ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07901374RF-PROSPECTIUUpdated Oct 28, 2026

Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Hyaluronic Acid Injection for Knee Osteoarthritis Pain

An interventional study of Thermal Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerves and Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis and Chronic Knee Pain, sponsored by Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 28, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 100 studies in Osteoarthritis, Knee with a site in Spain — 16 open to participants now, 19 under way, 3 of them phase 3. Osteoarthritis, Knee · Spain.

Planned enrollment
55th of 86
70 · median 100
Started
2026
with 8 others
No phase
47 of 100
12 open now
Primary completion
2028-05
later than 13 of 18 live
Registered
100th of 100
by date

Among the 100 studies in Osteoarthritis, Knee with a site in Spain, this one is the 55th largest by planned enrollment of the 86 interventional ones, is one of 9 that started in 2026, is one of 47 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 13 of the 18 other live ones, and was the 100th registered.

By phase

100 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study47 · 12 open
Phase 316 · 2 open
Observational14 · 2 open
Phase 210 · 0 open
Phase 48 · 0 open
Phase 1/25 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2000; this study’s year is marked. 9 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 100 across the 86 interventional studies, 153 across the 14 observational. Of the 71 that completed or were terminated, 19 (27%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 100 studies in Osteoarthritis, Knee with a site in Spain, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if thermal radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves (the nerves that carry pain signals from the knee) works better than a single injection of hyaluronic acid into the knee to relieve pain in adults with knee osteoarthritis who have not improved with conservative treatment. The study also includes patients with severe knee osteoarthritis who are not candidates for knee replacement surgery.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does genicular nerve radiofrequency reduce knee pain during movement more than hyaluronic acid over 12 months?
  • Does it improve knee function and quality of life, and does its effect last longer?

Researchers will compare radiofrequency ablation with hyaluronic acid injection to see which treatment gives greater and longer-lasting pain relief.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to one of the two treatments.
  • If assigned to radiofrequency, first receive a diagnostic nerve block with local anesthetic. Only those whose pain decreases by at least 50% will then receive radiofrequency ablation, in a single ultrasound-guided session.
  • If assigned to hyaluronic acid, receive a single injection of hyaluronic acid into the knee.
  • Attend follow-up visits at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, where they will rate their pain and answer questionnaires about knee function, overall status and quality of life.
Read the detailed description

Knee osteoarthritis is a leading cause of chronic pain and disability. Conventional conservative treatments, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and intra-articular hyaluronic acid, provide partial and time-limited relief. Thermal radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves is a minimally invasive technique that interrupts pain transmission from the knee joint. Most published studies have short follow-up (3-6 months), and evidence is scarce in patients with advanced osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV) who are not candidates for total knee arthroplasty because of severe comorbidity, morbid obesity or a documented multidisciplinary decision.

Design: single-center, randomized, parallel-group (1:1) controlled trial conducted at Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona (Spain). Patients and clinicians are not blinded; the outcome assessor and the statistician are blinded to treatment allocation.

Randomization: computer-generated sequence (sealedenvelope.com) with variable block sizes, stratified by Kellgren-Lawrence grade (II-III vs IV) and body mass index (\<40 vs >=40 kg/m2).

Interventions: in the radiofrequency group, an ultrasound-guided diagnostic block of the superomedial, superolateral and inferomedial genicular nerves (1 ml of 1% lidocaine per nerve) is performed first. Patients with at least 50% pain reduction within 4 hours undergo ultrasound-guided thermal radiofrequency ablation of the same nerves (80 C for 90 seconds per nerve). Patients with a negative block do not receive radiofrequency, are withdrawn from the study and are reported in the CONSORT flow diagram. In the hyaluronic acid group, patients receive a single 6 ml intra-articular injection of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (hylan G-F 20 or similar).

Sample size: 25 patients per group are required to detect a minimal clinically important difference of 2 points in the visual analogue scale (standard deviation 2.5, power 80%, two-sided alpha 0.05). Allowing for 20% losses over 12 months, 35 patients per group (70 in total) will be included.

A pre-specified subgroup analysis will compare treatment response in Kellgren-Lawrence grade II-III versus grade IV patients, and according to comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index) and body mass index. Health-related quality of life data will be collected for a potential cost-effectiveness analysis.

03

Conditions studied

  • Knee Osteoarthritis
  • Chronic Knee Pain

Keywords

  • Genicular Nerve
  • Radiofrequency Ablation
  • Hyaluronic Acid
  • Viscosupplementation
  • Gonarthrosis
  • Kellgren-Lawrence Grade IV
  • Non-Surgical Candidates
  • Ultrasound-Guided
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (18 years or older) with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis of more than 6 months' duration.
  • Pain during movement >4 on a 0-10 visual analogue scale.
  • Failure of conservative treatment: pain during movement >4 despite at least 3 months of NSAIDs and/or rehabilitation (physical therapy), documented in the medical record. Patients with a documented to NSAIDs may be included if they have undergone rehabilitation.
  • Radiographic Kellgren-Lawrence grade II or III, or
  • Kellgren-Lawrence grade IV in patients who are not candidates for total knee arthroplasty because of at least one of the following: >39.9 kg/m2; Charlson Comorbidity Index >=5 (original, not age-adjusted); or a documented multidisciplinary decision of the Orthopaedic Surgery Department.
  • Signed .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute or chronic knee joint infection.
  • Intra-articular hyaluronic acid or injection in the previous 6 months.
  • Coagulopathy or anticoagulant treatment that does not allow a safe therapeutic window for the procedure.
  • Major lower limb surgery in the previous 6 months that may affect function or pain of the index knee (including contralateral total or partial knee arthroplasty, hip arthroplasty, or tibial or femoral osteotomy).
  • Cardiac pacemaker or metallic implant ( for radiofrequency).
  • Known allergy to hyaluronic acid.
  • Severe dementia.
  • Institutionalized patients.
  • Decompensated systemic disease.
  • Active neurological or inflammatory rheumatological disease.
  • Terminal oncological disease.
  • Inability to understand the study questionnaires.
  • Radiofrequency arm only: negative diagnostic genicular nerve block (\<50% pain reduction within 4 hours).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation

    Ultrasound-guided diagnostic block of the superomedial, superolateral and inferomedial genicular nerves with 1 ml of 1% lidocaine per nerve. Participants with at least 50% pain reduction within 4 hours undergo ultrasound-guided thermal radiofrequency ablation of the same three nerves (80 C for 90 seconds per nerve) in a single session. Participants with a negative block do not receive radiofrequency and are withdrawn from the study.

    Procedure: Thermal Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerves

  • Active comparator
    Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid

    Single intra-articular injection of 6 ml of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid (hylan G-F 20, Synvisc-One, or similar) into the index knee.

    Device: Intra-articular Hyaluronic Acid

Interventions

  • ProcedureThermal Radiofrequency Ablation of the Genicular Nerves

    Ultrasound-guided thermal radiofrequency ablation (80 C, 90 seconds per nerve) of the superomedial, superolateral and inferomedial genicular nerves, performed only after a positive diagnostic block (\>=50% pain reduction within 4 hours after 1 ml of 1% lidocaine per nerve).

  • DeviceIntra-articular Hyaluronic Acid

    Single 6 ml intra-articular injection of high molecular weight hyaluronic acid into the index knee.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Knee Pain During Movement (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Pain during movement (walking or climbing stairs) in the index knee, measured on a 100 mm visual analogue scale and recorded in cm with one decimal (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate worse pain.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Knee Pain at Rest (Visual Analogue Scale)

    Pain at rest in the index knee, measured on a 100 mm visual analogue scale and recorded in cm with one decimal (0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate worse pain.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention

  2. Change in Knee Function (WOMAC)

    Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (Likert 3.1). Total score 0-96 and subscales for pain (0-20), stiffness (0-8) and physical function (0-68). Higher scores indicate worse symptoms and function.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention

  3. Proportion of Participants Achieving the Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Pain

    Percentage of participants with a reduction of at least 2 points from baseline in pain during movement (visual analogue scale, 0-10).

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention

  4. Analgesic Consumption

    Number of days with analgesic use in the previous 4 weeks (0-28) and most potent analgesic used (none, paracetamol, NSAID, weak opioid, strong opioid).

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention

  5. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Adverse events related to the diagnostic block, radiofrequency ablation or hyaluronic acid injection, systematically recorded at each visit.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after the intervention

  6. Retreatment or Rescue Treatment

    Proportion of participants requiring retreatment, rescue treatment (including corticosteroid injection) or indication of total knee arthroplasty, and time to first retreatment or rescue treatment.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months after the intervention

  7. Health-Related Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L)

    EQ-5D-5L descriptive system (5 dimensions, 5 levels; utility index calculated with the Spanish value set, where 1 = full health and higher values indicate better health) and EQ-VAS (0-100, higher scores indicate better health).

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months after the intervention

  8. Rate of Negative Diagnostic Genicular Nerve Blocks

    Percentage of participants allocated to the radiofrequency arm with less than 50% pain reduction within 4 hours after the diagnostic block, who therefore do not receive radiofrequency ablation.

    Time frame: 4 hours after the diagnostic block

  9. Patient Global Assessment

    Patient global assessment of the impact of knee osteoarthritis, measured on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (0 = very well, 100 = very poor). Higher scores indicate worse status.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention

  10. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

    Single 7-point item from "very much better" to "very much worse" compared with before the study treatment. Responders are participants reporting "much better" or "very much better".

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention

  11. Proportion of OMERACT-OARSI Responders

    Responder according to OMERACT-OARSI criteria, based on pain during movement, WOMAC physical function and patient global assessment, each expressed on a 0-100 scale: improvement in pain or function \>=50% and \>=20 points, or improvement \>=20% and \>=10 points in at least two of the three domains.

    Time frame: 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared publicly, as participant consent for data sharing was not obtained and data are protected under the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Data will be pseudonymized using participant codes and entered into REDCap, where the statistical analysis will be performed. Aggregated results will be published in peer-reviewed journals.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for May 2028, 19 months later.

Of 1,111 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Osteoarthritis, Knee, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 19 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,251 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 21, 2026
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 2028
CompletionEst.
May 2028
Last update
Oct 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07901374
Lead sponsor
Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.
Collaborators
Institut Investigacio Sanitaria Pere Virgili
Responsible party
Laura Pallarès Valls (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Study contacts

Laura Pallares Valls, MD
Contact
laura-pallares@hotmail.com
+34 646973140
Marta Sabater Martos, PhD
Contact
Sabaterms@gmail.com
676625869
Laura Pallarès Valls, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion