervention from the PROMIS Item Bank v1.0 - Self Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions - Managing Symptoms - Short Form 8a survey

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-intervention

  10. Survival

    Self/contact-reported survival

    Time frame: Immediate post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Krippendorff K. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications; 2013.
  • Stemler S. An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment. Research & Evaluation. 2001;7(17): 137-146.
  • Gruber-Baldini AL, Velozo C, Romero S, Shulman LM. Validation of the PROMIS(R) measures of self-efficacy for managing chronic conditions. Qual Life Res. 2017 Jul;26(7):1915-1924. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1527-3. Epub 2017 Feb 26. PubMed 28239781 ↗
  • Gabel N, Altshuler DB, Brezzell A, Briceno EM, Boileau NR, Miklja Z, Kluin K, Ferguson T, McMurray K, Wang L, Smith SR, Carlozzi NE, Hervey-Jumper SL. Health Related Quality of Life in Adult Low and High-Grade Glioma Patients Using the National Institutes of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Neuro-QOL Assessments. Front Neurol. 2019 Mar 15;10:212. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00212. eCollection 2019. PubMed 30930834 ↗
  • Gershon RC, Lai JS, Bode R, Choi S, Moy C, Bleck T, Miller D, Peterman A, Cella D. Neuro-QOL: quality of life item banks for adults with neurological disorders: item development and calibrations based upon clinical and general population testing. Qual Life Res. 2012 Apr;21(3):475-86. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9958-8. Epub 2011 Aug 27. PubMed 21874314 ↗
  • Bunevicius A. Reliability and validity of the SF-36 Health Survey Questionnaire in patients with brain tumors: a cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 4;15(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0665-1. PubMed 28472964 ↗
  • Blixen C, Perzynski A, Kanuch S, Dawson N, Kaiser D, Lawless ME, Seeholzer E, Sajatovic M. Training peer educators to promote self-management skills in people with serious mental illness (SMI) and diabetes (DM) in a primary health care setting. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015 Apr;16(2):127-37. doi: 10.1017/S1463423614000176. Epub 2014 Apr 7. PubMed 24703014 ↗
  • Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975 Mar;31(1):103-15. PubMed 1100130 ↗
  • Taves DR. Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1974 May;15(5):443-53. doi: 10.1002/cpt1974155443. No abstract available. PubMed 4597226 ↗
  • McVoy M, Delbello M, Levin J, Modi AC, Forthun LF, Briggs F, Appling D, Broadnax M, Conroy C, Cooley R, Eapen G, Sajatovic M. A customized adherence enhancement program for adolescents and young adults with suboptimal adherence and bipolar disorder: Trial design and methodological report. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Apr;115:106729. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106729. Epub 2022 Mar 9. PubMed 35278693 ↗
  • Barr VJ, Robinson S, Marin-Link B, Underhill L, Dotts A, Ravensdale D, Salivaras S. The expanded Chronic Care Model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the Chronic Care Model. Hosp Q. 2003;7(1):73-82. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2003.16763. PubMed 14674182 ↗
  • Reynolds R, Dennis S, Hasan I, Slewa J, Chen W, Tian D, Bobba S, Zwar N. A systematic review of chronic disease management interventions in primary care. BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 9;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0692-3. PubMed 29316889 ↗
  • Ruta D, Garratt A, Abdalla M, Buckingham K, Russell I. The SF 36 health survey questionnaire. A valid measure of health status.. BMJ. 1993 Aug 14;307(6901):448-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6901.448-b. No abstract available. PubMed 8374477 ↗
  • Cramer JA, Perrine K, Devinsky O, Meador K. A brief questionnaire to screen for quality of life in epilepsy: the QOLIE-10. Epilepsia. 1996 Jun;37(6):577-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1996.tb00612.x. PubMed 8641236 ↗
  • Montgomery SA, Asberg M. A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change. Br J Psychiatry. 1979 Apr;134:382-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.134.4.382. PubMed 444788 ↗
  • Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. PubMed 11556941 ↗
  • Blixen C, Perzynski A, Cage J, Smyth K, Moore S, Sila C, Pundik S, Sajatovic M. Using focus groups to inform the development of stroke recovery and prevention programs for younger African-American (AA) men. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015 Jun;22(3):221-30. doi: 10.1179/1074935714Z.0000000006. Epub 2015 Jan 14. PubMed 26084323 ↗
  • Sajatovic M, Tatsuoka C, Welter E, Perzynski AT, Colon-Zimmermann K, Van Doren JR, Bukach A, Lawless ME, Ryan ER, Sturniolo K, Lhatoo S. Targeted Self-Management of Epilepsy and Mental Illness for individuals with epilepsy and psychiatric comorbidity. Epilepsy Behav. 2016 Nov;64(Pt A):152-159. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.08.012. Epub 2016 Oct 12. PubMed 27743547 ↗
  • Perzynski AT, Ramsey RK, Colon-Zimmermann K, Cage J, Welter E, Sajatovic M. Barriers and facilitators to epilepsy self-management for patients with physical and psychological co-morbidity. Chronic Illn. 2017 Sep;13(3):188-203. doi: 10.1177/1742395316674540. Epub 2016 Oct 19. PubMed 28783975 ↗
  • Sajatovic M, Colon-Zimmermann K, Kahriman M, Fuentes-Casiano E, Burant C, Aebi ME, Cassidy KA, Lhatoo S, Einstadter D, Chen P. One-year follow-up of a remotely delivered epilepsy self-management program in high-risk people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Jul;96:237-243. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.04.034. Epub 2019 May 21. PubMed 31126825 ↗
  • Sajatovic M, Colon-Zimmermann K, Kahriman M, Fuentes-Casiano E, Liu H, Tatsuoka C, Cassidy KA, Lhatoo S, Einstadter D, Chen P. A 6-month prospective randomized controlled trial of remotely delivered group format epilepsy self-management versus waitlist control for high-risk people with epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2018 Sep;59(9):1684-1695. doi: 10.1111/epi.14527. Epub 2018 Aug 10. PubMed 30098003 ↗
  • Sajatovic M, Tatsuoka C, Welter E, Colon-Zimmermann K, Blixen C, Perzynski AT, Amato S, Cage J, Sams J, Moore SM, Pundik S, Sundararajan S, Modlin C, Sila C. A Targeted Self-Management Approach for Reducing Stroke Risk Factors in African American Men Who Have Had a Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack. Am J Health Promot. 2018 Feb;32(2):282-293. doi: 10.1177/0890117117695218. Epub 2017 Mar 6. PubMed 28530142 ↗
  • Still CH, Burant C, Moore S, Einstadter D, Killion C, Modlin C, Sundararajan S, Thornton JD, Wright JT Jr, Sajatovic M. The Targeted Management (TEAM) Intervention for Reducing Stroke Risk in African American Men: Rationale and Study Design of a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2021 Feb 23;14:513-522. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S288753. eCollection 2021. PubMed 33654407 ↗
  • Kottapalli I, Needham K, Colon-Zimmermann K, Richter N, Schrag K, Ryan ER, Storer N, Sarna K, Briggs FBS, Rentsch J, Sajatovic M. A community-targeted implementation of self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events (SMART): A research and community partnership to reduce epilepsy burden. Epilepsy Behav. 2022 Jan;126:108440. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108440. Epub 2021 Dec 15. PubMed 34920349 ↗
  • Sajatovic M, Gunzler DD, Kanuch SW, Cassidy KA, Tatsuoka C, McCormick R, Blixen CE, Perzynski AT, Einstadter D, Thomas CL, Lawless ME, Martin S, Falck-Ytter C, Seeholzer EL, McKibben CL, Bauer MS, Dawson NV. A 60-Week Prospective RCT of a Self-Management Intervention for Individuals With Serious Mental Illness and Diabetes Mellitus. Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Sep 1;68(9):883-890. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600377. Epub 2017 May 15. PubMed 28502243 ↗
  • Kwan BM, Rementer J, Richie N, Nederveld AL, Phimphasone-Brady P, Sajatovic M, Nease DE Jr, Waxmonsky JA. Adapting Diabetes Shared Medical Appointments to Fit Context for Practice-Based Research (PBR). J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct;33(5):716-727. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.200049. PubMed 32989066 ↗
  • Jost J, Muther M, Brandt R, Altuner U, Lemcke L, Stummer W, Volker K, Wiewrodt R, Wiewrodt D. Conceptual development of an intensive exercise program for glioma patients (ActiNO): summary of clinical experience. J Neurooncol. 2023 Jun;163(2):367-376. doi: 10.1007/s11060-023-04354-y. Epub 2023 Jun 12. PubMed 37306887 ↗
  • Sandler CX, Matsuyama M, Jones TL, Bashford J, Langbecker D, Hayes SC. Physical activity and exercise in adults diagnosed with primary brain cancer: a systematic review. J Neurooncol. 2021 May;153(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03745-3. Epub 2021 Apr 28. PubMed 33907968 ↗
  • Knobf MT, Musanti R, Dorward J. Exercise and quality of life outcomes in patients with cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2007 Nov;23(4):285-96. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2007.08.007. PubMed 18022056 ↗
  • Bartholomew JB, Morrison D, Ciccolo JT. Effects of acute exercise on mood and well-being in patients with major depressive disorder. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Dec;37(12):2032-7. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000178101.78322.dd. PubMed 16331126 ↗
  • Moses J, Steptoe A, Mathews A, Edwards S. The effects of exercise training on mental well-being in the normal population: a controlled trial. J Psychosom Res. 1989;33(1):47-61. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(89)90105-0. PubMed 2926699 ↗
  • Jeon MS, Agar MR, Koh ES, Nowak AK, Hovey EJ, Dhillon HM. Barriers to managing sleep disturbance in people with malignant brain tumours and their caregivers: a qualitative analysis of healthcare professionals' perception. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Jul;29(7):3865-3876. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05970-4. Epub 2021 Jan 2. PubMed 33386987 ↗
  • Jeon MS, Agar MR, Koh ES, Nowak AK, Hovey EJ, Dhillon HM. Understanding sleep disturbance in the context of malignant brain tumors: a qualitative analysis. Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Nov 29;8(2):179-189. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaa081. eCollection 2021 Apr. PubMed 33898051 ↗
  • Guo A, Asztely F, Smits A, Jakola AS. Methodological Approaches to Ketogenic Dietary Treatments in Glioma Patients from a Nutritional Point of View. Nutr Cancer. 2023;75(1):112-122. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2022.2108073. Epub 2022 Aug 12. PubMed 35959770 ↗
  • Voss M, Wenger KJ, von Mettenheim N, Bojunga J, Vetter M, Diehl B, Franz K, Gerlach R, Ronellenfitsch MW, Harter PN, Hattingen E, Steinbach JP, Rodel C, Rieger J. Short-term fasting in glioma patients: analysis of diet diaries and metabolic parameters of the ERGO2 trial. Eur J Nutr. 2022 Feb;61(1):477-487. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02666-1. Epub 2021 Sep 6. PubMed 34487222 ↗
  • Tollosa DN, Tavener M, Hure A, James EL. Adherence to multiple health behaviours in cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Jun;13(3):327-343. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00754-0. Epub 2019 Apr 16. PubMed 30993648 ↗
  • Piil K, Jakobsen J, Christensen KB, Juhler M, Guetterman TC, Fetters MD, Jarden M. Needs and preferences among patients with high-grade glioma and their caregivers - A longitudinal mixed methods study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12806. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12806. Epub 2018 Jan 4. PubMed 29314470 ↗
  • Li Q, Zhang L, Chen C, Gan Y, Jiang L, Li S, Xiang W, Ming Y, Yang C, Zhou J. Caregiver burden and influencing factors among family caregivers of patients with glioma: A cross-sectional survey. J Clin Neurosci. 2022 Feb;96:107-113. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.11.012. Epub 2021 Nov 25. PubMed 34840093 ↗
  • Ownsworth T, Chambers S, Damborg E, Casey L, Walker DG, Shum DH. Evaluation of the making sense of brain tumor program: a randomized controlled trial of a home-based psychosocial intervention. Psychooncology. 2015 May;24(5):540-7. doi: 10.1002/pon.3687. Epub 2014 Sep 23. PubMed 25251838 ↗
  • Kangas M. Psychotherapy Interventions for Managing Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Adult Brain Tumor Patients: A Scoping Review. Front Oncol. 2015 May 21;5:116. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00116. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26052507 ↗
  • Hickmann AK, Hechtner M, Nadji-Ohl M, Janko M, Reuter AK, Kohlmann K, Haug M, Gruninger S, Deininger M, Ganslandt O, Konig J, Wirtz CR, Coburger J, Renovanz M. Evaluating patients for psychosocial distress and supportive care needs based on health-related quality of life in primary brain tumors: a prospective multicenter analysis of patients with gliomas in an outpatient setting. J Neurooncol. 2017 Jan;131(1):135-151. doi: 10.1007/s11060-016-2280-0. Epub 2016 Sep 16. PubMed 27638638 ↗
  • Langbecker D, Yates P. Primary brain tumor patients' supportive care needs and multidisciplinary rehabilitation, community and psychosocial support services: awareness, referral and utilization. J Neurooncol. 2016 Mar;127(1):91-102. doi: 10.1007/s11060-015-2013-9. Epub 2015 Dec 7. PubMed 26643806 ↗
  • Otto-Meyer S, Lumibao J, Kim E, Ladomersky E, Zhai L, Lauing KL, Scholtens DM, Penedo F, Amidei C, Lukas RV, Wainwright DA. The interplay among psychological distress, the immune system, and brain tumor patient outcomes. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2019 Aug;28:44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Feb 26. PubMed 31049368 ↗
  • Webster Marketon JI, Glaser R. Stress hormones and immune function. Cell Immunol. 2008 Mar-Apr;252(1-2):16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2007.09.006. Epub 2008 Feb 14. PubMed 18279846 ↗
  • Bhanja D, Ba D, Tuohy K, Wilding H, Trifoi M, Padmanaban V, Liu G, Sughrue M, Zacharia B, Leslie D, Mansouri A. Association of Low-Grade Glioma Diagnosis and Management Approach with Mental Health Disorders: A MarketScan Analysis 2005-2014. Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 8;14(6):1376. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061376. PubMed 35326529 ↗
  • Hartung TJ, Brahler E, Faller H, Harter M, Hinz A, Johansen C, Keller M, Koch U, Schulz H, Weis J, Mehnert A. The risk of being depressed is significantly higher in cancer patients than in the general population: Prevalence and severity of depressive symptoms across major cancer types. Eur J Cancer. 2017 Feb;72:46-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.11.017. Epub 2016 Dec 23. PubMed 28024266 ↗
  • Singer S, Roick J, Danker H, Kortmann RD, Papsdorf K, Taubenheim S, Renovanz M, Jahne K, Meixensberger J. Psychiatric co-morbidity, distress, and use of psycho-social services in adult glioma patients-a prospective study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2018 Jun;160(6):1187-1194. doi: 10.1007/s00701-018-3527-7. Epub 2018 Mar 29. PubMed 29594548 ↗
  • Huang J, Zeng C, Xiao J, Zhao D, Tang H, Wu H, Chen J. Association between depression and brain tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 3;8(55):94932-94943. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19843. eCollection 2017 Nov 7. PubMed 29212279 ↗
  • Liu F, Huang J, Zhang L, Fan F, Chen J, Xia K, Liu Z. Screening for distress in patients with primary brain tumor using distress thermometer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 2;18(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-3990-9. PubMed 29394923 ↗
  • Young JS, Al-Adli N, Sibih YE, Scotford KL, Casey M, James S, Berger MS. Recognizing the psychological impact of a glioma diagnosis on mental and behavioral health: a systematic review of what neurosurgeons need to know. J Neurosurg. 2022 Nov 4;139(1):11-19. doi: 10.3171/2022.9.JNS221139. Print 2023 Jul 1. PubMed 36334288 ↗
  • Aaronson NK, Taphoorn MJ, Heimans JJ, Postma TJ, Gundy CM, Beute GN, Slotman BJ, Klein M. Compromised health-related quality of life in patients with low-grade glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Nov 20;29(33):4430-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.35.5750. Epub 2011 Oct 17. PubMed 22010018 ↗
  • Salmi L, Lum HD, Hayden A, Reblin M, Otis-Green S, Venechuk G, Morris MA, Griff M, Kwan BM. Stakeholder engagement in research on quality of life and palliative care for brain tumors: a qualitative analysis of #BTSM and #HPM tweet chats. Neurooncol Pract. 2020 Jul 29;7(6):676-684. doi: 10.1093/nop/npaa043. eCollection 2020 Dec. PubMed 33304602 ↗
  • Mellinghoff IK, van den Bent MJ, Blumenthal DT, Touat M, Peters KB, Clarke J, Mendez J, Yust-Katz S, Welsh L, Mason WP, Ducray F, Umemura Y, Nabors B, Holdhoff M, Hottinger AF, Arakawa Y, Sepulveda JM, Wick W, Soffietti R, Perry JR, Giglio P, de la Fuente M, Maher EA, Schoenfeld S, Zhao D, Pandya SS, Steelman L, Hassan I, Wen PY, Cloughesy TF; INDIGO Trial Investigators. Vorasidenib in IDH1- or IDH2-Mutant Low-Grade Glioma. N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 17;389(7):589-601. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2304194. Epub 2023 Jun 4. PubMed 37272516 ↗
  • Boele FW, den Otter PWM, Reijneveld JC, de Witt Hamer PC, van Thuijl HF, Lorenz LMC, Wesseling P, Lagerwaard FJ, Taphoorn MJB, Kouwenhoven MCM, Snijders TJ, Douw L, Klein M. Long-term wellbeing and neurocognitive functioning of diffuse low-grade glioma patients and their caregivers: A longitudinal study spanning two decades. Neuro Oncol. 2023 Feb 14;25(2):351-364. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noac185. PubMed 35908832 ↗
  • Miller KD, Ostrom QT, Kruchko C, Patil N, Tihan T, Cioffi G, Fuchs HE, Waite KA, Jemal A, Siegel RL, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. Brain and other central nervous system tumor statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Sep;71(5):381-406. doi: 10.3322/caac.21693. Epub 2021 Aug 24. PubMed 34427324 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study will not be publicly available, but will be available from the primary investigator on reasonable request.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2027, 16 months after the start.

Of 306 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Brain Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 65 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 36 and three quarters within 125. This study's planned 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 317 studies reached it within 64 months; a quarter within 35 and three quarters within 125.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 26, 2026
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
StartActual
Jun 10, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Nov 3, 2026
Sites
2 sites changed recruiting status (2 now recruiting)
Show 2 sites
  • University of Colorado Anschutz · Aurora, United Statesno status→Recruiting
  • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center · Cleveland, United Statesno status→Recruiting
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    2 sites changed recruiting status (2 now recruiting)
    Show 2 sites
    • University of Colorado Anschutz · Aurora, United Statesno status→Recruiting
    • University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center · Cleveland, United Statesno status→Recruiting
    + 2 other changes: verification date and date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07628647
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
Start date
Jun 10, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Research Services Professional
Contact
lwbc@cuanschutz.edu
303-724-1723
Bethany M Kwan, PhD, MSPH
principal investigator · University of Colorado, Denver

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion