ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07511283Updated Apr 6, 2026

Calciphylaxis in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease - A Study of the Danish Calciphylaxis Research Initiative (DanCaRI)

An observational study in Calciphylaxis, Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy and End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), sponsored by Odense University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-06.

Sponsored by Odense University Hospital · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
860
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Calciphylaxis is a rare yet life-threatening condition involving pronounced calcification in small blood vessels of the skin.

Knowledge about its underlying mechanisms and contributing risk factors remains limited. Chronic kidney disease is one of the strongest disease predictors. No evidence based effective therapy is currently available. Research on the topic is mainly hindered by the condition's rarity.

The study Calciphylaxis in patients with chronic kidney disease - A study of the Danish Calciphylaxis Research Initiative (DanCaRI) is set up to facilitate the systematic retrospective and prospective comparison of patients with chronic kidney disease and calciphylaxis to matched patients with chronic kidney disease who did not develop calciphylaxis thereby providing new knowledge that can support prevention, early detection, and new treatment approaches.

Read the detailed description

Calciphylaxis is a rare yet life-threatening condition involving pronounced calcification in small blood vessels of the skin.

Knowledge about its underlying mechanisms and contributing risk factors remains limited. Chronic kidney disease is one of the strongest disease predictors. No evidence based effective therapy is currently available. Research on the topic is mainly hindered by the condition's rarity.

The study Calciphylaxis in patients with chronic kidney disease - A study of the Danish Calciphylaxis Research Initiative (DanCaRI) is set up to facilitate the systematic retrospective (two years) and prospective (three years follow-up period) comparison of patients with chronic kidney disease and calciphylaxis (cases) to matched patients with chronic kidney disease who did not develop calciphylaxis (controls) thereby providing new knowledge that can support prevention, early detection, and new treatment approaches.

The study collects clinical data and biological samples. A healthy group is part of the study to enable comparison to reference parameters.

02

Conditions studied

  • Calciphylaxis
  • Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy
  • End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)
  • Chronic Kidney Diseases
  • Nephrogenic Calciphylaxis

Keywords

  • Calciphylaxis
  • Calcific Uremic Arteriolopathy
  • Nephrogenic Calciphylaxis
  • End Stage Renal Disease
  • Chronic Kidney Diseases
03

In context

Calciphylaxis

23 studies on the registry are indexed under Calciphylaxis; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 860 is above the median of 450 across 10 observational studies indexed under Calciphylaxis.

Browse Calciphylaxis studies →

Lead sponsor

Odense University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 479 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with chronic kidney disease diagnosed or suspected for calciphylaxis matched control patients, healthy reference group.

National study in Denmark

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Cases

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • CKD.
  • Suspicion of calciphylaxis or newly diagnosed calciphylaxis episode. The suspicion or diagnosis of calciphylaxis is a mutual decision of the involved medical specialties (nephrologist, dermatologist, pathologist, other).
  • Ability to give .
  • Ability to participate in a clinical study as assessed by the local investigator.
  • Provides written informed consent.

Controls

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • CKD
  • Ability to give informed consent.
  • Ability to participate in a clinical study as assessed by the local investigator.
  • Provides written informed consent.

Healthy reference group

  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Self-assessed as healthy, confirmed by local investigators at inclusion

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Cases

- the calciphylaxis diagnosis becomes excluded

Controls - Being diagnosed with calciphylaxis

Healthy controls Up to 60 years of age: below 60 ml/min/1.72m2.

- Over 60 years of age: eGFR below the 95% confidence interval for eGFR adjusted for age (Danish Society of Nephrology references ranges)

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
860 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with chronic kidney disease diagnosed or suspected for calciphylaxis
  • Matched control patients with chronic kidney disease without calciphylaxis
  • Age matched healthy reference group
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality

    Associations between disease status (case or control), clinical and laboratory variables, molecular parameters, and all-cause mortality will be evaluated.

    Time frame: 3 year follow up period

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain severity

    Associations between disease status (case or control), clinical and laboratory variables, molecular parameters, and pain severity (determined using Wong-Baker Faces scale) will be evaluated

    Time frame: 3 year follow up period

  2. Quality of life (QoL)

    Associations between disease status (case or control), clinical and laboratory variables, molecular parameters, and QoL (determined using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System-Revised: Renal (ESAS-r: Renal)) will be evaluated.

    Time frame: 3 year follow up period

  3. Hospitalizations

    Associations between disease status (case or control), clinical and laboratory variables, molecular parameters, and hospitalizations (inpatient-days of any cause) will be evaluated

    Time frame: 3 year follow up period

  4. Calciphylaxis Wound Status

    Associations between clinical and laboratory variables, as well as molecular parameters, and calciphylaxis wound status (determined using the Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool (BWAT) modified for DanCaRI) will be evaluated

    Time frame: 3 year follow up period

Other outcomes

  1. Retrospective and cross-sectional: Development of calciphylaxis skin lesions

    To determine clinical, laboratory, and molecular predictors of skin lesion development through comparison with a matched control population

    Time frame: 2 years retrospective and at inclusion

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Pseudonymized individual participant data and biomaterials may be shared with researchers whose proposed use of the data and materials has been approved by the relevant ethical and data protection authorities in all involved countries, with such use governed by contractual agreements.

Supporting information: Study protocol

Access criteria: Reasonable scientific rationale for the data to be used for the requested purpose. The required resources must be available in order to comply with the request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07511283
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 6, 2026
Start date
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2040 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2040 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 6, 2026

Study contacts

Subagini Nagarajah, PhD
Contact
subagini.nagarajah3@rsyd.dk
+45 40498337
Alexandra Scholze, Dr. med., PhD
Contact
Alexandra.Scholze@rsyd.dk
+45 65412402
Subagini Nagarajah, PhD
principal investigator · Odense University Hospital
Alexandra Scholze, Dr.med, PhD
principal investigator · Odense University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion