ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06858748CANMucUpdated Sep 24, 2026

Canadian Consortium on Airway Mucus Occlusions in Asthma, COPD and Chronic Cough

An observational study in Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and Chronic Cough (CC), sponsored by McMaster University. Recruiting at 7 sites in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
240
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Chronic lung diseases affect one in five Canadians, causing symptoms such as cough, breathlessness, and wheeze. Despite advancements in medical care, these conditions not only impact individuals and their close circles but also present substantial clinical and economic challenges at a national level. This grant is dedicated to addressing three prevalent lung diseases: asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and chronic cough. An alliance of clinicians, scientists, knowledge users, and patient partners from across Canada have come together to establish the Canadian Consortium for Understanding the Role of Airway Mucus Occlusions in Asthma, COPD, and Chronic Cough - "CANMuc." Mucus plays a pivotal role in the symptoms and severity of lung diseases, but its clinical assessment has been challenging. Fortunately, recent medical advances, particularly chest computed tomography (CT), facilitate visualizing and quantifying mucus in patients with lung diseases. Our goal is to initially assess mucus plugging in a diverse group of Canadians without lung disease and then compare these findings to those with asthma, COPD, and chronic cough. The investigators will recruit 100 healthy volunteers for comprehensive clinical and research evaluations, including sputum analyses, breathing tests, quality of life assessments, cough monitoring, and CT scans. In addition, testing will be conducted twice, two years apart, in 240 adult and 50 pediatric participants. This approach will enable the investigators to understand the burden of mucus and how it changes over time, explore proteins or chemicals in mucus that predict mucus persistence, and identify biomarkers that can help guide physicians to prescribe targeted treatments that might work better than others. The CANMuc team's findings will guide strategies for identifying and treating mucus plugging, inform policymakers, and share knowledge with Canadians living with asthma, COPD, and chronic cough.

02

Conditions studied

  • Asthma
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
  • Chronic Cough (CC)

Keywords

  • mucus occlusions
  • asthma
  • Chronic Cough (CC)
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
03

In context

Asthma

4,841 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 600 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 240 is above the median of 158 across 1,250 observational studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

McMaster University is the lead sponsor of 741 studies on the registry; 127 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (43%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

A coalition of 25 clinicians and scientists from across Canada have united to establish the Canadian Consortium for understanding the role of airway mucus occlusions in chronic cough, COPD, and asthma (CANMuc).

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females (≥18 years old)

Asthma: Respiratory physician confirmed diagnosis of moderate-to-severe asthma and Historical objective evidence of asthma and/or specialist/respirologist confirmation (post-bronchodilator reversibility and/or methacholine bronchoprovocation test \<8 mg/mL)

: Respiratory physician confirmed diagnosis of COPD that is moderate-to-severe according to GOLD criteria (post-bronchodilator /FVC\<LLN and FEV1\< 80%pred) and CAT score ≥10 or mMRC score ≥ 2

Chronic cough: Chronic Cough (RCC) and Unexplained Chronic Cough (UCC) lasting >1 year with Normal chest radiograph and no airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC >Lower Limit of Normal)

Healthy participants: No history of respiratory disease or other pulmonary disorders and no use of inhaled medications or with normal spirometry and Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale =\<1

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Current smoker or >10 yr pack history or smoked within the last 6 months
  • Exacerbation within 4 weeks of recruitment
  • Preterm birth (≤36 weeks gestation) or perinatal complications
  • History of other pulmonary disorders
  • Specialist/Respirologist suspects primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD)
  • Current use of mucolytic medications
  • Memory, cognitive, or psychiatric limitations that may prevent optimal participation
  • Treatment with current biologic therapy: anti-IgE mAb within 130 days, anti-IL-4/4R, IL-5/5R, IL-13, or TSLP within 2 months or 5 half-lives whichever is longer prior to visit 1
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
240 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Asthma

    Other: Observational

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

    Other: Observational

  • Chronic cough
  • Control group

    Other: Observational

Interventions

  • OtherObservational

    This is a 24-month observational study in adults in three disease domains, consisting of screening visit, baseline visit, quarterly telemonitoring visit and end of monitoring period

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Computed Tomography mucus score

    Quantify CT mucus score and evaluate its cross-sectional and longitudinal relationship with sputum rheology and inflammatory phenotype in a healthy cohort compared to disease groups at baseline and follow-up

    Time frame: Baseline/Day 0 and End of Assessment/48 months

07

Study locations

1 of 7 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 24 months after the start.

Of 364 non-industry observational studies under Asthma, half reached primary completion within 38 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 97. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 454 studies reached it within 36 months; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 82.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 27, 2025
First posted
Mar 5, 2025
StartActual
Dec 11, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 2028
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06858748
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 5, 2025
Start date
Dec 11, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion