ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07434011ET-AIARUpdated May 18, 2026

Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Therapeutic Exercise in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis

An interventional study of AI-Assisted Exercise Program and Paper-Based Home Exercise Program in Knee Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 45 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-18.

Sponsored by Universidad Complutense de Madrid · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
84
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 100 studies in Osteoarthritis, Knee with a site in Spain — 16 open to participants now, 19 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Osteoarthritis, Knee · Spain.

Planned enrollment
48th of 86
84 · median 100
Started
2026
with 8 others
No phase
47 of 100
12 open now
Primary completion
2027-03
later than 8 of 18 live
Registered
94th of 100
by date

Among the 100 studies in Osteoarthritis, Knee with a site in Spain, this one is the 48th largest by planned enrollment of the 86 interventional ones, is one of 9 that started in 2026, is one of 47 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 8 of the 18 other live ones, and was the 94th registered.

By phase

100 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study47 · 12 open
Phase 316 · 2 open
Observational14 · 2 open
Phase 210 · 0 open
Phase 48 · 0 open
Phase 1/25 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2000; this study’s year is marked. 9 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 100 across the 86 interventional studies, 153 across the 14 observational. Of the 71 that completed or were terminated, 19 (27%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 100 studies in Osteoarthritis, Knee with a site in Spain, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Knee osteoarthritis is a common, chronic degenerative condition that causes pain, functional limitations, and reduced quality of life, especially in adults older than 50 years. Although clinical practice guidelines recommend therapeutic exercise and physical therapy as the first-line treatment, many patients do not receive or adhere to the recommended programs. Digital health tools may help expand access and improve adherence by supporting home-based exercise.

This study is a parallel-group, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the effectiveness of an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted therapeutic exercise program delivered through a web-based app compared with a conventional home exercise program provided on paper in adults with knee osteoarthritis. The primary goal is to determine whether the AI-assisted program produces greater improvements in pain and knee-related function. Secondary goals include assessing changes in health-related quality of life and patient-perceived overall improvement, and comparing implementation outcomes like adherence, usability, satisfaction, self-efficacy for exercise, and use of the prescribed exercise resource (paper vs web platform). Participants will be recruited from the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and randomly assigned to either the AI-assisted exercise group or the conventional exercise group. The AI-assisted web app will adjust exercise dose and progression based on participant-reported pain and perceived exertion, using decision rules informed by clinical practice guidelines and high-quality research evidence. Both groups will complete a 6-week home-based exercise program and will also attend weekly in-person group sessions that will be held separately by study arm (experimental and control groups will not mix) to reduce cross-contamination and support masking procedures. These sessions will be used to address questions, reinforce the protocol, and monitor for adverse events. Clinical outcomes will include pain intensity (visual analog scale), knee-related disability and function (WOMAC), health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), and patient global rating of change (GROC). Physical performance outcomes (30-second Chair Stand Test and Stair Climb Test) will be assessed at baseline and 1 week after completion of the 6-week intervention. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, one week after the 6-week intervention, and at 3 and 6 months after the intervention, with the exception of physical performance outcomes, which will be assessed at baseline and 1 week post-intervention.

03

Conditions studied

  • Knee Osteoarthritis

Keywords

  • osteoarthritis
  • knee
  • exercise
  • digital intervention
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria (based on National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance):

  • Clinical criteria for KOA: age ≥45 years, activity-related knee pain, and morning knee stiffness lasting ≤30 minutes.
  • Knee pain for 3 months or longer.
  • Knee pain on most days during the previous month.
  • Overall knee pain intensity ≥4 on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS; 0-10) during the previous week.
  • Ownership of a smartphone and ability to use a mobile application.
  • Internet access at home and/or via the mobile phone.
  • Ability to provide , participate, and complete study assessments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a planned knee arthroplasty (knee replacement) surgery.
  • Knee prosthesis/arthroplasty in the most painful knee.
  • Participation in a therapeutic exercise program for knee osteoarthritis within the past 6 weeks.
  • Infiltration for knee osteoarthritis within the past 12 weeks.
  • Inflammatory arthritic conditions.
  • A fall in the past 12 months without medical clearance to perform unsupervised home exercise.
  • Being homebound during the past month without medical clearance to perform unsupervised home exercise.
  • Failing the pre-exercise screening and not having medical clearance to perform unsupervised home exercise.
  • Inability to communicate in Spanish.
  • Any neurological or systemic disease that may limit participation in the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
84 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    AI-Assisted Therapeutic Exercise (Web App)

    Participants will complete a 6-week home-based therapeutic exercise program delivered through an AI-assisted web application. The program will be individualized and updated based on participant-reported pain and perceived exertion, which will be used to guide exercise dose and progression (e.g., progression/regression, load adjustments, and exercise variants) according to guideline-informed decision rules embedded in the platform. Participants will also attend weekly in-person, arm-specific group sessions (experimental-only) for protocol reinforcement, questions, and adverse event monitoring.

    Other: AI-Assisted Exercise Program

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care (Paper-Based Home Exercise Program)

    Participants will complete a 6-week home-based therapeutic exercise program provided in paper format (printed exercise materials). The program will follow a conventional, predefined progression consistent with usual care and will not incorporate real-time, individualized adjustments based on symptom/effort inputs. Participants will also attend weekly in-person, arm-specific group sessions (control-only) for protocol reinforcement, questions, and adverse event monitoring.

    Other: Paper-Based Home Exercise Program

Interventions

  • OtherAI-Assisted Exercise Program

    Participants will complete a 6-week home-based therapeutic exercise program delivered through an AI-assisted web application. The program will be individualized and updated based on participant-reported pain and perceived exertion, which will be used to guide exercise dose and progression (e.g., progression/regression, load adjustments, and exercise variants) according to guideline-informed decision rules embedded in the platform. Participants will also attend weekly in-person, arm-specific group sessions (experimental-only) for protocol reinforcement, questions, and adverse event monitoring.

  • OtherPaper-Based Home Exercise Program

    Participants will complete a 6-week home-based therapeutic exercise program provided in paper format (printed exercise materials). The program will follow a conventional, predefined progression consistent with usual care and will not incorporate real-time, individualized adjustments based on symptom/effort inputs. Participants will also attend weekly in-person, arm-specific group sessions (control-only) for protocol reinforcement, questions, and adverse event monitoring.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), a single 11-point numerical rating scale widely validated across different patient populations, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain. Data obtained through the NPRS are easy to document, intuitively interpretable and meet regulatory requirements for pain assessment and documentation.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention and 6 months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Disability

    Pain, stiffness and self-reported physical function will be assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index short form (WOMAC-SF), a patient-reported outcome measure designed to quantify symptom severity and functional limitations typically associated with hip and knee osteoarthritis. Items will be summed to obtain a total score ranging from 0 to 44 points, where higher results indicate worse symptoms and greater functional limitation.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention and 6 months post-intervention

  2. Health-related quality of life

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQol EQ-5D-5L, a standardized, generic measure of self-reported health status widely used in clinical and health-economic research. The EQ-5D-5L comprises two components: (1) a descriptive system and (2) a visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system covers five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, each rated across five severity levels (from no problems to extreme problems). Responses are combined into a 5-digit health state (e.g., 11,121), which is then converted into a single utility index using a country-specific value set; in this study, the Spanish value set will be applied for index derivation. The EQ VAS records the participant's overall health "today" on a 0-100 scale, where 0 represents the worst imaginable health and 100 the best imaginable health. The EQ-5D-5L has demonstrated validity and provides reference norms for the Spanish population.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention and 6 months post-intervention

  3. Lower-limb functional performance

    Lower-limb functional performance will be assessed using the 30-Second Chair Stand Test (30CST), a pragmatic, clinic-friendly measure of functional strength and endurance of the lower extremities. In this test, participants will be instructed to rise to a full stand and sit down as many times as possible within 30 seconds, starting from a standard chair (without armrests), with arms crossed over the chest (or following a standardized alternative if needed for safety). The primary outcome is the number of fully completed sit-to-stand repetitions in 30 seconds, where higher values indicate better functional performance.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week post-intervention

  4. Lower-limb stair-climbing function

    Lower-limb stair-climbing function will be assessed using a Timed Stair Test consisting of 11 steps, a pragmatic measure of lower-extremity functional capacity during stair ascent and descent. Participants will be instructed to ascend and then descend a flight of 11 stairs as quickly and safely as possible, starting from a standardized position. The primary outcome will be time to completion (seconds), recorded from the initiation of movement to the moment the participant returns to the starting level after completing both ascent and descent; shorter times indicate better lower-limb function.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 week post-intervention

  5. Perceived overall change (Patient Global Rating of Change, GROC)

    Participants' perceived overall change will be assessed using the Patient Global Rating of Change (GROC), a single-item anchor measure designed to capture the participant's global perception of improvement or deterioration since baseline. Participants will be asked to rate how their condition has changed compared with the start of the study on a 15-point scale ranging from -7 to +7, where -7 indicates "a very great deal worse," 0 indicates "no change," and +7 indicates "a very great deal better." The primary outcome will be the GROC score at each follow-up, with positive values reflecting improvement and negative values reflecting worsening.

    Time frame: 1 week post-intervention, 3 months post-intervention and 6 months post-intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Mar 2027, 10 months after the start.

Of 1,111 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Osteoarthritis, Knee, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,251 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 19, 2026
First posted
Feb 25, 2026
StartActual
May 13, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 15, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 15, 2027
Last update
May 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07434011
Collaborators
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 25, 2026
Start date
May 13, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 18, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion