ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07599306CARDIO-PICSUpdated Jun 4, 2026

Effectiveness of a Structured Multidimensional Tele-rehabilitation Intervention in Cardiac Patients With Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (CARDIO-PICS)

An interventional study of Tele-rehabilitation and Standard of Care in Critical Illness, Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) and Cardiopathy, sponsored by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-04.

Primary conditionpostintensive care syndromeRegistry: Critical IllnessReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Critical Illness — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
postintensive care syndrome
Why
  1. Critical Illness is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name postintensive care syndrome, a narrower term within Critical Illness.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
326
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This two-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial investigates the effectiveness of an additional telerehabilitation program compared with standard care in patients with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS). The post-rehabilitation phase is crucial for consolidating recovery and ensuring continuity of care, with telerehabilitation offering a promising tool to enhance long-term adherence and outcomes.

The primary objective is to evaluate whether a structured, multidisciplinary remote rehabilitation program can reduce the risk of rehospitalization and mortality while improving clinical, functional, and psychosocial recovery. Approximately 326 patients aged 30-75 years will be enrolled after inpatient rehabilitation and randomly assigned to either a four-month structured telerehabilitation program or standard post-discharge follow-up.

All participants will undergo assessments at 4 and 12 months to monitor physical, cognitive, psychological, and metabolic recovery, with the ultimate aim of promoting a more complete and sustained rehabilitation after critical illness.

Read the detailed description

This interventional, two-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of an additional rehabilitation intervention compared with standard clinical practice in patients affected by Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS). The post-rehabilitation phase represents a critical period for consolidating the therapeutic gains achieved during inpatient rehabilitation and reinforcing the clinical recommendations provided. In this framework, telerehabilitation emerges as a potentially valuable strategy to enhance adherence to post-rehabilitation prescriptions and ensure continuity of care.

The primary objective of the study is to assess whether a structured remote intervention can reduce the risk of rehospitalization and mortality, while improving clinical and functional outcomes across the four key domains of PICS. Specifically, the study will determine whether a multidisciplinary, remotely delivered cardiac telerehabilitation program can promote recovery and decrease the incidence of readmissions or complications among patients previously hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit.

Following completion of the inpatient rehabilitation program, participants will be randomly allocated to one of two groups: the intervention group will undergo a structured four-month telerehabilitation program, whereas the control group will continue with standard discharge recommendations and conventional follow-up. All participants will be evaluated at 4 and 12 months after discharge to monitor physical, cognitive, psychological, and metabolic outcomes and to assess the long-term effectiveness of the intervention.

A total of approximately 326 patients aged between 30 and 75 years will be enrolled. Participation will be offered to individuals exhibiting signs or symptoms consistent with Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS), with the overall aim of promoting a more complete and sustained recovery following the critical illness phase.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critical Illness
  • Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)
  • Cardiopathy

Keywords

  • ICU
  • PICS
  • Multimodal rehabilitation
  • critical illness recovery
  • Polyneuropathies
  • Sarcopenia
  • Nutrition Assessment
  • Cognitive Dysfunction
  • Metabolic Diseases
  • tele-rehabilitation
03

In context

postintensive care syndrome Reclassified

105 studies on the registry are indexed under postintensive care syndrome; 48 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 326 is above the median of 78 across 47 interventional studies indexed under postintensive care syndrome.

Browse postintensive care syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS is the lead sponsor of 43 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Compared within postintensive care syndrome, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Critical Illness. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 30-75 years
  • Previous ICU admission ≥48 hours
  • Presence of Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS), defined as at least one of the following objectively assessed impairments at baseline (T0):
  • Neuromotor impairment, defined as Diagnosis of Critical Illness Myopathy (CIM) or Critical Illness Polyneuropathy (CIP), confirmed by electromyography (EMG)
  • Cognitive impairment, defined as (MoCA) score \< 26
  • Psychological impairment, defined as Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score ≥ 10
  • Nutritional impairment, defined as the presence of malnutrion according to GLIM criteria, requiring at least one phenotypic criterion (non-volitional weight loss >5% within 6 months or >10% beyond 6 months; \<20 kg/m² if \<70 years or \<22 kg/m² if ≥70 years; reduced muscle mass) and at least one etiologic criterion (reduced food intake or assimilation for >1 week, or any acute/chronic inflammatory burden) and/or presence of sarcopenia assessed by calf circumference \<31 cm and reduced muscle strength measured by handgrip strength
  • Metabolic or bone metabolism disorder, defined as altered bone metabolism markers (Bone Turnover Markers outside reference range)

Ability to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prognostically unfavorable malnutrition defined as: CONUT score ≥5.
  • Delirium present at the time of the enrollment, documented by a positive Confusion Assessment Method (CAM or CAM-ICU)
  • Pre-existing severe cognitive impairment or dementia, defined as:

documented diagnosis in the medical record prior to ICU admission

- Any clinical condition limiting participation in the rehabilitation program, including: severe orthopedic, neurological, or functional limitations not related to PICS

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
326 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tele-rehabilitation group

    Participants will undergo a structured, multidimensional cardiac telerehabilitation program with an integrated approach.

    Other: Tele-rehabilitation

  • Active comparator
    Standard Care Group

    Participants will continue with usual care, receiving standard outpatient rehabilitative treatment according to current clinical practice guidelines.

    Other: Standard of Care

Interventions

  • OtherTele-rehabilitation

    A structured, multidimensional telerehabilitation program delivered via the Maia Connected Care platform (AB Medica, MDR class IIa), lasting 16 weeks (4 months), in addition to standard post-rehabilitation care. 1. Synchronous sessions (televisits): Weeks 1-4: 2 sessions/week (physiotherapy + psychological support) Weeks 5-16: 1 session/week (alternating physiotherapy and psychological support) 1 session/month (nutritional counseling) 2. Asynchronous rehabilitation program (continuous for 16 weeks): Personalized exercise training (endurance and resistance training) delivered via video-guided modules; Remote monitoring and adaptation by clinicians 3. Cognitive training: Delivered via digital platform (RICORDO-DTx) Multidomain exercises tailored based on baseline MoCA performance 4\. Nutritional support: Monthly teleconsultations with a dietitian Monitoring using validated tools (MUST, SARC-F, BIA)

  • OtherStandard of Care

    Routine clinical care and standard rehabilitative treatment according to current hospital practices.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality and all-cause rehospitalization

    This is a composite outcome measure defined as the cumulative incidence of the first occurrence of either death from any cause or hospital readmission for any cause.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The cumulative incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events

    MACE is defined as a composite endpoint consisting of the first occurrence of any of the following: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke.

    Time frame: From enrollment to 6 and 12 months

  2. Change in six minute walk test

    The 6MWT assesses sub-maximal functional exercise capacity. It measures the distance a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes. The distance is measured in meters. Higher values represent better functional mobility and endurance. The change is calculated as the 4 months distance minus the baseline distance and the 12 months distance minus the baseline distance.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months of follow-up, 12 months of follow-up

  3. Change in Total Body Mass

    Total body mass (weight) is measured in kilograms (kg) using a calibrated digital scale. The change is calculated as the body mass at 4 months of follow-up minus the body mass at baseline and the body mass at 12 months of follow-up minus the body mass at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months of follow-up, 12 months of follow-up

  4. Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) Overall Summary Score

    The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, social limitations, and quality of life in patients with heart failure. The domains are combined into an Overall Summary Score. Scores are transformed to a range from 0 to 100. Higher scores represent a better health-related quality of life and fewer symptoms. The change is calculated as the score at 4 months of follow-up minus the score at baseline and as the score at 12 months of follow-up minus the score at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months of follow-up, 12 months of follow-up.

  5. Change in Urinary Calcium to Creatinine Ratio (24-hour collection)

    This ratio evaluates calcium excretion normalized by creatinine levels in 24-hour urine collection to assess bone resorption and mineral metabolism. Measured in mg/mg (or mmol/mmol). The change is measured as the value at 4 months minus the value at baseline and as the value at 12 months minus the value at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (0 months), 4 months, and 12 months

  6. Change in 24-Hour Creatinine Clearance

    A measure of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) calculated from 24-hour urine volume, urine creatinine, and serum creatinine levels to assess renal function. Measured in mL/min. The change is measured as the value at 4 months minus the value at baseline and as the value at 12 months minus the value at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, and 12 months.

  7. Change in Serum Osteocalcin Levels

    A biochemical marker of bone formation reflecting osteoblastic activity. Measured in ng/mL. The change is measured as the value at 4 months minus the value at baseline and as the value at 12 months minus the value at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, and 12 months.

  8. Change in Intact Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) Levels

    A key regulator of calcium and phosphate metabolism. Measured in pg/mL. The change is measured as the value at 4 months minus the value at baseline and as the value at 12 months minus the value at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, and 12 months.

  9. Change in Serum C-terminal Telopeptide of Type I Collagen (CTX)

    A specific marker of bone resorption reflecting osteoclast activity. Measured in ng/mL. The change is measured as the value at 4 months minus the value at baseline and as the value at 12 months minus the value at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, and 12 months.

  10. Change in Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH) Levels

    Assessment of thyroid function, which can influence bone turnover rates. Measured in µIU/mL. The change is measured as the value at 4 months minus the value at baseline and as the value at 12 months minus the value at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, and 12 months.

  11. Change in Bone-Specific Alkaline Phosphatase (BsALP)

    An isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase that serves as a specific marker for bone formation and osteoblast activity. Measured in µg/L. The change is measured as the value at 4 months minus the value at baseline and as the value at 12 months minus the value at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, and 12 months.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07599306
Lead sponsor
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS
Responsible party
Anastasia Toccafondi (physiotherapist, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 20, 2026
Start date
Apr 13, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 4, 2026

Study contacts

Anastasia Toccafondi, physioterapist
Contact
atoccafondi@dongnocchi.it
02-40308570

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion