ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07488988SCARFREE-001Updated Oct 27, 2026

SCARFREE-001: Verteporfin for Scar Prevention

A Phase 2 interventional study of Verteporfin Injection and Saline injection in Surgical Scar, sponsored by Odense University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Odense University Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 27, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate whether the drug verteporfin can reduce the formation of scars in adult patients undergoing a tummy tuck procedure (abdominoplasty).

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  • Whether treatment with verteporfin can reduce scar formation in surgical wounds that are closed with sutures, compared with placebo (saline). This will be assessed based on how the scars look after 3 months using a standardized scar assessment questionnaire (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale).
  • Whether treatment with verteporfin can reduce scar formation in small open wounds created after taking small tissue samples (4 mm), compared with placebo. This will also be assessed after 3 months using the same questionnaire.

The researchers will compare three different doses of verteporfin (0.5 mg/mL, 1.0 mg/mL, and 2.0 mg/mL) with placebo. Each participant will receive all three doses as well as placebo, but in different areas of the surgical wound and in different small wounds, allowing comparisons to be made within the same person.

Participants will:

  • Undergo a planned abdominoplasty procedure
  • During surgery, receive small injections in the skin with either verteporfin or placebo in different parts of the surgical wound.
  • Have four small wounds (4 mm) created from tissue samples, which will also be treated with verteporfin or placebo.
  • Attend follow-up visits after 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months, where the scars will be examined.
  • Have photographs and ultrasound measurements taken of the scars.
  • Complete questionnaires about their own assessment of the appearance of the scars.
Read the detailed description

Introduction and Background:

Scar formation after skin injury represents a significant medical challenge with both physical and psychosocial consequences. Scars can cause pain, pruritus, restricted movement, and substantial psychological distress.

While adult wound healing typically results in scar formation, fetal wounds heal with minimal or no scarring, suggesting that regenerative, scarless healing is biologically possible under specific conditions. Recent research has identified the Yes-Associated Protein (YAP)/ Transcriptional Co-Activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) signaling pathway as central to fibrosis development. Inhibition of this pathway has shown promising results in experimental fibrosis models.

YAP is a mechano-sensitive transcription coactivator regulated by the Hippo pathway. Its activity has emerged as a key determinant of whether injured tissues undergo regenerative healing (restoring normal structure) or fibrotic repair (scar formation). Recent studies across multiple organs indicate that the timing and duration of YAP activity is critical: Transient or timely YAP modulation can promote regeneration, whereas sustained YAP activation or complete loss of YAP often skews healing toward fibrosis.

Verteporfin is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved benzoporphyrin derivative used for treating macular degeneration that also inhibits the YAP/TAZ pathway. Animal studies have demonstrated that verteporfin reduces extracellular matrix deposition in liver, kidney, and retinal fibrosis. Most notably, Mascharak et al. recently showed that a single dose of verteporfin induced scarless wound healing in the Duroc pig, a model with skin healing characteristics closely resembling those of humans. The results were further validated using a human foreskin graft model in nude mice. Despite these promising preclinical results, human evidence for verteporfin's potential as a scar-preventing treatment is lacking. This study represents the first attempt to translate these findings into clinical practice.

Aim:

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability and to identify the most appropriate dose of intradermal verteporfin for the prevention of scar formation in surgical wounds. The results will pave the way for subsequent studies to further investigate the efficacy of verteporfin's anti-fibrotic properties.

Hypothesis:

It is hypothesized that a single intradermal administration of verteporfin at the time of surgery will result in a significant reduction in scar formation compared to placebo. Furthermore, a dose-response relationship is expected, with higher concentrations leading to greater improvement in scar quality without compromising wound healing. Finally, it is hypothesized that the treatment to be safe and well tolerated in humans with no serious adverse effects.

Study Design:

This trial is a phase 2, prospective, randomized, single blinded, placebo-controlled, intra-patient, single center clinical trial where each participant serves as their own control with different dose levels administered to different parts of the wound and different open wounds within the same patient. The total participation period for the individual subjects is 3 months.

The single-blinded study design (blinding of participants and outcome assessors, with the operating surgeon unblinded) was selected due to the visible dark green color of verteporfin, which makes full blinding difficult during administration. An intra-patient design was chosen to minimize inter-patient variability in wound healing.

Randomization and blinding:

Treatment allocation will be randomized using a computer-generated sequence to assign verteporfin dose levels and placebo to wound areas and punch biopsies within each participant.

Sample Size:

A total of 12 participants has been chosen as an appropriate sample size for this study. Due to the intra-patient design, where each participant contributes eight scar outcomes (four closed and four open wounds), a total of 96 observations will be available for safety assessment, exploratory dose-response analysis and estimation of effect. The underlying statistical considerations are presented below:

Fixed effect: treatment dose; random effect: participant. Pairwise comparisons between each verteporfin dose and placebo will be performed using a mixed-effects model with Dunnett's adjustment for multiple testing.

Based on previous scar studies, a 6-point difference in POSAS is considered clinically meaningful. Assuming a standard deviation of 5-7 points and intra-subject correlation of 0.3: With 12 participants, each contributing 4 scars per model (closed and open). The design yields sufficient power (≥80%, α = 0.025 per endpoint after Bonferroni correction). Total of 48 observations per model, supporting separate detection of meaningful differences in both scar types.

Methods:

Verteporfin will be administered by intradermal injection into wound margins at three dose levels:

  • 0.5 mg/mL
  • 1.0 mg/mL
  • 2.0 mg/mL. These dose levels have been established based on preclinical findings on verteporfin's anti-fibrotic properties where 2.0 mg/mL represents the optimal dose in porcine models (with higher doses showing reduced efficacy), 1.0 mg/mL represents the optimal dose in murine models and 0.5 mg/mL is included to determine the minimal effective dose.

The drug will be administered after suture in the closed model, and after punch creation in the open model. Punch biopsies will be obtained from the lower abdomen within the pubic hair-bearing region to evaluate whether hair regrowth occurs as part of the regenerative process and to minimize the visibility of any scars resulting from the biopsies. No light activation will be used in this study. Each participant will receive all three dose levels plus one placebo (saline injection) in separate wound segments and separate punch biopsies. A single administration will take place on Day 0 (day of surgery) with no repeat dosing. This timing exploits the critical early YAP/TAZ modulation window.

Participants will be monitored at preplanned follow-up visits on Day 7, Month 1 and Month 3 where scar quality will be assessed via the primary endpoint for both the closed and open model:

  • The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) at 3 months. POSAS scores range from 6 (normal skin) to 60 (worst imaginable scar) and include six clinical parameters: Vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability and surface area. The endpoint is defined as the difference in POSAS score between verteporfin-treated sites and placebo-treated sites within each participant.

Study Limitations:

This study has several limitations. Firstly, the small sample size of 12 participants and the single-centre design limit the generalizability of the findings and the ability to detect rare adverse events or establish clinical efficacy. Secondly, the study population consists of healthy adults undergoing elective abdominoplasty which provides a homogeneous wound model but does not reflect high-risk groups such as patients with diabetes, smokers or individuals prone to hypertrophic scarring, therefore external validity is limited.

The follow-up period of 3 months fails to capture the long-term phases of scar maturation. Additionally, inter-patient dose comparison - while reducing inter-individual variability - introduces the possibility of local interference between the scar segments. Moreover, several outcome measures rely on subjective scar assessment tools (e.g. POSAS, MSS, SCAR-Q) which - despite being validated - carry a risk of observer bias even under blinded evaluation. These limitations will be addressed in future trials with larger study populations, longer follow-up and multicenter variation as well as inclusion of high-risk groups.

Feasibility:

The intra-patient design significantly enhances feasibility by reducing the required sample size as each participant contributes four treatment sites per wound model (open and closed). Recruitment is therefore considered realistic, as eligible patients are routinely available among those undergoing elective abdominoplasty at Odense University Hospital. All study procedures are integrated into the routine surgical workflow and three follow-up visits consisting only of non-invasive assessments are planned, minimizing participant burden and risk of withdrawal.

The research team has full access to surgical facilities, ultrasound equipment and clinical photography tools. Furthermore, the investigational medicinal product, verteporfin, has an established safety profile in humans in other indications, and only a single, local administration is required per participant. Together, these factors ensure that the study is practically, logistically and ethically feasible.

Risks, Adverse Events, and Potential Disadvantages:

Verteporfin has an established safety profile in ocular use but is administered differently in this study. Therefore, additional or previously unobserved adverse effects may occur.

Possible adverse events include:

Common, non-serious adverse events

  • Mild tenderness, redness, or swelling at the injection sites.

Rare or potentially serious adverse events

  • Allergic reaction to verteporfin.
  • Infection related to the injection procedure or the collection of tissue samples (punch biopsies).

Potential longer-term effects

  • Changes in the cosmetic appearance or irregularity of the scar.
  • Tissue stiffness in the area surrounding the scar.
  • Small scars resulting from the punch biopsy procedures.

As with any clinical study, there may be risks that are currently unknown. Participants will therefore be asked to inform the study team if they experience any health-related problems during the course of the study. If new or previously unrecognized adverse effects are identified during the study, participants will be informed promptly and will have the opportunity to decide whether they wish to continue their participation.

Novelty:

This study is the first clinical trial to investigate intradermal verteporfin to reduce scarring in humans. Most available scar treatments focus on symptomatic treatment of cosmetic symptoms addressing established scars rather than preventing their formation. This project offers a unique possibility to introduce a new concept of pharmacological therapy targeting the biological mechanisms of fibrosis (YAP/TAZ signaling pathway) at the time of injury. This study therefore generates safety and preliminary efficacy data for a completely new therapeutic indication of verteporfin with significant translational potential and large global clinical relevance.

Clinical Impact:

Excessive scarring remains a major unmet clinical challenge with functional, aesthetic, and psychological consequences affecting millions of patients worldwide every year. Current treatment options are limited in efficacy and primarily reactive as they largely focus on the management of established scars rather than prevention.

If successful, this study could introduce a paradigm shift in postoperative wound care by demonstrating that scarring can be modulated at the time of injury through targeted biological intervention. Intradermal verteporfin has the potential to become the first pharmacological therapy to actively reduce scar formation by inhibiting fibrotic signaling pathways.

The clinical impact is substantial: Improved patient satisfaction after surgeries with better functional and aesthetic outcomes and significant cost savings for healthcare systems. The findings from this study could benefit a wide range of surgical fields, including plastic and reconstructive surgery, orthopedics, general surgery and dermatology. Ultimately, by bridging strong preclinical evidence with clinical data, this study has the potential to lay the foundation for a new standard of care in scar prevention and personalized wound management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Surgical Scar

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Scar
  • Scar formation
  • Scar prevention
  • Scar therapy
  • Verteporfin
  • Visudyne
03

In context

Cicatrix

611 studies on the registry are indexed under Cicatrix; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 40 across 512 interventional studies indexed under Cicatrix.

Browse Cicatrix studies →

Lead sponsor

Odense University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 479 studies on the registry; 110 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Scheduled to undergo elective abdominoplasty amenable to primary closure
  • I-II
  • Fitzpatrick skin type I-IV
  • Ability to provide written and and willing to comply with study procedures

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or planned pregnancy within the next 6 months at the time of inclusion
  • Breastfeeding
  • Smoking within the previous 6 months
  • Excessive alcohol intake (>10 units/week for women, >14 units/week for men)
  • Participants who are unable to read, understand and communicate in Danish sufficiently to provide and comply with study procedures
  • Known conditions of pathological scarring or other conditions affecting wound healing
  • Known to verteporfin or any
  • Porphyria or other photosensitivity disorders
  • Moderate hepatic dysfunction, defined as:

    1. or ALT >1.2 ×
    2. Hypoalbuminemia or prolonged PT
  • Biliary obstruction, defined as:

    1. ALP or GGT >1.2 × ULN
    2. Abnormal
  • or fibrotic skin conditions including (but not limited to):

    1. Keloids or hypertrophic scars, scleroderma, lupus, GVD, morphea, lichen sclerosus, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, cutis laxa, Marfan syndrome

  • Current use of photosensitizing medications (e.g. tetracyclines, thiazides, phenothiazines)
  • Any medical condition deemed by the investigator to pose a risk to safety or data integrity
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(8)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Saline

    Saline is used as placebo and administered to one segment of the closed wound and one open wound.

    Drug: Saline injection

  • Active comparator
    Verteporfin (0.5 mg/mL)

    Will be administered to one segment of the closed wound and one open wound. This dose level is included to explore the minimal effective dose.

    Drug: Verteporfin Injection

  • Active comparator
    Verteporfin (1.0 mg/mL)

    Will be administered to one segment of the closed wound and one open wound. This dose level reflects the optimal concentration in murine models.

    Drug: Verteporfin Injection

  • Active comparator
    Verteporfin (2.0 mg/mL)

    Will be administered to one segment of the closed wound and one open wound. This dose level reflects the optimal concentration in porcine models.

    Drug: Verteporfin Injection

Interventions

  • * Approved Generic Name: Verteporfin * Trade Name: Visudyne® * Chemical Class: Benzoporphyrin derivative * EU Substance No.: SUB00044MIG

    Also known as: Visudyne

  • DrugSaline injection

    Sterile saline solution administered intradermally as placebo.

    Also known as: Sodium chloride 0.9%

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. POSAS (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale)

    Closed wound endpoint: Difference in scar quality between three verteporfin doses (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/mL) and placebo, assessed in sutured incision segments using the Observer component of the POSAS 3.0. Open wound endpoint: Difference in scar quality between three verteporfin doses (0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/mL) and placebo, assessed in punch biopsy wounds using the Observer component of the POSAS 3.0. POSAS Observer scores range from 10 (normal skin) to 50 (worst imaginable scar) and includes ten items assessing clinically relevant scar characteristics and overall scar quality. Each wound type (closed and open) will be evaluated independently.

    Time frame: Month 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Safety and Tolerability

    Incidence, severity and type of local and systemic adverse events, including but not limited to injection site reactions, delayed wound healing, infections and systemic symptoms.

    Time frame: Day 7, month 1 and month 3

  2. MSS (Manchester Scar Scale)

    A clinician-rated scar assessment scale designed for the evaluation of linear surgical scars, primarily based on visual inspection. Total score ranges from 5 to 18 (higher scores indicate worse scar quality). Evaluation will be performed based on standardized clinical photographs. Scale modification The "texture" component (item 5) is omitted, as assessments are performed exclusively based on standardized photographs and do not include physical examination. Therefore, the total score with the modified scale ranges from 4 to 14 (higher scores indicate worse scar quality).

    Time frame: Month 3

  3. Ultrasound Assessment of Scar Thickness

    Quantitative measurement of dermal thickness using high-frequency ultrasound to assess fibrosis objectively.

    Time frame: Month 1 and 3

  4. Photographic Documentation

    Standardized clinical photography.

    Time frame: Day 7, month 1 and 3

  5. Patient-Reported Scar Outcomes using SCAR-Q Appearance Scale and SCAR-Q Symptom Scale

    The SCAR-Q is a validated patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess scar appearance and scar-related symptoms from the patient's perspective. The Appearance and Symptom scales are scored separately. Each scale consists of 12 items rated on a 4-point Likert scale (each likert scale ranges from 12 to 48 with higher scores indicating better outcomes). Likert scores are converted to Rasch-transformed scores ranging from 0 to 100 where higher scores indicate better outcomes (i.e., more favourable appearance or fewer symptoms).

    Time frame: Month 1 and 3

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gaynes BI, Fiscella RG. Safety of verteporfin for treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascular membranes associated with age-related macular degeneration. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2004 Jul;3(4):345-61. doi: 10.1517/14740338.3.4.345. PubMed 15268651 ↗
  • Mascharak S, Griffin M, Talbott HE, Guo JL, Parker J, Morgan AG, Valencia C, Kuhnert MM, Li DJ, Liang NE, Kratofil RM, Daccache JA, Sidhu I, Davitt MF, Guardino N, Lu JM, Abbas DB, Deleon NMD, Lavin CV, Adem S, Khan A, Chen K, Henn D, Spielman A, Cotterell A, Akras D, Downer M Jr, Tevlin R, Lorenz HP, Gurtner GC, Januszyk M, Naik S, Wan DC, Longaker MT. Inhibiting mechanotransduction prevents scarring and yields regeneration in a large animal model. Sci Transl Med. 2025 Feb 19;17(786):eadt6387. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.adt6387. Epub 2025 Feb 19. PubMed 39970235 ↗
  • LaCanna R, Liccardo D, Zhang P, Tragesser L, Wang Y, Cao T, Chapman HA, Morrisey EE, Shen H, Koch WJ, Kosmider B, Wolfson MR, Tian Y. Yap/Taz regulate alveolar regeneration and resolution of lung inflammation. J Clin Invest. 2019 Apr 15;129(5):2107-2122. doi: 10.1172/JCI125014. eCollection 2019 Apr 15. PubMed 30985294 ↗
  • Xin M, Kim Y, Sutherland LB, Murakami M, Qi X, McAnally J, Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Tan W, Shelton JM, Richardson JA, Sadek HA, Bassel-Duby R, Olson EN. Hippo pathway effector Yap promotes cardiac regeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Aug 20;110(34):13839-44. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1313192110. Epub 2013 Aug 5. PubMed 23918388 ↗
  • Lu L, Finegold MJ, Johnson RL. Hippo pathway coactivators Yap and Taz are required to coordinate mammalian liver regeneration. Exp Mol Med. 2018 Jan 5;50(1):e423. doi: 10.1038/emm.2017.205. PubMed 29303509 ↗
  • Houle JM, Strong A. Clinical pharmacokinetics of verteporfin. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 May;42(5):547-57. doi: 10.1177/00912700222011607. PubMed 12017349 ↗
  • Azab M, Benchaboune M, Blinder KJ, Bressler NM, Bressler SB, Gragoudas ES, Fish GE, Hao Y, Haynes L, Lim JI, Menchini U, Miller JW, Mones J, Potter MJ, Reaves A, Rosenfeld PJ, Strong A, Su XY, Slakter JS, Schmidt-Erfurth U, Sorenson JA; Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) Study Group; Verteporfin in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP) Study Group. Verteporfin therapy of subfoveal choroidal neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration: meta-analysis of 2-year safety results in three randomized clinical trials: Treatment Of Age-Related Macular Degeneration With Photodynamic Therapy and Verteporfin In Photodynamic Therapy Study Report no. 4. Retina. 2004 Feb;24(1):1-12. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200402000-00001. PubMed 15076937 ↗
  • Qin Z, Xia W, Fisher GJ, Voorhees JJ, Quan T. YAP/TAZ regulates TGF-beta/Smad3 signaling by induction of Smad7 via AP-1 in human skin dermal fibroblasts. Cell Commun Signal. 2018 Apr 25;16(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12964-018-0232-3. PubMed 29695252 ↗
  • Garoffolo G, Casaburo M, Amadeo F, Salvi M, Bernava G, Piacentini L, Chimenti I, Zaccagnini G, Milcovich G, Zuccolo E, Agrifoglio M, Ragazzini S, Baasansuren O, Cozzolino C, Chiesa M, Ferrari S, Carbonaro D, Santoro R, Manzoni M, Casalis L, Raucci A, Molinari F, Menicanti L, Pagano F, Ohashi T, Martelli F, Massai D, Colombo GI, Messina E, Morbiducci U, Pesce M. Reduction of Cardiac Fibrosis by Interference With YAP-Dependent Transactivation. Circ Res. 2022 Jul 22;131(3):239-257. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319373. Epub 2022 Jun 30. PubMed 35770662 ↗
  • Liu Z, Wu H, Jiang K, Wang Y, Zhang W, Chu Q, Li J, Huang H, Cai T, Ji H, Yang C, Tang N. MAPK-Mediated YAP Activation Controls Mechanical-Tension-Induced Pulmonary Alveolar Regeneration. Cell Rep. 2016 Aug 16;16(7):1810-9. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.07.020. Epub 2016 Aug 4. PubMed 27498861 ↗
  • Gao N, Lu L, Ma X, Liu Z, Yang S, Han G. Targeted inhibition of YAP/TAZ alters the biological behaviours of keloid fibroblasts. Exp Dermatol. 2022 Mar;31(3):320-329. doi: 10.1111/exd.14466. Epub 2021 Oct 19. PubMed 34623712 ↗
  • Lin RY, Sullivan KM, Argenta PA, Peter Lorenz H, Scott Adzick N. Scarless human fetal skin repair is intrinsic to the fetal fibroblast and occurs in the absence of an inflammatory response. Wound Repair Regen. 1994 Oct;2(4):297-305. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475X.1994.20411.x. PubMed 17147649 ↗
  • Mascharak S, desJardins-Park HE, Davitt MF, Griffin M, Borrelli MR, Moore AL, Chen K, Duoto B, Chinta M, Foster DS, Shen AH, Januszyk M, Kwon SH, Wernig G, Wan DC, Lorenz HP, Gurtner GC, Longaker MT. Preventing Engrailed-1 activation in fibroblasts yields wound regeneration without scarring. Science. 2021 Apr 23;372(6540):eaba2374. doi: 10.1126/science.aba2374. PubMed 33888614 ↗
  • Grijalva JL, Huizenga M, Mueller K, Rodriguez S, Brazzo J, Camargo F, Sadri-Vakili G, Vakili K. Dynamic alterations in Hippo signaling pathway and YAP activation during liver regeneration. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2014 Jul 15;307(2):G196-204. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00077.2014. Epub 2014 May 29. PubMed 24875096 ↗
  • Bessler NM; Vam Study Writing Committee. Verteporfin therapy in age-related macular degeneration (VAM): an open-label multicenter photodynamic therapy study of 4,435 patients. Retina. 2004 Aug;24(4):512-20. doi: 10.1097/00006982-200408000-00003. PubMed 15300071 ↗
  • Dreno B, Amici JM, Demessant-Flavigny AL, Wright C, Taieb C, Desai SR, Alexis A. The Impact of Acne, Atopic Dermatitis, Skin Toxicities and Scars on Quality of Life and the Importance of a Holistic Treatment Approach. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2021 Jun 14;14:623-632. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S315846. eCollection 2021. PubMed 34163201 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be shared due to data protection regulations and patient confidentiality considerations.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Aug 2028, 22 months later.

Of 24 phase 2 interventional studies under Cicatrix, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 61. This study's planned 22 months is close to that.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 5, 2026: start Jun 2026 → Oct 2026, primary completion Feb 2028 → Aug 2028 and completion Feb 2028 → Nov 2028.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 13, 2026
First posted
Mar 23, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026was Jun 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2028was Feb 2028
CompletionEst.
Nov 2028was Feb 2028
Last update
Oct 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 27, 2026
Sites
Odense University Hospital is now Recruiting
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Jun 2026→Oct 2026
Oct 5, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 2028→Aug 2028
Oct 5, 2026
Study completion
Feb 2028→Nov 2028
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    Odense University Hospital is now Recruiting
  2. Oct 5, 2026
    Start date Jun 2026→Oct 2026
    Primary completion Feb 2028→Aug 2028
    Study completion Feb 2028→Nov 2028
    + 2 other changes: identifiers and verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07488988
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 23, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Study contacts

Rikke Johansen
Contact
rikke.johansen2@rsyd.dk
+4565414326
David Hebbelstrup Jensen, MD, Ph.d.
principal investigator · Odense University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Verteporfin

Start the discussion