ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07919613Updated Nov 5, 2026

Ultrasound Findings in a Pediatric Population

An observational study in Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI) and Lung Ultrasound, sponsored by Odense University Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 28 Days to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Odense University Hospital · Observational

Updated Nov 5, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
138
Ages
28 Days to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether focused ultrasound of the chest can be used in a practical way in children with respiratory symptoms. The investigators will examine the different ways in which the ultrasound examination can be performed and what the examination may show in children with different types of respiratory symptoms.

The investigators will also investigate how this type of ultrasound examination can be introduced and used in everyday practice in a paediatric department. The results will help understand how chest ultrasound can best be used in children and which examination method is most suitable for future use.

Read the detailed description

Aim and collaborations The aim of this study is to examine and characterize the type of focused thoracic ultrasound (FTUS) findings in a non-selected cohort of children with respiratory symptoms, categorized by type (e.g., B-lines, consolidation, effusion). Additionally, the study aims to evaluate the feasibility of implementing FTUS in a pediatric department and future considerations regarding choice of protocol in a pediatric population.

The project will be conducted as a collaboration between the Department of Pediatrics, the Department of Respiratory Medicine, and the Department of Radiology at Odense University Hospital. The principal investigators are SB, EC, and PB.

Method, study design and data collection This study is designed as a prospective observational feasibility study conducted in the Pediatric Emergency Department at Odense University Hospital. The study population is an non-selected cohort of children between the ages of 28 days-18 age, who presents with respiratory symptoms or clinical signs of respiratory infections.

Screening of eligibility will be performed using data available from Cetrea (a patient flow management system), through which patients are admitted to the department and prioritized according to clinical symptoms and vital parameters. Inclusion will occur following written and oral information provided to the patient and/or parents/legal guardians, and after obtaining informed consent from either the patient, if they are over the age of 15, or by parents/ legal guardians. Patients will be examined by the responsible treating physician, who will conduct diagnostic evaluation and treatment according to clinical standards.

A FTUS examination using a 14-zones scanning protocol will subsequently be performed within the first four hours of admission. The ultrasound examinations will be performed by two medical students who have completed the regional course, followed by supervised training and certification. Ultrasound findings, use of transducer, transducer preset, and positions of the child will be examined, and data will be recorded. Furthermore symptoms, diagnostic procedures, therapeutic interventions, and discharge diagnoses will also be recorded. The feasibility of the protocol choice will be evaluated during data collection. Data management will be conducted primarily using Redcap for data entry and SharePoint/OPEN storage for secure data storage. Data will be securely stored in Redcap. No biological samples will be collected.

In the case of incidental or unexpected findings, the project investigators (EC, AH, or PGB) will be contacted to determine the need for further evaluation. In cases of suspected acute conditions, a pediatric physician will be contacted, and appropriate urgent measures will be initiated if necessary.

Statistical analysis Descriptive statistical analyses will be performed. The sample size is based on an expected prevalence of positive LUS findings of 10%. As this is a feasibility study, the primary aim is to assess applicability of LUS in a pediatric population, and the investigators will therefore include as many participants as possible. The final sample size may be adjusted based on practical considerations if deemed appropriate. Final sample size = 139 children

Adverse Effects, Risks, and Ethical Considerations Participation is voluntary and based on informed consent. Lung ultrasound is a safe and painless modality with no known adverse effects. It allows the child to sit on the lap of their parent, which can provide a feeling of safety and thus make the examination easier and more effective. Participants may experience minor transient discomfort due to light pressure from the ultrasound probe and cooling from the ultrasound gel. There are no known physical or psychological risks associated with participation. If unexpected suspicious findings are detected during the examination, participants will be contacted regarding the need for further evaluation.

Lung ultrasound will be used as a supplement to clinical evaluation. Ultrasound findings will be recorded, and it will be noted whether the treating physician considers that these findings would have resulted in a change in diagnostic or therapeutic management XXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Future perspectives and clinical impact The study aims to contribute to the evidence-based use of ultrasound in the diagnostic evaluation of children with respiratory symptoms. These data may help predict the association between clinical findings, diagnosis, and patient prognosis, in order to optimize diagnostic accuracy and minimize unnecessary radiation exposure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Tract Infections (RTI)
  • Lung Ultrasound

Keywords

  • Lower Respiratory Infection
  • Pediatric Lung Ultrasound
  • Lower Respiratory Tract and Lung Infections
  • Pediatric emergency department
03

In context

Respiratory Tract Infections

751 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Tract Infections; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 138 is below the median of 350 across 184 observational studies indexed under Respiratory Tract Infections.

Browse Respiratory Tract Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Odense University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 479 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
28 Days to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This study is conducted in the Pediatric Emergency Department at Odense University Hospital. The population is a non-selected cohort of children in all ages, presenting with respiratory symptoms to a pediatric emergency department. Patients will be included as a convenience sample during the period from October 19, 2026, to May 1, 2027.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical respiratory symptoms tentative diagnosed by an emergency doctor or an emergency nurse, including cough, wheezing, stridor, prolonged expiration, catharalia
  • Objective signs of respiratory infection: Fever, increased respiratory rate, decreased oxygen saturation, abnormal auscultation findings, or chest retractions

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fever with an alternative evident focus (e.g., urinary tract infection, gastrointestinal infection, or neuroinfection) diagnosed by an emergency doctor
  • Lack of
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
138 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Children between age 0-18 with suspected respiratory infection

    Children ages 0-18 admittet to the pediatric emergency department at Odense university hospital, Denmark, who meets the inclusion criteria. Patients will be examined by the responsible treating physician, who will conduct diagnostic evaluation and treatment according to clinical standards as it is not uncommon for an initial FTUS to have already been performed. If an FTUS is performed by the treating physician, the examined zones, acquired images, and clinical interpretations will be documented. The data collectors will observe the procedure and perform a supplementary scan within the first four hours of admission to ensure that all areas are covered, using a standardized 14-zone scanning protocol and appropriate transducers.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Focused Thoracic ultrasound findings in a children admitted to a pediatric emergency department, divided into type

    Type of ultrasound findings relevant: Lungsliding present? yes/no Lungpulse present? yes/no B-lines present? yes/no Consolidation present? yes/no Subpleural consolidation present? yes/no Pleural effusion present? yes/no Pleural thickness og irregulations? yes/no

    Time frame: FTUS should be performed within the first 4-hours of admission to the pediatric emergency department

  2. Characterization of findings on Focused Thoracic ultrasound, in a children admitted to a pediatric emergency department

    Characterization: Number of B-lines in zones with B-lines present Size of consolidations in mm Size of subpleural consolidations in mm Pleural effusion - simple or complex Thickness of pleura if thickened

    Time frame: FTUS should be performed within the first 4-hours of admission to the pediatric emergency department

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of children who undergo examination of all 14-zones

    Number of children who undergo examination of 14-zones

    Time frame: FTUS should be performed within the first 4-hours of admission to the pediatric emergency department, and data regarding number of examined zones will be noted in RedCap database within the following hour of FTUS examination

  2. Time to complete examination

    How many minutes it takes to complete the examination

    Time frame: FTUS should be performed within the first 4-hours of admission to the pediatric emergency department, and data regarding the time spend on the examination will be noted within the first hour following the FTUS examination

  3. Type of transducer used for examination

    Number of zones scanned using a linear transducer, and number of zones scanned using convex transducer

    Time frame: FTUS should be performed within the first 4-hours of admission to the pediatric emergency department, and data regarding the type of transducer and preset used, will be noted in our RedCap datase within the following hour of FTUS examination

  4. Type of transducer-preset used for examination

    Number of zones scanned using a lung-preset, and number of zones scanned using abdominal-preset

    Time frame: FTUS should be performed within the first 4-hours of admission to the pediatric emergency department, and data regarding the type of transducer and preset used, will be noted in our RedCap datase within the following hour of FTUS examination

  5. Quality of images on a Likert-scale of 1-3 and interrater reliability

    1. Not usefull: Images of insufficient quality for diagnostic purposes; key structures not identifiable. 2. Useful but not optimal for diagnostic imaging: Images of adequate quality to support interpretation, but with limitations such as suboptimal gain, depth, or partial obscuration. 3. Useful and optimal for diagnostic imaging: High-quality images with clear anatomical landmarks and artifact patterns sufficient for confident interpretation

    Time frame: Children admitted to a pediatric emergency department between 1 of October 2026 and 1 of May 2027

  6. The childs position during the scan

    Is the child sitting og lying during the scan

    Time frame: FTUS should be performed within the first 4-hours of admission to the pediatric emergency department, and data regarding the position of the child, will be noted in our RedCap datase within the following hour of FTUS examination

  7. Association between focused thoracic ultrasound findings and final diagnosis

    The association between focused thoracic ultrasound findings and the final clinical diagnosis established during the hospital admission.This includes assessing whether specific ultrasound findings or combinations of findings are associated with particular diagnoses

    Time frame: 5-7 days after the child has been discharged, the final diagnosis will be extracted from their medical journal and put into our RedCap database. This allows sufficient time for the results of microbiological testing to be completed and registered

07

Study locations

1 site
  • HC. Andersens Børnehospital, Odense Universitets Hopsital
    Odense, Denmark
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for May 2027, 6 months later.

Of 66 non-industry observational studies under Respiratory Tract Infections, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 85 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 9, 2026
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 23, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07919613
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Oct 23, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Siri H Kampmann-Bergdal, Research Student
Contact
Siri.Husted-Andersen.Bergdal@rsyd.dk
+45 31 35 35 01

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion