ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07566117FAST-COUGHUpdated Nov 2, 2026

Feasibility, Acceptability, and Safety Trial of Brief, Breath Control-Focused Acceptance and Commitment Therapy in Adults With Chronic Cough

An interventional study of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in Chronic Cough, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 2, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a prospective, single-center, single-arm pilot trial. The primary research question is whether brief, breath control-focused Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is feasible, acceptable, and safe in adults with chronic cough.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Cough

Keywords

  • chronic cough
  • cough
  • cough hypersensitivity syndrome
03

In context

Chronic Cough

142 studies on the registry are indexed under Chronic Cough; 39 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 60 across 104 interventional studies indexed under Chronic Cough.

Browse Chronic Cough studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,372 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 161 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 139 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed patient with UNC Health electronic medical record number (MRN) via medical chart review
  • 18-80 years of age via medical chart review
  • Completed outpatient clinical encounter within the prior 12 months with a provider in pulmonary medicine, gastroenterology, otolaryngology, and/or allergy at UNC Health via medical chart review, with documentation that chronic cough (lasting 8 weeks or longer) was listed as one of the reasons for the visit, with terminology such as, but not limited to chronic, ongoing, recurrent, persistent, lingering, , longstanding, constant, continual, continuous, prolonged, intermittent, frequent, repetitive, unresolved, non-resolving, habitual, troublesome, bothersome, unmanaged, unexplained, idiopathic, progressive, worsening, treatment-resistant, and/or intractable
  • Documented interpretation by provider of normal chest imaging, defined as a chest radiograph (X-ray) or computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest without abnormalities contributing to chronic cough, within the prior 12 months obtained as part of the evaluation for chronic cough via medical chart review
  • Documented judgment of provider within the prior 12 months that chronic cough was not primarily attributable to untreated or inadequately treated pulmonary, gastroesophageal, or sinonasal condition(s) via medical chart review
  • Chronic cough of at least moderate severity (i.e., moderate, severe, very severe) via self-report using a screening questionnaire
  • Score ≤ 14 on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), indicating no greater than moderate depressive symptom severity (maximum score: 27), via self-report using a screening questionnaire
  • Score of ≤ 14 on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), indicating no greater than moderate generalized anxiety symptoms (maximum score: 21), via self-report using a screening questionnaire
  • Score of ≤ 10 on the Distress Questionnaire-5 (DQ5), indicating no elevated psychological distress (maximum score: 25), via self-report using a screening questionnaire
  • Agree to participate in a program to learn new ways to manage chronic cough for 4 weeks via self-report using a screening questionnaire
  • Able to participate in study activities with a facilitator scheduled during standard weekday business hours via self-report using a screening questionnaire
  • Access to reliable internet connection and device capable of videoconferencing (e.g., computer, tablet, smartphone) via self-report using a screening questionnaire

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current smoking status via medical chart review
  • Current use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor medication(s) via medical chart review, including Benazepril/brand name: Lotensin; Captopril/brand name: Capoten; Enalapril/brand name: Vasotec; Fosinopril/brand name: Monopril; Lisinopril/brand name: Prinivil, Zestril; Moexipril/brand name: Univasc; Perindopril/brand name: Aceon; Quinapril/brand name: Accupril; Ramipril/brand name: Altace; and/or Trandolapril/brand name: Mavik
  • Unable to read, understand, and speak English without an interpreter via medical chart review
  • Documented cognitive, intellectual, developmental, or neurological conditions that could interfere with reliable self-report, comprehension, or completion of study procedures via medical chart review
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

    Brief Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) combined with breath control techniques

    Behavioral: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

Interventions

  • BehavioralAcceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

    Brief Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) combined with breath control techniques. Treatment delivered once per week for 30 minutes each session for total of 4 weeks

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recruitment rate

    Proportion of participants in the target population expected to enroll in the study (numerator) out of all eligible individuals identified (denominator)

    Time frame: From screening and recruitment to enrollment

  2. Retention rate

    Proportion of participants enrolled in the study expected to complete the follow-up assessments (numerator) out of all participants initially enrolled in the study (denominator)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  3. Adherence rate of session attendance

    Proportion of participants enrolled in the study expected to attend sessions for at least 24 minutes (80%) of the 30-minute sessions (numerator) out of all participants initially enrolled in the study (denominator)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  4. Ordinal scale of adherence to self-directed activities

    Proportion of participants enrolled in the study expected to complete more than half (50%) of the self-directed activities (numerator) out of all participants initially enrolled in the study (denominator)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  5. Likert scale of agreement for cough-related adherence barriers

    Proportion of participants enrolled in the study who completed the follow-up assessments expected to strongly agree or agree that each of 11 cough-related items was a barrier to doing in the program

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  6. Likert scale of agreement for acceptability

    Proportion of participants enrolled in the study who completed the follow-up assessments expected to strongly agree or agree that the program was acceptable

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  7. Likert scale of agreement for appropriateness

    Proportion of participants enrolled in the study who completed the follow-up assessments expected to strongly agree or agree that the program was a good fit for people with chronic cough

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  8. Likert scale of agreement for burden

    Proportion of participants enrolled in the study who completed the follow-up assessments expected to strongly agree or agree that the time and work the program took was reasonable

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  9. Distress Questionnaire-5 (DQ5)

    Expected means of general levels of psychological distress at baseline and follow-up assessments, expected standard deviations, and proportion of participants who completed the follow-up assessments expected to have an increased score of 1 or greater in general levels of psychological distress

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  10. Binary scale for monitoring program-specific psychological distress

    Proportion of participants enrolled in the study expected to report experiencing increased psychological distress specifically related to the program

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  11. Adverse events (AEs)

    Proportion of participants enrolled in the study expected to report one or more adverse events (AEs) and total number of AEs reported across all participants

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Leicester Cough Questionnaire

    The Leicester Cough Questionnaire is a 19-item questionnaire that measures how chronic cough affects quality of life over the past two weeks. It includes three domains: physical, psychological, and social. Each item is rated on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from "all of the time" to "none of the time." Total score range is between 3-21, with lower scores indicating a worse outcome. Expected means of cough-related quality of life at baseline and follow-up assessments, mean score differences between baseline and follow-up assessments, and expected standard deviations

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  2. Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II

    The Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II is a 7-item questionnaire that measures psychological flexibility by assessing the ability to be present and accept internal feelings and thoughts. Each item is rated on a seven-point Likert scale ranging from "never true" to "always true." Total score range is between 7-49, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. Expected means of psychological flexibility at baseline and follow-up assessments, mean score differences between baseline and follow-up assessments, and expected standard deviations

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  3. Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire

    The Brief Experiential Avoidance Questionnaire is a 15-item questionnaire that measures experiential avoidance by assessing the tendency to avoid unpleasant feelings, thoughts, and bodily sensations. Each item is rated on a six-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree." Total score range is between 15-90, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. Expected means of experiential avoidance at baseline and follow-up assessments, mean score differences between baseline and follow-up assessments, and expected standard deviations

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

  4. Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised

    The Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised is a 12-item questionnaire that measures a broad concept of mindfulness. Each item is rated on a four-point Likert scale ranging from "rarely/not at all" to "almost always." Total score range is between 12-48, with lower scores indicating a worse outcome. Expected means of mindfulness at baseline and follow-up assessments, mean score differences between baseline and follow-up assessments, and expected standard deviations

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data (IPD) will include demographic and clinical characteristics extracted from the electronic medical records. Primary outcome measures (e.g., feasibility, acceptability) and secondary outcome measures (e.g., cough-related quality of life, psychological flexibility) will be shared. All data will be de-identified prior to sharing, with removal of direct identifiers and use of coded study IDs.

Supporting information: Analytic code

Time frame: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and supporting information will be made available to the scientific community no later than the time of publication or by the end of the project period, whichever comes first. Data will be preserved for at least five years following the end of the grant award funding period (06/30/2029).

Access criteria: Access to de-identified individual participant data (IPD) and supporting information will be provided to qualified investigators who initiate requests for access. Investigators who submit a reasonable request demonstrating scientific merit, feasibility, and ethical use of the data will be eligible for access. Data will be accessible through a controlled-access process via the UNC Dataverse repository. Interested researchers must submit a request that will be reviewed by the study team. Upon approval, users will be required to complete a Data Use Agreement outlining conditions for data security, confidentiality, and appropriate use. Approved users will be granted access to de-identified datasets and accompanying documentation necessary to interpret and reuse the data.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Nov 2, 2026
Sites
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill is now Recruiting
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026→Dec 1, 2026
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill is now Recruiting
    Start date Aug 1, 2026→Dec 1, 2026

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07566117
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 4, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

Carolyn K. Novaleski, Ph.D., CCC-SLP
Contact
carolyn_novaleski@med.unc.edu
919-962-5965
Carolyn Novaleski, Ph.D., CCC-SLP
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion