ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07917416SLOPE-PHUpdated Nov 4, 2026

Home-based Inspiratory Muscle Training in Pulmonary Hypertension

An interventional study of Inspiratory muscle training and Sham inspiratory muscle training in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension and Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension, sponsored by Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Universidad Complutense de Madrid · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 4, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this study is to determine whether an 8-week inspiratory muscle training (IMT) programme, delivered at home through telerehabilitation, improves ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2 slope) compared with a sham (placebo) training programme in adults with pulmonary hypertension. Secondary objectives are to analyse its effects on airway inflammation, inspiratory muscle strength, lung function, ventilatory pattern and mechanical efficiency during exercise, dyspnoea and health-related quality of life.

Forty participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to active IMT or sham IMT. Both groups will train twice a day, 5 days a week, for 8 weeks, with biweekly load adjustments and supervision through video calls. Participants, therapists, outcome assessors and the statistician will be blinded to group allocation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
  • Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Keywords

  • Pulmonary Hypertension
  • Inspiratory Muscle Training
  • Ventilatory Efficiency
  • Telerehabilitation
03

In context

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

774 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension; 143 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is close to the median of 38 across 518 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Browse Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad Complutense de Madrid is the lead sponsor of 206 studies on the registry; 64 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Medical diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension group 1 (pulmonary arterial hypertension) or group 4 (chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension) according to the 2022 ESC/ERS guidelines.
  • Transthoracic echocardiography performed within the previous 6 months.
  • Clinical stability: no hospitalizations, changes in PH-specific treatment or worsening of functional class in the previous 3 months.
  • Sufficient functional capacity to perform cardiopulmonary exercise testing and the other study assessments.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absolute contraindications to cardiopulmonary exercise testing according to current guidelines.
  • Neuromuscular disease or conditions with primary diaphragmatic involvement.
  • Thoracic or abdominal surgery in the previous 3 months.
  • Severe comorbidities unrelated to PH pathophysiology (e.g., severe COPD or unstable ischaemic heart disease).
  • Current participation in cardiopulmonary rehabilitation, or participation in the previous 3 months.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Inability to understand or follow the telerehabilitation programme.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Inspiratory muscle training (IMT)

    Home-based IMT through telerehabilitation for 8 weeks with progressive loads from 30% to 60% of MIP.

    Other: Inspiratory muscle training

  • Sham comparator
    Sham inspiratory muscle training

    Identical telerehabilitation programme for 8 weeks using a device without effective inspiratory resistance.

    Other: Sham inspiratory muscle training

Interventions

  • OtherInspiratory muscle training

    It will be employed a POWERbreathe device (HaB International Ltd., UK) with adjustable inspiratory resistance and unloaded expiration. Load starts at 30% of MIP and increases by 10% every two weeks up to 60%. 4 sets of 15 breaths, twice a day, 5 days a week, for 8 weeks. Supervision through 3 video calls per week and a training diary reviewed weekly.

    Also known as: IMT

  • OtherSham inspiratory muscle training

    Identical-looking POWERbreathe device without the valve, so inspiratory resistance is nil at any dial setting. Participants adjust the dial weekly following the same progression schedule, with the same dose (4 sets of 15 breaths, twice a day, 5 days a week, 8 weeks) and supervision as the IMT group.

    Also known as: Sham IMT

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ventilatory efficiency (VE/VCO2 slope)

    Slope of the relationship between minute ventilation and carbon dioxide output, obtained during an individualized, continuous incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test, following international standards.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (post-intervention)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Airway inflammation

    Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in ppb measured following ATS/ERS guidelines; mean of two reproducible values.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (post-intervention)

  2. Inspiratory muscle strength

    Maximal inspiratory pressure from residual volume following ERS statement.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (post-intervention)

  3. Dyspnoea (Dyspnoea-12)

    Spanish version of Dyspnoea-12: 12 items (6 physical, 6 affective) scored 0-3; total 0-36. Higher scores indicates greater dyspnea severity.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (post-intervention)

  4. Health-related quality of life (Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review [CAMPHOR])

    Quality-of-life scale of the Spanish Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review: 25 true/false items, total 0-25. Higher scores indicates lower health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (post-intervention)

  5. Forced vital capacity (FVC)

    The total volume of air that can be forcibly exhaled after a maximal inspiration. Will be assessed by forced spirometry following ATS/ERS guidelines

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (post-intervention)

  6. Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁)

    The volume of air forcibly exhaled during the first second of the forced expiratory maneuver. Will be assessed by forced spirometry following ATS/ERS guidelines.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (post-intervention)

  7. FEV₁/FVC ratio

    The proportion of the FVC exhaled during the first second of the forced expiratory maneuver. Will be assessed by forced spirometry following ATS/ERS guidelines.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (post-intervention)

  8. Peak expiratory flow (PEF)

    The maximum flow rate achieved during forced expiration after maximal inspiration, reflecting the highest instantaneous expiratory airflow. Will be assessed by forced spirometry following ATS/ERS guidelines.

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and at 8 weeks (post-intervention)

Other outcomes

  1. Blinding success

    Participants' guess of their allocation, summarized with a blinding index.

    Time frame: At 8 weeks

  2. Adherence to the telerehabilitation programme

    Percentage of prescribed training sessions completed, based on training diaries and video-call records.

    Time frame: Throughout the 8-week intervention

  3. Adverse events

    Number and type of adverse events during the intervention, recorded systematically through training diaries and video calls.

    Time frame: Throughout the 8-week intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — To maintain privacy policies

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07917416
Collaborators
Colegio de Fisioterapeutas de la Comunidad de Madrid, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Clínico San Carlos
Responsible party
Ibai López de Uralde Villanueva (Co-Principal Investigator, Universidad Complutense de Madrid) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

Raúl Fabero-Garrido, MSc
Contact
rfabero@ucm.es
+34 91 394 1524
Raúl Fabero-Garrido, MSc
principal investigator · Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion